I must admit that I don't really know if this is the right place to ask this question, however: in your knowledge it possible to have AdSense on a Google Code project page? I have tried searching Google for information about this, but it gets very confused by the query (that's because the AdSense API is on Google Code as well!).
I found this method that allows you to put ad gadgets with AdSense on your Google Code project home and wiki pages: http://code.google.com/p/gprojecthosting-adsense/
It works very well for me, I must say.
Just keep in mind that the gadget renders in an iframe with little if any content, so the relevant ads as inferred by Google will be mostly (or only) interest-based.
I use this one https://code.google.com/p/gcodeadsense/
works like a charm. Mind this: just use the number from the client code and skip "ca-pub-".
Related
I am using the Instagram Rest API for a simple application and I've hit a bumb.
The call https://api.instagram.com/v1/tags/{tag-name} works fine (I also have the ?accesstoken=XXXXX... appended).
But the call for basic user information is not working. Not in the developer console and not in the browser when modifying my own URL.
Has the method been removed? Is it broken? If no one has an answer for that; How do you contact Instagram to report the broken link?
Thanks to #CnapoB I managed to realise the call wasnt what I was looking for! And also he showed me the Instagram Endpoints doesn't show the easy way!
https://api.instagram.com/v1/tags/{tag-name}?access_token=ACCESS_TOKEN
might as well be
https://api.instagram.com/v1/tags/{tag-name}?client_id=CLIENT_ID
which means you don't have to have the user login to the application etc.
Thank you so much for this!
What I wanted to do was instead this: (example: tyrabanks)
https://api.instagram.com/v1/users/search?q=tyrabanks&client_id=CLIENT_ID&count=1
I tried using this Google Analytics Embed API Demo, of course with my own ClientID (49803909):
Embed API Demo
However, instead of the graphic I should be getting, I only get a blank page. I did follow the instructions quite carefully. Does this work for others? Any ideas of what may be wrong?
PS: Here's the screenshot of where I am getting the id from. #DaImTo was right that just 49803909 wasn't it, but I also tried to full long string and even the service id below (the one with #), all to the same effect (a blank screen). So, is this the wrong screen then?
I think #DalmTo is correct. You're most likely using one of the many other Google Analytics IDs instead of using a valid Client ID (which is not Google Analytics-specific, it's a general ID used for accessing Google APIs), and you're probably getting errors logged to the JavaScript console that say something to that affect.
If you follow the steps in this Embed API Developer Guide, you'll see instructions on how to create a Client ID to use with the Embed API.
I have a website slateone.com, When I search slateone.com on google it gives me a search result with a group of links together as a single search. Whereas when I search for slateone it gives me the same links separately without any grouping.
I tried testing the same kind of search for popular websites like facebook and google shows same group search result for both facebook.com and facebook.
Please guide me on this issue.
Thanks in Advance!!
-Vinay
You are actually referring to sitelinks, they are completely automated and not editable.
Now your website first of all needs to have the title attribute in the tags defined, this will surely help the algorithm of Google to find them, but note that does not mean that this is the solution.
The exact algorithm is known only to Google, the fix i mentioned will make the links more readable for the bots, this will surely help.
The official information can be found here: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/47334?hl=en
I have successfully setup an iFrame based App using the Javascript SDK, and we are trying to enable it on a Page Tab.
It seems Facebook has changed some things lately, because the app breaks when added to the Page Tab. I even went as far as making sure that all external scripts were included in the main index.php file, and that the body tags were taken out.
No, I'm trying to find out if it is even possible to use methods such as the stream.publish within a Profile Tab at all.
It seems like it isn't. As far as I can tell, you can no longer use any social methods on the Profile Tab.
Here were two related articles on the subject:
insidefacebook.com/2010/08/19/facebook-moving-toward-iframes-over-fbml-for-canvas-apps-and-page-tabs/
-and-
developers.facebook.com/roadmap
If anyone can confirm or deny this, it would be a huge help. The Facebook docs are just all over the place.
Here's a link to the working App Canvas as it stands now: http://apps.facebook.com/votetesting/
I know that on tab pages, you cannot do any JS until the user clicks on something first. Maybe that is the problem.
-Roozbeh
I'm currently developing a Facebook application which will eventually end up on a Facebook Page. The problem is that I don't know how to remove the box header (handle?) with the application name and the close-button.
I've seen other applications on Pages being able to remove the header. Look at Apples Page here: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Apple-Students/11147074409
Is it because they use an IFrame? I've tried that as well but I still need to call setFBML and embed an IFrame inside it.
I think you're right about the IFrame in the Apple page. It looks like the entire left column is a single IFrame. Still, it's not clear how they managed to get rid of the handle bar. Now I'm curious too...
Is is possible that Apple paid facebook to remove the header you are talking about?
Maybe it's a special case and they have a special API/UI for people who are willing to give them cash money?
I wrote a Facebook application a while back and I do not believe it has what you are calling a box header on it: http://apps.facebook.com/photoisland/. The application is configured to run entirely in an IFrame and I am not using FBML at all.
I've finally found out how to get an IFrame without a header just like Apple does.
You have to sign a special deal with Facebook to get it... however this deal doesn't come cheap so it's out of question for most companies. :(