We have a bunch of code built around Mojo::UserAgent and migrating to MojoX::UserAgent is not quite an option. I wonder if there is a way to get/set user agent string in Mojo::UserAgent?
The current (Mojo 4.5) way is:
# Change name of user agent
$ua->transactor->name('MyUA 1.0');
See CPAN documentation here.
Use the name accessor:
my $name = $ua->name;
$ua->name('Mozilla/5.0');
(Note that in the 4.x release, the name accessor has been removed)
Related
Using grails mail plugin 1.0.7.
https://jira.grails.org/browse/GPMAIL-36 states that it's possible to change plguin configuration since 1.0.1 at runtime. Sadly it does not explains how to achieve it.
I want to be able to change the username at runtime to be able to use different mail accounts.
Thanks.
Based on this code, you should be able to change the configuration at runtime and the mail plugin will automagically re-deploy and update mail sender based on your changes.
Example:
Holders.config.grails.mail.username = 'foo'
Holders.config.grails.mail.password = 'bar'
sendMail {
to "foo#bar.com"
from "bar#foo.com"
subject "Hi"
body "This is an email"
}
Update:
It would appear that changing the configuration in this manner does not, in fact, fire the onConfigChange event. Per this, you can fire the event manually. Something like this:
Holders.pluginManager.getGrailsPlugin('mail').notifyOfEvent(GrailsPlugin.EVENT_ON_CONFIG_CHANGE, Holders.config)
I've realized this can be done accessing the mailSender bean from the context and updating it like is explained here
Changing mail configuration in runtime
However if #rmlan solution finally works it may be a much cleaner solution.
Actually thr rmlan solution works with the following fix. Since the onConfigChange compares hashCode of existing config map and new one, so if you set new configs in original configuration (Holders.config.grails.mail), then both configs are same and it never pass the condition to apply new changes, so a new structure should be created and pass it to notifyOfEvent method to mark the change as different hashCodes.
def mailConfig = [ grails: [ mail: [:] ] ]
mailConfig.grails.mail.host = newHost
mailConfig.grails.mail.port = newPort
Holders.pluginManager.getGrailsPlugin('mail').
notifyOfEvent(GrailsPlugin.EVENT_ON_CONFIG_CHANGE, mailConfig)
Still using async-mail and this one make the below exception
No qualifying bean of type [grails.plugin.mail.MailService] is defined: expected single matching bean but found 2: nonAsynchronousMailService,mailService
that is thrown because of the following part of onConfigChange
event.ctx.getBean(MailService.class).setPoolSize(mailConfig.poolSize?:null)
Commenting it let it works as a workaround, but making sendMail of mail plugin is called, not async-mail, so exception may raise if async-mail features is used on constructing mail. Hence to use async-mail in this workaround should use sendAsynchronousMail method.
I want to link to a method that has the following signature:
public SomeResponse getSomeObjects(#RequestParam(value = "foo", defaultValue = "bar") Foo fooValue)
Now I want the link to look like this:
http://myhost/api/someobjects
I tried using methodOn from Spring HATEOAS's ControllerLinkBuilder as seen below:
discoverResponse.add(linkTo(methodOn(SomeController.class).getSomeObjects(null)).withRel("someobjects"))
But it doesn't lead to the desired link because a ?foo is added at its end. How can I achieve the above objective?
Since backward compatibility is such an issue for you, you could always manually construct your Link objects like so:
discoverResponse.add(new Link(baseUri() + "/someobjects", "someobjects"));
The other option would be to fork Spring HATEOAS on GitHub, build the project yourself, and change the way defaults are handled in ControllerLinkBuilder. I don't really know how you'd expect an out-of-context Link builder to be able to differentiate between whether it should advertise an optional parameter. In the HATEOAS world, if the parameter isn't included, the client doesn't know about it. So why even have the optional parameter?
I know there are 7 years gone now, but I had a similar problem today which lead me here. In spring hateoas 1.1.0 the behavior is slightly different, instead it will generate URI-Templates by default for non-required #RequestParams:
http://myhost/api/someobjects{?foo}
If you don't want them in your link, you can just expand it
Map<String, Object> parameters = new HashMap<>();
parameters.put("foo", null);
link = link.expand(parameters);
It will result in the desired URL
http://myhost/api/someobjects
When we are sending the airbrake error to the airbrake server, by default it includes the controller name and action name.
But the question is that I want to add some extra parameters like username, email of the current user. If anyone has any idea please suggest how to do that?
In my layout application.html:
- if ['development'].include?(Rails.env)
= airbrake_javascript_notifier
= render :partial => 'layouts/airbrake_notifier'
and in the partial I have written:
Airbrake.errorDefaults['name'] = "#{current_user.name}";<br/>
Airbrake.errorDefaults['email'] = "#{current_user.email}";<br/>
Airbrake.errorDefaults['phone'] = "#{current_user.phone}";<br/>
Airbrake.errorDefaults['title'] = "#{current_user.title;<br/>
Not a great solution, but the Airbrake Knowledge Base recommends essentially patching the airbrake gem source of the lib/airbrake/notice.rb file.
def initialize(args)
...
self.parameters = args[:parameters] ||
action_dispatch_params ||
rack_env(:params) ||
{'username' => current_user.name}
It would certainly be better to have this be configurable without patching source.
What I've done instead is simply add a few pieces of data to the session (current_user.name mainly), since session data is sent with the request. I wouldn't do this for more than a few little pieces of data.
We've just added getting current users into the Airbrake Gem.
https://github.com/airbrake/airbrake/wiki/Sending-current-user-information
You'll soon be able to sort by current user in an upcoming redesign of the UI.
Using the Catalyst::Controller::FormBuilder module to handle forms in a Catalyst application.
The documentation says you can set the form_path like this:
form_path => File::Spec->catfile( $c->config->{home}, 'root', 'forms' ),
But the call to config() in my application is at the top level of the base module. Therefore, $c is undefined. So I can't call $c->config->{home}.
What is the proper way to configure form_path please?
You should be able to access configuration values that have already been set from your application's main module using the __PACKAGE__->config hash. Example: __PACKAGE__->config->{home} or __PACKAGE__->config->{'Controller::FormBuilder'}->{form_path}.
If you're trying to set the FormBuilder configuration in your applications main module, you should be able to use the code provided in the documentation and just replace $c->config->{home} with __PACKAGE__->config->{home}. I think they might have even made a mistake by not doing it this way, but I'm not sure.
I'm trying to use Class::DBI with a simple one parent -> may chidren relationships:
Data::Company->table('Companies');
Data::Company->columns(All => qw/CompanyId Name Url/);
Data::Company->has_many(offers => 'Data::Offer'=>'CompanyId'); # =>'CompanyId'
and
Data::Offer->table('Offers');
Data::Offer->columns(All => qw/OfferId CompanyId MonthlyPrice/);
Data::Offer->has_a(company => 'Data::Company'=>'CompanyId');
I try to add a new record:
my $company = Data::Company->insert({ Name => 'Test', Url => 'http://url' });
my $offer = $company->add_to_offers({ MonthlyPrice => 100 });
But I get:
Can't locate object method "add_to_offers" via package "Data::Company"
I looked at the classical Music::CD example, but I cannot figure out what I am doing wrong.
I agree with Manni, if your package declarations are in the same file, then you need to have the class with the has_a() relationship defined first. Otherwise, if they are in different source files, then the documentation states:
Class::DBI should usually be able to
do the right things, as long as all
classes inherit Class::DBI before
'use'ing any other classes.
As to the three-argument form, you are doing it properly. The third arg for has_many() is the column in the foreign class which is a foreign key to this class. That is, Offer has a CompanyId which points to Company's CompanyId.
Thank you
Well, the issue was actually not my code, but my set up. I realized that this morning after powering on my computer:
* Apache + mod_perl on the server
* SMB mount
When I made changes to several files, not all changes seems to be loaded by mod_perl. Restarting Apache solves the issue. I've actually seen this kind of issue in the past where the client and SMB server's time are out of sync.
The code above works fine with 1 file for each module.
Thank you
I really haven't got much experience with Class:DBI, but I'll give this a shot anyway:
The documentation states that: "the class with the has_a() must be defined earlier than the class with the has_many()".
I cannot find any reference to the way you are using has_a and has_many with three arguments which is always 'CompanyId' in your case.