Is there a way to configure lucene.net in Orchard to search the content of word docs in a dir under the Orchard root. And is there a way to have it index another website as well.
If you can somehow add the content as contentitems in Orchard, you can use a trick with the OnIndexing method inside a ContentHandler.
Something like this should do it:
public class WordDocumentContentHandler: ContentHandler {
public WordDocumentContentHandler() {
OnIndexing<ContentPart>((context, part) => {
// Detect if the part has the field containing the URL to the document
// and analyze it here.
});
}
}
Related
I am trying to use vscode to write an extension which interacts with my backend service.
The problem I am having is that my "documents" that I want to edit are actually nested JSON documents. The top level document I am managing looks something like this for instance:
{
'filename': 'My JSON info.exp',
'filecontent': '{"this": "that"}'
}
I'd like to open and edit these files in vscode.
Using Virtual Documents I got to the point where I could open a document from a custom tree, and display the filecontent in a document named with the filename. Worked perfectly until I tried to edit the document content.
I'd like to provide an editor for just the filecontent, then handle things like saves myself using my API.
I looked into the FileSystem Provider, but it doesn't look like what I am looking for as the uris have to actually exist... I think?
Any hints or suggestions?
I'm trying to do something similar with Joplin - opening, editing and saving notes via a REST API.
I'm not as far along as you, but it was my understanding from scanning through the docs that Virtual Documents were read-only. Because of that, I'm dropping my content into a TextDocument so it can be edited; I am super curious if there's a way to override a document's onSave() to do what we're both after.
Below is what I'm doing to open the text document; if you could share any insights into your progress (or better yet code) that'd be awesome.
async openNote(item: Omit<FolderOrNote, 'item'> & { item: JoplinListNote }) {
console.log('openNote: ', item.id, await
noteApi.get(item.id, [
'id',
'parent_id',
'title',
'is_todo',
'todo_completed',
'body'
]).then (
note => {
vscode.workspace.openTextDocument( {
content: note.body,
language: 'markdown'
} ).then(
doc => vscode.window.showTextDocument( doc )
);
}
)
)
}
Edit:
Digging around some more it looks like maybe a CustomEditor is needed. A CustomEditor requires the extension to implement things like loading and saving into the model because VS Code is unaware of how to deal with the raw data. There is also a CustomTextEditor but that appears to be tied to the local filesystem.
There's a YouTube video here that talks about it in detail:
https://youtu.be/Dekn2MHy9Os?t=1147
Here's the sample code:
https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-extension-samples/tree/main/custom-editor-sample
I'm trying to use Areas in my ASP.NET Core ABP project like so:
Folder Structure
I'm trying to add a single file bundle like this:
<abp-script src="/Areas/Community/Pages/Mentors/Index.js" />
When I try running the page I get the following error:
AbpException: Could not find the bundle file '/Areas/Community/Pages/Mentors/Index.js' from IWebContentFileProvider
The documentation says the files can be located in Pages, Views, Components, and Themes but it seems limiting if it doesn't also support areas. Do I need to add a route somewhere so the virtual file system can find it?
Update:
I found the source code in \Volo.Abp.AspNetCore\Volo\Abp\AspNetCore\VirtualFileSystem\AbpAspNetCoreContentOptions.cs
where it sets the AllowedExtraWebContentFolders list:
AllowedExtraWebContentFolders = new List<string>
{
"/Pages",
"/Views",
"/Themes",
"/Components"
};
Is there any way to add to this list?
You can configure it in the module's ConfigureServices method.
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
Configure<AbpAspNetCoreContentOptions>(options =>
{
options.AllowedExtraWebContentFolders.Add("/Areas");
});
}
I'm new at Apache Isis and I'm stuck.
I want to create my own submit form with editable parameters for search some entities and a grid with search results below.
Firstly, I created #DomainObject(nature=Nature.VIEW_MODEL) with search results collection, parameters for search and #Action for search.
After deeper research, I found out strict implementations for actions (For exapmle ActionParametersFormPanel). Can I use #Action and edit #DomainObject properties(my search parameters for action) without prompts?
Can I implement it by layout.xml?
Then I tried to change a component as described here: 6.2 Replacing page elements, but I was confused which ComponentType and IModel should I use, maybe ComponentType.PARAMETERS and ActionModel or implement my own IModel for my case.
Should I implement my own Wicket page for search and register it by PageClassList interface, as described here: 6.3 Custom pages
As I understood I need to replace page class for one of PageType, but which one should I change?
So, the question is how to implement such issues properly? Which way should I choose?
Thank you!
===================== UPDATE ===================
I've implemented HomePageViewModel in this way:
#DomainObject(
nature = Nature.VIEW_MODEL,
objectType = "homepage.HomePageViewModel"
)
#Setter #Getter
public class HomePageViewModel {
private String id;
private String type;
public TranslatableString title() {
return TranslatableString.tr("My custom search");
}
public List<SimpleObject> getObjects() {
return simpleObjectRepository.listAll();
}
#Action
public HomePageViewModel search(
#ParameterLayout(named = "Id")
String id,
#ParameterLayout(named = "Type")
String type
){
setId(id);
setType(type);
// finding objects by entered parameters is not implemented yet
return this;
}
#javax.inject.Inject
SimpleObjectRepository simpleObjectRepository;
}
And it works in this way:
I want to implement a built-in-ViewModel action with parameters without any dialog windows, smth like this:
1) Is it possible to create smth like ActionParametersFormPanel based on ComponentType.PARAMETERS and ActionModel and use this component as #Action in my ViewModel?
2) Or I should use, as you said, ComponentType.COLLECTION_CONTENTS? As I inderstand my search result grid and my search input panel will be like ONE my stub component?
Thank you.
We have a JIRA ticket in our JIRA to implement a filterable/searchable component, but it hasn't yet made it to the top of the list for implementation.
As an alternative, you could have a view model that provides the parameters you want to filter on as properties, with a table underneath. (I see you asked another question here on SO re properties on view models, so perhaps you are moving in that direction also... I've answered that question).
If you do want to have a stab at implementing that ticket, then the ComponentTYpe to use is COLLECTION_CONTENTS. If you take a look at the isisaddons, eg for excel or gmap3 then it might help get you started.
======= UPDATE TO ANSWER (based on update made to query) ==========
I have some good news for you. v1.15.0-SNAPSHOT, which should be released in the couple of weeks, has support for "inline prompts". You should find these give a user experience very similar to what you are after, with no further work needed on your part.
To try it out, check out the current trunk, and then load the simpleapp (in examples/application/simpleapp). You should see that editing properties and invoking actions uses the new inline prompt style.
HTH
Dan
I'm looking specifically for a way to automatically hyphenate CamelCase actions and views. That is, I'm hoping I don't have to actually rename my views or add decorators to every ActionResult in the site.
So far, I've been using routes.MapRouteLowercase, as shown here. That works pretty well for the lowercase aspect of URL structure, but not hyphens. So I recently started playing with Canonicalize (install via NuGet), but it also doesn't have anything for hyphens yet.
I was trying...
routes.Canonicalize().NoWww().Pattern("([a-z0-9])([A-Z])", "$1-$2").Lowercase().NoTrailingSlash();
My regular expression definitely works the way I want it to as far as restructuring the URL properly, but those URLs aren't identified, of course. The file is still ChangePassword.cshtml, for example, so /account/change-password isn't going to point to that.
BTW, I'm still a bit rusty with .NET MVC. I haven't used it for a couple years and not since v2.0.
This might be a tad bit messy, but if you created a custom HttpHandler and RouteHandler then that should prevent you from having to rename all of your views and actions. Your handler could strip the hyphen from the requested action, which would change "change-password" to changepassword, rendering the ChangePassword action.
The code is shortened for brevity, but the important bits are there.
public void ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)
{
string controllerId = this.requestContext.RouteData.GetRequiredString("controller");
string view = this.requestContext.RouteData.GetRequiredString("action");
view = view.Replace("-", "");
this.requestContext.RouteData.Values["action"] = view;
IController controller = null;
IControllerFactory factory = null;
try
{
factory = ControllerBuilder.Current.GetControllerFactory();
controller = factory.CreateController(this.requestContext, controllerId);
if (controller != null)
{
controller.Execute(this.requestContext);
}
}
finally
{
factory.ReleaseController(controller);
}
}
I don't know if I implemented it the best way or not, that's just more or less taken from the first sample I came across. I tested the code myself so this does render the correct action/view and should do the trick.
I've developed an open source NuGet library for this problem which implicitly converts EveryMvc/Url to every-mvc/url.
Uppercase urls are problematic because cookie paths are case-sensitive, most of the internet is actually case-sensitive while Microsoft technologies treats urls as case-insensitive. (More on my blog post)
NuGet Package: https://www.nuget.org/packages/LowercaseDashedRoute/
To install it, simply open the NuGet window in the Visual Studio by right clicking the Project and selecting NuGet Package Manager, and on the "Online" tab type "Lowercase Dashed Route", and it should pop up.
Alternatively, you can run this code in the Package Manager Console:
Install-Package LowercaseDashedRoute
After that you should open App_Start/RouteConfig.cs and comment out existing route.MapRoute(...) call and add this instead:
routes.Add(new LowercaseDashedRoute("{controller}/{action}/{id}",
new RouteValueDictionary(
new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional }),
new DashedRouteHandler()
)
);
That's it. All the urls are lowercase, dashed, and converted implicitly without you doing anything more.
Open Source Project Url: https://github.com/AtaS/lowercase-dashed-route
Have you tried working with the URL Rewrite package? I think it pretty much what you are looking for.
http://www.iis.net/download/urlrewrite
Hanselman has a great example herE:
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/ASPNETMVCAndTheNewIIS7RewriteModule.aspx
Also, why don't you download something like ReSharper or CodeRush, and use it to refactor the Action and Route names? It's REALLY easy, and very safe.
It would time well spent, and much less time overall to fix your routing/action naming conventions with an hour of refactoring than all the hours you've already spent trying to alter the routing conventions to your needs.
Just a thought.
I tried the solution in the accepted answer above: Using the Canonicalize Pattern url strategy, and then also adding a custom IRouteHandler which then returns a custom IHttpHandler. It mostly worked. Here's one caveat I found:
With the typical {controller}/{action}/{id} default route, a controller named CatalogController, and an action method inside it as follows:
ActionResult QuickSelect(string id){ /*do some things, access the 'id' parameter*/ }
I noticed that requests to "/catalog/quick-select/1234" worked perfectly, but requests to /catalog/quick-select?id=1234 were 500'ing because once the action method was called as a result of controller.Execute(), the id parameter was null inside of the action method.
I do not know exactly why this is, but the behavior was as if MVC was not looking at the query string for values during model binding. So something about the ProcessRequest implementation in the accepted answer was screwing up the normal model binding process, or at least the query string value provider.
This is a deal breaker, so I took a look at default MVC IHttpHandler (yay open source!): http://aspnetwebstack.codeplex.com/SourceControl/latest#src/System.Web.Mvc/MvcHandler.cs
I will not pretend that I grok'ed it in its entirety, but clearly, it's doing ALOT more in its implementation of ProcessRequest than what is going on in the accepted answer.
So, if all we really need to do is strip dashes from our incoming route data so that MVC can find our controllers/actions, why do we need to implement a whole stinking IHttpHandler? We don't! Simply rip out the dashes in the GetHttpHandler method of DashedRouteHandler and pass the requestContext along to the out of the box MvcHandler so it can do its 252 lines of magic, and your route handler doesn't have to return a second rate IHttpHandler.
tl:dr; - Here's what I did:
public class DashedRouteHandler : IRouteHandler
{
public IHttpHandler GetHttpHandler(RequestContext requestContext)
{
requestContext.RouteData.Values["action"] = requestContext.RouteData.GetRequiredString("action").Replace("-", "");
requestContext.RouteData.Values["controller"] = requestContext.RouteData.GetRequiredString("controller").Replace("-", "");
return new MvcHandler(requestContext);
}
}
I want to use the default XML editor (org.eclipse.wst.xml.ui) of Eclipse in an RCP application. I need to read the DOM of the xml file currently open. The plugin doesn't offer any extension point, so I'm trying to access the internal classes. I am aware that the I should not access the internal classes, but I don't have another option.
My approach is to create a fragment and an extension point to be able to read data from the plugin. I'm trying not to recompile the plugin, that's why I thought that a fragment was necessary. I just want to load it and extract the data at runtime.
So, my question is: is there another way to access the classes of a plugin? if yes, how?
Any tutorial, doc page or useful link for any of the methods is welcome.
Since nobody answered my question and I found the answer after long searches, I will post the answer for others to use if they bump into this problem.
To access a plugin at runtime you must create and extension point and an extension attached to it into the plugin that you are trying to access.
Adding classes to a plugin using a fragment is not recommended if you want to access those classes from outside of the plugin.
So, the best solution for this is to get the plugin source from the CVS Repository and make the modifications directly into the source of the plugin. Add extension points, extensions and the code for functionality.
Tutorials:
Getting the plugin from the CVS Repository:
http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/community/tutorials/DevelopingWTP/DevelopingWTP.html
Creating extensions and extension points and accessing them:
http://www.vogella.de/articles/EclipseExtensionPoint/article.html
http://www.eclipsezone.com/eclipse/forums/t97608.rhtml
I ended up extending XMLMultiPageEditorPart like this:
public class MultiPageEditor extends XMLMultiPageEditorPart implements
IResourceChangeListener {
#Override
public void resourceChanged(IResourceChangeEvent event) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
setActivePage(3);
}
public Document getDOM() {
int activePageIndex = getActivePage();
setActivePage(1);
StructuredTextEditor fTextEditor = (StructuredTextEditor) getSelectedPage();
IDocument document = fTextEditor.getDocumentProvider().getDocument(
fTextEditor.getEditorInput());
IStructuredModel model = StructuredModelManager.getModelManager()
.getExistingModelForRead(document);
Document modelDocument = null;
try {
if (model instanceof IDOMModel) {
// cast the structured model to a DOM Model
modelDocument = (Document) (((IDOMModel) model).getDocument());
}
} finally {
if (model != null) {
model.releaseFromRead();
}
}
setActivePage(activePageIndex);
return modelDocument;
}
}
This is not a clean implementation, but it gets the job done.