Is there a way to auto expand objects in Chrome Dev Tools? - google-chrome-devtools

EVERY SINGLE TIME I view an object in the console I am going to want to expand it, so it gets tiresome to have to click the arrow to do this EVERY SINGLE TIME :) Is there a shortcut or setting to have this done automatically?

Consider using console.table().

To expand / collapse a node and all its children,
Ctrl + Alt + Click or Opt + Click on arrow icon
(note that although the dev tools doc lists Ctrl + Alt + Click, on Windows all that is needed is Alt + Click).

While the solution mentioning JSON.stringify is pretty great for most of the cases, it has a few limitations
It can not handle items with circular references where as console.log can take care of such objects elegantly.
Also, if you have a large tree, then ability to interactively fold away some nodes can make exploration easier.
Here is a solution that solves both of the above by creatively (ab)using console.group:
function expandedLog(item, maxDepth = 100, depth = 0){
if (depth > maxDepth ) {
console.log(item);
return;
}
if (typeof item === 'object' && item !== null) {
Object.entries(item).forEach(([key, value]) => {
console.group(key + ' : ' +(typeof value));
expandedLog(value, maxDepth, depth + 1);
console.groupEnd();
});
} else {
console.log(item);
}
}
Now running:
expandedLog({
"glossary": {
"title": "example glossary",
"GlossDiv": {
"title": "S",
"GlossList": {
"GlossEntry": {
"ID": "SGML",
"SortAs": "SGML",
"GlossTerm": "Standard Generalized Markup Language",
"Acronym": "SGML",
"Abbrev": "ISO 8879:1986",
"GlossDef": {
"para": "A meta-markup language, used to create markup languages such as DocBook.",
"GlossSeeAlso": ["GML", "XML"]
},
"GlossSee": "markup"
}
}
}
}
})
Will give you something like:
The value of maxDepth can be adjusted to a desired level, and beyond that level of nesting - expanded log will fall back to usual console.log
Try running something like:
x = { a: 10, b: 20 }
x.x = x
expandedLog(x)
Also please note that console.group is non-standard.

Might not be the best answer, but I've been doing this somewhere in my code.
Update:
Use JSON.stringify to expand your object automatically:
> a = [{name: 'Joe', age: 5}, {name: 'John', age: 6}]
> JSON.stringify(a, true, 2)
"[
{
"name": "Joe",
"age": 5
},
{
"name": "John",
"age": 6
}
]"
You can always make a shortcut function if it hurts to type all that out:
j = function(d) {
return JSON.stringify(d, true, 2)
}
j(a)
Previous answer:
pretty = function(d)
{
var s = []
for (var k in d) {
s.push(k + ': ' + d[k])
}
console.log(s.join(', '))
}
then, instead of:
-> a = [{name: 'Joe', age: 5}, {name: 'John', age: 6}]
-> a
<- [Object, Object]
You do:
-> a.forEach(pretty)
<- name: Joe, age: 5
name: John, age: 6
Not the best solution, but works well for my usage. Deeper objects will not work so that's something that can be improved on.

option+Click on a Mac. Just discovered it now myself and have made my week! This has been as annoying as anything

By default the console on Chrome and Safari browsers will output objects which are collapsed, with sorted property keys, and include all inherited prototype chains.
I'm personally not a fan. Most developers need raw output of an object without the prototype chain, and anything else should be opt-in. Collapsed objects waste the developer's time, because they need to expand them, and if they wanted less output they could just log the property keys they need. Auto-sorting the property keys, leaves the developer without a way to check if their own sort works correctly, which could cause bugs. And lastly, the common Javascript developer does not spend much time working on the inherited prototype chain, so that adds noise to the logs.
How to expand objects in Console
Recommended
console.log(JSON.stringify({}, undefined, 2));
Could also use as a function:
console.json = object => console.log(JSON.stringify(object, undefined, 2));
console.json({});
"Option + Click" (Chrome on Mac) and "Alt + Click" (Chrome on Window)
However, it's not supported by all browsers (e.g. Safari), and Console still prints the prototype chains, auto-sorts property keys, etc.
Not Recommended
I would not recommend either of the top answers
console.table() - this is shallow expansion only, and does not expand nested objects
Write a custom underscore.js function - too much overhead for what should be a simple solution

Here is a modified version of lorefnon's answer which does not depend on underscorejs:
var expandedLog = (function(MAX_DEPTH){
return function(item, depth){
depth = depth || 0;
isString = typeof item === 'string';
isDeep = depth > MAX_DEPTH
if (isString || isDeep) {
console.log(item);
return;
}
for(var key in item){
console.group(key + ' : ' +(typeof item[key]));
expandedLog(item[key], depth + 1);
console.groupEnd();
}
}
})(100);

Here is my solution, a function that iterates an all the properties of the object, including arrays.
In this example I iterate over a simple multi-level object:
var point = {
x: 5,
y: 2,
innerobj : { innerVal : 1,innerVal2 : 2 },
$excludedInnerProperties : { test: 1},
includedInnerProperties : { test: 1}
};
You have also the possibility to exclude the iteration if the properties starts with a particular suffix (i.e. $ for angular objects)
discoverProperties = function (obj, level, excludePrefix) {
var indent = "----------------------------------------".substring(0, level * 2);
var str = indent + "level " + level + "\r\n";
if (typeof (obj) == "undefined")
return "";
for (var property in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(property)) {
var propVal;
try {
propVal = eval('obj.' + property);
str += indent + property + "(" + propVal.constructor.name + "):" + propVal + "\r\n";
if (typeof (propVal) == 'object' && level < 10 && propVal.constructor.name != "Date" && property.indexOf(excludePrefix) != 0) {
if (propVal.hasOwnProperty('length')) {
for (var i = 0; i < propVal.length; i++) {
if (typeof (propVal) == 'object' && level < 10) {
if (typeof (propVal[i]) != "undefined") {
str += indent + (propVal[i]).constructor.name + "[" + i + "]\r\n";
str += this.discoverProperties(propVal[i], level + 1, excludePrefix);
}
}
else
str += indent + propVal[i].constructor.name + "[" + i + "]:" + propVal[i] + "\r\n";
}
}
else
str += this.discoverProperties(propVal, level + 1, excludePrefix);
}
}
catch (e) {
}
}
}
return str;
};
var point = {
x: 5,
y: 2,
innerobj : { innerVal : 1,innerVal2 : 2 },
$excludedInnerProperties : { test: 1},
includedInnerProperties : { test: 1}
};
document.write("<pre>" + discoverProperties(point,0,'$')+ "</pre>");
Here is the output of the function:
level 0
x(Number):5
y(Number):2
innerobj(Object):[object Object]
--level 1
--innerVal(Number):1
--innerVal2(Number):2
$excludedInnerProperties(Object):[object Object]
includedInnerProperties(Object):[object Object]
--level 1
--test(Number):1
You can also inject this function in any web page and copy and analyze all the properties, try in on the google page using the chrome command:
discoverProperties(google,0,'$')
Also you can copy the output of the command using the chrome command:
copy(discoverProperties(myvariable,0,'$'))

if you have a big object, JSON.stringfy will give error Uncaught TypeError: Converting circular structure to JSON
, here is trick to use modified version of it
JSON.stringifyOnce = function(obj, replacer, indent){
var printedObjects = [];
var printedObjectKeys = [];
function printOnceReplacer(key, value){
if ( printedObjects.length > 2000){ // browsers will not print more than 20K, I don't see the point to allow 2K.. algorithm will not be fast anyway if we have too many objects
return 'object too long';
}
var printedObjIndex = false;
printedObjects.forEach(function(obj, index){
if(obj===value){
printedObjIndex = index;
}
});
if ( key == ''){ //root element
printedObjects.push(obj);
printedObjectKeys.push("root");
return value;
}
else if(printedObjIndex+"" != "false" && typeof(value)=="object"){
if ( printedObjectKeys[printedObjIndex] == "root"){
return "(pointer to root)";
}else{
return "(see " + ((!!value && !!value.constructor) ? value.constructor.name.toLowerCase() : typeof(value)) + " with key " + printedObjectKeys[printedObjIndex] + ")";
}
}else{
var qualifiedKey = key || "(empty key)";
printedObjects.push(value);
printedObjectKeys.push(qualifiedKey);
if(replacer){
return replacer(key, value);
}else{
return value;
}
}
}
return JSON.stringify(obj, printOnceReplacer, indent);
};
now you can use JSON.stringifyOnce(obj)

Its a work around, but it works for me.
I use in the case where a control/widget auto updates depending on user actions. For example, when using twitter's typeahead.js, once you focus out of the window, the dropdown disappears and the suggestions get removed from the DOM.
In dev tools right click on the node you want to expand enable break on... -> subtree modifications, this will then send you to the debugger. Keep hitting F10 or Shift+F11 untill you dom mutates. Once that mutates then you can inspect. Since the debugger is active the UI of Chrome is locked and doesn't close the dropdown and the suggestions are still in the DOM.
Very handy when troubleshooting layout of dynamically inserted nodes that are begin inserted and removed constantly.

Another easier way would be
Use JSON.stringify(jsonObject)
Copy and Paste the result to Visual Studio Code
Use Ctrl+K and Ctrl+F to format the result
You will see formatted expanded object
I have tried this for simple objects.

You can package JSON.stringify into a new function eg
jsonLog = function (msg, d) {
console.log(msg + '\n' + JSON.stringify(d, true, 2))
}
then
jsonLog('root=', root)
FWIW.
Murray

For lazy folks
/**
* _Universal extensive multilevel logger for lazy folks_
* #param {any} value **`Value` you want to log**
* #param {number} tab **Abount of `tab`**
*/
function log(value, tab = 4) {
console.log(JSON.stringify(value, undefined, tab));
}
Usage
log(anything) // [] {} 1 true null

Alt-click will expand all child nodes in the Chrome console.

You could view your element by accessing document.getElementsBy... and then right click and copy of the resulted object. For example:
document.getElementsByTagName('ion-app') gives back javascript object that can be copy pasted to text editor and it does it in full.
Better yet: right click on the resulted element - 'Edit as html' - 'Select all' - 'Copy' - 'Paste'

Related

How to loop a search over a long string?

In order to get around the 255 character search limitation in the desktop Word api I'm breaking long strings into searchable chunks of 254 characters and pushing them into an object "oSearchTerms". Then I'm attempting to iterate over oSearchTerms, search for the text, highlight it, then search for the next chunk and do the same until all items in oSearchTerms have been highlighted. The problem is it's not looping. It goes through the first iteration successfully but stops.
I've tried copious context.sync() calls, return true, return context.sync(), etc, which you'll see commented out below, to no avail.
I should also point out that it's not showing any errors. The loop just isn't looping.
Do I have to convert this over to an async function? I'd like to stick with ES5 and not use fat arrow functions.
What am I missing?
var fullSearchTerm = "As discussed earlier, one of the primary objectives of these DYH rules is to ensure that operators have at least one source of XYZ-approved data and documents that they can use to comply with operational requirements The objective would be defeated if the required data and documents were not, in fact, approved and Only by retaining authority to approve these materials can we ensure that they comply with applicable requirements and can be relied upon by operators to comply with operational rules which We believe there are differences between EXSS ICA and other ICA that necessitate approval of EVIS ICA."
function findTextMatch() {
Word.run(function(context) {
OfficeExtension.config.extendedErrorLogging = true;
var oSearchTerms = [];
var maxChars = 254;
var lenFullSearchTerm = fullSearchTerm.length;
var nSearchCycles = Math.ceil(Number((lenFullSearchTerm / maxChars)));
console.log("lenFullSearchTerm: " + lenFullSearchTerm + " nSearchCycles: " + nSearchCycles);
// create oSearchTerms object containing search terms
// leaves short strings alone but breaks long strings into
// searchable 254 character chunks
for (var i = 0; i < nSearchCycles; i++) {
var posStart = i * maxChars;
var mySrch = fullSearchTerm.substr(posStart, maxChars);
console.log( i +" mySrch: "+ mySrch);
var oSrch = {"searchterm":mySrch};
oSearchTerms.push(oSrch);
}
console.log("oSearchTerms.length: " + oSearchTerms.length +" oSearchTerm: "+ JSON.stringify(oSearchTerms));
// Begin search loop
// iterate over oSearchTerms, find and highlight each searchterm
for (var i = 0; i < oSearchTerms.length; i++) {
console.log("oSearchTerms["+i+"].searchterm: " + JSON.stringify(oSearchTerms[i].searchterm));
var searchResults = context.document.body.search(oSearchTerms[i].searchterm, { matchCase: true });
console.log("do context.sync() ");
context.load(searchResults);
return context.sync()
.then(function(){
console.log("done context.sync() ");
console.log("searchResults: "+ JSON.stringify(searchResults));
if(typeof searchResults.items !== undefined){
console.log("i: "+i+ " searchResults: "+searchResults.items.length);
// highlight each result
for (var j = 0; j < searchResults.items.length; j++) {
console.log("highlight searchResults.items["+j +"]");
searchResults.items[j].font.highlightColor = "red";
}
}
else{
console.log("typeof searchResults.items == undefined");
}
// return true;
// return context.sync();
});
//.then(context.sync);
//return true;
} // end search loop
})
.catch( function (error) {
console.log('findTextMatch Error: ' + JSON.stringify(error));
if (error instanceof OfficeExtension.Error) {
console.log('findTextMatch Debug info: ' + JSON.stringify(error));
}
});
}
I recommend that you not have a context.sync inside a loop. That can be a performance hit and it makes the code hard to reason about. Please see my answer to: Document not in sync after replace text and this sample: Word Add-in Stylechecker for a design pattern that avoids this. The pattern can be used with ES5 syntax if you want.
If you implement this pattern, you may find that the problem has gone away, or at least you will be able to see clearer where the cause might be.

ServiceStack Ormlite Deserialize Array for In Clause

I am storing some query criteria in the db via a ToJson() on the object that contains all the criteria. A simplified example would be:
{"FirstName" :[ {Operator: "=", Value: "John"}, { Operator: "in", Value:" ["Smith", "Jones"]"}], "SomeId": [Operator: "in", Value: "[1,2,3]" }]}
The lists are either string, int, decimal or date. These all map to the same class/table so it is easy via reflection to get FirstName or SomeId's type.
I'm trying to create a where clause based on this information:
if (critKey.Operator == "in")
{
wb.Values.Add(keySave + i, (object)ConvertList<Members>(key,
(string)critKey.Value));
wb.WhereClause = wb.WhereClause + " And {0} {1} (#{2})".Fmt(critKey.Column,
critKey.Operator, keySave + i);
}
else
{
wb.Values.Add(keySave + i, (object)critKey.Value);
wb.WhereClause = wb.WhereClause + " And {0} {1} #{2}".Fmt(critKey.Column, critKey.Operator, keySave + i);
}
It generates something like this (example from my tests, yes I know the storenumber part is stupid):
Email = #Email0 And StoreNumber = #StoreNumber0 And StoreNumber in (#StoreNumber1)
I'm running into an issue with the lists. Is there a nice way to do this with any of the ormlite tools instead of doing this all by hand? The where clause generates fine except when dealing with lists. I'm trying to make it generic but having a hard time on that part.
Second question maybe related but I can't seem to find how to use parameters with in. Coming from NPoco you can do (colum in #0, somearray)` but I cant' seem to find out how to do this without using Sql.In.
I ended up having to write my own parser as it seems ormlite doesn't support have the same support for query params for lists like NPoco. Basically I'd prefer to be able to do this:
Where("SomeId in #Ids") and pass in a parameter but ended up with this code:
listObject = ConvertListObject<Members>(key, (string)critKey.Value);
wb.WhereClause = wb.WhereClause + " And {0} {1} ({2})"
.Fmt(critKey.Column, critKey.Operator,listObject.EscapedList(ColumnType<Members>(key)));
public static string EscapedList(this List<object> val, Type t)
{
var escapedList = "";
if (t == typeof(int) || t == typeof(float) || t == typeof(decimal))
{
escapedList = String.Join(",", val.Select(x=>x.ToString()));
} else
{
escapedList = String.Join(",", val.Select(x=>"'" + x.ToString() + "'"));
}
return escapedList;
}
I'd like to see other answers especially if I'm missing something in ormlite.
When dealing with lists you can use the following example
var storeNumbers = new [] { "store1", "store2", "store3" };
var ev = Db.From<MyClass>
.Where(p => storeNumbers.Contains(p => p.StoreNumber));
var result = Db.Select(ev);

Codemirror adding keywords on the fly for syntax highlight

I am currently adding a new language mode in CodeMirror for my current project. This is a proprietary language in which user can create a new keyword. Basically I am trying to update existing keyword list at the runtime and my syntax highlighter can pick this new keyword.
var mode = editor.doc.modeOption;
if(mode === "dmsrl") mode = "text/dmsrl";
var keyWords = CodeMirror.resolveMode(mode).keywords;
keyWords[x]=true;
I am currently trying to add new keyword like above, but somehow the list is not getting updated and new keyword is unavailable in my tokebase() method.
Any help would be appreciated.
You can try to redefine hintOptions object, that pass to Codemirror's init function and than building hints in your specific hint addon with this data. Just try this
cm.setOption("hintOptions", { "keywords" : ["k1", "k2"] });
Look at first in sql-hint for example (link):
cm.setOption("hintOptions", { "tables" : ["k1", "k2"] });
For sql-mode this is not heavy operation
I wanted to reach the same goal as yours but with some more degree of freedom, consisting in inputting a container, which I can re-define along the run.
1) Put the following code into a file custom.mode.js, to be loaded from your web page
var _glob_keywords = [ [ "key1", "keyword1" ],
[ "key2", "keyword2" ]
] ;
var cm_custom_check_stream_fn = function( stream )
{
for( var _i = 0 ; _i < _glob_keywords.length ; _i++ )
{
if ( stream.match( _glob_keywords[_i][0] ) ) return _glob_keywords[_i][1] ;
}
return "" ;
}
CodeMirror.defineMode("custom.mode", function()
{
return {
token: function(stream,state)
{
var _ret = cm_custom_check_stream_fn( stream ) ;
if ( _ret.length > 0 ) return _ret ;
else { stream.next(); return null; }
}
};
});
This code will be automatically embedded into the Codemirror object to dynamically handle the input in the textbox.
Example: if "key1" is found, then "keyword1" is returned.
We assume that "keyword1", "keyword2" refer to entries inside a custom css definitions file, as explained in the codemirror documentation, that is,
.cm-keyword1 { color:#8BA8C4; }
.cm-keyword2 { color:lime; }
Hope it helps!

YUI 3 Autocomplete Textbox Value Change

The question I have is how I would be able to change the value that is set in the text box that the autocomplete is linked to. The task I am attempting to do is to convert from YUI 2 to YUI 3. Please don't say that I shouldn't do that... because It isn't my choice. I am aware... The code below is what was used before. I already have the autocomplete functionality doing most of what it needs to do. It's just when it gets to the field.itemSelectEvent.subscribe(myHandler) part that I can no longer get anything else to work. The list comes up with the persons information but when selected it just puts [object Object] in the text box instead of their name that automatically forwards to another page. Thank you for your help!!!
var field = new YAHOO.widget.AutoComplete("webUserSearch",
"webUserSearchContainer", oDS);
field.highlightClassName = "autoCompleteHighlight";
field.useShadow = true;
field.queryMatchContains = true;
field.maxResultsDisplayed = 20;
field.resultTypeList = false;
field.formatResult = function(oResultData, sQuery) {
return "<div class=\"result\"><u style=\"cursor:pointer\">"
+ oResultData['Last Name'] + ", " + oResultData['First Name']
+ "</u> (" + oResultData['User Name'] + ")</div>";
};
var myHandler = function(sType, aArgs) {
var theField = aArgs[0];
var selectedElement = aArgs[1];
var repObject = aArgs[2];
theField.getInputEl().value = repObject['Last Name'] + ", "
+ repObject['First Name'];
var newTabURL = <URL Removed for Stack Overflow>;
window.location.href = newTabURL;
};
field.itemSelectEvent.subscribe(myHandler);
Listen for the select event, then in the handler for that you'll get a result object. The structure of that is described in the docs for the result event (a little up from the select event).
I usually take a value out of the raw property on the result object to stick into the field.
resultTextLocator was the ticket. All I had to do was to return the value I wanted to display in the box.
resultTextLocator : function (result) {
return result["Last Name"] +
', ' +
result["First Name"];
}

tinymce.dom.replace throws an exception concerning parentNode

I'm writing a tinyMce plugin which contains a section of code, replacing one element for another. I'm using the editor's dom instance to create the node I want to insert, and I'm using the same instance to do the replacement.
My code is as follows:
var nodeData =
{
"data-widgetId": data.widget.widgetKey(),
"data-instanceKey": "instance1",
src: "/content/images/icon48/cog.png",
class: "widgetPlaceholder",
title: data.widget.getInfo().name
};
var nodeToInsert = ed.dom.create("img", nodeData);
// Insert this content into the editor window
if (data.mode == 'add') {
tinymce.DOM.add(ed.getBody(), nodeToInsert);
}
else if (data.mode == 'edit' && data.selected != null) {
var instanceKey = $(data.selected).attr("data-instancekey");
var elementToReplace = tinymce.DOM.select("[data-instancekey=" + instanceKey + "]");
if (elementToReplace.length === 1) {
ed.dom.replace(elementToReplace[0], nodeToInsert);
}
else {
throw new "No element to replace with that instance key";
}
}
TinyMCE breaks during the replace, here:
replace : function(n, o, k) {
var t = this;
if (is(o, 'array'))
n = n.cloneNode(true);
return t.run(o, function(o) {
if (k) {
each(tinymce.grep(o.childNodes), function(c) {
n.appendChild(c);
});
}
return o.parentNode.replaceChild(n, o);
});
},
..with the error Cannot call method 'replaceChild' of null.
I've verified that the two argument's being passed into replace() are not null and that their parentNode fields are instantiated. I've also taken care to make sure that the elements are being created and replace using the same document instance (I understand I.E has an issue with this).
I've done all this development in Google Chrome, but I receive the same errors in Firefox 4 and IE8 also. Has anyone else come across this?
Thanks in advance
As it turns out, I was simply passing in the arguments in the wrong order. I should have been passing the node I wanted to insert first, and the node I wanted to replace second.