Is there a way under Citrix for my application to make a call to the Citrix host to find out how many copies of my application are presently running? We want to limit this in our license and we need to have a way to verify it in the code.
thanks - dave
No, Citrix XenApp (which is their best-known product and probably the one you are asking about) does not offer any APIs or services that can be used for application license checking.
The closest you could get via Citrix is to use the Powershell SDK and call Get-XASessionProcess to get a process list. The problem with this approach is you need to be a Citrix admin, and it's a fairly round about way of doing this.
If I wanted to implemented a simple concurrent limit for license enforcement I would look at two options:
Implement a simple web-service somewhere that my app talks to, to get a license.
Create a simple Windows service that tracks processes to maintain a count of concurrent instances of your app. When the configured license count is exceeded you could set a flag in a shared memory section in the global namespace. Then in your app you check this flag at startup and exit immediately when it is set.
You could track processes using WMI, e.g.
http://weblogs.asp.net/whaggard/archive/2006/02/11/438006.aspx
Related
I'm a casual and mostly inexperienced LSF user, so please bear with...
I develop software in a corporate setting that submits jobs to LSF for processing. We have a set of machines that we want to use for a specific application but not open up to the public at large for any other usage. There is something in place now that allowsa few specific users access to use the machines. But we also want any user to use them IF they are running a certain application (a shell script that runs a perl script in this case).
I suppose registering the application(s) would be one approach. Another might be to pass a secret/encrypted token or key. Or maybe there are other mechanisms for this.
Is there an LSF based solution for this ?
Thanks
There's a couple of LSF features that can help here. A queue or application profile can have dedicated hosts, and users (the HOSTS and USERS parameters).
Queues can have a job starter to check and reject invalid job commands.
me again..
I had done all the sensu-uchiwa-graphite set up. And i get a new request,:(. Rather than go to change the threshold in check.json file on sensu server..any plugin at the UCHIWA that this adjustment will be shown in Uchiwa dashboard? I asked because in case that my application teams wanna change it by themselves without accessing to server.
I think sensu-admin in enterprise is available but we need to pay big money per year ;(...
Thanks in advance to help.
Sumana W.
This is fairly doable if you use a configuration management system like Chef/Ansible/Puppet - especially if you run standalone checks on the sensu-client.
This allows the clients to define their own thresholds, rather than changing the sensu servers themselves.
See https://sensuapp.org/docs/latest/reference/checks.html#standalone-checks
In this case, the definitions for the checks are sitting on the client servers and they have the choice of their thresholds or configurations. The client itself manages how often to run the check and sends the output back to the server, rather than the server requesting the checks. This helps quite a bit as far as scaling or multitenancy.
The other way to accomplish this, if you are tied to serverside checks, would be to use client attributes (https://sensuapp.org/docs/0.25/reference/checks.html#check-token-substitution)
For example, you can have a cpu check that says something like check-cpu.sh -w :::cpu_warn::: -c :::cpu_critical::: and these come from a cpu_warn and cpu_critical value from the client.json on the client server.
Source: We use sensu extensively in an enterprise environment across thousands of hosts and have been working through these same issues.
I'd like to develop a bunch of SaaS-Applications in Java and I'm not sure wat is the best way to go.
Each Application will have a WAR containing the Webservice and will have at least one Worker-WAR, which is a Thread waiting for new Tasks in the DB to come up and then working off this task. This worker contains the intelligence of the application and uses a lot of cpu. The Webservice gives Users the possibility to add new tasks and other stuff ...
Resource Limitations
The infrastructure must ensure the following:
The Webservice must always get a certain amount of cpu time to be able to respond to the user. So the hungry Worker must not get all cpu time for its working.
Each Tenant has its own worker and they must not interfere with each other as it must be not possible to block the whole system (and all tenants) with a single task.
Resource Sharing
It would be nice to be able to share the resources but always ensure that in extreme situations every worker and webservice gets the required minimum.
Versioning
As new Versions of a application are released each tenant must have the possibility to initiate a update on its own when he adapted to the API-Changes. Furthermore a tenant must be able to keep more than one application-endpoint (lets call them channels) to have a production channel and a beta-channel. In the Beta-Channel the tenant can test againts new versions and when he feels comfortable with the new version he can update his production channel.
User-Management
All applications of a tenant must share a user-Database and have the same way to authenticate.
Environment
I want to use Java EE 7. I would enjoy using Wildfly.
Question
What is the best infrastructure to approach these aims? I want to host this on my own servers.
What I already found
I understand that you cannot limit CPU-usage in a jvm. So the Workers must have their own jvms.
I looked at PaaS-Providers like OpenShift Origin, but it seems that they encourage you to run a application-server per tenant, per application which sounds to me as a resource-eater.
Is there no way to have one Wildfly running and limit the amount cpu-usage per tenant and app?
Thank You
Lukas
When I deployed my site that uses nservice to a new production box, it was unusably slow...
After some debugging I discovered that mqsvc.exe was taking up 50% of the CPU usage and the other 50% was being taken up by w3wp.exe
I found this post here:
http://geekswithblogs.net/michaelstephenson/archive/2010/05/07/139717.aspx
which recommended the following:
Make sure you set the windows service for NserviceBus Generic Host to the right credentials
Make sure you have the queue set with the right permissions
Make sure you turn on the right logging configuration in NServiceBus
So I figured the issue was something related to permissions, but even after trying to set the permissions correctly (I thought) I still wasn't able to resolve the issue.
If you allow NServiceBus to create its own queues, then it will create them with the correct permissions it needs.
The problem comes in when you set up a web application, and then the queues are created, and then the identity the application runs under changes. Then you get exactly this problem. NServiceBus tries to check the queue for a message, it does not have access to do so, so it immediately retries over and over, and you spike the processor.
The fix: Delete the queue. Restart the web application. NServiceBus takes over.
Edit: As noted in the comments, NServiceBus 3.x doesn't invoke the installers by default, which means queues are not automatically created in production unless you ask it to. See the documentation page on Installers for more detail.
For a web application (or any other situation where you're not using NServiceBus.Host) you can invoke the installers as part of the fluent config. There is a full example in the NServiceBus download, but here is a link to the relevant file on GitHub.
The issue did end up being that the website needed to be granted explicit permissions to the queues.
I found a number of resources online telling me this, but I still had to spend a good amount of time monkeying around with exactly WHICH account needed access... turned out that since my application pools were set to run as ApplicationPoolIdentity, I need to grant the account permissions by adding the following account to the nservicebus queue:
IIS AppPool\{APP POOL NAME}
I granted full access rights, though I'm sure you could refine that a bit if you needed to.
Hopefully, this will help anyone who runs into the same issues.
(This is my first attempt at the "Answer your own question" mechanism so please let me know if I am doing something wrong..)
I want to write a workflow application that routes a link to a document. The routing is based upon machines not users because I don't know who will ever be at a given post. For example, I have a form. It is initially filled out in location A. I now want it to go to location B and have them fill out the rest. Finally, it goes to location C where a supervisor will approve it.
None of these locations has a known user. That is I don't know who it will be. I only know that whomever it is is authorized (they are assigned to the workstation and are approved to be there.)
Will Microsoft Windows Workflow do this or do I need to build my own workflow based on SQL Server, IP Addresses, and so forth?
Also, How would the user at a workstation be notified a document had been sent to their machine?
Thanks for any help.
I think if I was approaching this problem workflow would work to do it. It is a state machine you want that has three states:
A Start
B Completing
C Approving
However workflow needs to work in one central place (trust me on this, you only want to have one workflow run time running at once, otherwise the same bit of work can be done multiple times see our questions on MSDN forum). So a central server running the workflow is the answer.
How you present this to the users can be done in multiple ways. Dave suggested using an ASP.NET site to identify the machines that are doing the work, which is probably how I would do it. However you could also write a windows forms client that would do the same thing. This would require using something like SOAP / WCF to facilitate communication between client form applications and the central workflow service. This would have the advantage that you could use a system try icon to alert the user.
You might also want to look at human workflow engines, as they are designed to do things such as this (and more), I'm most familiar with PNMsoft's Sequence
You can design a generic "routing" workflow that will cause data to go to a workstation. The easiest way to do this would be to embed the workflow in an ASP.NET application. Each workstation should visit the application with a workstation ID in the querystring:
http://myapp/default.aspx?wid=01
When the form is filled out at workstation A, the workflow running in the web app can enter it into the "work bin" of the next workstation. Anyone sitting at the computer for which the form is destined will see it appear in their list of forms to review. You can use AJAX to make it slick and auto-updating.