I have a jQuery template, and I would like to use a KnockOutJS template within this.
I cannot make this work as this example illustrates: http://jsfiddle.net/maate/bwmcR/1/.
However, it DOES work when the KnockOutJS template itself is placed outside the scope of the jQuery template as in this example: http://jsfiddle.net/maate/bwmcR/2/.
It seems that the problem is related to the scope of the template data variables (for instance, I can access the ${test} variable within the subTemplate).
Does anyone know how to make this work?
Br. Morten
The first example you have is just not valid. Although you want to create a sub-template it has to be in a separate script tag. You just can't embed templates within each other, you have to create them one after the other.
WRONG:
<script id="superTemplate" type="text/html">
...
<script id="subTemplate" type="text/html">
...
</script>
</script>
RIGHT:
<script id="superTemplate" type="text/html">
...
</script>
<script id="subTemplate" type="text/html">
...
</script>
When you applied the subtemplate on the ul, you defined what data it should be using with the foreach, so you won't be able to read the test as it is not a property on an item.
If you want you can pass it as a templateOption so it will be available on the subtemplate too.
<ul data-bind="template: { name: 'subTemplate', foreach: items, templateOptions: { testValue: 'Value' } }"></ul>
This way it will be available on the subtemplate.
<span data-bind="text: $item.testValue"></span>
Also, I wouldn't use the default jQuery template tags, it is much nicer with data-binding.
<div id="body" data-bind="template:{name: 'superTemplate'}"></div>
It will do the same, more or less, in the end. You can take a look here : http://jsfiddle.net/bwmcR/18/
Related
I want to figure out a way to insert HTML inside a <sly data-sly-resource> tag and be able to go inside the component I am retrieving from the resource attribute.
To compare, it would be something like Vue's slots, and React's { this.props.children }.
Example:
Parent Component
<sly data-sly-resource="${'example' # resourceType='path/to/component/structure/example'}">
<h1>Hello World</h1>
</sly>
Example Component
<div id="example-component">
${ variable.getChildrenHTMLCall() } // Does something like this exist?
</div>
Output
<div id="example-component">
<h1>Hello World</h1>
</div>
This functionality does not exist.
You could make a similar functionality by using data-sly-template. But you’d have to pass the HTML sting as a parameter (more specifically option) but that might not be desired or maintainable.
You could use the com.day.cq.contentsync.handler.util.RequestResponseFactory as seen here: http://www.nateyolles.com/blog/2015/10/get-rendered-html-for-an-aem-resource-or-component
I want to use x3dom together with my PolymerElements, but if I put the needed x3d tag inside my Polymer.Element, X3Dom states, that no containers are found, because it uses document.getElementsByTagName('X3D');
see here: https://github.com/x3dom/x3dom/blob/652f3d4acd5e9e9f62b3ecdd92dec5e5c8a2fd86/src/Main.js#L25
Is there a way to make dom elements 'public' so that they can be found by libraries like x3dom?
P.S.: A working solution I found is by 'slotting' the element through to the actual destination.
Example:
<body>
<my-custom-element>
<x3d ...> ... </x3d>
</my-customelement>
<script src="x3dom-full.js">
</body>
Works, if I design my Element like this:
<dom-module id="my-custom-element">
<template>
<style></style>
<slot></slot>
</template>
</dom-module>
In case I design my element like this:
<dom-module id="my-custom-element">
<template>
<style></style>
<x3d></x3d>
</template>
</dom-module>
x3dom cannot find it, even if the script tag for x3dom-full.js lies inside the template tag.
The reason I do not prefer the slot tags is that I want to hide the x3dom functionality inside my custom element.
I have a polymer element <my-element> with a computed property myProperty. I need to bind myProperty to another place in the HTML page, so I can't put it inside a dom-bind template
Here's what I mean
<html>
<body>
<div>
<my-element my-property="{{myProperty}}"></my-element>
</div>
<!--somewhere deep inside another part of the document-->
<div>
<h4>myProperty = </h4><span>[[myProperty]]</span>
<div>
</body>
</html>
I cannot wrap my-element and the usage of [[myProperty]] in a dom-bind template as this would result in nearly the entire document being enclosed in this. Attempting to use the bind as it is results in myProperty = [[myProperty]] being displayed, not the value of [[myProperty]].
Is there some way to have behaviour similar to data binding but usable across the whole HTML document? (In the future there might also be a case where [[myProperty]] is used inside an attribute such as <my-second-element my-property="[[myProperty]]">). Or if both occurences are wrapped individually in dom-bind templates is there some way to make the bind global?
Thanks in advance
Not sure why you wouldn't be able to do like this:
<head>
...
<script src="bower_components/webcomponentsjs/webcomponents-lite.js"></script>
...
</head>
<html>
<body>
<template is="dom-bind" id="app">
<div>
<my-element my-property="{{myProperty}}"></my-element>
</div>
<!--somewhere deep inside another part of the document-->
<div>
<h4>myProperty = </h4><span>[[myProperty]]</span>
<div>
</template>
</body>
</html>
This is totally doable. If myProperty changes inside my-element it would also change in "this" html-document. There also wouldn't be a problem adding your second element:
<my-second-element my-property="[[myProperty]]">
Unless you're missing to tell us some specific behavior that you want, this should be what you want. :)
Thanks for the help. I'm trying to use a jQuery selector to watch for a click on a group of elements, that start with particular characters. I have come up with the following code, but I must be missing something. If I hard code the ID (ie. $("#test_1")...), the code works:
<body>
<div id="content">
<div id="parentcontainer">
<div id="test_1"></div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
<script>
$(window).load(function(){
$("#statusbar").text("Ready");
$("#parentcontainer").click(function(){alert("parent clicked");});
$("#btnaddelement").click(function(){alert("Add Button Clicked");});
$("[name^='test_']").click(function(e){e.stopPropagation();
alert("Child Clicked");});
});
</script>
You are selecting on $("[name^='test_']") which will give you elements who have a name attribute that start with test_. You need to select on $("[id^='test_']") for elements with an id that start with test_. That is one example of what you are getting with your hard-coded success of $('#test_1') -- an element whose id attribute is test_1.
Also, be aware if you are not already that xpath is the language used for selectors, so you can do all kinds of incredible selection if you become familiar with it.
Yes, you missed something. Change the div's attribute id to name will work
<div name="test_1"></div>
Actually, class was used more frequently.
And there are an opinion I want to improve the code.
Try to use the jquery's $(document).ready instead of DOM's load. Because load will wait for all the sources to be loaded compeletely before the js code can be executed, for example, all the photos are downloading ok.
I hope this help!
I would like to define some templates in play 2 which takes an other template as a parameter:
#aTemplate(otherTemplate())
I think that should be possible in scala, right?
How would look like the parameter definition in the otherTemplate()? I should also have a default value in it. I'm thinking of something like that:
#(template: PlayScalaViewTemplate = defaultTemplate())
Thanks!
Yes you can. It's very simple once you discover that Play templates are just functions.
The higher order template (the one that gets the simple template as parameter) would look like this:
higherOrder.scala.html:
#(template: Html => Html)
<html>
<head><title>Page</title></head>
<body>
#template {
<p>This is rendered within the template passed as parameter</p>
}
</body>
</html>
So, if you have a simple sub-template like
simple.scala.html:
#(content: Html)
<div>
<p>This is the template</p>
#content
</div>
you would apply the template in the controller like so:
def index = Action {
Ok(views.html.higherOrder(html => views.html.simple(html)))
}
The result would be:
<html>
<head><title>Page</title></head>
<body>
<div>
<p>This is the template</p>
<p>This is rendered within the template passed as parameter</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
So, scala templates are ultimately functions so you can compose them like functions.