As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 9 years ago.
I'm looking for a simple RDF library for Scala. So far I've found three, which all seem to have issues:
scardf (https://code.google.com/p/scardf/) doesn't seem to be currently maintained, although it has documentation and positive comments
banana-rdf (https://github.com/w3c/banana-rdf) seems to be actively maintained, but has no docs
FeDeRate (https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FeDeRate/summary) seems unmaintained and undocumented
Does anyone have any recommendations? I'm using Scala 2.10, and would like something light, fast and clean. I'm mostly going to be carrying out simple queries and storing stuff, but I'd like the option to work with external endpoints as well.
Related
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 9 years ago.
I've been doing research online to find a good IDE for programming in NASM. The only one I found consistently mention is RadASM however, in contains no documentation on how to set it up and on top of that it is riddled with viruses/trojans (according to Norton).
Does anyone know of a reliable, preferably free, IDE that works well with NASM?
I'm looking for something to do the same for NASM as NetBeans or Eclipse do for Java.
I have some links to IDE's here
Both RadASM v2 and v3 are from the authors sourcforge repository site and are virus free
Update
Because the links are broken on the above page, I'm adding the git info here.
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 10 years ago.
Japid is a fast template engine (probably 2x to 20x faster) supported by play framework, But is it better enough or stable enough to be used in production environment ? And if japid is better than why play shipped examples projects in scala?
Japid is not faster because it is written in Java. It's faster because the people who wrote it decided to spend the effort to make it faster. Scala can be just as fast.
It's also newer, and a plugin, which explains why it isn't used for the core examples for Play.
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 11 years ago.
I am working on a project and as I want it to be hassle free so I am considering using Amazon SimpleDB for the sake of simplicity. At least I can cross out DB administration.
But why there is so little info about SimpleDB on the net? As if nobody cares about it and I feel like I might be on the wrong track. Is it so unpopular? The other major NoSQL databases have a lot more coverage. What could be the reason? Is it because it is hosted? Does it lack major important features which I don't notice? Is it horrible performance-wise? Is it not durable? Why people are not very interested? Are there better alternatives for hosted NoSQL?
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 11 years ago.
I know this has been asked way too many times... But I am in search of a non-mvc-based PHP framework. My only requirements are that it be stable enough, and not one that can be easily found (meaning that if it can be easily found, then I've probably already found it, and don't like it)
Any help is appreciated
Thanks!
Check out Fat Free - can be used in an MVC way or not - super flexible, but needs PHP 5.3+ to run.
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 10 years ago.
is there any open-source and extendable tool like what js-kit/disqus provides that could be self hosted ?
Since disqus is made with django, IMHO it is relevant to suggest something similar that is made with django too. :-) From my understanding is disqus is basically a threaded commenting system. The most popular ones in django community for this is django-threaded-comments.
Take a look on Juvia
It's in Ruby and there is a demo available following the Github project readme