Using the new ASP.NET Web API beta. I can not seem to get the suggested method of authenticating users, to work. Where the suggested approach seems to be, to add the [Authorize] filter to the API controllers. For example:
[Authorize]
public IEnumerable<Item> Get()
{
return itemsService.GetItems();
}
This does not work as intended though. When requesting the resource, you get redirected to a login form. Which is not very suitable for a RESTful webapi.
How should I proceed with this? Will it work differently in future versions?, or should I fall back to implementing my own action filter?
Double check that you are using the System.Web.Http.AuthorizeAttribute and not the System.Web.Mvc.AuthorizeAttribute. This bit me before. I know the WebAPI team is trying to pull everything together so that it is familiar to MVC users, but I think somethings are needlessly confusing.
Set your authentication mode to None:
<authentication mode="None" />
None Specifies no authentication. Your application expects only anonymous users or the application provides its own authentication.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/532aee0e.aspx
Of course then you have to provide some sort of authentication via headers or tokens or something. You could also specify Windows and use the built in auth via headers.
If this site is mixed between API and actual pages that do need the Forms setting, then you will need to write your own handling.
All the attribute does is return an HttpUnauthorizedResult instance, the redirection is done outside of the attribute, so its not the problem, its your authentication provider.
Finally, I've found a solution at:
ASP.NET MVC 4 WebAPI authorization
This article shows how you can fix this issue.
You are being redirected to login page because forms authentication module does this automatically. To get rid of that behavior disable forms authentication as suggested by Paul.
If you want to use more REST friendly approach you should consider implementing HTTP authorization support.
Take a look at this blog post http://www.piotrwalat.net/basic-http-authentication-in-asp-net-web-api-using-membership-provider/
ASP.NET 5 Introduced the new Microsoft.AspNet.Authorization System which can secure both MVC and Web API controllers.
For more see my related answer here.
Update:
At that time 2 years ago it was Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization.
As #Chris Haines pointed out. now it resides on
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization.
From .NET core 1.0 to 2.0 many namespaces have been moved i think.
And spread functionality between .net classic and core was obscure.
That's why Microsoft introduced the .net standard.
.net standard
Also, look at my answer for:
How to secure an ASP.NET Web API
There is a NuGet package I have created which you can use for convenience.
If you're using a Role, make sure you have it spelled correctly :
If your role is called 'Administrator' then this - for instance will not work :
[System.Web.Http.Authorize(Roles = "Administator")]
Neither will this :
[System.Web.Http.Authorize(Roles = "Administrators")]
Oops...
[Authorize(AuthenticationSchemes = JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)]
[Produces("application/json")]
[Route("api/[controller]")]
public class CitiesController : Controller
{
[HttpGet("[action]")]
public IActionResult Get(long cityId) => Ok(Mapper.Map<City, CityDTO>(director.UnitOfWork.Cities.Get(cityId)));
}
Use
[Authorize(AuthenticationSchemes = JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)]
Filter with authentication type
Related
I'm developer my first symfony (3) app. it is a REST service publicly accessible.
I'm doing this using FOSRestBundle.
I'll have to ad some admin forms soon or later, and I'll probably want to create them directly (without passing by the extra work of consuming my own web services)
I wonder how to handle the CSRF token in this case. I see different solutions:
globally deactivate the CSRF token : I don't want to do this
create two set of forms, one with the token activated : form my admin forms, the other one for the REST API. => in this case, the rest API can't have a fallback _format=html
find a way to give the api consumer an auth, with an API_GROUP, and disable the token for this group
it seem to me the best solution, but I don't know how to do it transparently, without affecting the auth of my future admin, and without needing to give credentials in the REST request.
use an event listener in order to hack symfony's auth mechanism and give an auth if a call is made to the REST API (all but _format=html)
Which one of this (or other) solution seem the best to you, and how would you code it?
I found a way, perhaps not the best one, but it works :
$_format = $request->attributes->get('_format');
if ('html' == $_format) {
$form = $this->createForm(ItopInstanceUserType::class, $itopInstanceUser);
} else {
$form = $this->createForm(ItopInstanceUserType::class, $itopInstanceUser, ['csrf_protection' => false]);
}
For me, forget CSRF token managed by yourself, check subjects like Oauth authentication.
Take a look here: https://github.com/FriendsOfSymfony/FOSOAuthServerBundle/blob/master/Resources/doc/index.md
FOSOAuthServerBundle works perfectly with FOSRestBundle.
First things first. I'm a complete OAuth newbie. This will be my first stab at it, and things are getting hairy...
I'm writing a single page application using Durandal & Web API.
The user needs to be able to login using any social network.
I don't have access to a database whatsoever, I have to call an unprotected 3rd party web service which I consume server-side, and need to protect using OAuth.
So I've managed to add the files to my solution which generates the login using facebook contol/button (created a new MVC4 web application, and did a manual copy and paste of all the auth related files, updated bootstrappers etc..), and the code seems to work for the most part.
When facebook redirects back to
[AllowAnonymous]
public ActionResult ExternalLoginCallback(string returnUrl)
{
AuthenticationResult result = OAuthWebSecurity.VerifyAuthentication(this.Url.Action("ExternalLoginCallback", new { ReturnUrl = returnUrl }));
if (!result.IsSuccessful)
{
return this.RedirectToAction("ExternalLoginFailure");
}
if (OAuthWebSecurity.Login(result.Provider, result.ProviderUserId, createPersistentCookie: false))
{
return this.RedirectToLocal(returnUrl);
}
//code removed for brevity ....
}
I get the error specified once the following line tries to execute.
OAuthWebSecurity.Login(result.Provider, result.ProviderUserId, createPersistentCookie: false)
I've removed the [InitializeSimpleMembership] attribute from the controller, as I don't have a database.
Please forgive me if this is the dumbest question ever, but...
Why does the login fail? I mean at that point, isn't the app trying to log into facebook, why does it need a databse? Or am I correct in saying I can remove/replace that code section, with a login/authorise call on the web-service I'm using?
Not the dumbest question ever. Not by a long shot. But you are getting the error because your membership provider is still set to use the SimpleMembershipProvider and OAuthWebSecurity will use the default membership provider. If you don't want to use a database you will have to create or find a different membership provider to use.
EDIT:
I know you said you don't have access to a DB but if you can use SQL Compact you can just stick with the default SimpleMembershipProvider(check out Hanselman's blog) or DevArt has a SQLLite provider. Also the MemFlex Project has a RavenDb provider. If none of those work I think you might just have to write your own.
I want to get the values of all custom fields for a particular JIRA issue using SOAP API. I have a custom field named 'Phase' having value Decision Pending for a JIRA issue JIRA-123.
I am using JIRA 5.1.3.
I am able to get all the properties of JIRA issue using SOAP API except the value of the custom field for above issue.
I tried following code, but I am not able to use ComponentManager in my code
IssueManager issueManager = ComponentManager.getInstance().getIssueManager();
CustomFieldManager customFieldManager = ComponentManager.getInstance().getCustomFieldManager();
Issue issue = issueManager.getIssueObject("JIRA-123");
CustomField customField = customFieldManager.getCustomFieldObjectByName("Phase");
Object customFieldValue = issue.getCustomFieldValue(customField);
I would highly appreciate if anyone can provide correct approach.
The SOAP API is deprecated by 5.1.3. I suggest you use the REST API - it is both more easy to use and implement.
What is REST?: read here. The basic idea is to bind HTTP request types to actions, it's quite obvious - check this table for a quick run-in.
Jira has a powerful REST API that you can use. This is the main documentation of the current release.
What do you need to do in some high-level steps?:
Set-Up some type of authentication with your JIRA instance. Be it:
Baisc - example
OAuth - example
Get a list of all fields via the API:
The /rest/api/2/field' [method returns a list of all fields][6] - both System and Custom.
Then when you identify the exact field use/rest/api/2/customFieldOption/{id}` to get the full
representation of the Custom Field Option.
I recommend you use a tools like Chrome REST Console ,or anything similar that you can easily make requests with, to get to know the API. The bonus is that you don't need to setUp authentication if you're logged in through the same browser. Your user will require full admin access though.
This is the root of all JIRA REST API docs. Check it out.
If you're doing this in PHP I would personally recommend using some kind of library. I've used
Guzzle (in a CakePHP environment) for this exact task and it turned out very well.
I'm not sure of how do you use the soap API, here is example of using it via the PHP-SOAP:
#!/usr/bin/php -q
<?php
$soapClient = new SoapClient("https://jira.com/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl");
$token = $soapClient->login('user', 'password');
$myIssue = $soapClient->getIssue($token,"TES-13");
print_r($myIssue); // all of the issue details
print_r($myIssue->customFieldValues); // get all custom fields
foreach ($myIssue->customFieldValues as $customFieldValue) {
// search for the right custom field
if ($customFieldValue->customfieldId == 'customfield_10402') {
echo $customFieldValue->values[0];
die();
}
}
?>
In case you want to use any other API, have a look at the JIRA Remote API Reference.
A remark regarding the REST and SOAP APIs -To quote from Jira's site the SOAP API "Supported but no future development". The Rest API is still a bit new and there are things you can't yet do with the REST API (example), and can be done easily using the SOAP API.
I started the site using AST.NET Razor template, not ASP.NET MVC template.
I recall seeing somewhere on the Internet that even without MVC, it's possible to use RESTFul URLs in the razor-based ASP.NET site. It appears to work without the CHTML extension names right out of the box -- www.test.com/car automatically redirects to www.test.com/car.cshtml.
But, what if I used www.test.com/car/2, how would I get to the "2" inside the View without using MVC? I really hope that's something already baked in.
Found it -- it's in UrlData
http://beta.asp.net/web-pages/tutorials/aspnet-razor-pages/18-customizing-site-wide-behavior
section "How Routing Works"
Look at the WebGet Attribute. It has a UriTemplate.
Example:
WebGet(UriTempate="{Id}")<br>
public JsonResult Get(int Id)
{
}
I just started working with ASP.Net MVC 2.
I created a new ASP.Net MVC application and created one vehicle controler with a database table connected with LINQ. Then created forms authentication mechanism for the application and tried to use the uri instead of cookies it was working smoothly but when i submit the form by creating a "Create" view from the controler using the utility it just dont work. The autherization got failed and asking to enter the user name and password again.I had created the authorization mechanism by adding Authorise attribute to the Controller so as to get authorized for all the actions.
namespace MVCNEW.Controllers
{
[Authorize]
public class VehicleController : Controller
{
But if i use the cookies instead of uri it works fine.
Thanks in advance...
Please see http://forums.asp.net/p/1517391/3634908.aspx for an official response.
Summary: Cookieless Session support is essentially obsolete, and the MVC framework isn't likely to include additional support for it.
I found the problem and a solution.
This was due to some error in the framework. They are not creating the Uri string for the Form action while calling
Html.BeginForm()
But if we make it call overloading of this method like the providing the Controller name and Action name it is working fine.
view plaincopy to clipboardprint?
Html.BeginForm("Create","Vehicle")