securing a WCF service for consumption by iphone - iphone

I have a WCF service that needs to be secured to be consumed by an iphone app. I would like to know what my options are. I looked around the net and found that using SSL or api key or username/password over SSL is an option but I wasn't able to find any links about how to properly implement them for consumption by an iphone app. I'd really appreciate if someone could point me to the right direction.

Configure the WCF service for basicHttp binding and transport security. To make the client side of things work, you will need to implement an NSUrlConnection delegate. The phone will then be able to authenticate correctly. You can use the Keychain to store the user's credentials.
Stay away from the WS-* protocols that are typically turned on by wsHttp binding. These greatly increase the complexity of the XML you need to read and/or generate.
Although the phone can receive and send XML, it's not nearly as convenient as in .NET. You might want to consider a simpler serialization format such as JSON. This will require the use of webHttp binding.

Related

Alternative to building a proper web service for iPhone app to consume

I am in the process of scoping the development of an iPhone app for a client. Among other things, the app will allow users to browse through and place orders on specific (tangible) products.
The client has a website that currently does a similar thing and due to their limited budget and the fact that the website runs on a third-party proprietary platform which they have no control over, we are investigating possible alternatives to building a web service.
On the website, user registration and authentication, as well as order placing is done through POST requests via secure HTTP. The response is always a formatted HTML page which will contain strings indicating whether the request was successful or not, and if there was an error, what the error is etc.
So provided I can replicate the POST requests on the phone, and parse the HTML responses to read the results of each request, do you think this is an acceptable alternative to building a web service to handle this?
Apart from the possibility of pages changing (which we can manage) and the fact that I will probably have to download and parse a relatively large HTML response, are there any other drawbacks to this solution and is there anything else that I might be missing?
Many thanks in advance for your thoughts.
Cheers,
Rog
You could create an intermediary server that will communicate with the client server, and on it expose some REST web services with json (small overhead and easy to handle) responses that will be consumed by the iPhone app.
So, you're going to parse HTML and formulate POSTs off a third-party server, and pray that they don't even so much as rename a form field.
Your question is in two parts:
Do I think that a miracle is an acceptable solution? I don't.
Do I think that aside from the fact a miracle is required, are there any other drawbacks? None that I can think of.
You didn't ask, but this is a terrible course of action. Two suggestions.
I spy an assumption that the providers of the third-party platform aren't interested in enabling third-party applications by providing an API. They have a very good business reason for this, which is that it promotes platform lock-in. Reach out to their support department and have a talk with them.
You have to sell the client on building an intermediary web service. To at least try to mitigate the damage that changes on this third-party platform can do to your app, I recommend that you build and operate a proxy that receives requests from your applications, and proxies them over to the third-party platform. You should build into this client-server protocol a means for returning "we are in maintenance mode, go away" messages to apps, for that inevitable day when the third-party server changes something that breaks your app (they swapped the billing and shipping address pages, for instance) and you have to rush through an update through Apple to deal with it.
The proxy could be written in something more flexible and easy to bash stuff out in, such as PHP, Python, Perl, or Ruby. It could be hosted at Amazon in a micro instance.
p.s. This question is inappropriately tagged objective C.
HTML is the worst because of parsing (1-2secs per page), memory, and changes, but you already know that. Check in advance that ALL the data you need is exposed on the HTML.
If you use an intermediary server you are moving work elsewhere and you have another server to maintain. I would only do that if memory is an issue. Check How To Choose The Best XML Parser for Your iPhone Project for memory/performance/xpath support. libxml2 is a good option, but it depends on your needs. And maybe you'll want to check ASIHTTPRequest features before using the SDK.
I think utilising the web language of JSON would contribute to the diminishing of the parsing time. By building a REST service that, when sent a GET request, returns the correct information for easy sorting, you could then display the output a lot faster than that of parsing straight HTML.
I prefer JSON over XML, but everyone has their personal preference. You should look at a few very good libraries that are built specifically for parsing purposes of both XML and JSON.
For XML I recommend using the inbuilt libxml parser. Albeit, this can sometimes deem very difficult to use. A simple Google search will bring up a heap of results that relate specifically to what parser should be used depending on what task is to be completed.
As for a JSON parser, I recommend SBJSON. I am currently using it one of the biggest projects I have undertaken and it is definitely working perfectly for my use.
If you need a good way to connect to a RESTful web service, you should try LRResty.
Don't go for a parsing solution on the iPhone for 4 reasons:
Server can change their design and break your application (AppStore submition is long) + They can also detect that the request are sent from an application based on user agent which you have to update the application to change it.
Some of the requests might be made thru Javascript so you not only have to parse (X)HTML but also Javascript request (which can be in the form of XMLHttpRequest, but don't have to)
Long term evolution of the mobile market : maybe your client want (or will want) an application for android, Blackberry, Bada OS (Samsung), Symbian (Nokia/ OVIStore), Java Mobile or Windows Phone 7?
Of course network traffic, Memory and CPU needed to parse HTML (look the time it takes to the browser to do it?)
Regarding the traffic, if the application will not have a huge traffic you can home-host your proxy. Or you can find some provider to host it for you. I guess you won't need more than a couple of Megabytes of storage but maybe traffic. For less than 100€/year you can find some with unlimited traffic (like OVH Pro plan or Infomaniak). But if you want to go Java have a look at Google App Engine : you pay only if your traffic is important and if your application generate many CPU Cycles. If not : you don't have to pay. And it's hosted on Google server : reliable.
If the client is open, you could consider the paypal API.

iPhone app and server communication

We have a web-based BI reporting product. We have exposed certain webservices which mainly return html content and do authentication.
We are in a initial process of developing an iPhone App, which will interact with these services and get data on iPhone.
There are couple of things we need to make sure before we start with the actual development process...
1) Should we use SOAP or REST (Will have to write the server part in Java) for the communication between iPhone and our web-application?
2) If we use SOAP, Can you suggest something, which will effectively create web services stubs in Objective-C.
3) In either case (SOAP or REST), what security mechanism is suggested by Apple?
We want to know your thoughts on the best and effective way communication could be done between iPhone app and backend servers (mostly written in Java)
Thanks in advance.
If it is an option, I'd use REST
Never did it, but may this will help: http://abhicodehelp.blogspot.com/2010/12/handling-soap-with-iphone.html
I'd do any HTTP-Communication using ASIHttpRequest. It is SSL-capable
In my apps I use simple URL requests returning XML / Cocoa-touch plists over https. I guess that's called "REST" -- it's simple and quick to implement. There are long flame-fests over SOAP vs. REST -- I just use this technique and get my apps done :)

iPhone web service calls to WCF Service with Certificate Authentication

We are a .Net shop that has standardized on WCF Services. We are in the processs of developing an iPhone application that needs to make secure web services calls to obtain data for the app. To ensure secure communiations we have enabled SSL on our web servers. But this does not ensure the service can only be consumed by authorized apps. We have configured our services to support x509 certificate authentication. Is it even possible to call a secure WCF service with certifcate authentication from an IPhone app?
I have spent many hours searching the internet for examples but to no avail. I HAVE been able to successfuly call an un-secure WCF service with no issues. I have also done a lot of research on the WS-Security and WS-Trust communications standards. I believe I understand how this should work. I am just having trouble piecing together the steps/objects within the iPhone frameworks I need to make this work.
Any thoughts and ideas on the subject would be greatly appreciated.
Also, any thoughts on any of the following:
How best to deploy the P12 certifcate file with the iPhone application
How best to secure the password for the P12 file within the app
Is deploying the P12 file with the app a best practice
Are there facilties within the iPhone frameworks to support this kind of secure communication? If not, what would be an alternative recommendation.
For starters, I'd say if you are really serious about security please dedicate the proper time and resources to it and treat it like a first class citizen in your feature list. Don't just "turn on SSL" and pretend things are secure. I'm not suggesting you are doing this or not doing this, but I just feel like I have to say it before proceeding.
That said, you probably already know that WS-* is all built on top of http requests, and any time you are doing loads of http requests, you'll probably find ASIHTTPRequest very helpful on the iPhone. However, that will not get you 100% of the way there.
From the iPhone's perspective you have:
The URL loading system, which is a high level API for dealing with network resources of any kind
The CFNetwork C API which is lower-level and allows you a great deal more control of encrypting streams and network traffic any way you see fit
The Certificate, Key, and Trust Services that do the heavy lifting, and more specifically the X509 trust policies
On Macs you get to use Secure Transport, but as far as I know they haven't ported that to the device so I wouldn't get too distracted reading up on that unless you are planning on bringing this to the desktop or are just in the mood to learn everything :)
If you are doing any security with WCF, the first thing you probably realized is that there are many options available to you, but it all boils down to this short list:
Transport layer security (https) with clear text messages (xml/json/...)
Message layer security (encrypted message body) over an open transport (http)
Secured messages over a secured transport
The last time I was doing WCF (about a year ago) the general recommendation from Microsoft seemed to be Message layer security over an open transport because of firewall / accessibility issues introduced when trying to secure the transport. However, this approach assumed that all parties involved were .NET / WCF capable. I believe it would be easier to consume on the device if it were an HTTPS transport level security, with clear XML or JSON message bodies. That way you can take advantage of all the stuff baked into CFNetwork and NSHTTPRequest that Apple has done.
Once you get something working, you'll want to refer to the Enterprise Deployment Guide, and specifically the documentation on Over-the-Air Enrollment so that you can install the certificates on the devices. Remember, anything is possible, and don't be afraid to use one of those Apple support tickets that come with the program :)
EDIT:
I completely forgot to mention the GenericKeychain and CryptoExcercise examples
EDIT 2:
After I got downvoted for no apparent reason I re-read my response and realized I rambled a bit too much without actually answering your question about how to open a p12 file on the device. You ought to be able to simply [[UIApplication sharedApplication] openURL:urlToP12FileEitherLocalOrRemote]] and have it kick out to the OS for the installation procedure.
You can also use ssl + user/pass authentication at the message level.
Generally, if you want to install certificates on the iPhone, there are two options I have found (both of them from here):
Email the certificate to the recipient. If it is a valid certificate and the headers in the email are in order, then it will allow the recipient of the email to install the certificate. The problem here of course is a man-in-the-middle attack.
Use the iPhone enterpirse configuration utlity.
That should get you part of the way there (installing the certificate locally). I should note that in general, you don't want to install one certifiate for the entire application, but have separate certificates for your users. As a general practice, authenticating the application is a very bad thing, whereas you should be authenticating the user.
However, if you are authenticating the user already, then this shouldn't be an issue, as using basic authentication over HTTPS would work just as well (and easier to code).
I agree with Yaron Naveh's solution too, probably the best bet is to use SSL. I believe SSL/TLS encryption is better performance wise than message/XML based encryption in WCF too.
I think the certificate would probably need to be from a trusted CA (certificate authority) for this to work though. From memory, I had difficulty with the iPhone SDK with self-signed certificates, but that may well have changed in the last year...
An iPhone should be able to access a Certificate-secured WCF application. If you make your WCF service a RP of Azure ACS it should work using OAuth among other methods.
Take a look at the samples here for more: http://acs.codeplex.com/

iPhone application talking to a web service, the basics

We have an iPhone application created by an external consultancy that we're planning to add card payment facilities to in a subsequent release.
We plan to host a service ourselves in order to process the payment stuff, with SSL encryption. We have in-house expertese for all of this apart from the (contracted out) iPhone bit.
Are there any specific gotchas that we should be aware of that concern designing web services for iPhones?
We'll be writing the web service in C# 3.5.
JSON data format is better to be converted into NSArray or NSDictionary objects. It's easier and faster to be parsed.
So, specifically for the iPhone, it's a lot better to consume JSON data. Unless if there's some technical complexity that JSON is unable to handle.
Check YAJL:
http://github.com/lloyd/yajl
There are Objective-C wrapper/implementations by gabriel in github and by MGTwitterEngine.
TouchJSON is another code that's simpler than yajl. You can convert JSON string into NSDictionary or NSArray object in 2 lines of code. But, it maybe slower.
I'm not sure there are really any special considerations. The iPhone should be able to communicate with most types of webservice.
I worked on an iPhone app that communicated to a RESTful webservice written in Java.
I imagine it's pretty straightforward across the board - there are plenty of libraries for parsing/generating XML or JSON formatted messages, the iPhone can handle HTTP authentication, HTTPS, caching, etc.
It's just down to your iPhone developer to get it right :)
For SOAP based web services I strongly suggest that you try gSOAP. This library does not support Objective-C, however it supports C and C++ and is certainly the most complete open source project to access SOAP based web service; it also outperforms all of the other libraries.
For Objective-C you may want to try wsdl2objc, but I am not sure if it provides support for SSL/TLS (gSOAP does).
Finally, REST based web services are easily handled using ASIHTTPRequest.

What common backend can be accessed securely from an iPhone and Android application?

I'm thinking about creating an application for the iPhone and Android that will need to access a common backend to retrieve account information. Can both access a web service over https? What other way would allow me to have one interface to the backend that is accessible by both?
They both work over http and https which is a common enough protocol. I would suggest you go with a RESTful web service so you expose your service via URI's like http://www.myservice.com/weather/zip/98007 which would return an XML blob that can be parsed by the client.
if you are starting from nothing, i'd definitely go with RESTful service that returns/accepts JSON... there are plenty of libraries for both platforms that will accept JSON and turn it into arrays and dictionaries.
I'd recommend using a RESTful web service backend, which is all standard HTTP and/or HTTPS. If you can use Ruby on Rails, its default scaffolding will get you about 99% of the way there and for the iPhone there is an open source project called ObjectiveResource that will automate your communication with this Rails backend. I haven't investigated yet what options are available on Android but since it is all simple HTTP it should be straightforward. I am not the maintainer of ObjectiveResource but I have contributed some code. You can check it out here:
http://iphoneonrails.com
One good approach I have seen used with other services is to write the backend in such a way that it can feed data back in different types - for Android an XML response is best, but for the iPhone sending back plist data is preferred (though it can also work with XML if required). In both cases it's easier to simply POST updates back to the server than to wrap an update in XML.
Both platforms should be able to use whatever form of authentication you wish to use, the iPhone I know supports all methods of HTTP authentication.