I have an entity:
public class Foo {
#Id
#GeneratedValue
private Long id;
private String username;
#ManyToOne(cascade = { CascadeType.MERGE }, fetch = FetchType.LAZY, optional = true)
#JoinColumn(name = "ParentID", nullable = true)
private Foo parent;
// other fields
}
With this kind of relationship, each Foo object has a parent, except the first Foo instance in the DB which has a NULL ParentID. When i try to create a query via criteria api and try to search for the first Foo object (null parent id) using any of it's properties (ID, username etc..), i get a:
javax.persistence.NoResultException: No entity found for query
How should the JoinColumn be implemented in this case? How should i get the first Foo object in the DB which has a null parent ID?
Thanks
Updated September 28 2011
What i am trying to achieve is to look lookfor all Foos with a username starting in "foo" and would like to use as separate object being returned then:
CriteriaBuilder criteriaBuilder = entityManager.getCriteriaBuilder;
CriteriaQuery<FooDto> criteriaQuery = criteriaBuilder.createQuery(FooDto.class);
Root<Foo> foo = criteriaQuery.from(Foo.class);
criteriaQuery.multiselect(foo.get("id"), foo.get("username"), foo.get("parent").get("username"), foo.get("property1")
//other selected properties);
Predicate predicate = criteriaBuilder.conjunction();
predicate = criteriaBuilder.and(predicate, criteriaBuilder.like(foo.get("username").as(String.class), criteriaBuilder.parameter(String.class, "username")));
// other criteria
criteriaQuery.where(predicate);
TypedQuery<FooDto> typedQuery = entityManager.createQuery(criteriaQuery);
typedQuery.setParameter("username", "foo%");
// other parameters
// return result
assuming that the usernames are foo1, foo2 and foo3 wherein foo1 has a null parent, the result set will only return foo2 and foo3 even if the foo1 has a username that starts with the specified predicate.
and also searching for foo1 alone will throw a
javax.persistence.NoResultException: No entity found for query
Is there a way to still include foo1 with the rest of the results? or foo1 will always be a special case since i have to add a criteria specifying that the parent is null? Or perhaps ai have missed an option in the joinColumn to do so.
Thanks
UPDATED Thu Sep 29 13:03:41 PHT 2011
#mikku
I have updated the criteria part of the post above (property1), because i think this is the part that is responsible for foo1 not to be included in the Result Set.
Here's a partial view of the generated query from the logs:
select
foo.id as id,
foo.username as username,
foo.password as password,
foo.ParentID as parentId,
foo_.username as parentUsername,
foo.SiteID as siteId,
from FOO_table foo, FOO_table foo_ cross join Sites site2_
where foo.ParentID=foo_.id and foo.SiteID=site2_.id and 1=1
and foo.username=? and site2_.remoteKey=? limit ?
and this wont return Foo1, obviously because username value is from foo_ which is why my original question is 'how should i get to Foo1'.
On the part that i have commented that ill use SelectCase and mix it up with your first reply, what i did is to add this part on the multiselect:
criteriaBuilder
.selectCase()
.when(criteriaBuilder.isNotNull(agent.get("parent")), agent.get("parent").get("username"))
.otherwise(criteriaBuilder.literal("")),
replacing the
foo.get("parent").get("username")
However this wont be able to get Foo1 as well. My Last resort though inefficient would probably check if the parameters are of Foo1 and create a criteriaQuery specifying a literal value for username, and using the default query otherwise.
Suggestions/alternatives are very much appreciated.
EDIT:
In your edited question nullable joincolumn is not problem - missing construction of FooDto, multiselect etc are. You can achieve your goal with following:
Querying:
/**
* Example data:
* FOO
* |id|username|property1|parentid|
* | 1| foo | someval| null|<= in result
* | 2| fooBoo | someval2| 1|<= in result
* | 3|somename| someval3| null|
*/
CriteriaBuilder cb = em.getCriteriaBuilder();
CriteriaQuery<FooDto> c = cb.createQuery(FooDto.class);
Root<Foo> fooRoot = c.from(Foo.class);
Predicate predicate = cb.like(fooRoot.get("username").as(String.class),
cb.parameter(String.class, "usernameParam"));
c.select(
cb.construct(FooDto.class,
fooRoot.get("id"),
fooRoot.get("username"),
fooRoot.get("property1")))
.where(predicate);
TypedQuery<FooDto> fooQuery = em.createQuery(c);
fooQuery.setParameter("usernameParam", "foo%");
List<FooDto> results = fooQuery.getResultList();
Object to hold data:
public class FooDto {
private final long id;
private final String userName;
private final String property1;
//you need constructor that matches to type and order of arguments in cb.construct
public FooDto(long id, String userName, String property1) {
this.id = id;
this.userName = userName;
this.property1 = property1;
}
public long getId() { return id; }
public String getUserName() { return userName; }
public String getProperty1() { return property1; }
}
Related
Given this very simple DTO:
#Entity
public class Employee implements Serializable {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
private long id;
private String name;
#OneToOne
private Employee boss;
}
I'd like to make a query that gathers all employee names and their boss' id, put in a nice clean POJO:
public class EmployeeInfo {
private String name;
private Long bossId;
public EmployeeInfo(String name, Long bossId) {
this.name = name;
this.bossId = bossId;
}
}
This query should be of use:
CriteriaBuilder cb = em.getCriteriaBuilder();
CriteriaQuery<EmployeeInfo> query = cb.createQuery(EmployeeInfo.class);
Root<Employee> root = query.from(Employee.class);
query.select(
cb.construct(EmployeeInfo.class,
root.get("name").as(String.class),
root.get("boss").get("id").as(Long.class)));
result = em.createQuery(query).getResultList();
When a bossId is present in the employee column this works just fine. But when no boss id is set the record will be completly ignored. So how do i treat this non existing boss relation as null or 0 for the construct/multiselect?
In pure SQL it is easy:
SELECT name, COALESCE(boss_id, 0) FROM EMPLOYEE;
But for the love of god i cannot make the criteria api do this.
cb.construct(EmployeeInfo.class,
root.get("name").as(String.class),
cb.coalesce(root.get("boss").get("id").as(Long.class), 0L)));
The problem is that root.get("boss") generate query with cross join like this from Employee employee, Employee boss where employee.boss.id=boss.id. So records where employee.boss.id is null are ignored.
To solve the problem you should use root.join("boss", JoinType.LEFT) instead of root.get("boss")
I have below table temp_tbl (postgres):
ID(int) NAME(TEXT) LINKS(jsonb)
-------- ---------- -------------------
1 Name1 ["1","23","3", "32]
2 Name2 ["11","3","31", "2]
3 Name3 ["21","13","3", "12]
Now my native query to get rows which has 'LINKS' with value as "3" is:
select * from temp_tbl where links #> '["3"]'
returns rows 2 & 3.
I want implement this query using org.springframework.data.jpa.domain.Specification
I have implemented something like below where the jsonb column is not-an-array, but has key-value json using jsonb_extract_path_text. But the above column stores only values in an array.
My entity class.
#Entity
#Table(name = "temp_tbl")
public class TempTbl {
#Id
#Column(name = "ID")
private Long id;
#Column(name = "NAME", nullable = false)
private String name;
#Column(name = "LINKS", columnDefinition = "jsonb null")
#Convert(converter = JsonbConverter.class)
private List<String> linkIds;
}
I need help in translating above query into specification using criteriabuilder.
One way to check if a jsonb array contains a String using Jpa specifications is to use the functions jsonb_contains and jsonb_build_array, the latter of which is used to change the String into a jsonb array for use in jsonb_contains.
public static Specification<TempTbl> linkInLinks(String linkId) {
return (root, query, builder) -> {
Expression toJsonbArray = builder.function("jsonb_build_array", String.class, builder.literal(linkId));
return builder.equal(builder.function("jsonb_contains", String.class, root.get("linkIds"), toJsonbArray), true);
};
}
I have two entity:
public class public class Person implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = -8729624892493146858L;
#Column(name="name")
private String name;
...
#JoinColumn(name = "idcity",referencedColumnName = "id",nullable = true)
#ManyToOne(targetEntity = City.class, fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
private City city
...
}
and the related entity (extract):
public class City{
Long id;
String name;
...
}
Now i'm creating a criteria query in a standard way, querying the Person class:
CriteriaBuilder cb = getEntityManager().getCriteriaBuilder();
CriteriaQuery query = cb.createQuery(selectClass);
Root<T> root = query.from(this.entityClass);
Selection selezioni[] = new Selection[selections.length];
for(int i=0; i< selections.length; i++){
selezioni[i] = CriteriaHelper.getField(selections[i], cb, root);
}
query.select(cb.construct(selectClass, selezioni));
where entityClass is Person and selection and selectClass are used to compile the SELECT clause. In the select i've person.city.name field.
This system create a query with where clause:
select person.name, ..., city.name from person, city WHERE person.idcity = city.id...
but city is not required, so the records without city are not fetched.
Without changing all my automatic system, does exists a simpler way to force the use on LEFT JOIN for the relationship than adding a system to create root.join("field",LEFT)?
Note: the method CriteriaHelper.getField() return a Path starting from the root object
I'm using QueryHints in Spring Data JPA to use EclipseLink Batch Fetch with a type of IN. Ultimately, I need to use this around 30 fields but it doesn't seem to work right for 2 fields. Field A has a ManyToOne relationship and Field B has a ManyToMany. Based on the results of the initial query, I would expect the batch hint to generate an IN clause with 2 ids for Field A and 12 for Field B. This works fine when the hint is turned on for one field at a time. When it is enabled for both fields, the hint only applies to whichever field is the last hint in the list of QueryHints. I've tried EAGER and LAZY fetch on the fields as a shot in the dark, but it had not impact.
Is there a limitation with mixing batch fetch hints based on the relationship type? Is there something different going on? The EclipseLink documentation isn't very detailed for this feature.
EDIT: It seems it doesn't matter what fields I enable it only, it only works for one at at time. Here is sample code for two entities. The BaseEntity defines the PK id generation.
#Entity
#Table(name = "MainEntity")
public class MainEntity extends BaseEntity implements Cloneable {
...
#ManyToMany(fetch=FetchType.LAZY, cascade=CascadeType.PERSIST)
#JoinTable(
name="EntityBMapping",
joinColumns={#JoinColumn(name="mainId", referencedColumnName="id")},
inverseJoinColumns={#JoinColumn(name="bId", referencedColumnName="id")})
#JsonIgnore
private Set<EntityB> bSet = new HashSet<>();
#ManyToMany(fetch=FetchType.LAZY, cascade=CascadeType.ALL)
#JoinTable(
name="EntityAMapping",
joinColumns={#JoinColumn(name="mainId", referencedColumnName="id")},
inverseJoinColumns={#JoinColumn(name="aId", referencedColumnName="id")})
#JsonIgnore
#OrderColumn(name="order_index", columnDefinition="SMALLINT")
private List<EntityA> aList = new ArrayList<>();
...
}
#Entity
#Cache(type=CacheType.FULL)
#Table(name = "EntityA")
public class EntityA extends BaseEntity {
#Column(name = "name", columnDefinition = "VARCHAR(100)")
private String name;
#ManyToMany(mappedBy = "entityASet", fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
#JsonIgnore
private Set<MainEntity> mainEntityList = new HashSet<>();
}
#Entity
#Cache(type=CacheType.FULL)
#Table(name = "EntityB")
public class EntityB extends BaseEntity {
#Column(name = "name", columnDefinition = "VARCHAR(100)")
private String name;
#ManyToMany(mappedBy = "entityBSet", cascade=CascadeType.ALL)
#JsonIgnore
private Set<MainEntity> mainEntityList = new HashSet<>();
}
The repository query:
#QueryHints(value = {
#QueryHint(name = org.eclipse.persistence.config.QueryHints.BATCH_TYPE, value = "IN"),
#QueryHint(name = org.eclipse.persistence.config.QueryHints.BATCH_SIZE, value = "250"),
#QueryHint(name = org.eclipse.persistence.config.QueryHints.BATCH, value = "o.aList")},
#QueryHint(name = org.eclipse.persistence.config.QueryHints.BATCH, value = "o.bSet")},
forCounting = false)
List<MainEntity> findAll(Specification spec);
Generated queries:
SELECT id, STATUS, user_id FROM MainEntity WHERE ((STATUS = ?) OR ((STATUS = ?) AND (user_id = ?)))--bind => [ONESTAT, TWOSTAT, myuser]
..
SELECT t1.id, t1.name, t0.order_index FROM EntityAMapping t0, EntityA t1 WHERE ((t0.mainId = ?) AND (t1.id = t0.aId))--bind => [125e17d2-9327-4c6b-a65d-9d0bd8c040ac]
...
SELECT t1.id, t1.name, t0.mainId FROM EntityBMapping t0, EntityB t1 WHERE ((t1.id = t0.bId) AND (t0.mainId IN (?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)))--bind => [125e17d2-9327-4c6b-a65d-9d0bd8c040ac, 1c07a3a9-7028-48ba-abe8-2296d58ebd57, 235bb4f2-d724-4237-b73b-725db2b9ca9f, 264f64b3-c355-4476-8530-11d2037b1f3c, 2d9a7044-73b3-491d-b5f1-d5b95cbb1fab, 31621c93-2b0b-4162-9e42-32705b7ba712, 39b33b19-c333-4523-a5a7-4ba0108fe9de, 40ba7706-4023-4b7e-9bd5-1641c5ed6498, 52eed760-9eaf-4f6a-a36f-076b3eae9297, 71797f0c-5528-4588-a82c-5e1d4d9c2a66, 89eda2ef-80ff-4f54-9e6a-cf69211dfa61, 930ba300-52fa-481c-a0ae-bd491e7dc631, 96dfadf9-2490-4584-b0d4-26757262266d, ae079d02-b0b5-4b85-8e6f-d3ff663afd6e, b2974160-33e8-4faf-ad06-902a8a0beb04, b86742d8-0368-4dde-8d17-231368796504, caeb79ce-2819-4295-948b-210514376f60, cafe838f-0993-4441-8b99-e012bbd4c5ee, da378482-27f9-40b7-990b-89778adc4a7e, e4d7d6b9-2b8f-40ab-95c1-33c6c98ec2ee, e557acf4-df01-4e66-9d5e-84742c99870d, ef55a83c-2f4c-47b9-99bb-6fa2f5c19a76, ef55a83c-2f4c-47b9-99bb-6fa2f5c19a77]
...
SELECT t1.id, t1.name, t0.order_index FROM EntityAMapping t0, EntityA t1 WHERE ((t0.mainId = ?) AND (t1.id = t0.aId))--bind => [1c07a3a9-7028-48ba-abe8-2296d58ebd57]
As Chris mentioned, Named Queries are the best work around for this issue. The other option is to use a custom repository and call setHint on the EntityManager yourself for each hint specified (plenty of examples out there for creating custom repos in Spring Data JPA). You could attempt to override findOne(...) and protected <S extends T> TypedQuery<S> getQuery(Specification<S> spec, Class<S> domainClass, Sort sort) on SimpleJpaRepository to try and create a generic way to properly set the hints but you'll likely want to check that you don't duplicate hint setting on getQuery(...) as you'll still want to call super() for that and then apply your additional hints before returning the query. I'm not sure what the behavior would be if you applied a duplicate hint. Save yourself the trouble and use Named Queries is my advice.
Mainly I work with JSF so am totally new to this annotation subject
If anyone can help
I wanna a list from this query
SELECT f.CODE ,f.NAME || '-' || e.NAME
FROM FS.ELIGIBLE e RIGHT
OUTER JOIN FS.FINANCIAL_SUPPORT f ON e.CODE = f.CODE ;
The query above retrieves a list from 2 tables and concatenating the name field from both tables!!
How can i do this in JPA or in play with another query supported by Play Framework ???
Have a read of the Play Framework documentation, specifically the part about JPA and your Domain Model.
You can access the entity manager at any time by calling
EntityManager entityManager = JPA.em();
Using this you can create any query that you want, even a "Native" Query. For example:
List<Object> results = JPA.em().createNativeQuery(
"SELECT f.CODE ,f.NAME || '-' || e.NAME "+
"FROM FS.ELIGIBLE e RIGHT "+
"OUTER JOIN FS.FINANCIAL_SUPPORT f ON e.CODE = f.CODE").getResultList()
JPA is not like relational database system which you can do your queries like join, left join or outer joins it is a mapping technology of objects. You can also do the same fetch just like those RDBMS counterparts but with a different approach.
What you have to do is make an Object then relate your second Object to your first Object, that is the proper way to relate 2 or more Objects. The Objects I'm talking about is your Table. See my example below:
Table1: Items.java
...
// do your imports here ...
// do your annotations here like
#Entity
#Table(name="Items")
public class Items implements Serializable {
private String id;
private String itemno;
private String description;
private Set<Vendors> vendors; //this is the 2nd table (1:n relationship)
...
// don't forget your constructor
// in your setter and getter for Vendors do the ff:
#OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL, fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
#JoinColumn(name="id")
public Set<Vendors> getVendors() {
return vendors;
}
public void setVendors(Set<Vendors> vendors) {
this.vendors = vendors;
}
...
}
Table2: Vendors.java
#Entity
#Table(name="Vendors")
public class Vendors implements Serializable {
private long id;
private String company;
private String contact;
private String sequence;
...
public Vendors() { }
...
// in your setter & getter
#Id
public long getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(long id) {
this.id = id;
}
...
}
Now on your query, just do a regular select as in the ff:
public void makeQuery(String seq) {
EntityManagerFactory emf = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory(...);
EntityManager em = emf.createEntityManager();
TypedQuery<Items> query = em.createQuery("
SELECT i, j.contact, j.company, j.sequence FROM Items i LEFT OUTER JOIN i.vendors j WHERE i.vendors.sequence = :seq
ORDER BY i.id", Items.class);
List<Items> items = query.setParameter("sequence", seq).getResultList();
...
}
Now you can refer to your 2nd table Vendors by using items.vendors.company ... and so on.
One disadvantage with this one is that, JPA make its related objects in the form of Set, see the declaration in Table1 (Items) - private Set vendors. Since it was a Set, the sequence is not in order it was received, unlike using List.
Hope this will help ...
Regards, Nelson Deogracias