I've created a fresh PHP-class, named it Application_Form_Login and saved it as Application_Form_Login.php inside the /website/lib directory. But everytime I'm running pimcore it refuses to load that file. What am I doing wrong here?
I've been looking at the Zend autoloader and trying to find out the issue.
I've noticed that in pimcore bootstrapping all the relevant directories are added to the include path. But they don't seem to get checked. Or maybe my file isn't named correctly to be picked up?
Your filename should be /website/lib/Application/Form/Login.php
From the page you just quoted:
Each "_" character in the CLASS NAME is converted to a DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR. The "_" character has no special meaning in the namespace.
Related
I have a Windows Forms .NET application in Visual Studio. Making a form "Localizable" adds a Form1.resx file nested below the form. I also want to add a separate .resx file for each form (Form1Resources.resx). This is used for custom form-specific resources, e.g. messages generated using the code behind.
This is set up as follows:
It would be tidier to nest the custom .resx file beneath the form (see this question for details about nest how to do this), as follows:
However, this results in the following error when I build the application:
Two output file names resolved to the same output path:
"obj\Debug\WindowsFormsApp1.Form1.resources" WindowsFormsApp1
I'm guessing that MSBuild uses some logic to find nested .resx files and generate .resources file based on its parent. Is there any way that this can be resolved?
Note that it is not possible to add custom messages to the Form1.resx file - this is for design-specific resources only and any resources that you add get overwritten when you save changes in design mode.
The error comes from the GenerateResource task because the 2 resx files (EmbeddedResource items in msbuild) passed both have the same ManifestResourceName metadata value. That values gets created by the CreateManifestResourceNames task and assumingly when it sees an EmbeddedResource which has the DependentUpon metadata set (to Form1.cs in your case) it always generates something of the form '$(RootNamespace).%(DependentUpon)': both your resx files end up with WindowsFormsApp1.Form1 as ManifestResourceName. Which could arguably be treated as the reason why having all resx files under Form1 is not tidier: it's not meant for it, requires extra fiddling, moreover it could be confusing for others since they'd typcially expect to contain the resx fils placed beneath a form to contain what it always does.
Anyway: there's at least 2 ways to work around this:
there's a Target called CreateCustomManifestResourceNames which is meant to be used for custom ManifestResourceName creation. A bit too much work for your case probably, just mentioning it for completeness
manually declare a ManifestResourceName yourself which doesn't clash with the other(s); if the metadata is already present it won't get overwritten by
Generic code sample:
<EmbeddedResource Include="Form1Resources.resx">
<DependentUpon>Form1.cs</DependentUpon>
<ManifestResourceName>$(RootNamespace).%(FileName)</ManifestResourceName>
...
</EmbeddedResource>
I would like to map pages such domain/content/myProject/home.html to domain/home.html. /content/myProject/ is not needed. I have the following code:
String newpath = getResourceResolver().map(page.getPath());
this does not change anything. newpath is stay page.getPath()
how to solve this issue?
Answering as this question as it remains unanswered. Here is an example of how the etc mappings should look like:
Trick is you add 2 entries to sling:internalRedirect as / and /content/example/
AEM first tries to resolve resources with first entry '/'. So non page URLs like /etc/designs, /content/dam etc will be addressed by the first entry. If it is unable to resolve using the first one, it uses the second entry to resolve the page.
This is also the adobe recommended way for URL shortening compared to other techniques like apache redirect.
You need to create map in etc.Then Resource Resolver will take care of trimming the path .
CREATING MAPPING DEFINITIONS IN AEM
In a standard installation of AEM you can find the folder:
/etc/map/http
This is the structure used when defining mappings for the HTTP protocol. Other folders (sling:Folder) can be created under /etc/map for any other protocols that you want to map.
Configuring an Internal Redirect to /content
To create the mapping that prefixes any request to http://localhost:4503/ with /content:
Using CRXDE navigate to /etc/map/http.
Create a new node:
Type sling:Mapping
This node type is intended for such mappings, though its use is not mandatory.
Name localhost_any
Click Save All.
Add the following properties to this node:
Name sling:match
Type String
Value localhost.4503/
Name sling:internalRedirect
Type String
Value /content/
Click Save All.
This will handle a request such as:
localhost:4503/geometrixx/en/products.html
as if:
localhost:4503/content/geometrixx/en/products.html
had been requested.
You can refer here for further documentation http://docs.adobe.com/docs/en/cq/5-6-1/deploying/resource_mapping.html
I'm just trying to begin develop a game in Marmalade (6.3). But when I have made my new sources (.cpp, and .h) and added them to the mkb, and then trying to run my program, then I got an error which says that Unable to find file.cpp in path(s). It's for all of my files except the files (game.h, game.cpp, main.cpp) which were made by Marmalade when I have chosen the new 2D game project. Should I add my .cpp and .h files to anywhere else?
Thanks
It is difficult to give a categorical answer without more info. However my guess is that you've copied and pasted from an example and not understood about the syntax of the files section. Basically:
files
{
(foo)
humbug.cpp
)
The "(foo)" might look very innocent, but it actually says that humbug.cpp is actually in directory foo - relative to the mkb file. It is common practice to actually use "(source)" and put all the source files in a directory of that name - making the source layout a bit neater.
Naturally if you have (source) and don't put the files actually in directory source, they won't be found. My guess is that is what you are seeing.
Just to clarify previous answer, The format of files directive is like this -
files
{
(<Path relative to MKB>,<Alternate Path>)
["Name of the parent Group in VS/XCode project","Name of the subparent group"]
fileName.cpp
fileName.h
}
for example I have two files SoundManager.h and SoundManager.cpp in System folder of Source, while MainMenu.h and MainMenu.cpp in Source/UI. Now the files directive would be -
files
{
(Source/System)
["Source","System"] #This part is not required, it's just to arrange your files in IDE project
SoundManager.h
SoundManager.cpp
(Source/UI)
("Source","UI")
MainMenu.h
ManinMenu.cpp
}
My problem:
In magento admin I made my own email templates (order_new.html, order_new_guest.html), and translate them. Everything works, when i buy sthing, i get a translated email, but I can't translate the names of the datas in sales_email_order_items block /'Subtotal (Excl.Tax)', 'Subtotal (Incl.Tax)', etc/ - everything else is translated in the block!
Mage_Sales.csv, Mage_Weee.csv, Mage_Tax.csv exists in locale/[country_language] directory, and translated
Does anybody know where these words come from?
Thank you the answers
check templates at template/email/order/* Look at used helper names to find out what csv files should be changed
The file that requires editing is:
\app\design\frontend\base\default\template\email\order\items\order\default.phtml
The translation wrapper is missing from around the attribute label output.
Change line 35:
<dt><strong><em><?php echo $option['label']; ?></em></strong></dt>
to:
<dt><strong><em><?php echo $this->__($option['label']); ?></em></strong></dt>
It may also be one of the other tpl files located in the following directory, all have the same issue:
\app\design\frontend\base\default\template\email\order\items\*\*.phtml
How does an action like this "customSearchAction()" map to the view script file name.
Neither of these file names work "customsearch.xml.phtml", "customSearch.xml.phtml", "custom-search.xml.phtml".
Please, note that I am using context switching view helper for xml, json. Also, the module and action are resolving properly. When I change the action name to "customsearchAction()" and name the rename the script file to "customsearch.xml.phtml", then it works.
So how is the view script file name resolved in the above case? in the Zend Framework
From documentation:
Note: Naming Conventions: Word Delimiters in Controller and Action Names
If your controller or action name is composed of several words, the dispatcher requires that these are separated on the URL by specific path and word delimiter characters. The ViewRenderer replaces any path delimiter found in the controller name with an actual path delimiter ('/'), and any word delimiter found with a dash ('-') when creating paths. Thus, a call to the action /foo.bar/baz.bat would dispatch to FooBarController::bazBatAction() in FooBarController.php, which would render foo-bar/baz-bat.phtml; a call to the action /bar_baz/baz-bat would dispatch to Bar_BazController::bazBatAction() in Bar/BazController.php (note the path separation) and render bar/baz/baz-bat.phtml.
Note that the in the second example, the module is still the default module, but that, because of the existence of a path separator, the controller receives the name Bar_BazController, in Bar/BazController.php. The ViewRenderer mimics the controller directory hierarchy.
So, from that custom-search.phtml is the right name. Now you are maybe wrong with the directory where you store it, what's the controller name (and module)? Check as well you view script is readable by apache.
Edit
In the case of ContextSwitch usage:
the initialisation is: $contextSwitch->addActionContext('custom-search', 'xml');
the view script is custom-search.xml.phtml
Just tested it on a ZF 1.6 (old but should still be valid). So maybe your initialization is wrong (used 'customSearch' instead of 'custom-search'?).