The Scala website says:
For historical and testing purposes, we also keep an archive of
previous releases (currently since version 2.5). Prior versions of
Scala, from 0.9.x to 2.4.x, have been archived offline.
Is there any way to get these versions? The source code is available in the git repo, but binaries would be nice.
EDIT:
I found some old versions at archive.org, but the oldest that I could get was 1.1.1.3 from http://web.archive.org/web/20040603140225/http://scala.epfl.ch/downloads/index.html
It turns out, if one looks hard enough, everything from 1.0.0-b4 can be found on archive.org. Unfortunately, some version in between are nowhere to be found, for example 2.3.x and 2.0.x. The question remains why they aren't published on http://scala-lang.org.
Related
Is httpclient-4.5.2.jar backward compatible with httpclient-4.3.6.jar?
Same question also for httpcore-4.4.4.jar with httpcore-4.3.3.jar?
I have to use a newer version for supporting some functionality. but is there any impact of my older code?
Is those jar version controlling working conventional way for backward compatibility support like java JDK?
Short answer no. For minor upgrades (4.3.3 to 4.3.4) things usually work, but when you go from 4.3 to 4.5 you can expect changes. See release notes for hints about what you can expect.
Having said that, if you can compile without errors you are usually safe!
Where can I download the latest beta of PlayFramework 2.6 so that I can use it with Scala 2.12? Is one available? All the links from documentation, e.g. https://www.playframework.com/documentation/2.6.x/Highlights26 seem to lead to dead-ends when I actually try to download. If it is not available, should the documentation not at least state that? Why no branches or tags corresponding to 2.6 in Github? Why is there a migration guide for 2.6 if it cant' yet be downloaded?
You can try building the framework from source.
The github master branch should contain the latest developments.
https://www.playframework.com/documentation/2.5.x/BuildingFromSource
Be careful though, it may be unusable.
I just upgraded to version 3.0.1 from nunit 2.6.4. It used to have a NUnit Gui Runner, located here:
After installing 3.0.1 (which I downloaded windows version from here)
I now no longer see the nunit.exe in the installation folder, for example the directory structure is different and appears to be missing many files that were part of the previous installation:
The NUnit team decided to make the GUI a separate product and will be releasing it separately. It is being rewritten from the ground up for NUnit 3, but hasn't been released yet. Development is happening on the GitHub page at https://github.com/nunit/nunit-gui if you want to get involved or track the progress. Initial releases will be out soon.
Update - There have been several preview releases of the new NUnit GUI that can be found at https://github.com/nunit/nunit-gui/releases. The previews are not recommended for production use, but they work and can be used.
The "final" release is here, you can find it at: https://github.com/TestCentric/testcentric-gui/releases
For anyone coming to this page, looking where to find the NUnit Gui, please note that on http://nunit.org/?p=download you can get version 2.6.4, which does contain the Gui.
UPDATE
As pointed out in the comments, a lot has changed since, and you should no longer use the 2.x version tools, rather use the new TestCentric UI found at https://github.com/TestCentric/testcentric-gui/releases
I am upgrading my server from an old version of Mercurial, 1.5 to the newest version. I am wondering if the 2.2 build of Mercurial is stable for use by multiple users at a time. Also are there any gotchas when upgrading like my custom hooks not working, or a buildslave object not working? I have not done a major upgrade on a source control server before so help would be appreciated.
Mercurial is famouse for being very strict regarding compatibility. Have you checked upgrade notes? It list all breaking changes between version. Biggest change for me is introduction of hgweb in 1.6.
Biggest exception from compatibility rules are hooks. Mercurial doesn't guarantee anything so only way is to try.
Also consider making update in two stages. For example first to 1.9 and than to 2.2.
I want to compile the latest snapshot version of gedit on OSX as it has a lot of bug fixes and a number of new features, but I'm a little confused about the requirements to compile the sourcecode.
The readme says I need the GTK+-3 libraries, but for the life of me I can't seem to find them. I've gone through the GTK site, but there is only the 2.0 series available. Google doesn't seem to show any results for the 3.0 series either.
Anyone know how/where to get them?
The readme: http://git.gnome.org/browse/gedit/tree/README
GTK 3 has not actually been released yet, it's the current "in-development" version for the upcoming release of Gnome 3. It's still in development and not at all ready for mainstream use.
Still, if you really insist on trying it out, you can get a source tarball from the Gnome FTP server.
GTK+ 3 has been released some time ago (10-Feb-2001):
Sources: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gtk+/3.0/
Git repo: http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+