I wrote an extension for NUnit 2.6.2.
I install a listener like
namespace NUnit.EventExtension
{
[NUnitAddin(Type = ExtensionType.Core)]
public class NUnitExtension : IAddin
{
public bool Install(IExtensionHost host)
{
IExtensionPoint listeners = host.GetExtensionPoint("EventListeners");
listeners.Install(new AttrHooksEventListener());
return true;
}
}
}
The AttrHooksEventListener is a simple class when I output some text to the console.
The project is builded success. I copy my dll file to bin\addins path. But my extension isn't showed in list of extensions and doesn't work.
PS I tried to use some other sample extensions, anyone from them doesn't work.
Whiy?
I found a solution.
I olny changed the target .NET framework version from v4.0 to v3.5.
Related
I'm using mvvmcross version 6.4.1 to develop an app for IOS, Android, and WPF.
I've searched all over for my to use plugins. There seems to be no code examples. The documentation said to install the nuget in both my core and ui application projects. Which I did. Is there any special IOC registration/setup/or loading that needs to be done before I can use the plugin and how do I go about using the plugin? Do they get injected in the constructor or Do I have to manually pull them from the IOC container or new () them up.
I've installed nuget for the File plugin into my WPF UI and Core project. I added the IMvxFileStore to one of my core project's service constructor thinking it automagically gets added to the DI container, but it doesn't seem to get injected.
namespace My.Core.Project.Services
{
public class SomeService : ISomeService
{
private IMvxFileStore mvxFileStore;
public SomeService(IMvxFileStore mvxFileStore)
{
this.mvxFileStore = mvxFileStore;
}
public string SomeMethod(string somePath)
{
mvxFileStore.TryReadTextFile(somePath, out string content);
return content;
}
}
}
App.xaml.cs
using MvvmCross.Core;
using MvvmCross.Platforms.Wpf.Views;
...
public partial class App : MvxApplicatin
{
protected override void RegisterSetup()
{
this.RegisterSetupType<Setup<Core.App>>();
}
}
App.cs
using MvvmCross;
using MvvmCross.ViewModels;
using My.Core.Project.Services;
public class App: MvxApplication
{
public override void Initialize()
{
Mvx.IocProvider.RegisterType<ISomeService, SomeService>();
RegisterCustomAppStart<AppStart>();
}
}
AppStart.cs
using MvvmCross.Exceptions;
using MvvmCross.Navigation;
using MvvmCross.ViewModels;
using My.Core.Project.ViewModels;
using System;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
....
public class AppStart : MvxAppStart
{
public AppStart(IMvxApplication application, IMvxNavigationService navigationService) : base(application, navigationService)
{}
public override Task NavigateToFirstViewModel(object hint = null)
{
try {
return NavigationService.Navigate<FirstPageViewModel>();
} catch {
throw e.MvxWrap("Some error message {0}", typeof(FirstPageViewModel).Name);
}
}
}
Setup.cs in WPF project
using MvvmCross;
using MvvmCross.Base;
using MvvmCross.Platforms.Wpf.Core;
using MvvmCross.Plugin.File;
using MvvmCross.Plugin.Json;
using MvvmCross.ViewModels;
using My.Wpf.Project.Services;
...
public class Setup<T> : MvxWpfSetup
{
public Setup() : base() {}
protected override IMvxApplication CreateApp()
{
return new Core.App();
}
protected override void InitializeFirstChange()
{
base.InitializeFirstChange();
Mvx.IocProvider.RegisterType<ISomeWpfSpecificService>(() => new SomeWpfSpecificService());
}
protected override void InitializeLastChange()
{
base.InitializeLastChange();
}
}
I'm expecting my service to load but instead, I get the error message
MvxIoCResolveException: Failed to resolve parameter for parameter mvxJsonConverter of type IMvxJsonConverter
NOTE: I get the same error message for both File and Json plugin, The plugin that gets listed first in the constructor gets the error message when the app trys to load.
Am I properly using or loading the plugin?
UPDATE: I manually registered the Plugins in the UI Setup.cs and it is working but I am not sure if this is the proper way to do it.
WPF UI project Setup.cs
using MvvmCross;
using MvvmCross.Base;
using MvvmCross.Platforms.Wpf.Core;
using MvvmCross.Plugin.File;
using MvvmCross.Plugin.Json;
using MvvmCross.ViewModels;
using My.Wpf.Project.Services;
...
public class Setup<T> : MvxWpfSetup
{
public Setup() : base() {}
protected override IMvxApplication CreateApp()
{
return new Core.App();
}
protected override void InitializeFirstChange()
{
base.InitializeFirstChange();
Mvx.IocProvider.RegisterType<ISomeWpfSpecificService>(() => new SomeWpfSpecificService());
Mvx.IoCProvider.RegisterType<IMvxFileStore, MvxFileStoreBase>();
Mvx.IoCProvider.RegisterType<IMvxJsonConverter, MvxJsonConverter>();
}
protected override void InitializeLastChange()
{
base.InitializeLastChange();
}
}
Yes you are using the plugin properly and I think that for now your solution to manually register your plugin is viable.
The root of the problem is located in the MvxSetup class. This class contains the method LoadPlugins which is responsible for loading the MvvmCross plugins which are referenced by your UI project. This is how LoadPlugins determines what plugins to load:
Get all assemblies that have been loaded into the execution context of the application domain.
Find types within these assemblies which contain the MvxPluginAttribute.
Now the problem occurs in step 1. In a .NET framework project, by default, your referenced assemblies won't be loaded into the execution context until you actually use them in your code. So if you don't use something from your MvvmCross.Plugin.File reference in your UI project it won't be loaded into your execution context and it won't be found in step 1 and thus it won't be registered by LoadPlugins. (good read: when does a .NET assembly Dependency get loaded)
One way I have tested this is by doing this:
protected override void InitializeFirstChance()
{
// Because a type of the MvvmCross.Plugin.File.Platforms.Wpf reference is
// used here the assembly will now get loaded in the execution context
var throwaway = typeof(Plugin);
base.InitializeFirstChance();
}
With the above code you don't have to manually register the Plugin.
There has been a pull request to fix this in the MvvmCross framework but this has been reverted later since it caused problems on other platforms.
In other platforms the plugin assemblies will get loaded into the execution context without any tricks so I would say updating the MvvmCross documentation stating you have to register your plugin manually for WPF would be useful for other developers in the future.
In my App I have a helper class App\Command\GenerateFixturesCommand that provides a command named my-nice-project:generate-fixtures.
This command consumes a service of my own project named App\Services\CatalogFixtureGenerator that generates 1000 random PDF documents for testing while developing the app.
To do so, this service uses the joshtronic\LoremIpsum class which is required in composer only in dev. LoremIpsum is a third-party library. I require it under composer's require-dev.
So the injection is:
I run my GenerateFixturesCommand.
Before that, the system transparently locates my CatalogFixtureGenerator and to inject it into the command.
Before that, the system transparently locates the LoremIpsum third party service to inject it into my fixture generator service.
All is autowired.
When I deploy to prod and do composer install --no-dev --optimize-autoloader of course the LoremIpsum class is not installed.
But when I clear the cache with APP_ENV=prod php bin/console cache:clear the framework finds the command and cannot inject the autowired dependencies.
[WARNING] Some commands could not be registered:
In CatalogsFixtureGenerator.php line 26:
Class 'joshtronic\LoremIpsum' not found
This my-nice-project:generate-fixtures command is never going to be used in the production server.
Question
How can I "disable" the command in prod?
I mean: How can I tell the framework that the class GenerateFixturesCommand should not be loaded nor its autowired dependencies, and neither of them should be autowired in prod?
Use the isEnabled() method in Command.
For example
public function isEnabled(): bool
{
// disable on prod
if ($this->appKernel->getEnvironment() === 'prod') {
return false;
}
return true;
}
In my last project, I need some commands to work only in dev environment. You use getenv function to achieve this:
# src/Command/SomeCommand.php
...
public function __construct()
{
parent::__construct();
if (getenv("APP_ENV") !== "dev") {
exit('This command should work only "dev" environment.');
}
}
This will do the trick.
Code fun :)
The solution #gusDeCooL suggests doesn't work with lazy-loaded commands (at least not for me).
I ended up implementing the isEnabled() method anyway, but then I added a guard in execute():
<?php
namespace App\Command;
use Symfony\Component\Console\Attribute\AsCommand;
use Symfony\Component\Console\Command\Command;
use Symfony\Component\Console\Input\InputInterface;
use Symfony\Component\Console\Output\OutputInterface;
use Symfony\Component\Console\Style\SymfonyStyle;
#[AsCommand(
name: 'command:name',
description: 'Some description',
)]
class CommandName extends Command
{
public function isEnabled(): bool
{
return 'dev' === getenv('APP_ENV');
}
protected function execute(InputInterface $input, OutputInterface $output): int
{
$io = new SymfonyStyle($input, $output);
if (!$this->isEnabled()) {
$io->error('This command is only available in `dev` environment.');
exit(1);
}
// the rest
}
}
I've been trying to implement DirectInput into unity using SharpDX.DirectInput dlls, but when i create a joystick, it gives me an error:
SharpDXException: HRESULT: [0x80070057], Module: [General], ApiCode: [E_INVALIDARG/Invalid Arguments], Message: The parameter is incorrect.
and here is my code:
using System;
using UnityEngine;
using SharpDX.DirectInput;
namespace KurdifyEngine.Input
{
static class Direct
{
public static DirectInput directInput;
public static Guid directGuid;
public static Joystick directGamepad ;
internal static void Initialize()
{
// Initialize DirectInput
directInput = new DirectInput();
directGuid = Guid.Empty;
DirectUpdate();
}
internal static void DirectUpdate()
{
// search for Gamepad
foreach (var deviceInstance in directInput.GetDevices(SharpDX.DirectInput.DeviceType.Gamepad, DeviceEnumerationFlags.AttachedOnly))
directGuid = deviceInstance.InstanceGuid;
}
if (directGuid != Guid.Empty)
{
directGamepad = new Joystick(directInput, directGuid);
}
}
}
}
the error happens when i create a joystick:
directGamepad = new Joystick(directInput, directGuid);
We have been developing exotic controller support for a Unity product and encountered the same problem (SharpDXException: HRESULT: [0x80070057]) on the exact same line.
We tried recompiling the SharpDX by fixing it like it is explained in this github post: https://github.com/sharpdx/SharpDX/issues/406 but encountered other problems with the DirectX (June 2010) SDK.
We just found a way to compile our Unity project using the libraries included in this project (which is an add-on for exotic controllers support in Kerbal Space Program): https://github.com/pbatard/AltInput just pick up the .dll under Libraries/, replace your old .dll by these and you're good to go !
I have two three projects
1. framework
2. Repository
3. MVC Project
In framework project i implemented aspect
namespace FrameworkHelper.TestAspect
{
[Serializable]
[MulticastAttributeUsage(MulticastTargets.Method)]
public class CacheAspect : OnMethodBoundaryAspect
{
// This field will be set by CompileTimeInitialize and serialized at build time,
// then deserialized at runtime.
public string methodName;
// Method executed at build time.
public override void CompileTimeInitialize(MethodBase method, AspectInfo aspectInfo)
{
this.methodName = method.DeclaringType.FullName + "." + method.Name;
}
// This method is executed before the execution of target methods of this aspect.
public override void OnEntry(MethodExecutionArgs args)
{
}
// This method is executed upon successful completion of target methods of this aspect.
public override void OnSuccess(MethodExecutionArgs args)
{
}
}
}
And aspect implemented into repository project
[TestAspect]
public List<string> TestMethod()
{
}
, When we calling method TestMethod() from MVC project , aspect not working , what's wrong on this code.
Its working fine when we use with one assembly.
I created new project for test the scanario and uploading project into github you can go through and can test home index controller.
https://github.com/virenderkverma/PostSharp-Examples
Project - PostSharpMultipleAssemblyCall
You can test this project
Sorry Daniel, Its working fine with latest version of postsharp , right now using
Postsharp of 3.1.50.9
Before i used 3.1.48 , May be that's problem with old version.
Thanks
I have a VSIX and a associated MEF DLL using IModelConversionExtension Class as per the documentation, and a pkgdef file setting up .foo as an extension to invoke the EF Designer.
[PartCreationPolicy(CreationPolicy.Shared)]
[Export(typeof(IModelConversionExtension))]
[ModelFileExtension(".foo")]
public class MyConversionCallback : IModelConversionExtension
{
public void OnAfterFileLoaded(ModelConversionExtensionContext context)
{
//How does this get called?
return;
}
public void OnBeforeFileSaved(ModelConversionExtensionContext context)
{
//How does this get called?
return;
}
}
[$RootKey$\Editors\{c99aea30-8e36-4515-b76f-496f5a48a6aa}\Extensions]
"foo"=dword:00000032
[$RootKey$\Projects]
[$RootKey$\Projects\{F184B08F-C81C-45F6-A57F-5ABD9991F28F}]
[$RootKey$\Projects\{F184B08F-C81C-45F6-A57F-5ABD9991F28F}\RelatedFiles]
[$RootKey$\Projects\{F184B08F-C81C-45F6-A57F-5ABD9991F28F}\RelatedFiles\.foo]
".diagram"=dword:00000002
[$RootKey$\Projects]
[$RootKey$\Projects\{FAE04EC0-301F-11D3-BF4B-00C04F79EFBC}]
[$RootKey$\Projects\{FAE04EC0-301F-11D3-BF4B-00C04F79EFBC}\RelatedFiles]
[$RootKey$\Projects\{FAE04EC0-301F-11D3-BF4B-00C04F79EFBC}\RelatedFiles\.foo]
".diagram"=dword:00000002
I can get both the similar Transform and Generation MEF Classes to work fine.
And my Model1.foo does invoke the EF Designer, but
1. OnAfterFileLoaded and OnBeforeFileSaved never fire, and
2. I get an error message when I try to save Model1.foo, which says to see errors in the Error List but there are none.
What am not doing to get this to work.
Thanks
OnAfterFileLoaded is supposed to be invoked if you load a file whose extension is different than edmx and the IEntityDesignerConversionData.FileExtension returns a value that matches your extension. OnBeforeFileSaved works the opposite way - on save. However - I looked at code in this area today and concluded that it actually cannot work. I filed a work item for this: https://entityframework.codeplex.com/workitem/1371