I have the following model:
class User
include Mongoid::Document
store_in :users
field :full_name, :type => String
end
class Message
include Mongoid::Document
embeds_one :sender, :class_name => "User"
field :text, :type => String
end
I would like to store User and Message in separated standalone collections so that they could be queried directly, and I would like to have one copy of user for sender in each Message entry. Is my model correct for this kind of request?
And when I have an instance of User user, how could I query the messages where sender = user?
I've tried:
Message.where(:sender => user)
Message.where('sender.id' => user.id)
both not work.
only Message.where('sender.full_name' => user.full_name) worked, but I don't want to rely on a text field when there's an id field to use.
What's the best way to do that?
How I save Message/User:
user = User.new
user.full_name = 'larry'
user.save
m = Message.new(:text => 'a text message')
m.sender = user
m.save
And it results in the database:
> db.users.find({ 'full_name' : 'larry'})
> db.messages.find({})[0]
{
"_id" : ObjectId("4f66e5c10364392f7ccd4d74"),
"text" : "a text message",
"sender" : {
"_id" : ObjectId("4f62e0af03642b3fb54f82b0"),
"full_name" : "larry"
}
}
Like explain by Jordan Durran ( Mongoid lead developer ) in Google group of Mongoid : http://groups.google.com/group/mongoid/browse_thread/thread/04e06a8582dbeced#
You're going to need a separate model if you want to embed the user
data inside the message. When denormalizing like this I generally
namespace one of them, and create a module with the common fields to
include in both - maybe in your case you can call it Sender?
class Sender
include Mongoid::Document
include UserProperties
class << self
def from_user(user)
Sender.new(user.attributes)
end
end
end
class User
include Mongoid::Document
include UserProperties
end
module UserProperties
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
included do
field :full_name, type: String
end
end
class Message
include Mongoid::Document
embeds_one :sender
end
You also don't need the :store_in macro on User - by default it's name
would be "users".
You can't do what you do.
Your user document is save in his one collection because you use the store_in method. And you try save it on an other document ( Message)
If you really want 2 collections, you need use has_one :user in your Message class.
class Message
has_one :sender, :class_name => 'User', :foreign_key => 'sender_id'
end
After you can get your message like :
Message.senders to have all of your sender.
Related
I have nested models like (using PostgresSQL)
class User
has_many :pages
end
class Page
has_many :details
belongs_to :user
end
class Detail
belongs_to :page
#It has a column named "count"
end
What I need is say
User with id=1, it has many pages with ids= 1,2,3.
these pages with ids(1,2,3) has many details.
What I need is to get latest detail of each of these pages and get sum of field named "counts" from these latest details
What I 'm doing now is
page_ids = current_user.pages.pluck(:id)
last_followers = Detail.select("DISTINCT ON(page_id) *").where(page_id: page_ids).order("page_id, created_at DESC")
last_followers.each { |detail| last_sum += detail.counts }
But it doesn't look ok to find page_ids, than details and than looping through all of them.
Is there a direct way like single query, thanks
Not entirely sure of what you ask for but here's a try:
sum = current_user.pages.map { |page| page.details.last.counts }.sum
I am attempting to order the results of a query by the value of a specific embedded document, but even with what seems to be a valid set of options and using the $elemMatch operator, my results are coming back in natural order.
My model is composed of Cards, which embeds_many :card_attributes, which in turn reference a specific CardAttributeField and contain an Integer value. I would like to be able to order a collection of Cards by that value.
I am able to isolate a collection of Cards which have a CardAttribute referencing a specific CardAttributeField like this:
cards = Card.where(:card_attributes.elem_match => {
:card_attribute_field_id => card_attribute_field.id
})
If I knew the order in which the card_attributes were set, I could use MongoDB array notation, like this:
cards.order_by(['card_attributes.0.value', :asc])
This does deliver my expected results in test scenarios, but it won't work in the real world.
After much messing around, I found a syntax which I thought would allow me to match a field without using array notation:
cards.asc(:'card_attributes.value'.elem_match => {
:card_attribute_field_id => card_attribute_field.id
})
This produced a set of options on the resulting Mongoid::Criteria which looked like:
{:sort=>{"{#<Origin::Key:0x2b897548 #expanded=nil, #operator=\"$elemMatch\", #name=:\"card_attributes.value\", #strategy=:__override__, #block=nil>=>{:card_attribute_field_id=>\"54c6c6fe2617f55611000068\"}}"=>1}}
However, the results here came back in the same order regardless or whether I called asc() or desc().
Is there any way to do what I'm after? Am I taking the wrong approach, or do I have a mistake in my implementation? Thanks.
Simplified, my model is:
class Card
include Mongoid::Document
# various other fields
has_many :card_attribute_fields
embeds_many :card_attributes do
def for_attribute_field card_attribute_field
where(:card_attribute_field_id => card_attribute_field.id)
end
end
end
class CardAttributeField
include Mongoid::Document
belongs_to :card
field :name, type: String
field :default_value, type: String
field :description, type: String
end
class CardAttribute
include Mongoid::Document
embedded_in :card
field :card_attribute_field_id, type: Moped::BSON::ObjectId
field :value, type: Integer
end
I am using mongoid(2.6.0) with its alias and this is how my model field looks like
class Place
include Mongoid::Document
field :n, :as => :name, :type => String
....
Now I have a controller which finds a place and return the object as json
#places = Place.find({some query})
respond_to do |format|
format.json { render json: #places }
end
Now when I do
JSON.parse(response.body)
My response contains the field as "n" and not as "name".
Is there a way I can ask mongoid to return me the alias name and not the actual name?
Well you can try overriding serializable_hash method. Just add something like this in your model.
def serializable_hash(options)
original_hash = super(options)
Hash[original_hash.map {|k, v| [self.aliased_fields.invert[k] || k , v] }]
end
Suppose the following model :
class Product
include MongoMapper::Document
key :name, String
key :product_category_id, ObjectId
belongs_to :product_category
end
class ProductCategory
include MongoMapper::Document
key :name, String, :required => true, :unique => true
timestamps!
userstamps!
end
I want to implement an advanced search that will inspect all value inside my Model including its all association like :
I have :
Product A data named "aLaptop" belongs_to:ProductCategory named "Notebook".
Product B data named "aGreatNotebook" belongs_to:ProductCategory named "Notebook".
When I search with keyword named "Notebook", I want to search it to Product.name fields and also its associations which mean ProductCategory.name also. So it will returned both of that items, because Product A have ProductCategory.name "Notebook" & Product B have Product.name "aGreatNotebook" and ProductCategory "Notebook"..
How can I do this?? I've already searching for 2 days and not success until now:(.. When is in MySQL, I used join table.. But hows in MongoMapper??
Please help.. Thank you..
You can't do joins in MongoDB. So the basic idea is to get the ObjectId associated with the "Notebook" category and then to query the products where product_category is equal to notebook_id. This generally involves two queries. So that'd be something like this:
notebook_id = ProductCategory.first(:name => "Notebook")
if notebook_id
Product.where({:product_category_id => notebook_id['_id']})
end
The question is confusing, but the title of the question is clear.
So in case someone comes here hoping to see how to get all of the:
keys
associations
Read on...
To get the keys in a model:
ConfinedSpace.keys.keys
=> ["_id", "photo_ids", "include_in_qap", "position", "created_at", "updated_at",
"structure_id", "identifier", "name", "description", "notes", "entry_info",
"anchor_points", "nature", "special_equipment", "rescue_overview"]
And to get the associations:
ConfinedSpace.associations.each{|name,assoc| puts name}
photos
attachments
activities
structure
videos
And the class (edited for brevity):
class ConfinedSpace
include MongoMapper::EmbeddedDocument
include Shared::HasPhotos
include Shared::HasAttachments
include HasActivities
TAG = "ConfinedSpace"
belongs_to :structure
many :videos, :as => :attachable
key :identifier, String
key :name, String
key :description, String
key :notes, String
key :entry_info, String
key :anchor_points, String
key :nature, String
key :special_equipment, String
key :rescue_overview, String
validates :identifier, presence: true
end
I am just starting a new Rails 3 project using Mongoid ORM for MongoDB. There is just one thing I can not get my head around, and that is how to effectively have a many-to-many relationship. Now there is a good chance that I may be approaching this problem wrong, but as far as I know, there is at least two containers in my project that need a many-to-many relationship. I would prefer to treat both models as "first class" models and allocate each with its own container.
This is the simplest way I can think to structure my many-to-many relationship:
// Javascript pseudo modeling
// -------------------- Apps
{
app: {
_id: "app1",
name: "A",
event_ids: ["event1","event2"]
}
}
{
app: {
_id: "app2",
name: "B",
event_ids: ["event1"]
}
}
// -------------------- Events
{
event: {
_id: "event1",
name: "Event 1",
}
}
{
event: {
_id: "event2",
name: "Event 2",
}
}
As far as I can tell this is the minimum amount of information need to infer a many-to-many relationship. My assumption is that I might have to have a map reduce procedure to determine what apps belong to an event. I would also have to write post commit/save hooks on Event to update App.event_ids if an app is added to or removed from an event model.
Am I on the right track here? If someone has any Mongoid or Mongomapper code examples of a many-to-many relationship working, could you please share.
Your structure can work and you don't need a mapreduce function to determine what apps belong to an event. You can query the app collection on an eventid. You can index field collection.event_ids.
If you don't want to search apps on an eventid but on a event name, you will need to add that event name to the app collection (denormalization). That means that you also have to update the app collection when the name of an event changes. I don't know if that happens very often?
You often have to denormalize when you use MongoDB, so you don't store the minimal amount of information but you store some things "twice".
I was able to implement this design using Mongoid. I wrote extensive tests and I was able to get my solution working; however, I am not satisfied with my implementation. I believe that my implementation would be a difficult to maintain.
I'm posting my non-elegant solution here. Hopefully, this will help someone with the start of a better implementation.
class App
include Mongoid::Document
field :name
references_one :account
references_many :events, :stored_as => :array, :inverse_of => :apps
validates_presence_of :name
end
class Event
include Mongoid::Document
field :name, :type => String
references_one :account
validates_presence_of :name, :account
before_destroy :remove_app_associations
def apps
App.where(:event_ids => self.id).to_a
end
def apps= app_array
unless app_array.kind_of?(Array)
app_array = [app_array]
end
# disassociate existing apps that are not included in app_array
disassociate_apps App.where(:event_ids => self.id).excludes(:id => app_array.map(&:id)).to_a
# find existing app relationship ids
existing_relationship_ids = App.where(:event_ids => self.id, :only => [:id]).map(&:id)
# filter out existing relationship ids before making the new relationship to app
push_apps app_array.reject { |app| existing_relationship_ids.include?(app.id) }
end
def push_app app
unless app.event_ids.include?(self.id)
app.event_ids << self.id
app.save!
end
end
def disassociate_app app
if app.event_ids.include?(self.id)
app.event_ids -= [self.id]
app.save!
end
end
def push_apps app_array
app_array.each { |app| push_app(app) }
end
def disassociate_apps app_array
app_array.each { |app| disassociate_app(app) }
end
def remove_app_associations
disassociate_apps apps
end
end