Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
Whats the best way to organize code in Rebol?
(Rebol2, not Rebol3. Rebol3 will have import, as it seems.)
Is the do %myfunctions.r-style all that is needed? There is no real package statement like in Java, or #include like in C?
Do community-approved naming conventions exist?
Could http://www.rebol.it/power-mezz/mezz/module.html be considered a standard?
I read somewhere that I could build my own module system as well. But this seems not like a sensible approach to me.
Is this discussion doomed as Rebol3 will be finished soon? ;-)
Some subjects I know use my include.r, released under Apache 2.0 now. It is not a module system but you may find it useful.
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 4 days ago.
Improve this question
While trying to replace some functionality in AOSP with something more suitable I got stuck in the mess of the Soong documentation. It seems, that there is some better edited documentation available, but only for those who have the honor to be within the oo-VPN. https://android.googlesource.com/platform/build/soong/
As the soong process is at the very heart of the AOSP project, it would be very helpful if the full documentation would be accessible.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
According to Scala style guide (https://docs.scala-lang.org/style/files.html), multi-unit files should be named with lower camel case. However, nobody seems to do it. I asked few experienced Scala developers and they didn't know about this convention. Even mentioned example is misleading and Option.scala (checked for scala 2.13.6) starts with capital letter.
This whole idea is for me rather obscure. On one hand official style guide states that as
very important convention
on the other hand even files built-in Scala language don't follow this convention.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Since many front-end frameworks/CMS have a fully customizable appearance, I would like to know how is the best/easiest way to determine or identify if some web-site is developed or running with a specific technology.
Any ideas?
Thank you in advance.
Wappalyzer browser extension is the best way to know the technology behind a website.
And to discover if it's build with Liferay or any other way.
https://wappalyzer.com/
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
This question stems from curiosity more than anything else.
If one was to sit down and write a Perl module with the sole objective of getting that module to eventually become a part of the CORE load, what factors should they pay attention to? Here are a few that spring to mind, though I'm sure there are exceptions to every one of them:
Usefulness
Maturity
Stability
Core-modules-only dependency
Problem area being solved
Cross-platform compatibility
CPAN testers review
Reviews
Also, am I right in assuming that the Perl 5 Porters make the final call on whether to include something in the core load or not?
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
Instead of using UIImageWirteToSavedAlbum, is it safe to write your image to /private/var/mobile/Media/DCIM/100APPLE/ directly?
Without consulting the actual developer contracts at all, I feel safe in saying "Count on it, you will get rejected".
(Besides, is this even possible, given the sandboxing?)
Edit: The iPhone Application Programming Guide says that "for security purposes, your application is placed in its own directory and is limited to reading and writing files in that directory only." If that isn't actually the case (i.e. you can write to /private/var/... anyway, I'm pretty sure it's still "forbidden").