I am currently successfully using a CASE expression to update an empty column based on attributes from other columns. For example
UPDATE table SET cat = CASE
WHEN term = '{"Boulder"}' then 'Boulder'
However, I need to do the same but on an text array and particularly when an element is in a specific position within that array.
For example if the data looks like
{"Boulder, Tree, Bush"}
WHEN position('Tree' in term) > 0 then 'Boulder'
But I receive an error message
function pg_catalog.position(character varying[], unknown) does not exist
I have used position in a function before so I am not sure why PostgreSQL does not like it in this situation.
Is there a way to using a CASE expression whilst determining the position of a text element within an array.
Apparently your term column is defined as an array, e.g. varchar[]. The position function only works with scalar values, not with arrays.
If you want to test if an element is contained in an array you need to use a different operator: #>
update foobar
set cat = 'Boulder'
where term #> '{"Boulder"}'
The expression '{"Boulder"}' creates an array with a single element. It's equivalent to array['Boulder'] (which I find more readable). So the above where condition updates all rows where the array term contains all elements of the array on the right hand side of the operator. In this case it's only a single element you are testing for.
More details about the array functions and operators can be found in the manual: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-array.html
Edit after the requirements have changed
To find and update only those where boulder is in the first, second or third place, you can use this:
update foobar
set cat = 'Boulder'
where 'Boulder' in (term[1], term[2], term[3]);
Related
I have the following string: WhatsappAutoResponse+landing+redirectFrom1206+redirectFrom1352
My goal is to extract the numbers after the substrings +redirectfrom and store that in an array, like this: [1206, 1352]
I managed to do the following:
The function split_to_array separates the string in parts. The numbers I'm looking for are the 2nd and 3rd elements in the array. I don't want the first element.
select split_to_array('WhatsappAutoResponse+landing+redirectFrom1206+redirectFrom1352', '+redirectFrom');
Result: ["WhatsappAutoResponse+landing","1206","1352"]
I get rid of the 1st element using the subarray function:
select subarray(split_to_array('WhatsappAutoResponse+landing+redirectFrom1206+redirectFrom1352', '+redirectFrom'),1,2);
Result: ["1206","1352"]
Almost there! However, I'm getting an array of strings, but I need an array of integers. I couldn't find a way to cast values inside an array, like in array::int
Is there any way to solve this?
I have the following list of the object:
"animals":[
{
"family":"cat",
"color":"grey"
},
{
"family":"dog",
"color":"white"
}
]
I want to access first animal object that is in dog family and white color. I am trying to achieve it by doing this:
animals[family = "dog" and color = "white"][0]
But it shows warning as follows:
FEEL WARN while evaluating literal expression 'animals[ family = .... [string clipped after 50 chars, total length is 82]': Index out of bound: list of 1 elements, index 0; will evaluate as FEEL null
What exactly is incorrect here? I feel I am doing wrong something semantically. I also referred FEEL's specification but am unable to figure out what's wrong. I also referred dmn decision modeling documentation for DMN from Redhat but still I am clueless. Please help.
In FEEL, the list's elements index starts at 1.
So the expression you want to access first animal object, actually is:
animals[family = "dog" and color = "white"][1]
This is documented in the DMN specification at page 126:
The first element of a list L can be accessed using L[1] and the last
element can be accessed using L[-1].
To provide a more friendly reference, this is also documented in Drools documentation
Elements in a list can be accessed by index, where the first element
is 1. Negative indexes can access elements starting from the end of
the list so that -1 is the last element.
...and equivalently for the productized Red Hat documentation version as well:
In my code, I have a structure and in a field of it, I want to sort its values.
For instance, in the field of File_Neg.name there are the following values, and They should be sorted as the right values.
File_Neg.name --> Sorted File_Neg.name
'-10.000000.dcm' '-10.000000.dcm'
'-102.500000.dcm' '-12.500000.dcm'
'-100.000000.dcm' '-100.000000.dcm'
'-107.500000.dcm' '-102.500000.dcm'
'-112.500000.dcm' '-107.500000.dcm'
'-110.000000.dcm '-110.000000.dcm'
'-12.500000.dcm' '-112.500000.dcm'
There is a folder that there are some pictures with negative labels in it (above example are labels of pictures). I want to get them in the same order as present in the folder(that's mean the Sorted File_Neg.name). But when running the following code the values of Files_Neg.name load as the above example (left: File_Neg.name), while I want the right form.
I have also seen this and that but they didn't help me.
How to sort values of a field in a structure in Matlab?
Files_Neg = dir('D:\Rename-RealN');
File_Neg = dir(strcat('D:\Rename-RealN\', Files_Neg.name, '\', '*.dcm'));
% when running the code the values of Files_Neg.name load as the above example (left: File_Neg.name)
File_Neg.name:
This answer to one of the questions linked in the OP is nearly correct for the problem in the OP. There are two issues:
The first issue is that the answer assumes a scalar value is contained in the field to be sorted, whereas in the OP the values are char arrays (i.e. old-fashioned strings).
This issue can be fixed by adding 'UniformOutput',false to the arrayfun call:
File_Neg = struct('name',{'-10.000000.dcm','-102.500000.dcm','-100.000000.dcm','-107.500000.dcm','-112.500000.dcm','-110.000000.dcm','-12.500000.dcm'},...
'folder',{'a','b','c','d','e1','e2','e3'});
[~,I] = sort(arrayfun(#(x)x.name,File_Neg,'UniformOutput',false));
File_Neg = File_Neg(I);
File_Neg is now sorted according to dictionary sort (using ASCII letter ordering, meaning that uppercase letters come first, and 110 still comes before 12).
The second issue is that OP wants to sort according to the magnitude of the number in the file name, not using dictionary sort. This can be fixed by extracting the value in the anonymous function applied using arrayfun. We use str2double on the file name, minus the last 4 characters '.dcm':
[~,I] = sort(arrayfun(#(x)abs(str2double(x.name(1:end-4))),File_Neg));
File_Neg = File_Neg(I);
Funnily enough, we don't want to use 'UniformOutput',false any more, since the anonymous function now returns a scalar value.
I've research this topic extensibly and I'm asking as a last resort before assuming that there is no wildcard for what I want to do.
I need to pull up all the text input elements from the document and add it to an array. However, I only want to add the input elements that have an id.
I know you can use the \S* wildcard when using an id selector such as $(#\S*), however I can't use this because I need to filter the results by text type only as well, so I searching by attribute.
I currently have this:
values_inputs = $("input[type='text'][id^='a']");
This works how I want it to but it brings back only the text input elements that start with an 'a'. I want to get all the text input elements with an 'id' of anything.
I can't use:
values_inputs = $("input[type='text'][id^='']"); //or
values_inputs = $("input[type='text'][id^='*']"); //or
values_inputs = $("input[type='text'][id^='\\S*']"); //or
values_inputs = $("input[type='text'][id^=\\S*]");
//I either get no values returned or a syntax error for these
I guess I'm just looking for the equivalent of * in SQL for JQuery attribute selectors.
Is there no such thing, or am I just approaching this problem the wrong way?
Actually, it's quite simple:
var values_inputs = $("input[type=text][id]");
Your logic is a bit ambiguous. I believe you don't want elements with any id, but rather elements where id does not equal an empty string. Use this.
values_inputs = $("input[type='text']")
.filter(function() {
return this.id != '';
});
Try changing your selector to:
$("input[type='text'][id]")
I figured out another way to use wild cards very simply. This helped me a lot so I thought I'd share it.
You can use attribute wildcards in the selectors in the following way to emulate the use of '*'. Let's say you have dynamically generated form in which elements are created with the same naming convention except for dynamically changing digits representing the index:
id='part_x_name' //where x represents a digit
If you want to retrieve only the text input ones that have certain parts of the id name and element type you can do the following:
var inputs = $("input[type='text'][id^='part_'][id$='_name']");
and voila, it will retrieve all the text input elements that have "part_" in the beginning of the id string and "_name" at the end of the string. If you have something like
id='part_x_name_y' // again x and y representing digits
you could do:
var inputs = $("input[type='text'][id^='part_'][id*='_name_']"); //the *= operator means that it will retrieve this part of the string from anywhere where it appears in the string.
Depending on what the names of other id's are it may start to get a little trickier if other element id's have similar naming conventions in your document. You may have to get a little more creative in specifying your wildcards. In most common cases this will be enough to get what you need.
I am trying to reference an element buried within a structure that I did not create (hence I don't know the exact way in which it was built).
Having loaded the structure, if I type:
dataFile.RECORDINGS.eye
I receive the following output:
ans =
2
ans =
2
Both of those variables will always be the same, but they could be at any time 1, 2 or 3. What I'd like to do is check with a switch statement which looks like this:
switch dataFile.RECORDINGS.eye
case {1, 2}
% action A
case 3
% action B
end
Of course, the above throws up an error because 'case' cannot check whether dataFile.RECORDINGS.eye contains a given value since there are two elements stored under that address. So, my question is: how do I reference just one of the elements? I thought it would be as simple as replacing the first line with:
switch dataFile.RECORDINGS.eye(1)
...But, this gives the error:
??? Field reference for multiple structure elements that is followed by more reference blocks is an error.
Similarly, I can't access the element like this:
switch dataFile.RECORDINGS.eye.1
...As I get the following error:
??? Dot name reference on non-scalar structure.
If the values are really always the same, you can try the following to get a scalar that can be used in the switch command:
unique([dataFile.RECORDINGS.eye])
By the way, did you try to index RECORDINGS, i.e.,
dataFile.RECORDINGS(1).eye
dataFile.RECORDINGS(2).eye
Perhaps instead of eye having multiple elements, you have multiple elements of RECORDINGS that each have a single value of eye? You might want dataFile.RECORDINGS(1).eye or dataFile.RECORDINGS(2).eye.