I posted this question on the Google groups site, but did not get a response. From what I can tell, by default, messages do NOT go to the dead letter queue. I need to enable this. I see that I can modify the MSMQMessageBuilder class and set the UseDeadLetterQueue property to true for the message.
However, if I want to use the Nuget package, this option is out. Is there a configuration I can set to enable the DLQ?
Related
I am getting many welcome messages from the same user, is it some kind of a monitoring system by Google?
How can I learn to ignore those requests?
Yes, Google periodically issues a health check against your Action, usually about every 5-10 minutes. Your Action should respond to it normally so Google knows if there is something wrong. If there is, you will receive email that your Action is unavailable because it is unhealthy. They will continue to monitor it and, when healthy again, will restore it.
You don't need to ignore those requests, however you may wish to, either to save on resources or to avoid logging it all the time.
With a library such as multivocal, it detects it and responds automatically - there is nothing you need to to. For other libraries, you will need to examine the raw input sent in the body of your webhook request.
If you are using the Action SDK, you should examine the inputs array to see if there is one with an argument named "is_health_check". If you are using Dialogflow, then you would need to look under originalDetectIntentRequest.data.inputs.
I am working on a tool to generate fake data for System Center Operations Manager for internal testing purposes. I wrote a script as part of a discovery that is able to create an instance of any class I want and make SCOM fake-discover it. Currently, I'm using a class for AD Printer. Now the next step is to somehow create alerts on behalf of the Printer. For this, I wrote a rule targeted at the AD Printer, which reads from the logs to detect when it should be fired. The logs are being written to from a PowerShell script. However, I see no results. But when I target the same rule to All Windows Computers, I see the alerts.
From what I understand the rule will run on all agents that have an instance of the target class. Since I fake-discovered the AD Printer on this agent (which also happens to be the Management Server), should the rule not run on this?
Any other suggestions on how I can achieve this are welcome as well.
PS. I probably cannot share any of my code as I am under an NDA, but I can clarify my approach further, if needed.
Yes, the Powershell script should run on the agents which have instances of the AD Printer. I recommend you to check the OperationsManager event log for script errors. The easiest way to generate (fake) alerts is to set up a simple, Event-based text log monitor: one specific word can trigger the unhealthy state (which in turn generates an alert), while another word resets the monitor to the healthy state. You can specify criteria for both events. Look at this blog post for further details.
I've converted a console app into a scheduled WebJob. All is working well, but I'm having a little trouble figuring out how to accomplish the error logging/emailing I'd like to have.
1.) I am using Console.WriteLine and Console.Error.WriteLine to create log messages. I see these displayed in the portal when I go to WebJob Run Details. Is there any way to have these logs saved to files somewhere? I added my storage account connection string as AzureWebJobsDashboard and AzureWebJobsStorage. But this appears to have just created an "azure-webjobs-dashboard" blob container that only has a "version" file in it.
2.) Is there a way to get line numbers to show up for exceptions in the WebJob log?
3.) What is the best way to send emails from within the WebJob console app? For example, if a certain condition occurs, I may want to have it send me and/or someone else (depending on what the condition is) an email along with logging the condition using Console.WriteLine or Console.Error.WriteLine. I've seen info on triggering emails via a queue or triggering emails on job failure, but what is the best way to just send an email directly in your console app code when it's running as a WebJob?
How is your job being scheduled? It sounds like you're using the WebJobs SDK - are you using the TimerTrigger for scheduling (from the Extensions library)? That extensions library also contains a new SendGrid binding that you can use to send emails from your job functions. We plan on expanding on that to also facilitate failure notifications like you describe, but it's not there yet. Nothing stops you from building something yourself however, using the new JobHostConfiguration.Tracing.Trace to plug in your own TraceWriter that you can use to catch errors/warnings and act as you see fit. All of this is in the beta1 pre-release.
Using that approach of plugging in a custom TraceWriter, I've been thinking of writing one that allows you to specify an error threshold/sliding window, and if the error rate exceeds, an email or other notification will be sent. All the pieces are there for this, just haven't done it yet :)
Regarding logging, the job logs (including your Console.WriteLines) are actually written to disk in your Web App (details here). You should be able to see them if you browse your site log directory. However, if you're using the SDK and Dashboard, you can also use the TextWriter/TraceWriter bindings for logging. These logs will be written to your storage account and will show up in the Dashboard Functions page per invocation. Here's an example.
Logs to files: You can use a custom TraceWriter https://gist.github.com/aaronhoffman/3e319cf519eb8bf76c8f3e4fa6f1b4ae
Exception Stack Trace Line Numbers: You will need to make sure your project is built with debug info set to "full" (more info http://aaron-hoffman.blogspot.com/2016/07/get-line-numbers-in-exception-stack.html)
SendGrid, Amazon Simple Email Service (SES), etc.
When I try to test the queue via the Message Bus. I've checked and permissions are set to full control for everyone. I use 'msmqmng.exe send' from a different machine to put a message onto the queue, it works and is absolutely the message I sent. So what other moving parts might I be missing???
I spent couple of days banging my head for this error, and the root cause was that the storage quota for MSMQ was exceeded! which doesn't seem related to the error message, which makes it a difficult cause to detect...
When sending a message to MSMQ, the sender server will use an outgoing queue located on the sender side, and this outgoing queue is using the storage on that sender server.
The MSMQ component has a maximum quota, defined in the MSMQ properties, and when this quota is exceeded, the above error message starts popping (that's why when you sent from another machine, it worked correctly, since the issue is with the sender not the receiver).
Resolution:
To change this quota, right click on Message Queuing (from Computer management if using Windows server 2003 for example) then properties... (I cannot post images since i am a new user), but in the properties window, you will find in the first tab an editable storage limit field.
To check the currently used storage on the server, open the path of the storage, and check its size: (open the storage tab in the same properties window, and get the path of the storage folder)
If the size of the quota is similar to the size of the storage folder, then this is the root cause of your issue.
If you dont have permission to increase this quota limit, you should have your user added to the "Security" tab in the message queuing properties window.
Hope this helps...
Please vote up if you agree in order for me to have some points and post images in my next answer... :-)
Setting up the queue in Server Manager, Message Queueing I neglected to add the data source name to the queue name. (queue_name_dsNAme) So from one side I was able to insert messages. However, from the Server Group, Message Bus, it automatically appends the data source to the queue to be tested. So, the queue really did not exist.
Turns out there's another twist... even after the naming convention was sorted out there was an application that knew of the queue and was reading from it. When the test message was sent the app grabbed it before the test mechanism had a chance to receive it back, which caused the timeouts. By enabling journaling the message gets put there and you can see what went through the queue. While all this may seem obvious... it pays to ask stupid questions.
When I deployed my site that uses nservice to a new production box, it was unusably slow...
After some debugging I discovered that mqsvc.exe was taking up 50% of the CPU usage and the other 50% was being taken up by w3wp.exe
I found this post here:
http://geekswithblogs.net/michaelstephenson/archive/2010/05/07/139717.aspx
which recommended the following:
Make sure you set the windows service for NserviceBus Generic Host to the right credentials
Make sure you have the queue set with the right permissions
Make sure you turn on the right logging configuration in NServiceBus
So I figured the issue was something related to permissions, but even after trying to set the permissions correctly (I thought) I still wasn't able to resolve the issue.
If you allow NServiceBus to create its own queues, then it will create them with the correct permissions it needs.
The problem comes in when you set up a web application, and then the queues are created, and then the identity the application runs under changes. Then you get exactly this problem. NServiceBus tries to check the queue for a message, it does not have access to do so, so it immediately retries over and over, and you spike the processor.
The fix: Delete the queue. Restart the web application. NServiceBus takes over.
Edit: As noted in the comments, NServiceBus 3.x doesn't invoke the installers by default, which means queues are not automatically created in production unless you ask it to. See the documentation page on Installers for more detail.
For a web application (or any other situation where you're not using NServiceBus.Host) you can invoke the installers as part of the fluent config. There is a full example in the NServiceBus download, but here is a link to the relevant file on GitHub.
The issue did end up being that the website needed to be granted explicit permissions to the queues.
I found a number of resources online telling me this, but I still had to spend a good amount of time monkeying around with exactly WHICH account needed access... turned out that since my application pools were set to run as ApplicationPoolIdentity, I need to grant the account permissions by adding the following account to the nservicebus queue:
IIS AppPool\{APP POOL NAME}
I granted full access rights, though I'm sure you could refine that a bit if you needed to.
Hopefully, this will help anyone who runs into the same issues.
(This is my first attempt at the "Answer your own question" mechanism so please let me know if I am doing something wrong..)