I am trying to link against the libconfig++ library using cmake. I installed the library
using apt-get so I am assuming it will have a .cmake file so I can use find_package. Problem is I don't know what package name to use. I tried libconfig, config, config++ as the package name to no avail.
As a general question, how does one find out which package is associated with a library.
I know that find_package looks into CMAKE_MODULE_PATH to see if there is a .cmake script. How to I find out what is the value of CMAKE_MODULE_PATH on my system. It's not an environment variable. I am running ubuntu 12.04.
Any help is appreciated.
To use find_package you need to have corresponding Find or Config cmake file. But library may not to provide it, seems with your library is such a case. You can use find_library for finding libraries and find_path to find include directories. With these commands you can even write FindXXX.cmake yourself.
CMAKE_MODULE_PATH is not an environment variable, it is CMake's one. This variable is intended for you to set, if you have additional directories with modules, by default it's empty. This is used in the "Module" mode. In this mode CMake searches FindXXX.cmake in the CMAKE_MODULE_PATH (your modules) or in modules shipped with CMake and if it's found, it then used to find library and it's headers.
If that module wasn't found, it then switches into "Config" mode. On Unix it searches for ConfigXXX.cmake in the following directories:
<prefix>/(lib/<arch>|lib|share)/cmake/<name>*/
<prefix>/(lib/<arch>|lib|share)/<name>*/
<prefix>/(lib/<arch>|lib|share)/<name>*/(cmake|CMake)/
This files is shipped with the library, so there is no need to find anything, they contain all information, where library and includes located, etc.
About naming scheme, there is no standard one. You can look at Standard CMake modules. Modules found in internet for your library named FindLibConfig.cmake
For your case, library ships without corresponding cmake file, so you should write it your self (or find already written) and add directory with that file to CMAKE_MODULE_PATH.
I suggest you to read how find_package command works and how to write FindXXX.cmake files.
Related
Might be a dumb question, but how to use GTK+ (or its language bindings) with CodeBlocks in Windows? Official site gtk.org shows downloading after installing msys2, via pacman. After doing that and adding C://msys64/mingw64/bin to variable path the CodeBlocks still doesn't "see" gtk header files in include since they're in gtk-3.0/gtk/ instead of gtk/. I thought to myself that I should move files one dir up, but then after finding gtk header files, CodeBlocks is unable to find its dependencies (since they are also in some gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-pixbuf instead of gdk-pixbuf/).
I was able to find gtk-bundle in some third party site, which contains all needed files and headers. After extracting them into C://gtk/ and adding it to variable path I was able to get started with gtk. However after trying to get gtkmm (C++ binding for gtk) I've ran into same problem, install only via msys2, but unfortunately no bundle archive could be found.
Any help regarding how to use libraries installed via msys2 properly would be great. Thanks in advance.
For further usage. So after long searches and tries I've found a solution to my problem.
After installing GTK+ (or any of language bindings) via msys2 what you need to do is to use 'pkg-config gtk+-3.0 --cflags --libs > link.txt' in cmd (first cd to convenient location), this will generate .txt file with linker settings. Copy all content to CodeBlocks > linker settings. And that's where the boring part comes in. In order for CB to find all headers and dependencies, need to add all folders listed in .txt file needs to be added to CB > Search Directories.
These were the steps that allowed me to compile GTK+ and gtkmm wit CodeBlocks.
I would like to include a few additional .pl files in my CPAN module. These files are not essential to use the module, but are provide useful functionality/glue when the module is used in some common frameworks and applications.
Currently, I just include the .pl files in a "extras" directory of the distribution. This has the drawback that the files are not installed on make install. Is there a way to include them in the installation and where should they go? (They aren't executables and don't belong in "bin".) Would "share" make sense? Or are these kinds of files usually just not installed and it is left to the user to get them out of the .tgz archive and use as needed?
I use Dist::Zilla to manage my distribution.
I would suggest the following:
If they're actual complete programs or are almost complete, polish then up and make them standalone items that could go into /bin with POD of their own.
If they're utility glue, make a ::Utils module for them to live in and document their usage.
If these are useful code snippets but not something you can install somewhere or are sample usages or handy idioms, create a ::Cookbook all-POD module and include them there with the appropriate illuminating explanation for each one.
I don't know exactly how Dist::Zilla works, but the resulting archive has to be compatible with what ExtUtils::MakeMaker creates.
When you create a module with module-starter, it creates a module template using ExtUtils::MakeMaker. It creates several files and directories like the lib directory where your module lives and the t directories where your tests live.
One thing it doesn't create is a bin directory. However, if you create a bin directory, and you put files under this directory (such as Perl scripts), these files will be installed under the bin directory in your Perl's distribution and linked to /usr/local/bin or /usr/bin. Would this be a good place for your scripts?
I liked #Joe's answer, except that in my case the files were WebWork macros -- individual .pl files that make my module callable from WebWork end-user's code. So they don't fit under any of the categories discussed here, and as .pl files can't be made a module.
This is what I ended up doing:
put all .pl macro files into 'extras/WebWork' in the distribution.
add to "dist.ini" file a [ShareDir] stanza with dir = extras property.
now the WebWork admin can install my distribution from CPAN and then use perl -MFile::ShareDir -e 'print File::ShareDir::dist_dir("Statistics-R-IO")' to find the macros and make them available in WebWork.
I am creating rpm for apc. While writing spec file, I realized that some commands may have path which can keep on changing which are required during the compilation time. For eg. these commands are required to be executed during the building time.
$ /usr/local/php/bin/phpize
$ ./configure --with-php-config=/usr/local/php/bin/php-config
But the complete path of phpize and php-config file may change. So how can i prevent this dependencies so that i should not hard-code these path in my spec file.
Because these commands are used at building time, the ideal solution to this problem is here:
Find packages on distribution which provide these commands or paths e.g php-config is provided by php-devel package on Fedora operating system. In fedora you can find it using yum whatprovides "*/php-config" or if they are already installed on system then using rpm -qf /path/to/command.
Once you know the packages add them as BuildRequire tag in spec file. Step 2 will make sure that paths are always present whenever you build the package from spec file even if you use hard coded paths (which isn't ofcourse best way to do it).
In place of /usr/ you can use %{_prefix}, it depends entirely on macros available on distribution you are building this rpm on. Check macro files for path macros. One link which has common macro definitions is here.
We use MyCPAN::App::DPAN (Version 1.28) just like in Question: How can I manage Perl module dependencies?
This works quite well in general. But we ran into troubles with some specific packages:
As expample DBD::Oracle does not have their main *.pm file in DBD-Oracle-1.27/lib/DBD/Oracle/Oracle.pm but in DBD-Oracle-1.27/Oracle.pm.
It seems that dpan does not find this *.pm file, since it is not listed in modules/02packages.details.txt.gz. Whereas DBD::Oracle::Object (other Perl-Module of this distribution, but located DBD-Oracle-1.27/lib/DBD/Oracle/) is listed there.
In dpan.conf we only have set the recommended values:
dpan_dir /some/dir
indexer_id Me
pause_full_name The Admin Team
pause_id TAT
system_id my system id
Other Packages with the same problem:
Apache::DB
Packages that work:
Crypt::Blowfish (no extra modules)
Math::Round (no extra modules)
XML::Twig (no "lib" dir, but extra modules)
Does someone have any tips/hints?
DPAN works by indexing the distributions and storing the results in a file in the indexer_reports directory. As a workaround until I can investigate your problem, you can just edit the report it created for the problem distributions. As long as you haven't set fresh_start in your configuration, it will use the cached report which you have edited to add the missing module.
I had developed a small program in netbeans using c++. I need to know how can i deploy/run the package on another linux system
Abdul Khaliq
I have seen your code, you probably missing XML files in the current folder... where the executable is located... paste then and then run as ./your-executable
I recommend that you use a makefile to recompile on your target machine which will ensure that your program is deployed properly.
You should use a makefile as suggested. I know that NetBeans can generate one, but it's been a while since I last did so. Maybe this can help: http://forums.netbeans.org/topic3071.html
Typically, once compiled, your executable will need several libraries. Chance is that those libraries will also be available on the target linux system.
Thus, you can simply copy your executable over to the other system. If you run ldd on your executable, you should see the list of libraries your executable is dynamically loading. Those libraries should be available on the target system as well.
In case your executable makes use of resources such as images and other binary files, you can use a resource system (e.g. Qt Resource System) and compile those binary files into your executable.
The easiest way to test is to do the copy, run
ldd yourExecutable
on the target system. It will tell you if you are missing any library. Install those libraries using the system package manager.
Of course, you also have the option to statically build all libraries into your executable. However, this is not recommended since it makes the executable too large and complicates matters.
What type of package is your netbeans compiler creating? deb,rpm? If you are moving the package to a different linux install you will need to use that distributions package type. Ubuntu - deb
Fedora/Redhat - rpm
etc...
I'm not sure how you change this in netbeans but I'm pretty sure it has the ability to. A google search could help you more.