In a play 2.1 application I have the following code (it's just a request wrapper that gets rid of any trailing slash):
class NormalizedRequest(request: RequestHeader) extends RequestHeader {
val headers = request.headers
val id = request.id
val method = request.method
val queryString = request.queryString
val remoteAddress = request.remoteAddress
val tags = request.tags
val version = request.version
// strip first part of path and uri if it matches http.path config
val path = if (request.path == "/") "/" else request.path.stripSuffix("/")
val uri = path + {
if(request.rawQueryString == "") ""
else "?" + request.rawQueryString
}
}
object NormalizedRequest {
def apply(request: RequestHeader) = new NormalizedRequest(request)
}
This kind of code is pretty common, you just wrap an object inside another
I was wondering if there's an easier way to acomplish it, ideally it would be something like (pseudo code inspired on case classes):
object NormalizedRequest {
def apply(request: RequestHeader) = {
val path = if (request.path == "/") "/" else request.path.stripSuffix("/")
val uri = path + {
if(request.rawQueryString == "") ""
else "?" + request.rawQueryString
}
request.copy(path = path, uri = uri)
}
}
If I understand correctly, you're asking for a more concise version of the Decorator pattern in scala. You still need your "wrapper" to be the same type as you inner class (by extending it or a common base/trait) in order to be able to pass it over to some function that expects to receive an instance of the inner class (or of the common base/trait).
What you wrote in your pseudo code is actually almost legal scala, you just have to change the definition of apply in NormalizedRequest to return an anonymous class that extends RequestHeader.
I.e. instead of
class NormalizedRequest(request: RequestHeader) extends RequestHeader {
//.... "decorated" logic here
}
object NormalizedRequest {
def apply(request: RequestHeader) = new NormalizedRequest(request)
}
you would have
object NormalizedRequest {
def apply(request: RequestHeader) = new RequestHeader {
// ...
// instead of having a separate NormalizedRequest class
// define its behaviour here in anonymous form
}
}
A simplified example:
// our inner class and companion object
// (a simplified version of your RequestHeader)
class Inner() {def test="hello"}; object Inner {
def apply() = new Inner()
}
// our wrapper
object Outer {
def apply(inner: Inner) = new Inner {
override def test=inner.test + "!"
}
}
however, although it saves you a few keystrokes, I really think you would lose in readability.
Related
I have a HelperMethod class.
class HelperMethods {
def getUniqueID(): UUID = {
UUID.randomUUID()
}
def bucketIDFromEmail(email:String): Int = {
val bucketID= email(0).toInt
println("returning id "+bucketID+" for name "+email)
bucketID
}
}
And an object which has an instance of HelperMethods
package object utilities{
private val helper = new HelperMethods()
def getUniqueID(): UUID = helper.getUniqueID()
def bucketIDFromEmail(email:String): Int = helper.bucketIDFromEmail(email)
}
I wrote a spec to test that my mock works correctly.
class UserControllerUnitSpec extends PlaySpec {
val mockHelperMethods = mock(classOf[HelperMethods])
when(mockHelperMethods.getUniqueID()).thenReturn(UUID.fromString("87ea52b7-0a70-438f-81ff-b69ab9e57210"))
when(mockHelperMethods.bucketIDFromEmail(ArgumentMatchers.any[String])).thenReturn(1)
"mocking helper class " should {
"work" in {
val bucketId = utilities.bucketIDFromEmail("t#t.com")
println("user keys are " + userKeys)
val id: UUID = utilities.getUniqueID()
println("got id " + userKeys)
bucketId mustBe 1
id mustBe UUID.fromString("87ea52b7-0a70-438f-81ff-b69ab9e57210")
}
}
}
the test fails with reason 116 was not equal to 1. This corresponds to line
bucketId mustBe 1 in the spec. I can see the print returning id 116 for name t#t.com. I shouldn't see it as I am trying to mock this class. I suspect that it could be because the utilities object is getting created before the statement val mockHelperMethods = mock(classOf[HelperMethods]) in the spec.
Question 2- Is there a way to mock HelperMethods and make utilities use the mocked class?
You have mocked HelperMethods but not utilities.
Question 2- Is there a way to mock HelperMethods and make utilities use the mocked class?
It is not possible to mock an object.
If you want, you have to extract the behavior in a trait.
Here is a solution that would work:
package utils
// move the behavior to a trait:
trait UtitilitiesTrait {
private[utils] def helper = new HelperMethods()
def getUniqueID(): UUID = helper.getUniqueID()
def bucketIDFromEmail(email: String): Int = helper.bucketIDFromEmail(email)
}
// provide an object for real use
object Utilities extends UtitilitiesTrait
// override helper for test mock
object TestUtilities extends UtitilitiesTrait {
private[utils] override def helper = mock(classOf[HelperMethods])
}
And here is your test:
class UserControllerUnitSpec extends PlaySpec {
val mockHelperMethods = mock(classOf[HelperMethods])
object TestUtilities extends UtitilitiesTrait {
private[utils] override def helper = mockHelperMethods
}
when(mockHelperMethods.getUniqueID()).thenReturn(UUID.fromString("87ea52b7-0a70-438f-81ff-b69ab9e57210"))
when(mockHelperMethods.bucketIDFromEmail(ArgumentMatchers.any[String])).thenReturn(1)
"mocking helper class " should {
"work" in {
val bucketId = TestUtilities.bucketIDFromEmail("t#t.com")
println("user keys are " + userKeys)
val id: UUID = TestUtilities.getUniqueID()
println("got id " + userKeys)
bucketId mustBe 1
id mustBe UUID.fromString("87ea52b7-0a70-438f-81ff-b69ab9e57210")
}
}
}
The typical pattern that enables mocking objects used internally is to inject them, or at least provide a way to inject an alternate.
Since Utilities is an object, you can't inject using a constructor. You could still introduce a setter method.
If you'd like to discourage use of the setter for anything other than unit tests, make it package-private, and you might also prefix the name with "qa":
private[utils] def qaSetHelperMethods(qaHelper: HelperMethods): Unit
I'm trying to build a generic router for a personal project by Binding.scala.
I've defined a PageState trait
sealed trait WhistState {
def text: String
def hash: String
def render: Binding[Node]
}
with a number of subclasses for each route type. I've then trying to create a router, which based on the hash chooses the correct class.
object Router {
val defaultState: WhistState = DefaultState("Games")
val allStates: Vector[WhistState] = Vector(defaultState)
val route: Route.Hash[WhistState] = Route.Hash[WhistState](defaultState)(new Route.Format[WhistState] {
override def unapply(hashText: String): Option[WhistState] = allStates.find(_.hash == window.location.hash)
override def apply(state: WhistState): String = state.hash
})
route.watch()
}
And then I'm my application classes im trying to use this
object Application {
import example.route.Router._
#dom
def render: Binding[Node] = {
for (hash <- route.state.bind.hash) yield println("hash: " + hash)
route.state.bind match {
case default: WhistState => println("default"); default.render.bind
case _ => println("none"); <div>NotFound</div>
}
}
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
dom.render(document.querySelector("#content"), render)
}
}
I've would expect that changing the hash would force a reevaluation of route.state.bind match ... expression.
Any idea to why this doesn't work?
Best regards
route.state is only changed when unapply returns a Some(newState) and newState does not equal to the previous state.
In your case, unapply always returns Some(defaultState) or None. That's why route.state never changes.
I'm trying to come up with a CSV Parser that can be called like this:
parser parse "/path/to/csv/file" using parserConfiguration
Where the parser will be a class that contains the target case class into which the CSV file will be parsed into:
class CSVParser[A] {
def parse(path: String) = Source.fromFile(fromFilePath).getLines().mkString("\n")
def using(cfg: ParserConfig) = ??? How do I chain this optionally???
}
val parser = CSVParser[SomeCaseClass]
I managed to get up to the point where I can call:
parser parse "/the/path/to/the/csv/file/"
But I do not want to run the parse method yet as I want to apply the configuration using the using like DSL as mentioned above! So there are two rules here. If the caller does not supply a parserConfig, I should be able to run with the default, but if the user supplies a parserConfig, I want to apply the config and then run the parse method. I tried it with a combination of implicits, but could not get them to work properly!
Any suggestions?
EDIT: So the solution looks like this as per comments from "Cyrille Corpet":
class CSVReader[A] {
def parse(path: String) = ReaderWithFile[A](path)
case class ReaderWithFile[A](path: String) {
def using(cfg: CSVParserConfig): Seq[A] = {
val lines = Source.fromFile(path).getLines().mkString("\n")
println(lines)
println(cfg)
null
}
}
object ReaderWithFile {
implicit def parser2parsed[A](parser: ReaderWithFile[A]): Seq[A] = parser.using(defaultParserCfg)
}
}
object CSVReader extends App {
def parser[A] = new CSVReader[A]
val sss: Seq[A] = parser parse "/csv-parser/test.csv" // assign this to a val so that the implicit conversion gets applied!! Very important to note!
}
I guess I need to get the implicit in scope at the location where I call the parser parse, but at the same time I do not want to mess up the structure that I have above!
If you replace using with an operator with a higher precedence than parse you can get it to work without needing extra type annotations. Take for instance <<:
object parsedsl {
class ParserConfig
object ParserConfig {
val default = new ParserConfig
}
case class ParseUnit(path: String, config: ParserConfig)
object ParseUnit {
implicit def path2PU(path: String) = ParseUnit(path, ParserConfig.default)
}
implicit class ConfigSyntax(path: String) {
def <<(config: ParserConfig) = ParseUnit(path, config)
}
class CSVParser {
def parse(pu: ParseUnit) = "parsing"
}
}
import parsedsl._
val parser = new CSVParser
parser parse "path" << ParserConfig.default
parser parse "path"
Your parse method should just give a partial result, without doing anything at all. To deal with default implem, you can use implicit conversion to output type:
class CSVParser[A] {
def parse(path: String) = ParserWithFile[A](path)
}
case class ParserWithFile[A](path: String) {
def using(cfg: ParserConfig): A = ???
}
object ParserWithFile {
implicit def parser2parsed[A](parser: ParserWithFile[A]): A = parser.using(ParserConfig.default)
}
val parser = CSVParser[SomeCaseClass]
Need to extract tokens and fixed text. Example:
"Hello {token1} today's date is {token2} would you like to call {token3}"
would return
FixedPart("Hello ")
TokenPart(token1)
FixedPart(" today's date is ")
TokenPart(token2)
FixedPart(" would you like to call ")
TokenPart(token3)
Here is naive implementation
import org.parboiled2.ParserInput
import org.parboiled2.Parser
import org.parboiled2.CharPredicate
sealed trait Part
case class TokenPart(tokenName : String ) extends Part
case class FixedPart( text : String ) extends Part
class MyParser(val input: ParserInput) extends Parser {
def Token = rule { '{' ~ capture(TokenName) ~> (TokenPart(_)) ~'}' }
//how this should be implemented??
def NotToken = rule { capture (!Token) ~>(FixedPart(_) )}
def TokenName = rule { CharPredicate.Alpha ~ oneOrMore (CharPredicate.AlphaNum) }
// This would not work
def TokenNotToken = rule { (Token|NotToken) }
def InputLine = rule { zeroOrMore (TokenNotToken) }
}
object MyParser {
def main(args: Array[String]) {
val res = new MyParser("Hello {token1} today's date is {token2} would you like to call {token3}").InputLine.run() // Success
println( res )
}
}
Any other to implement this ??
Hi I modified your code and added some comments (I hope they will be helpful), so it works, and (I guess) does what you wanted it to do:
import org.parboiled2.ParserInput
import org.parboiled2.Parser
import org.parboiled2.CharPredicate
sealed trait Token
case class TokenPart(tokenName : String) extends Token
case class StringToken(text: String) extends Token
// I moved pre-evaluated char predicates to the companion
// you may leave them inside the class if you want.
// I also moved literals like startToken and endToken here
object TokenExtractor {
val AlphaChar = CharPredicate.Alpha
val AlphaNum = CharPredicate.AlphaNum
val startToken = "{"
val endToken = "}"
}
class TokenExtractor(val input: ParserInput) extends Parser {
import TokenExtractor._
// may be you wanted zero or more? Anyway in this case
// shortcut can play nice here. In fact, if you want to stick
// with oneOrMore you can user AlphaNum.+ instead
def TokenName = rule {
AlphaChar ~ AlphaNum.*
}
// There's a shortcut for Extraction syntax. If you are extracting
// data to the case class and Rule arguments match the number of
// items in the case class's apply method
// you can simply give a name of this case class:
// the extraction operator '~>' should be located at the end of the
// from the official documtation:
// https://github.com/sirthias/parboiled2
// One more very useful feature is special support for
// case class instance creation:
//
// case class Person(name: String, age: Int)
// (foo: Rule2[String, Int]) ~> Person
//
def Token = rule {
startToken ~ capture(TokenName) ~ endToken ~> TokenPart
}
// the text should follow until the parser will meet the
// enclosing '{' character. Disclosing is not mandatory :)
def Text = rule {
oneOrMore(noneOf(startToken))
}
// Here we're capturing a data that matches
// pre-defined rule (in our case Text)
def TextString = rule {
capture(Text) ~> StringToken
}
def TextPart = rule {
TextString | Token
}
// EOI is mandatory. Parser is greedy, so it tells the parser
// where parsing procedure must end, so please, add it at the
// end of the input
def InputLine = rule {
zeroOrMore(TextPart) ~ EOI
}
}
object Main {
def main(args: Array[String]) {
val example =
"Hello {token1} today's date is {token2} would you like to call {token3}"
// parser input can be string, so put it inside the constructor
val result = new TokenExtractor(example).InputLine.run()
println(result)
}
}
I am making a simple snippet that should pass a Box[String] with the requests user-agent to a helper class that passes back the css classes that should be added to the html element. I am doing this since it seems tricky to get Lift to supply a html respons with conditional comments like those in html5boilerplate. This is what I have now and it works:
class LiftBoilerplate {
def render = "html [class+]" #> getClassForUserAgent(S.request)
private def getClassForUserAgent(request:Box[Req]) = request match {
case Full(r) => LiftBoilerplateHelper.getHtmlClass(r.userAgent)
case _ => ""
}
}
My problem is that I'd like to write a unit test for this like:
object LiftBoilerplateSpecs extends Specification {
val session = new LiftSession("", randomString(20), Empty)
"LiftBoilerplate" should {
"add 'no-js' to the class of an html tag element" in {
val snippet = new LiftBoilerplate
val result = snippet.render(<html><head></head><body>test</body></html>)
result must ==/(<html class="no-js"><head></head><body>test</body></html>)
}
}
}
This test fails since S.request is Empty. What should I do to supply the snippet with a mocked request with a userAgent in it?
So far I have looked at http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/wiki/Unit_Testing_Snippets_With_A_Logged_In_User
and
http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/wiki/Mocking_HTTP_Requests
but I do not understand how to achive my goal.
To make the request and apply it automatically in each test example you will need to use the Trait AroundExample to wrap each test in a S.init call:
object LiftBoilerplateSpecs extends Specification with AroundExample {
val session = new LiftSession("", randomString(20), Empty)
def makeReq = {
val mockRequest = new MockHttpServletRequest("http://localhost")
mockRequest.headers = Map("User-Agent" -> List("Safari"))
new Req(Req.NilPath, "", GetRequest, Empty, new HTTPRequestServlet(mockRequest, null),
System.nanoTime, System.nanoTime, false,
() => ParamCalcInfo(Nil, Map(), Nil, Empty), Map())
}
def around[T <% Result](t: => T) = S.init(makeReq, session)(t)
"LiftBoilerplate" should {
"add 'no-js' to the class of an html tag element" in {
val snippet = new LiftBoilerplate
val result = snippet.render(<html><head></head><body>test</body></html>)
result must ==/(<html class="no-js"><head></head><body>test</body></html>)
}
}
}