We're creating a WebAPI using Entity Framework in MVC 4. Our client wants to send complex objects containing related objects - both new and updated. The root object maybe new or existing one too. The client generates primary keys - we're using Guids for that. So on server we really can't tell that we got an existing object update or a new one. What would be the best way to handle this situation? We need some sort of add or update functionality and it's not yet clear to us how to proceed with Entity Framework for this.
EF doesn't have any build in support for discovering changes in detached object graph. You either have to include some field into every object describing if the object is new, not modified, updated or deleted (you will also need similar behavior to track changes in many-to-many relationships). If you don't use such field you have no other way than querying database and comparing current DB state with data received from client to find what has changed.
Related
I'm working on a unit of work and repository set-up for Entity Framework, where I want to make sure only changed entities, that have been through an Update method on the repository, are actually saved to the database.
The IQueryable extension, AsNoTracking, makes sure that all entities fetched from the IDbSet are not being tracked, but if I want to read a single entity, by it's primary key (using Find()), there seems to be no way to make sure the entity isn't tracked?
I don't want to Detach/Attach, as that ruins the options to, lazily, fetch complex properties.
What am I missing?
Nothing.
Find has no AsNoTracking. That's because Find first tries to find the requested entity in the (tracked!) context cache (the state manager). It goes to the database if it's not there, so for a subsequent second time Find it doesn't have to do this roundtrip again.
So, Find is all about tracked entities.
Use Single(OrDefault) (+ AsNoTracking) if you want to get one entity without tracking.
I'm using Entity Framework 4.1. I've implemented a base repository using lots of the examples online. My repository get methods take a bool parameter to decide whether to track the entities. Sometimes, I want to load an entity and track it, other times, for some entities, I simply want to read them and display them (i.e. in a graph). In this situation there is never a need to edit, so I don't want the overhead of tracking them. Also, graph entities are sent to a silverlight client, so the entities are disconnected from the context. Hence my Get methods can return a list of entities that are either tracked or not. This is achieved dynamically creating the query as follows:
DbQuery<E> query = Context.Set<E>();
// Track the entities in the context?
if (!trackEntities)
{
query = query.AsNoTracking();
}
However, I now want to enable the user to interact with the graph and edit it. This will not happen very often, so I still want to get some entities without tracking them but to have the ability to save them. To do this I simply attach them to the context and set the state as modified. Everything is working so far.
I am auditing any changes by overriding the SaveChanges method. As explained above I may, in some low cases, need to save modified entities that were disconnected. So to audit, I have to retrieve the current values from the database and then compare to work out what was changed while disconnected. If the entity has been tracked, there is no need to get the old values, as I've got access to them via the state manager. I'm not using self tracking entities, as this is overkill for my requirements.
QUESTION: In my auditing method I simply want to know if the modified entity is tracked or not, i.e. do I need to go to the db and get the original values?
Cheers
DbContext.ChangeTracker.Entries (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg679172(v=vs.103).aspx) returns DbEntityEntry objects for all tracked entities. DbEntityEntry has Entity property that you could use to find out whether the entity is tracked. Something like
var isTracked = ctx.ChangeTracker.Entries().Any(e => Object.ReferenceEquals(e.Entity, myEntity));
I am using the Service Layer --> Repository --> Entity Framework (Code-First) w/POCO objects approach, and I am having a hard time with updating entities.
I am using AutoMapper to map my Domain Objects to my View Models and that works good for getting the data, no how do I get that changes back into the database?
Using pure POCO objects, I would assume that there is no sort of change tracking, so I see my only option is to handle it myself. Do you just make sure that your View Models have the EXACT same properties as your Domain Objects? What if I just change a field or two on the View Model? Won't the rest of the fields on the Domain Object get overwritten in the database with default values?
With that said, what is the best approach?
Thanks!
Edit
So what I am stumbling on is this, lets take for example a simple Customer:
1) The Controller has a service, CustomerService, that calls the services GetCustmoerByID method.
2) The Service calls into the CustomerRepository and retrieves the Customer object.
3) Controller uses AutoMapper to map the Customer to the ViewModel.
4) Controller hands the model to the View. Everything is great!
Now in the view you do some modifications of the customer and post it back to the controller to persist the changes to the database.
I would assume at this point the object is detached. So should the model have the EXACT same properties as the Customer object? And do you have to make hidden fields for each item that you do not want to show, so they can persist back?
How do you handle saving the object back to the database? What happens if your view/model only deals with a couple of the fields on the object?
If you're using EF Code First, i.e: the DbContext API, then you still do have change tracking which is taken care of by your context class.
after making changes to your objects, all you have to do is call SaveChanges() on your context and that will persist the changes to your database.
EDIT:
Since you are creating a "copy" of the entity using AutoMapper, then it's no longer attached to your context.
I guess what you could do is something similar to what you would in ASP.NET MVC (with UpdateModel). You can get the original entity from your context, take your ViewModel (which may contain changed properties) and update the old entity, either manually (just modified properties), or using AutoMapper. And then persist the changes using context.SaveChanges().
Another solution would be to send the model entity as [part of] the ViewModel. This way, you'll have your entity attached to the container and change tracking will still work.
Hope this helps :)
You are absolutely right that with a detached object you are responsible for informing the context about changes in your detached entity.
The basic approach is just set the entity as modified. This works for scalar and complex properties but it doesn't work for navigation properties (except FK relations) - for further reading about problems with navigation properties check this answer (it is related to EFv4 and ObjectContext API but same problems are with DbContext API). The disadvantage of this approach is that all fields in DB will be modified. If you just want to modify single field you still have to correctly fill others or your database record will be corrupted.
There is a way to explicitly define which fields have changed. You will set the modified state per property instead of whole entity. It is little bit harder to solve this on generic approach but I tried to show some way for EFv4 and for EFv4.1.
I agree with #AbdouMoumen that it's much simpler to use the model entities at the view level. The service layer should provide an API to persist those entities in the data store (db). The service layer shouldn't dumbly duplicate the repository lawyer (ie: Save(entity) for every entity) but rather provide a high level save for an aggregate of entities. For instance, you could have a Save(order) in the service layer which results in updating more basic entities like inventory, customer, account.
I'm building an iPad application where I need user to create entity dynamically. I'm already having 3 entities which program uses.
Could you help me with code how to do it?
I want to understand the whole structure according to my understanding I have to create new managedObjectModel, add new entities and than merge it with existing one, is it correct?
While it is possible to create a new entity and a new model on the fly in practice this is massively complex. If nothing else you would have to migrate any existing persisted data to the new model and a new persistent store file. I strongly recommend against attempting this especially if you are just starting out with Core Data.
You do have options:
Firstly, are you sure you actually need a new entity? People just starting out with Core Data often mistake entities for managed objects. Entities are to managed objects as classes are to instances. Entities are abstractions used to create the object graph. They don't actually contain data. The times when you need new entities are very,very rare.
Secondly, if you do need some kind of dynamic entity, it would usually be best to decompose the dynamic entity into numerous fixed subentities and then use relationships to create a virtual entity. E.g. you need a dynamic Person "entity" so you create several entities in the model each of which holds one attribute of the person. You could have a Field entity which would have a fieldName attribute and then a fieldValue attribute. Then have a an actual Person entity that has no attributes but just relationships to the necessary Field objects. You could add any fields needed to any person and then reconstitute an virtual person object by walking the relationships to its fields.
I rather doubt however that you need that kind of flexibility. Such a need is very rare. I would step back and see exactly what dynamic data you think the user might need to enter.
That's correct -- you'd create an array of NSEntityDescription objects, then call setEntities: on the new managed object model. Then, finally, you'd merge that model with your built-in model.
But note that you can't change a model once it has been used to create a managed object context (or used for storage). You'll need to create new storage and context after the model is changed.
I'm new to the Entity Framework and am currently experimenting with it. I created a simple database, set up the model in VS2008, and have got the code going to query the database using the EF as well as inserting new data.
There's one thing that has me a little confused though. I have an entity (set up in my model) called Customer, and as part of the logic of my application I want to be able to create a temporary Customer object for some intermediate processing. This particular object should never actually be stored in the database. However, I noticed that as soon as I call SaveChanges() the customer is saved to the database. This isn't what I want to happen. I'd be quite happy to call AddCustomer() on the objects I do want to include - I just want to have the option to create a temporary instance for my own use.
I did discover I could call Detach() and pass in my temporary instance, which would stop it from being persisted. However I'm not sure this is the best way to do this since the temporary Customer object will have related objects, and unless I go through and detach them all I might end up in hot water.
It's possible I'm misunderstanding something about how the EF is supposed to work, or that I'm missing something obvious - I'm hoping someone can set me straight!
Thanks
John
If you want to have a temporary instance of an entity that'll never be connected to the EF again, use this Entity Cloner for cloning the entity
If you are trying to disconnect an entity, send it over the wire some where (let us say pass it over to the client over a service, to modify it, and then again get it back), and again merge back the changes to the EF - right now this is not directly supported. How ever, you can try these solutions
Entity Bag:
EFContrib (you need PostSharp4EF)
Why not have another Customer class with the same fields?
Just ran into this problem myself with a service using EF4 - there's a simpler solution - after you create the new entity instance, call
objectContext.Detach(newEntity);