I'm developer my first symfony (3) app. it is a REST service publicly accessible.
I'm doing this using FOSRestBundle.
I'll have to ad some admin forms soon or later, and I'll probably want to create them directly (without passing by the extra work of consuming my own web services)
I wonder how to handle the CSRF token in this case. I see different solutions:
globally deactivate the CSRF token : I don't want to do this
create two set of forms, one with the token activated : form my admin forms, the other one for the REST API. => in this case, the rest API can't have a fallback _format=html
find a way to give the api consumer an auth, with an API_GROUP, and disable the token for this group
it seem to me the best solution, but I don't know how to do it transparently, without affecting the auth of my future admin, and without needing to give credentials in the REST request.
use an event listener in order to hack symfony's auth mechanism and give an auth if a call is made to the REST API (all but _format=html)
Which one of this (or other) solution seem the best to you, and how would you code it?
I found a way, perhaps not the best one, but it works :
$_format = $request->attributes->get('_format');
if ('html' == $_format) {
$form = $this->createForm(ItopInstanceUserType::class, $itopInstanceUser);
} else {
$form = $this->createForm(ItopInstanceUserType::class, $itopInstanceUser, ['csrf_protection' => false]);
}
For me, forget CSRF token managed by yourself, check subjects like Oauth authentication.
Take a look here: https://github.com/FriendsOfSymfony/FOSOAuthServerBundle/blob/master/Resources/doc/index.md
FOSOAuthServerBundle works perfectly with FOSRestBundle.
Related
I was trying out the new enhanced revocable sessions in Parse on my Android app. It works well when logging in or signing up via email password or facebook but doesn't work well for custom authentication, e.g. google+.
I'm currently logging in the user using the cloud code which also creates the new user when signing up. This does not create a new Session object, that means the new enhanced sessions are not used and it still uses the legacy sessions.
I pass the session token back to client where using the become method the user logs in but it's the legacy sessions.
This feels like the feature is not complete but I would really like to move to the new enhanced sessions with my app. Has anyone worked with them yet? Are there any workarounds using the REST API or by creating the sessions manually and handling them manually? I looked into the JS API but it says it's only read only.
Here's the Blog post on Enhanced Sessions.
Where should I go next?
Yes, I found a solution but it's a workaround, works for my case because I don't support signing up with user/password.
Basically, the solution (cloud code) in semi pseudo-code is:
Fetch the user with master key
Check if user.getSessionToken() has value
if it has, return the session token and do a user.become() in the client as usual
if it's not, here the workaround, do the following:
yourPreviousPromiseInOrderToChainThem.then(function(user)
password = new Buffer(24);
_.times(24, function(i) {
password.set(i, _.random(0, 255));
});
password = password.toString('base64')
user.setPassword(password);
return user.save();
}).then(function(user) {
return Parse.User.logIn(user.get('username'), password)
}).then(function(user) {
var sessionToken = user.getSessionToken();
// Return the session token to the client as you've been doing with legacy sessions
})
That means, I'm changing the user password each time in order to make a remote login and, of course, I know thist can't be applied to all cases, it's enough for app because I don't support login with user/password (only third party logins) but I understand that maybe it's not for all cases.
I got the idea from this official Parse example.
I don't like this solution because I think is not a workaround, it's a mega hack but I think there is no other way to do it currently (either Parse.com or Parse-Server)
If you find other workaround, please, share it :)
First things first. I'm a complete OAuth newbie. This will be my first stab at it, and things are getting hairy...
I'm writing a single page application using Durandal & Web API.
The user needs to be able to login using any social network.
I don't have access to a database whatsoever, I have to call an unprotected 3rd party web service which I consume server-side, and need to protect using OAuth.
So I've managed to add the files to my solution which generates the login using facebook contol/button (created a new MVC4 web application, and did a manual copy and paste of all the auth related files, updated bootstrappers etc..), and the code seems to work for the most part.
When facebook redirects back to
[AllowAnonymous]
public ActionResult ExternalLoginCallback(string returnUrl)
{
AuthenticationResult result = OAuthWebSecurity.VerifyAuthentication(this.Url.Action("ExternalLoginCallback", new { ReturnUrl = returnUrl }));
if (!result.IsSuccessful)
{
return this.RedirectToAction("ExternalLoginFailure");
}
if (OAuthWebSecurity.Login(result.Provider, result.ProviderUserId, createPersistentCookie: false))
{
return this.RedirectToLocal(returnUrl);
}
//code removed for brevity ....
}
I get the error specified once the following line tries to execute.
OAuthWebSecurity.Login(result.Provider, result.ProviderUserId, createPersistentCookie: false)
I've removed the [InitializeSimpleMembership] attribute from the controller, as I don't have a database.
Please forgive me if this is the dumbest question ever, but...
Why does the login fail? I mean at that point, isn't the app trying to log into facebook, why does it need a databse? Or am I correct in saying I can remove/replace that code section, with a login/authorise call on the web-service I'm using?
Not the dumbest question ever. Not by a long shot. But you are getting the error because your membership provider is still set to use the SimpleMembershipProvider and OAuthWebSecurity will use the default membership provider. If you don't want to use a database you will have to create or find a different membership provider to use.
EDIT:
I know you said you don't have access to a DB but if you can use SQL Compact you can just stick with the default SimpleMembershipProvider(check out Hanselman's blog) or DevArt has a SQLLite provider. Also the MemFlex Project has a RavenDb provider. If none of those work I think you might just have to write your own.
I'm using the Javascript SDK inside a node.js (Express) App.
Connecting Users works fine, but the connection does not persist between page reloads.
Is this the default behaviour, or is the User supposed to stay connected in new requests?
Do I have to use OAuth token authentication and if so, how can this be done with the JS-SDK?
Inside the "Permission"-Popup, Users are already logged in with soundlcoud, though.
(just have to click the "connect" button each time)
Figured I'd share my answer for those who are unsatisfied with the current answers for automated oauth:
Retrieving access_token:
I had to define get and set cookie functions and then I use the functions to set and retrieve a function holding the access token. I'm not going to give these functions for conciseness but you can easily find them with a google search. I then use this line of code to get the SC access token (once the user has authenticated for the first time)
SC.accessToken()
Setting token:
So this is kind of just an elephant in the room in my opinion that for some reason no one has mentioned. How in the **** do you connect w/ SC using the access token? Do you set it as oauth param? On each call pass it? Well, after experimenting with putting the parameter in every single place I could think, I found out you have to do something like this:
SC.initialize({
client_id: '[removed for security reasons]',
client_secret: '[removed for security reasons]',
redirect_uri: '[removed for security reasons]',
access_token: getCookie("sc_lm2"),
scope: 'non-expiring'
});
//Where "sc_lm2" is the name of my cookie
Hope the helps! Took me a while to figure this out for such a simple thing
EDIT
Using PHP and Wordpress:
$json = wp_remote_get("http://api.soundcloud.com/users/[user_id]/tracks.json?client_id=[client_id]");
$soundcloudData = json_decode($json['body'],true);
(substitue cURL functionality if you're not using Wordpress). #krafty I assume you would just change the endpoint from "/tracks" to "/users" but I can't say I have ever really needed to grab anything but tracks using the Soundcloud API. Hope this helps, though I'm not sure I fully understand what it is that you are trying to accomplish (or rather, how exactly you're going about it) - are you trying to allow user logins? If you want to explain fully what you're trying to accomplish and the steps you're taking I'd be happy to take a crack at it.
Yep, this is the way to do it, officially. :)
For the Next SoundCloud site, we store the token in localStorage (until the user logs out, of course). In each AJAX request to the API from the front end, we put the oauth token in a request header:
jqXHR.setRequestHeader('Authorization', 'OAuth ' + the_oauth_token);
Using the new ASP.NET Web API beta. I can not seem to get the suggested method of authenticating users, to work. Where the suggested approach seems to be, to add the [Authorize] filter to the API controllers. For example:
[Authorize]
public IEnumerable<Item> Get()
{
return itemsService.GetItems();
}
This does not work as intended though. When requesting the resource, you get redirected to a login form. Which is not very suitable for a RESTful webapi.
How should I proceed with this? Will it work differently in future versions?, or should I fall back to implementing my own action filter?
Double check that you are using the System.Web.Http.AuthorizeAttribute and not the System.Web.Mvc.AuthorizeAttribute. This bit me before. I know the WebAPI team is trying to pull everything together so that it is familiar to MVC users, but I think somethings are needlessly confusing.
Set your authentication mode to None:
<authentication mode="None" />
None Specifies no authentication. Your application expects only anonymous users or the application provides its own authentication.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/532aee0e.aspx
Of course then you have to provide some sort of authentication via headers or tokens or something. You could also specify Windows and use the built in auth via headers.
If this site is mixed between API and actual pages that do need the Forms setting, then you will need to write your own handling.
All the attribute does is return an HttpUnauthorizedResult instance, the redirection is done outside of the attribute, so its not the problem, its your authentication provider.
Finally, I've found a solution at:
ASP.NET MVC 4 WebAPI authorization
This article shows how you can fix this issue.
You are being redirected to login page because forms authentication module does this automatically. To get rid of that behavior disable forms authentication as suggested by Paul.
If you want to use more REST friendly approach you should consider implementing HTTP authorization support.
Take a look at this blog post http://www.piotrwalat.net/basic-http-authentication-in-asp-net-web-api-using-membership-provider/
ASP.NET 5 Introduced the new Microsoft.AspNet.Authorization System which can secure both MVC and Web API controllers.
For more see my related answer here.
Update:
At that time 2 years ago it was Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization.
As #Chris Haines pointed out. now it resides on
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization.
From .NET core 1.0 to 2.0 many namespaces have been moved i think.
And spread functionality between .net classic and core was obscure.
That's why Microsoft introduced the .net standard.
.net standard
Also, look at my answer for:
How to secure an ASP.NET Web API
There is a NuGet package I have created which you can use for convenience.
If you're using a Role, make sure you have it spelled correctly :
If your role is called 'Administrator' then this - for instance will not work :
[System.Web.Http.Authorize(Roles = "Administator")]
Neither will this :
[System.Web.Http.Authorize(Roles = "Administrators")]
Oops...
[Authorize(AuthenticationSchemes = JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)]
[Produces("application/json")]
[Route("api/[controller]")]
public class CitiesController : Controller
{
[HttpGet("[action]")]
public IActionResult Get(long cityId) => Ok(Mapper.Map<City, CityDTO>(director.UnitOfWork.Cities.Get(cityId)));
}
Use
[Authorize(AuthenticationSchemes = JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)]
Filter with authentication type
Well there seems to be quite a bit of confusion on this topic and I am struggling to get a clear answer, so here is my question...
I am using the serverside flow to obtain access tokens for my web app, I previously used offline_access which is now being depreciated so I need a way to refresh the token in the following situations:
1) User changes FB password
2) Token expires naturally
My app posts results to users FB walls so the refresh needs to be done automatically by our server (no cookies or OAuth dialogs)
I thought I could try to use the new endpoint described here
http://developers.facebook.com/roadmap/offline-access-removal/
, with the following piece of code (Java):
public static String refreshFBAccessToken(String existingAccessToken)
throws Exception{
//Currently not working
String refreshUrl = "https://graph.facebook.com/oauth/access_token?
client_id="+FacebookApp.appId+"
&client_secret="+FacebookApp.appSecret+"
&grant_type=fb_exchange_token
&fb_exchange_token="+existingAccessToken;
URL url = new URL(refreshUrl);
URI uri = new URI(url.getProtocol(), url.getHost(), url.getPath(),
url.getQuery(), null);
String result = readURL(uri.toURL());
String[] resultSplited = result.split("&");
return resultSplited[0].split("=")[1];
}
But this doesnt seem to work (I get a response 400), and when I re-read the documentation it seems this endpoint is used for tokens obtained using the client-side flow only...
So what about the serverside flow....?
Can someone tell me if the approach above is correct or there is another way?
Many thanks
From what I understand there is no server side flow for refreshing tokens.
The refresh token call needs to include the response of the user authentication process which is a short lived token.
You will need to include the refresh token process as part of the user login flow or if this doesn't work for your setup you will need to email the user asking them to come back!
I dont know java but syntax is very much like C#, so I can say,you are doing everything right.
But I doubt what does this function readURL do ?
If it works like get_file_contents() of php (i.e. if it does an HTTP get) , I guess thats not a right way to do .
Based on my experience on google's refresh token method, I think you should do an HTTP POST instead of HTTP GET to given url.