I'm trying to understand why the free shipping cartrule I just created doesn't work on all the available shipping methods.
I have one shipping method that becomes free, and the other (socolissimoflexibilite) doesn't change.
Could someone give me a hint, explanation, or some config/data/code to check on socolissimoflexibilite shipping method?
My first investigations lead me to the sales/quote_address_rate collection: one rate is well changed to 0.00€, but not the other.
I also checked the quote shipping address: its free_shipping field is set to 1.
Ok I found the answer :
We had a module (socolissimoflexibilite) extending the module socolissimosimplicite.
socolissimoflexibilite rewrites the collectRates() function, and freeShipping isn't supported anymore. I had to rewrite this part by myself.
For people getting the same issues with this module, here is the trick :
In Addonline_SoColissimoFlexibilite_Model_Carrier_ShippingMethod class, the collectRates() function must be replaced with this code :
public function collectRates(Mage_Shipping_Model_Rate_Request $request)
{
$rates = parent::collectRates($request);
$shippingAddress = Mage::getSingleton('checkout/session')->getQuote()->getShippingAddress();
if ($shippingAddress && $shippingAddress->getData('soco_product_code') == 'RDV') {
foreach ($rates->getAllRates() as $rate) {
if ($rate->getCarrier()===$this->_code) {
$rate->setPrice($rate->getPrice()+(int)Mage::getStoreConfig('carriers/socolissimoflexibilite/rdv_fees'));
}
}
}
if($shippingAddress->getFreeShipping()) {
foreach ($rates->getAllRates() as $rate) {
if($rate->getCarrier() === $this->_code) {
$rate->setPrice(0) ;
$rate->setCost(0) ;
}
}
}
return $rates;
}
And now, freeShipping rules will be supported by socolissimoflexibilite !
Related
Via a logic hook I'm trying to update fields of my products, after an invoice has been saved.
What I understand so far is, that I need to get the invoice related AOS_Products_Quotes and from there I could get the products, update the required fields and save the products. Does that sound about right?
The logic hook is being triggered but relationships won't load.
function decrement_stocks ( $bean, $event, $arguments) {
//$bean->product_value_c = $bean->$product_unit_price * $bean->product_qty;
$file = 'custom/modules/AOS_Invoices/decrement.txt';
// Get the Invoice ID:
$sInvoiceID = $bean->id;
$oInvoice = new AOS_Invoices();
$oInvoice->retrieve($sInvoiceID);
$oInvoice->load_relationship('aos_invoices_aos_product_quotes');
$aProductQuotes = $oInvoice->aos_invoices_aos_product_quotes->getBeans();
/*
$aLineItemslist = array();
foreach ($oInvoice->aos_invoices_aos_product_quotes->getBeans() as $lineitem) {
$aLineItemslist[$lineitem->id] = $lineitem;
}
*/
$sBean = var_export($bean, true);
$sInvoice = var_export($oInvoice, true);
$sProductQuotes = var_export($aProductQuotes, true);
$current = $sProductQuotes . "\n\n\n------\n\n\n" . $sInvoice . "\n\n\n------\n\n\n" . $sBean;
file_put_contents($file, $current);
}
The invoice is being retrieved just fine. But either load_relationship isn't doing anything ($sInvoice isn't changing with or without it) and $aProductQuotes is Null.
I'm working on SuiteCRM 7.8.3 and tried it on 7.9.1 as well without success. What am I doing wrong?
I'm not familiar with SuiteCRM specifics, however I'd always suggest to check:
Return value of retrieve(): bean or null?
If null, then no bean with the given ID was found.
In such case $oInvoice would stay empty (Your comment suggests that's not the case here though)
Return value of load_relationship(): true (success) or false (failure, check logs)
And I do wonder, why don't you use $bean?
Instead you seem to receive another copy/reference of $bean (and calling it $oInvoice)? Why?
Or did you mean to receive a different type bean that is somehow connected to $bean?
Then its surely doesn't have the same id as $bean, unless you specifically coded it that way.
I am using Codeigniter 3.x form validation callback method in combination trim and required to validate a field.
The problem is, when I pipe them: trim|required|callback_some_method, the callback method seems to take precedence over trim and required and shows its error message.
Any ideas on this?
EDIT:
This is the rule:
$this->form_validation->set_rules('new_password', 'New Password', 'trim|required|min_length[8]|callback_password_check');
And this is the password_check method:
function password_check($pwd) {
$containsLetterUC = preg_match('/[A-Z]/', $pwd);
$containsLetterLC = preg_match('/[a-z]/', $pwd);
$containsDigit = preg_match('/\d/', $pwd);
$containsSpecial = preg_match('/[^a-zA-Z\d]/', $pwd);
if ( !($containsLetterUC && $containsLetterLC && $containsDigit && $containsSpecial) ) {
$this->form_validation->set_message('password_check', '{field} must contain UPPERCASE and lowercase letters, digits, and special characters.');
return FALSE;
}
return TRUE;
}
The method should return FALSE, but as long as required is before my custom rule and the field is empty, it should stop there with Required field message, NOT the custom method message.
Okay guys, I've managed to solve it by extending the Form_validation library, putting my callback method there and piping as the other rules (without callback_ prefix).
Unfortunately, as described in the code from CI, callbacks validation rules are always verified first, prior to ‘required’ for instance.
There is an official issue opened at CI : https://github.com/bcit-ci/CodeIgniter/issues/5077
I know I can configure tt_news to automatically set author and email to a given value, like this:
TCAdefaults.tt_news.author = full name
TCAdefaults.tt_news.author_email = name#domain.tld
But could I retrieve the name an email from the info of the currently logged BE user instead?
To meake it possible to fill the values on every change (if empty), you need to register a hook somewhere ie, in your own extension
typo3conf/ext/yourext/hooks/class.tx_ttnews_hooks.php
class tx_ttnews_hooks {
// hook for prefilling TCA values
function getSingleField_preProcess($table, $field, &$row, $altName, $palette, $extra, $pal, $pObj) {
switch($field) {
case 'author_email':
if($row[$field] == '') {
$row[$field] = $GLOBALS['BE_USER']->user['email'];
}
break;
case 'author':
if($row[$field] == '') {
$row[$field] = $GLOBALS['BE_USER']->user['realName'];
}
break;
}
}
}
and then add this into typo3conf/ext/yourext/ext_localconf.php:
$TYPO3_CONF_VARS['SC_OPTIONS']['t3lib/class.t3lib_tceforms.php']['getSingleFieldClass'][]
= 'EXT:yourext/hooks/class.tx_ttnews_hooks.php:tx_ttnews_hooks';
There is an extension that does what you want. I haven't used it myself, but the description sounds pretty promising.
As another solution, you may write a little bit of php code that adds a dynamic user ts. I only found an example in German, but maybe that's helpful anyway.
I'm trying to use Yahoo Local Search in a Kynetx Application.
ruleset avogadro {
meta {
name "yahoo-local-ruleset"
description "use results from Yahoo local search"
author "randall bohn"
key yahoo_local "get-your-own-key"
}
dispatch { domain "example.com"}
global {
datasource local:XML <- "http://local.yahooapis.com/LocalSearchService/V3/localsearch";
}
rule add_list {
select when pageview ".*" setting ()
pre {
ds = datasource:local("?appid=#{keys:yahoo_local()}&query=pizza&zip=#{zip}&results=5");
rs = ds.pick("$..Result");
}
append("body","<ul id='my_list'></ul>");
always {
set ent:pizza rs;
}
}
rule add_results {
select when pageview ".*" setting ()
foreach ent:pizza setting pizza
pre {
title = pizza.pick("$..Title");
}
append("#my_list", "<li>#{title}</li>");
}
}
The list I wind up with is
. [object Object]
and 'title' has
{'$t' => 'Pizza Shop 1'}
I can't figure out how to get just the title. It looks like the 'text content' from the original XML file turns into {'$t' => 'text content'} and the '$t' give problems to pick().
When XML datasources and datasets get converted into JSON, the text value within an XML node gets assigned to $t. You can pick the text of the title by changing your pick statement in the pre block to
title = pizza.pick("$..Title.$t");
Try that and see if that solves your problem.
Side notes on things not related to your question to consider:
1) Thank you for sharing the entire ruleset, what problem you were seeing and what you expected. Made answering your question much easier.
2) The ruleset identifier should not be changed from what AppBuilder or the command-line gem generate for you. Your identifier that is currently
ruleset avogadro {
should look something more like
ruleset a60x304 {
3) You don't need the
setting ()
in the select statement unless you have a capture group in your regular expression
Turns out that pick("$..Title.$t") does work. It looks funny but it works. Less funny than a clown hat I guess.
name = pizza.pick("$..Title.$t");
city = pizza.pick("$..City.$t");
phone = pizza.pick("$..Phone.$t");
list_item = "<li>#{name}/#{city} #{phone}</li>"
Wish I had some pizza right now!
I have been looking at a couple of books and resources on domain specific languages.
I think I want to build an internal DSL in Scala.
def instrument = new FXInstrument {
provider = "EuroBase"
instrumentOrders = List(
new FXOrder {
baseCcy = "GBP"
termCcy = "EUR"
legs = List(
new FXLeg {
amountPrice = 100000.0
spotPrice = 1.56
requirements = List(
new FXRequirement {
baseCcy="GBP" termCcy="EUR"
settlement="Banker Rain"
}
)
},
new FXLeg {
amountPrice = 200000.0
spotPrice = 1.50
requirements = List(
new FXRequirement {
baseCcy="GBP" termCcy="EUR"
settlement="Banker Sunny"
}
)
}
)
}
}
Such that following asserts are valid:
instrument.orders(0).baseCcy should equal ("GBP")
instrument.orders(0).termCcy should equal ("EUR")
instrument.orders(0).legs(0).amountPrice should equal 100000.0
instrument.orders(0).legs(0).spotPrice should equal 1.56
instrument.orders(0).legs(1).amountPrice should equal 200000.0
instrument.orders(0).legs(1).spotPrice should equal 1.50
instrument.orders(0).legs(0).requirements(0).settlement should equal "Banker Rain"
instrument.orders(0).legs(1).requirements(0).settlement should equal "Banker Sunny"
I just do not know quite how to implement the domain specific language as an internal representation
1) new FXOrder() { /closure/ }
I like this syntax, is it good or should I prefer companion objects.
For instance I can quickly introduce other FX types easy.
2) I want to use "peers" such FXOrder is a scala.Proxy mixee, thus it uses the trait Proxy (mixin)
For example ``instrument.peer'' gives the internal peer Java Object of the third party proprietary API (a well known financial services trading system, can you guess?)
Ditto for
instrument.orders(0).peer
instrument.orders(0).legs(0).peer
instrument.orders(0).legs(0).requirements(0).peer
and so on.
I realise that domain specific language is not as simple as I thought, however some pointers on this above, would be really be useful. I would appreciate your responses. Ta!
PP
I haven't considered what you want yet, but I saw a problem:
1) new FXOrder() { /closure/ }
No, it doesn't work that way. When you follow an initialization (new Something) with a block, you are doing anonymous subclassing. What you are actually doing is new FXOrder() { /constructor, methods, getters and setters/ }.
Maybe, this can help you: DSL in Scala