I have two three projects
1. framework
2. Repository
3. MVC Project
In framework project i implemented aspect
namespace FrameworkHelper.TestAspect
{
[Serializable]
[MulticastAttributeUsage(MulticastTargets.Method)]
public class CacheAspect : OnMethodBoundaryAspect
{
// This field will be set by CompileTimeInitialize and serialized at build time,
// then deserialized at runtime.
public string methodName;
// Method executed at build time.
public override void CompileTimeInitialize(MethodBase method, AspectInfo aspectInfo)
{
this.methodName = method.DeclaringType.FullName + "." + method.Name;
}
// This method is executed before the execution of target methods of this aspect.
public override void OnEntry(MethodExecutionArgs args)
{
}
// This method is executed upon successful completion of target methods of this aspect.
public override void OnSuccess(MethodExecutionArgs args)
{
}
}
}
And aspect implemented into repository project
[TestAspect]
public List<string> TestMethod()
{
}
, When we calling method TestMethod() from MVC project , aspect not working , what's wrong on this code.
Its working fine when we use with one assembly.
I created new project for test the scanario and uploading project into github you can go through and can test home index controller.
https://github.com/virenderkverma/PostSharp-Examples
Project - PostSharpMultipleAssemblyCall
You can test this project
Sorry Daniel, Its working fine with latest version of postsharp , right now using
Postsharp of 3.1.50.9
Before i used 3.1.48 , May be that's problem with old version.
Thanks
Related
I'm using mvvmcross version 6.4.1 to develop an app for IOS, Android, and WPF.
I've searched all over for my to use plugins. There seems to be no code examples. The documentation said to install the nuget in both my core and ui application projects. Which I did. Is there any special IOC registration/setup/or loading that needs to be done before I can use the plugin and how do I go about using the plugin? Do they get injected in the constructor or Do I have to manually pull them from the IOC container or new () them up.
I've installed nuget for the File plugin into my WPF UI and Core project. I added the IMvxFileStore to one of my core project's service constructor thinking it automagically gets added to the DI container, but it doesn't seem to get injected.
namespace My.Core.Project.Services
{
public class SomeService : ISomeService
{
private IMvxFileStore mvxFileStore;
public SomeService(IMvxFileStore mvxFileStore)
{
this.mvxFileStore = mvxFileStore;
}
public string SomeMethod(string somePath)
{
mvxFileStore.TryReadTextFile(somePath, out string content);
return content;
}
}
}
App.xaml.cs
using MvvmCross.Core;
using MvvmCross.Platforms.Wpf.Views;
...
public partial class App : MvxApplicatin
{
protected override void RegisterSetup()
{
this.RegisterSetupType<Setup<Core.App>>();
}
}
App.cs
using MvvmCross;
using MvvmCross.ViewModels;
using My.Core.Project.Services;
public class App: MvxApplication
{
public override void Initialize()
{
Mvx.IocProvider.RegisterType<ISomeService, SomeService>();
RegisterCustomAppStart<AppStart>();
}
}
AppStart.cs
using MvvmCross.Exceptions;
using MvvmCross.Navigation;
using MvvmCross.ViewModels;
using My.Core.Project.ViewModels;
using System;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
....
public class AppStart : MvxAppStart
{
public AppStart(IMvxApplication application, IMvxNavigationService navigationService) : base(application, navigationService)
{}
public override Task NavigateToFirstViewModel(object hint = null)
{
try {
return NavigationService.Navigate<FirstPageViewModel>();
} catch {
throw e.MvxWrap("Some error message {0}", typeof(FirstPageViewModel).Name);
}
}
}
Setup.cs in WPF project
using MvvmCross;
using MvvmCross.Base;
using MvvmCross.Platforms.Wpf.Core;
using MvvmCross.Plugin.File;
using MvvmCross.Plugin.Json;
using MvvmCross.ViewModels;
using My.Wpf.Project.Services;
...
public class Setup<T> : MvxWpfSetup
{
public Setup() : base() {}
protected override IMvxApplication CreateApp()
{
return new Core.App();
}
protected override void InitializeFirstChange()
{
base.InitializeFirstChange();
Mvx.IocProvider.RegisterType<ISomeWpfSpecificService>(() => new SomeWpfSpecificService());
}
protected override void InitializeLastChange()
{
base.InitializeLastChange();
}
}
I'm expecting my service to load but instead, I get the error message
MvxIoCResolveException: Failed to resolve parameter for parameter mvxJsonConverter of type IMvxJsonConverter
NOTE: I get the same error message for both File and Json plugin, The plugin that gets listed first in the constructor gets the error message when the app trys to load.
Am I properly using or loading the plugin?
UPDATE: I manually registered the Plugins in the UI Setup.cs and it is working but I am not sure if this is the proper way to do it.
WPF UI project Setup.cs
using MvvmCross;
using MvvmCross.Base;
using MvvmCross.Platforms.Wpf.Core;
using MvvmCross.Plugin.File;
using MvvmCross.Plugin.Json;
using MvvmCross.ViewModels;
using My.Wpf.Project.Services;
...
public class Setup<T> : MvxWpfSetup
{
public Setup() : base() {}
protected override IMvxApplication CreateApp()
{
return new Core.App();
}
protected override void InitializeFirstChange()
{
base.InitializeFirstChange();
Mvx.IocProvider.RegisterType<ISomeWpfSpecificService>(() => new SomeWpfSpecificService());
Mvx.IoCProvider.RegisterType<IMvxFileStore, MvxFileStoreBase>();
Mvx.IoCProvider.RegisterType<IMvxJsonConverter, MvxJsonConverter>();
}
protected override void InitializeLastChange()
{
base.InitializeLastChange();
}
}
Yes you are using the plugin properly and I think that for now your solution to manually register your plugin is viable.
The root of the problem is located in the MvxSetup class. This class contains the method LoadPlugins which is responsible for loading the MvvmCross plugins which are referenced by your UI project. This is how LoadPlugins determines what plugins to load:
Get all assemblies that have been loaded into the execution context of the application domain.
Find types within these assemblies which contain the MvxPluginAttribute.
Now the problem occurs in step 1. In a .NET framework project, by default, your referenced assemblies won't be loaded into the execution context until you actually use them in your code. So if you don't use something from your MvvmCross.Plugin.File reference in your UI project it won't be loaded into your execution context and it won't be found in step 1 and thus it won't be registered by LoadPlugins. (good read: when does a .NET assembly Dependency get loaded)
One way I have tested this is by doing this:
protected override void InitializeFirstChance()
{
// Because a type of the MvvmCross.Plugin.File.Platforms.Wpf reference is
// used here the assembly will now get loaded in the execution context
var throwaway = typeof(Plugin);
base.InitializeFirstChance();
}
With the above code you don't have to manually register the Plugin.
There has been a pull request to fix this in the MvvmCross framework but this has been reverted later since it caused problems on other platforms.
In other platforms the plugin assemblies will get loaded into the execution context without any tricks so I would say updating the MvvmCross documentation stating you have to register your plugin manually for WPF would be useful for other developers in the future.
I have implemented the Shiny Speech Recognition plugin in a MvvmCross Xamarin.Forms solution.
=> https://github.com/shinyorg/shiny
Nuget => https://www.nuget.org/packages/Shiny.SpeechRecognition/1.0.0.357-beta
I'm trying to use the ISpeechRecognition in the MvxViewModel constructor as it work on the Prism Sample on GitHub.
=> https://github.com/shinyorg/shinysamples/tree/master/Samples/Speech
I have implemented The integration plugin for MvvmCross.
=> https://www.nuget.org/packages/Shiny.Integrations.MvvmCross/1.0.0.375-beta
Now I want to know how I can use the Speech Recognition service.
Can I have something like:
public YourViewsModel(IMvxNavigationService navigationService, ISpeechRecognizer speechRecognizer)
{
_navigationService = navigationService;
_speechRecognizer = speechRecognizer;
}
Or maybe dependency injection with the register dependence like:
Mvx.IoCProvider.LazyConstructAndRegisterSingleton<ISpeechRecognizer, SpeechRecognizerImpl>();
What I want to know, if someone have already Shiny plugin Xamarin.Forms is how used the service ?
I have create a startup Shiny class.
public class InitializeShiny : ShinyStartup
{
public override void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.UseSpeechRecognition(); // implement Speech Recognition service.
}
}
Then initialize a top level custom Application definition.
In the OnCreate() method:
// Initialisation Shiny Plugin.
AndroidShinyHost.Init(Application, new InitializeShiny(), services =>
{
services.UseSpeechRecognition();
});
So now in our ViewModel we can inherit from ShinyMvxViewModel to start the ViewModel.
public class YourViewModel : ShinyMvxViewModel {}
All is working perfectly. The application is launched without problem.
This doesn't work:
public YourViewsModel(IMvxNavigationService navigationService, ISpeechRecognizer speechRecognizer)
I can create the constructor because it doesn't recognize ISpeechRecognizer.
Only
public YourViewsModel(IMvxNavigationService navigationService)
is working.
This doesn't work too:
private ISpeechRecognizer _speechRecognizer;
_speechRecognizer = Mvx.IoCProvider.Resolve<ISpeechRecognizer>();
The error is it doesn't have implemention for ISpeechRecognizer. I don't know.
I have initialise the lazy register in the override method.
protected override void InitializePlatformServices()
Mvx.IoCProvider.LazyConstructAndRegisterSingleton<ISpeechRecognizer, SpeechRecognizerImpl>();
Thank for the help.
Zebiphire
UPDATE: I think I've eliminated Unity from the equation. See below for more details.
UPDATE 2: I think I may have eliminated Entity Framework fro the equation. See below for more details.
I have some code that is building a unity container, but it started failing with the above error message out of the blue. It works on other people's machines, but not mine. I deleted the folder the solution was in and refreshed everything from source control to ensure I had nothing that could be causing issues (e.g. duplicate assemblies lying around from a previous build).
Here is part of my code:
public static class UnityBootstrapper
{
public static IUnityContainer Initialise()
{
Trace.WriteLine("UnityBootstrapper.Initialise()");
var container = BuildUnityContainer();
DependencyResolver.SetResolver(new UnityDependencyResolver(container));
return container;
}
private static IUnityContainer BuildUnityContainer()
{
Trace.WriteLine("UnityBootstrapper.BuildUnityContainer()");
var container = new UnityContainer();
// Other dependencies are registered here
// If the following line is commented out the container is build
// but, obviously, it won't resolve this dependency.
container.RegisterType<IUserAccessEntities, UserAccessEntities>(WebRequestLifetime);
// Other dependencies are registered here
return container;
}
The code apparently fails on the call to BuildUnityContainer(), and I can see that the trace statement I put inside that method is never displayed.
However, if I comment out the line that registers the UserAccessEntities class (which was code generated from Entity Framework 5) then the container is built. Naturally, when I ask for that dependency it can't resolve it, so the code just fails elsewhere.
I've Googled for solutions and they all seem to resolve around generics and moving the generic type from the method to the class level. I can't do that as EF5 creates the class and it puts generics on the properties. e.g
DbSet<MyTable> Tables { get; set; }
The only other thing I can think of is that I've extracted an interface from the EF5 generated class called IUserAccessEntities and the problem could lie there... but I used ReSharper to generate that, so it should be perfectly aligned.
UPDATE
Just to eliminate Unity from the equation, I tried to new up the UserAccessEntities on its own
private static void TestUae()
{
var uae = new UserAccessEntities(); //container.Resolve<IUserAccessEntities>();
Trace.WriteLine("Got the entities: " + uae);
}
And the call to TestUae() fails instead.
UPDATE 2
I created a new class, AlternativeEntities based on the interface I'd previously extracted. When I try to construct that directly it has a new exception: Method 'Set' in type 'AlternativeEntities' from assembly 'UserAccess.Model, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' does not have an implementation.
However, it does. There are two methods called set, both of which I've given a basic implementation:
public class AlternativeEntities : IUserAccessEntities
{
public DbSet<TEntity> Set<TEntity>() where TEntity : class
{
Trace.WriteLine("public DbSet<TEntity> Set<TEntity>() where TEntity : class");
return null;
}
public DbSet Set(Type entityType)
{
Trace.WriteLine("public DbSet Set(Type entityType)");
return null;
}
// Other methods and properties here.
}
I'm struggling with Play and JPA in order to be able to use two different javax.persistence.Entity model associated to two different persistence units (needed to be able to connect to different DB - for example an Oracle and a MySQL db).
The problem come from the Transaction which is always bind to the default JPA persitenceUnit (see jpa.default option).
Here is two controller actions which show the solution I found to manually define the persistence :
package controllers;
import models.Company;
import models.User;
import play.db.jpa.JPA;
import play.db.jpa.Transactional;
import play.mvc.Controller;
import play.mvc.Result;
public class Application extends Controller {
//This method run with the otherPersistenceUnit
#Transactional(value="other")
public static Result test1() {
JPA.em().persist(new Company("MyCompany"));
//Transaction is run with the "defaultPersistenceUnit"
JPA.withTransaction(new play.libs.F.Callback0() {
#Override
public void invoke() throws Throwable {
JPA.em().persist(new User("Bobby"));
}
});
return ok();
}
//This action run with the otherPersistenceUnit
#Transactional
public static Result test2() {
JPA.em().persist(new User("Ryan"));
try {
JPA.withTransaction("other", false, new play.libs.F.Function0<Void>() {
public Void apply() throws Throwable {
JPA.em().persist(new Company("YourCompany"));
return null;
}
});
} catch (Throwable throwable) {
throw new RuntimeException(throwable);
}
return ok();
}
}
This solution doesn't seem to be really "clean". I'd like to know if you know a better way to avoid the need to manually modify the transaction used.
For this purpose, I created a repo on git with a working sample application which shows how I configured the project.
https://github.com/cm0s/play2-jpa-multiple-persistenceunit
Thank you for your help
i met the same problem, too. too many advices are about PersistenceUnit annotation or getJPAConfig. but both them seem not work in play framework.
i found out a method which works well in my projects. maybe you can try it.
playframework2 how to open multi-datasource configuration with jpa
gud luk!
Is it possible to do Inter Type Declarations with AspectJ on Compiled Class Files at Load Time Weaving?
As an example: I compile some Groovy code and want to add fields or methods with IDT.
Update:
Oh my goodness, you do not need reflection to access members or execute methods. Eclipse shows errors in the editor, but you may just ignore them, the code compiles and runs fine anyway. So the aspect is really much more strightforward and simple:
public aspect LTWAspect {
public static String Application.staticField = "value of static field";
public String Application.normalField = "value of normal field";
public void Application.myMethod() {
System.out.println(normalField);
}
void around() : execution(void Application.main(..)) {
System.out.println("around before");
proceed();
System.out.println("around after");
System.out.println(Application.staticField);
new Application().myMethod();
}
}
Original answer:
Yes, but you have a hen-and-egg problem there, i.e. you cannot just reference the newly introduced fields from your LTW aspect code without reflection. (The last sentence is not true, see update above.) Plus, in order to make your LTW aspect compile, you need the classes to be woven on the project's build path so as to be able to reference them. Example:
Java project
public class Application {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("main");
}
}
AspectJ project
import org.aspectj.lang.SoftException;
public aspect LTWAspect {
public static String Application.staticField = "value of static field";
public String Application.normalField = "value of normal field";
public void Application.myMethod() {
try {
System.out.println(Application.class.getDeclaredField("normalField").get(this));
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new SoftException(e);
}
}
void around() : execution(void Application.main(..)) {
System.out.println("around before");
proceed();
System.out.println("around after");
try {
System.out.println(Application.class.getDeclaredField("staticField").get(null));
Application.class.getDeclaredMethod("myMethod", null).invoke(new Application());
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new SoftException(e);
}
}
}
So, e.g. in Eclipse you need to put the Java project on the AspectJ project's build path under "Projects" because only then it can see Java class Application on which you want to declare members. After compilation you just start the Java project and do LTW on the aspect project (don't forget an aop-ajc.xml referencing LTWAspect).
In my example above I declare a static member, a non-static ("normal") member and a non-static method. My advice prints the static member and calls the non-static method, both via reflection. The non-static method then prints the non-static member, again via reflection. This is not nice, but it works and proves the ITD in combination with LTW is possible. There might be a more elegant way, but if so I am unaware of it. (Update: There is a more elegant way: Just ignore the errors marked by Eclipse IDE, see above.)
Program output
around before
main
around after
value of static field
value of normal field