I am trying to do something like the following:
list.foreach {x =>
x match {
case """TEST: .*""" => println( "TEST" )
case """OXF.*""" => println("XXX")
case _ => println("NO MATCHING")
}
}
The idea is to use it like groovy switch case regex match. But I can't seem to get to to compile. Whats the right way to do it in scala?
You could either match on a precompiled regular expression (as in the first case below), or add an if
clause. Note that you typically don't want to recompile the same regular expression on each case evaluation, but rather have it on an object.
val list = List("Not a match", "TEST: yes", "OXFORD")
val testRegex = """TEST: .*""".r
list.foreach { x =>
x match {
case testRegex() => println( "TEST" )
case s if s.matches("""OXF.*""") => println("XXX")
case _ => println("NO MATCHING")
}
}
See more information here and some background here.
Starting Scala 2.13, it's possible to directly pattern match a String by unapplying a string interpolator:
// val examples = List("Not a match", "TEST: yes", "OXFORD")
examples.map {
case s"TEST: $x" => x
case s"OXF$x" => x
case _ => ""
}
// List[String] = List("", "yes", "ORD")
Related
I have a few vals that match for matching values
Here is an example:
val job_ = Try(jobId.toInt) match {
case Success(value) => jobs.findById(value).map(_.id)
.getOrElse( Left(WrongValue("jobId", s"$value is not a valid job id")))
case Failure(_) => jobs.findByName(jobId.toString).map(_.id)
.getOrElse( Left(WrongValue("jobId", s"'$jobId' is not a known job title.")))
}
// Here the value arrives as a string e.i "yes || no || true || or false" then converted to a boolean
val bool_ = bool.toLowerCase() match {
case "yes" => true
case "no" => false
case "true" => true
case "false" => false
case other => Left(Invalid("bool", s"wrong value received"))
}
Note: invalid case is case class Invalid(x: String, xx: String)
above i'm looking for a given job value and checking whether it exist in the db or not,
No I have a few of these and want to add to a list, here is my list val and flatten it:
val errors = List(..all my vals errors...).flatten // <--- my_list_val (how do I include val bool_ and val job_)
if (errors.isEmpty) { do stuff }
My result should contain errors from val bool_ and val job_
THANK!
You need to fix the types first. The type of bool_ is Any. Which does not give you something you can work with.
If you want to use Either, you need to use it everwhere.
Then, the easiest approach would be to use a for comprehension (I am assuming you're dealing with Either[F, T] here, where WrongValue and Invalid are both sub-classes of F and you're not really interested in the errors).
for {
foundJob <- job_
_ <- bool_
} yield {
// do stuff
}
Note, that in Scala >= 2.13 you can use toIntOption when converting the String to Int:
vaj job_: Either[F, T] = jobId.toIntOption match {
case Some(value) => ...
case _ => ...
}
Also, in case expressions, you can use alternatives when you have the same statement for several cases:
val bool_: Either[F, Boolean] = bool.toLowerCase() match {
case "yes" | "true" => Right(true)
case "no" | "false" => Right(false)
case other => Left(Invalid("bool", "wrong value received"))
}
So, according to your question, and your comments, these are the types you're dealing with.
type ID = Long //whatever id is
def WrongValue(x: String, xx: String) :String = "?-?-?"
case class Invalid(x: String, xx: String)
Now let's create a couple of error values.
val job_ :Either[String,ID] = Left(WrongValue("x","xx"))
val bool_ :Either[Invalid,Boolean] = Left(Invalid("x","xx"))
To combine and report them you might do something like this.
val errors :List[String] =
List(job_, bool_).flatMap(_.swap.toOption.map(_.toString))
println(errors.mkString(" & "))
//?-?-? & Invalid(x,xx)
After checking types as #cbley explained. You can just do a filter operation with pattern matching on your list:
val error = List(// your variables ).filter(_ match{
case Left(_) => true
case _ => false
})
I have a configuration value that matches to one of the values in a map and depending on to which it matches i take an action. Here is some sample code of what i am trying to do
val x = 1 // or 2 or 3
val config = Map("c1"-> 1, "c2"-> 2, "c3"-> 3)
x match {
case config("c1") =>
println("1")
case config("c2") =>
println("2")
case config("c3") =>
println("3")
}
Now this should print 1 because config("c1") evaluates to 1 but it gives error
error: value config is not a case class, nor does it have an unapply/unapplySeq member
case config("c1") =>
Similarly for the other 2 cases. Why should i have an unapply here? Any pointers?
An expression like that looks like an extractor, hence the message about unapply/unapplySeq methods. If you don't want to use an extractor but just want to match against a plain value, you need to store that value in a stable identifier - you can't use an arbitrary expression as a match case:
val case1 = config("c1")
x match {
case case1 => println("1")
...
}
To the best of my knowledge, in Scala, x match {case config("c1") gets translated to config.unapply(x) with the branching dependent on the result of the unapply method. As Imm already mentioned in his answer, this isn't the case for stable identifiers (literals and val), and I'd encourage you to use his solution.
Nevertheless, to show you how you could solve the problem using extractors, I'd like to post a different solution:
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
object config {
val configData = Map("c1" -> 1, "c2" -> 2, "c3" -> 3)
def unapply(value: Int): Option[String] = configData find (_._2 == value) map (_._1)
}
1 to 4 foreach {
case config("c1") => println("1")
case config("c2") => println("2")
case config("c3") => println("3")
case _ => println("no match")
}
}
I changed the match for a foreach to show the different results, but this has no effect on the implementation. This would print:
1
2
3
no match
As you can see, case config("c1") now calls the unapply method and checks whether the result is Some("c1"). Note that this is inverse to how you'd use a map: The key is searched according to the value. However, this makes sense: If in the map, "c1" and "c2" both map to 1, then 1 matches both, the same way _ matches everything, in our case even 4 which is not configured.
Here's also a very brief tutorial on extractors. I don't find it particularly good, because both, the returned type and the argument type are Int, but it might help you understand what's going on.
As others have stated, with x match { case config("c1") => ..., scala looks for an extractor by the name of config (something with an unapply method that takes a single value and returns an Optional value); Making pattern matching work this way seems like an abuse of the pattern, and I would not use an extractor for this.
Personally, I would recommend one of the following:
if (x == config("c1"))
println("1")
else if (x == config("c2"))
println("2")
else ...
Or, if you're set on using a match statement, you can use conditionals like this:
x match {
case _ if x == config("c1") =>
println("1")
case _ if x == config("c2") =>
println("2")
case _ if x == config("c3") =>
println("3")
}
Not as clean; unfortunately, there isn't a way to invoke a method call literally where the extractor goes. You can use back-ticks to tell scala "match against the value of this variable" (rather than default behavior, which would yield the value named as that variable):
val (c1,c2,c3) = (config("c1"), config("c2"), config("c3"))
x match {
case `c1` =>
println("1")
case `c2` =>
println("2")
case `c3` =>
println("3")
}
Finally, if your goal is to reverse-apply a map, maybe try this instead?
scala> Map("a" -> 1).map { case (k,v) => (v,k) }
res0: scala.collection.immutable.Map[Int,String] = Map(1 -> a)
I have a map like this:
val mealIdsMap: Map[String, String] =
Map (
"breakfast" -> "omelet",
"lunch" -> "steak",
"dinner" -> "salad"
)
Then I try to use it in a match statement like this:
"omelet" match
{
case mealIdsMap("breakfast") => "Thank God"
}
And I get this error:
error: value mealIdsMap is not a case class constructor,
nor does it have an unapply/unapplySeq method
case mealIdsMap("breakfast") => "Thank God"
Anyone know how to use a map like this in a match/case statement?
Thanks alot for your help.
You should read what is the purpose of pattern matching from a tutorial, may be from this one (first non trivial example on google).
You have inverted the test:
mealIdsMap("breakfast") match {
case "omelet" => "Thank God"
case _ => "Don't forget a default"
}
And if you're not sure that the key is present (and even if you are, if you want to write idiomatic scala, you should prefer:
mealIdsMap.get("breakfast") match {
case Some("omelet") => "Thank God"
case _ => "Don't forget a default"
}
Where getreturns an option, avoiding you to try catch your code or to let it break silently.
Though, its still interesting to try to achieve such a behavior. have a look at this example:
case class InvMatcher (m:Map[String, String]){
def unapply(v:String):Option[String] = {
return m collectFirst {case (k, `v`) => k}
}
}
This class helps you to inverse-match a map.
usage:
val ma = InvMatcher (Map (
"breakfast" -> "omelet",
"lunch" -> "steak",
"dinner" -> "salad"
));
"steak" match {
case ma(s) => s match {
case "breakfast" => print("Thank God")
case "lunch" => print("whatever")
case _ => print("dont forget default")
}
case _ => print("dont forget default")
}
This is nearly as you wanted it though you need a second match-statement (which doesnt need a default case here...)
My method definition looks as follows
def processLine(tokens: Array[String]) = tokens match { // ...
Suppose I wish to know whether the second string is blank
case "" == tokens(1) => println("empty")
Does not compile. How do I go about doing this?
If you want to pattern match on the array to determine whether the second element is the empty string, you can do the following:
def processLine(tokens: Array[String]) = tokens match {
case Array(_, "", _*) => "second is empty"
case _ => "default"
}
The _* binds to any number of elements including none. This is similar to the following match on Lists, which is probably better known:
def processLine(tokens: List[String]) = tokens match {
case _ :: "" :: _ => "second is empty"
case _ => "default"
}
What is extra cool is that you can use an alias for the stuff matched by _* with something like
val lines: List[String] = List("Alice Bob Carol", "Bob Carol", "Carol Diane Alice")
lines foreach { line =>
line split "\\s+" match {
case Array(userName, friends#_*) => { /* Process user and his friends */ }
}
}
Pattern matching may not be the right choice for your example. You can simply do:
if( tokens(1) == "" ) {
println("empty")
}
Pattern matching is more approriate for cases like:
for( t <- tokens ) t match {
case "" => println( "Empty" )
case s => println( "Value: " + s )
}
which print something for each token.
Edit: if you want to check if there exist any token which is an empty string, you can also try:
if( tokens.exists( _ == "" ) ) {
println("Found empty token")
}
case statement doesn't work like that. That should be:
case _ if "" == tokens(1) => println("empty")
I can write the code like this:
str match {
case s if s.startsWith("!!!") => s.stripPrefix("!!!")
case _ =>
}
But I want to know is there any better solutions. For example:
str match {
case "!!!" + rest => rest
case _ =>
}
val r = """^!!!(.*)""".r
val r(suffix) = "!!!rest of string"
So suffix will be populated with rest of string, or a scala.MatchError gets thrown.
A different variant would be:
val r = """^(!!!){0,1}(.*)""".r
val r(prefix,suffix) = ...
And prefix will either match the !!! or be null. e.g.
(prefix, suffix) match {
case(null, s) => "No prefix"
case _ => "Prefix"
}
The above is a little more complex than you might need, but it's worth looking at the power of Scala's regexp integration.
Starting Scala 2.13, it's now possible to pattern match a String by unapplying a string interpolator:
"!!!hello" match {
case s"!!!$rest" => rest
case _ => "oups"
}
// "hello"
If it's the sort of thing you do often, it's probably worth creating an extractor
object BangBangBangString{
def unapply(str:String):Option[String]= {
str match {
case s if s.startsWith("!!!") => Some(s.stripPrefix("!!!"))
case _ => None
}
}
}
Then you can use the extractor as follows
str match{
case BangBangBangString(rest) => println(rest)
case _ => println("Doesn't start with !!!")
}
or even
for(BangBangBangString(rest)<-myStringList){
println("rest")
}
Good question !
Even i was trying a lot to find out the answer.
Here is a good link where I found the answer
object _04MatchExpression_PatternGuards {
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
val url: String = "Jan";
val monthType = url match {
case url if url.endsWith(".org") => "Educational Websites";
case url if url.endsWith(".com") => "Commercial Websites";
case url if url.endsWith(".co.in") => "Indian Websites"
case _ => "Unknow Input";
}
}
}