SQL Server 2000 TOP and OUTPUT keywords - tsql

This query works great in SQL Server 2005 and 2008. How would I write it in SQL Server 2000?
UPDATE TOP 10 myTable
SET myBooleanColumn = 1
OUTPUT inserted.*
Is there any way to do it besides running multiple queries?

To be honest, your query doesn't really make sense, and I have a hard time understanding your criteria for "great." Sure, it updates 10 rows, and doesn't give an error. But do you really not care which 10 rows it updates? Your current TOP without ORDER BY suggests that you want SQL Server to decide which rows to update (and that's exactly what it will do).
To accomplish this in SQL Server 2000 (without using a trigger), I think you would want to do something like this:
SET NOCOUNT ON;
SELECT TOP 10 key_column
INTO #foo
FROM dbo.myTable
ORDER BY some_logical_ordering_clause;
UPDATE dbo.MyTable
SET myBooleanColumn = 1
FROM #foo AS f
WHERE f.key_column = dbo.MyTable.key_column;
SELECT * FROM dbo.MyTable AS t
INNER JOIN #foo AS f
ON t.key_column = f.key_column;
If you want a simple query, then you can have this trigger:
CREATE TRIGGER dbo.upd_tr_myTable
ON dbo.myTable
FOR UPDATE
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
SELECT * FROM inserted;
END
GO
Note that this trigger can't tell if you're doing your TOP 10 update or something else, so all users will get this resultset when they perform an update. Even if you filter on IF UPDATE(myBooleanColumn), other users may still update that column.
In any case, you'll still want to fix your update statement so that you know which rows you're updating. (You may even consider a WHERE clause.)

Related

TSQL (SSMS) conditionally display result of query only conditionally

Is it possible to display in the results-window of a query in TSQL (SSMS) window conditionally?
For example, display column-header and result of:
SELECT COUNT(1) AS ourCount FROM [ourDatabase].[dbo].[ourTable]
only if it is > 0
NOTE: We use SQL Server 2008, r-2
This is in the context of a larger system of queries with many results. I don't want to clutter the results if this particular query has a zero-value. Of course, the concept could be generalized for other situations.
So I am monitoring the query output, and one could think of the results as an 'alert' to myself (informally).
This will push the result into a variable, and then only display it if it's greater than zero, you could also use PRINT, etc.
DECLARE #Count INT;
SELECT #Count = COUNT(1) AS ourCount FROM [ourDatabase].[dbo].[ourTable];
IF #Count > 0
BEGIN
SELECT #Count;
END;
If the answer is <= 0 then you will see nothing but the row count in the message part of SSMS. You can even stop this by adding:
SET NOCOUNT ON;
...at the top of your script, but remember to add:
SET NOCOUNT OFF;

Postgresql update 2 tables in one update statement

I have two different tabs with same field, like:
host.enabled, service.enabled.
How I can update his from 1 update statement?
I tried:
UPDATE hosts AS h, services AS s SET h.enabled=0, s.enabled=0
WHERE
ctid IN (
SELECT hst.ctid FROM hosts hst LEFT JOIN services srv ON hst.host_id = srv.host_id
WHERE hst.instance_id=1
);
On mysql syntax this query worked like this:
UPDATE hosts LEFT JOIN services ON hosts.host_id=services.host_id SET hosts.enabled=0, services.enabled=0 WHERE hosts.instance_id=1
I didn't really understand your schema. If you can set up a fiddle that would be great.
In general though to update two tables in a single query the options are:
Trigger
This makes the assumption that you always want to update both together.
Stored procedure/function
So you'll be doing it as multiple queries in the function, but it can be triggered by a single SQL statement from the client.
Postgres CTE extension
Postgres permits common table expressions (with clauses) to utilise data manipulation.
with changed_hosts as (
update hosts set enabled = true
where host_id = 2
returning *
)
update services set enabled = true
where host_id in (select host_id from changed_hosts);
In this case the update in the WITH statement runs and sets the flag on the hosts table, then the main update runs, which updates the records in the services table.
SQL Fiddle for this at http://sqlfiddle.com/#!15/fa4d3/1
In general though, its probably easiest and most readable just to do 2 updates wrapped in a transaction.

INSERT INTO, return number of rows inserted [duplicate]

My database driver for PostgreSQL 8/9 does not return a count of records affected when executing INSERT or UPDATE.
PostgreSQL offers the non-standard syntax "RETURNING" which seems like a good workaround. But what might be the syntax? The example returns the ID of a record, but I need a count.
INSERT INTO distributors (did, dname) VALUES (DEFAULT, 'XYZ Widgets')
RETURNING did;
I know this question is oooolllllld and my solution is arguably overly complex, but that's my favorite kind of solution!
Anyway, I had to do the same thing and got it working like this:
-- Get count from INSERT
WITH rows AS (
INSERT INTO distributors
(did, dname)
VALUES
(DEFAULT, 'XYZ Widgets'),
(DEFAULT, 'ABC Widgets')
RETURNING 1
)
SELECT count(*) FROM rows;
-- Get count from UPDATE
WITH rows AS (
UPDATE distributors
SET dname = 'JKL Widgets'
WHERE did <= 10
RETURNING 1
)
SELECT count(*) FROM rows;
One of these days I really have to get around to writing a love sonnet to PostgreSQL's WITH clause ...
I agree w/ Milen, your driver should do this for you. What driver are you using and for what language? But if you are using plpgsql, you can use GET DIAGNOSTICS my_var = ROW_COUNT;
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/plpgsql-statements.html#PLPGSQL-STATEMENTS-DIAGNOSTICS
You can take ROW_COUNT after update or insert with this code:
insert into distributors (did, dname) values (DEFAULT, 'XYZ Widgets');
get diagnostics v_cnt = row_count;
It's not clear from your question how you're calling the statement. Assuming you're using something like JDBC you may be calling it as a query rather than an update. From JDBC's executeQuery:
Executes the given SQL statement, which returns a single ResultSet
object.
This is therefore appropriate when you execute a statement that returns some query results, such as SELECT or INSERT ... RETURNING. If you are making an update to the database and then want to know how many tuples were affected, you need to use executeUpdate which returns:
either (1) the row count for SQL Data Manipulation Language (DML)
statements or (2) 0 for SQL statements that return nothing
You could wrap your query in a transaction and it should show you the count before you ROLLBACK or COMMIT. Example:
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
INSERT .... ;
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
If you run the first 2 lines of the above, it should give you the count. You can then ROLLBACK (undo) the insert if you find that the number of affected lines isn't what you expected. If you're satisfied that the INSERT is correct, then you can run the same thing, but replace line 3 with COMMIT TRANSACTION;.
Important note: After you run any BEGIN TRANSACTION; you must either ROLLBACK; or COMMIT; the transaction, otherwise the transaction will create a lock that can slow down or even cripple an entire system, if you're running on a production environment.

Getting Affected Rows by UPDATE statement in RAW plpgsql

This has been asked multiple times here and here, but none of the answers are suitable in my case because I do not want to execute my update statement in a PL/PgSQL function and use GET DIAGNOSTICS integer_var = ROW_COUNT.
I have to do this in raw SQL.
For instance, in MS SQL SERVER we have ##ROWCOUNT which could be used like the following :
UPDATE <target_table>
SET Proprerty0 = Value0
WHERE <predicate>;
SELECT <computed_value_columns>
FROM <target>
WHERE ##ROWCOUNT > 0;
In one roundtrip to the database I know if the update was successfull and get the calculated values back.
What could be used instead of '##ROWCOUNT' ?
Can someone confirm that this is in fact impossible at this time ?
Thanks in advance.
EDIT 1 : I confirm that I need to use raw SQL (I wrote "raw plpgsql" in the original description).
In an attempt to make my question clearer please consider that the update statement affects only one row and think about optimistic concurrency:
The client did a SELECT Statement at first.
He builds the UPDATE and knows which database computed columns are to be included in the SELECT clause. Among other things, the predicate includes a timestamp that is computed each time the rows is updated.
So, if we have 1 row returned then everything is OK. If no row is returned then we know that there was a previous update and the client may need to refresh the data before trying to update clause again. This is why we need to know how many rows where affected by the update statement before returning computed columns. No row should be returned if the update fails.
What you want is not currently possible in the form that you describe, but I think you can do what you want with UPDATE ... RETURNING. See UPDATE ... RETURNING in the manual.
UPDATE <target_table>
SET Proprerty0 = Value0
WHERE <predicate>
RETURNING Property0;
It's hard to be sure, since the example you've provided is so abstract as to be somewhat meaningless.
You can also use a wCTE, which allows more complex cases:
WITH updated_rows AS (
UPDATE <target_table>
SET Proprerty0 = Value0
WHERE <predicate>
RETURNING row_id, Property0
)
SELECT row_id, some_computed_value_from_property
FROM updated_rows;
See common table expressions (WITH queries) and depesz's article on wCTEs.
UPDATE based on some added detail in the question, here's a demo using UPDATE ... RETURNING:
CREATE TABLE upret_demo(
id serial primary key,
somecol text not null,
last_updated timestamptz
);
INSERT INTO upret_demo (somecol, last_updated) VALUES ('blah',current_timestamp);
UPDATE upret_demo
SET
somecol = 'newvalue',
last_updated = current_timestamp
WHERE last_updated = '2012-12-03 19:36:15.045159+08' -- Change to your timestamp
RETURNING
somecol || '_computed' AS a,
'totally_new_computed_column' AS b;
Output when run the 1st time:
a | b
-------------------+-----------------------------
newvalue_computed | totally_new_computed_column
(1 row)
When run again, it'll have no effect and return no rows.
If you have more complex calculations to do in the result set, you can use a wCTE so you can JOIN on the results of the update and do other complex things.
WITH upd_row AS (
UPDATE upret_demo SET
somecol = 'newvalue',
last_updated = current_timestamp
WHERE last_updated = '2012-12-03 19:36:15.045159+08'
RETURNING id, somecol, last_updated
)
SELECT
'row_'||id||'_'||somecol||', updated '||last_updated AS calc1,
repeat('x',4) AS calc2
FROM upd_row;
In other words: Use UPDATE ... RETURNING, either directly to produce the calculated rows, or in a writeable CTE for more complex cases.
Generally the answer to this question depends on the type of the driver used.
PQcmdTuples() function does what is needed, if the application uses libpq. Other libraries on top of libpq need to have some wrapper on top of this function.
For JDBC the Statement.executeUpdate() method seems to the job.
ODBC provides SQLRowCount() function for the similar purpose.

How do I avoid using cursors in Sybase (T-SQL)?

Imagine the scene, you're updating some legacy Sybase code and come across a cursor. The stored procedure builds up a result set in a #temporary table which is all ready to be returned except that one of columns isn't terribly human readable, it's an alphanumeric code.
What we need to do, is figure out the possible distinct values of this code, call another stored procedure to cross reference these discrete values and then update the result set with the newly deciphered values:
declare c_lookup_codes for
select distinct lookup_code
from #workinprogress
while(1=1)
begin
fetch c_lookup_codes into #lookup_code
if ##sqlstatus<>0
begin
break
end
exec proc_code_xref #lookup_code #xref_code OUTPUT
update #workinprogress
set xref = #xref_code
where lookup_code = #lookup_code
end
Now then, whilst this may give some folks palpitations, it does work. My question is, how best would one avoid this kind of thing?
_NB: for the purposes of this example you can also imagine that the result set is in the region of 500k rows and that there are 100 distinct values of look_up_code and finally, that it is not possible to have a table with the xref values in as the logic in proc_code_xref is too arcane._
You have to have a XRef table if you want to take out the cursor. Assuming you know the 100 distinct lookup values (and that they're static) it's simple to generate one by calling proc_code_xref 100 times and inserting the results into a table
Unless you are willing to duplicate the code in the xref proc, there is no way to avoid using a cursor.
They say, that if you must use cursor, then, you must have done something wrong ;-) here's solution without cursor:
declare #lookup_code char(8)
select distinct lookup_code
into #lookup_codes
from #workinprogress
while 1=1
begin
select #lookup_code = lookup_code from #lookup_codes
if ##rowcount = 0 break
exec proc_code_xref #lookup_code #xref_code OUTPUT
delete #lookup_codes
where lookup_code = #lookup_code
end