I am having trouble creating a property-dependent create/edit-view in KnockoutJS.
Here's the thing: everything I create are "People" of sorts - it could be a Healthcare Professional, Plumber, Mechanic or Engineer. Depending on what kind/type of person it is, I need to enter different data.
Here an example:
Healthcare Professional: Name, Telephone, Hospital, etc.
Plumber: Name, Telephone, Crafts, etc.
Engineer: Name, Telephone, Specialities, etc.
What I can do is create properties on my ViewModels such as "showCity", "showHospital" and so on to hide individual form-fields.
However, for the sake of separation, I would like to use entirely different forms: again, I could set the respective form to only show if the condition is met.
However, I would like KnockoutJS to only render the respective form that should be used (the Person's type is always determined when it is first created - it cannot be changed).
What I don't end-up doing is have one form that is shown and ten that are there (and data-bound) but hidden.
I tried using the "if" binding like so: <div data-bind="with: $root.selectedPerson"><form data-bind="if: $data.type='mathematician'"></form></div>, but to no avail.
Would anybody know what the best-practice is in this case?
Your if binding is setting the $data.type value, not comparing it. Try:
<div data-bind="with: $root.selectedPerson"><form data-bind="if: $data.type() === 'mathematician'"></form></div>
Although this is fine, I always try to avoid code in my data-binding markup. I would try and create a computed that would return the resulting true/false of the comparison, but in your situation, you would need one for each person type, and that would get tricky. For that, I would turn to templates. You could do:
<div data-bind="template: { name: $root.selectedPerson().type, data: $root.selectedPerson }"></div>
<script type="text/html" id="mathematician">...</script>
<script type="text/html" id="plumber">...</script>
*Note: As of KO version 2.3.0, the name property of the template binding can accept observables. If you're using a previous version, be sure to call the observable in the binding: name: $root.selectedPerson().type()
Related
I have a model Company that has a type field. There are two subclasses Fleet and Dealer.
I know the inheritance is working so I'm now working towards the views working too. However the views/companies/_form.html.erb is producing this error when I click edit on a specific company object on my webpage:
undefined method `dealer_path' for #<ActionView::Base:0x000000000418c0>
Here is the form_with tag:
<%= form_with(model: company, class: "contents") do |form| %>
*CONTENT*
<%end%>
I want to generate the form based on what company type I am looking at and for all the fields to be populated with their corresponding data.
I found this warning on the ROR site (https://guides.rubyonrails.org/form_helpers.html):
When you're using STI (single-table inheritance) with your models, you can't rely on record identification on a subclass if only their parent class is declared a resource. You will have to specify :url, and :scope (the model name) explicitly.
But I do not understand exactly what this means and I believe it is the key to my solution. I wish there was an example of this situation on that guide.
Any help or suggestions are welcome and appreciated!
UPDATE
I changed the form_with tag to be:
<%= form_with(model: [:company #company], class: "contents") do |form| %>
and from my understanding this now generates the URL companies/:id/edit
This is closer, and now brings me to the companies edit page but I can't update now because the changes don't persist.
My NEW question now is, what routes should I have set up?
If I'm on localhost:3000/companies and I click 'show company', should this take me to /companies/id: or take me to /dealer/id: / /fleet/id: ?
I have managed to route the app so it will take me to /companies/id regardless of the type value of the object. This works well and all CRUD is working well now too.
I didn't log exactly what it was I changed this time as I just reverted to a previous commit and rebuilt from there.
I need reject for sap.m.Input control any input except integer values. So in input may be inputted only 0-9, without any sign symbol(+-) or any decimal separators. I Can't find good solution. View declared in XML format, and preferable way is just change this XML with additional parameters, if it possible.
Possible solutions:
The first one - write custom formatter.
The second one - try to find some standard solution with types. I found internal data types and they settings, but it seems that they not working well.
A custom formatter won't help you in this case as its only used oneway (model->view).
But data types are your friend here. I would suggest sap.ui.model.type.Integer with a minimum constraint of 0.
<Input value="{path: '/value', type: 'sap.ui.model.type.Integer', constraints:{minimum:0}}" />
However this does have two prerequisites:
You need to enable complex databinding. This can be done in the bootstrap tag in index.html with the data-sap-ui-compatVersion attribute. Version 1.26 is needed at least. You can use the value edge to specify the newest version:
<script src="https://openui5.hana.ondemand.com/resources/sap-ui-core.js"
id="sap-ui-bootstrap"
data-sap-ui-theme="sap_bluecrystal"
data-sap-ui-libs="sap.m"
data-sap-ui-compatVersion="edge">
Alternatively you can use data-sap-ui-bindingSyntax="complex".
If the user enters invalid data the datatype throws a ValidationException. The error will be silently ignored but the model won't be updated. To get some feedback for the user you can register the control or the whole view at the MessageManager:
sap.ui.getCore().getMessageManager().registerObject(this.getView(), true);
You can also enable handleValidation in the Component or when instantiating the component.
Example on JSBin.
Regex is your friend here.
Here is a pretty simple jsbin I re-used from someone validating text only and modified the regex to accept numbers only.
You could wire the validation into the change event so it would fire and set the state to error if text entered.
Let us know how this works out.
Cheers,
Nigel
One part of my meteor application is a semi-collaborative table where users can edit different rows at the same time. When a user is editing a row, the static text values need to switch to input boxes so that the values can be edited and then saved. I would like a template/helper to do this, essentially I want:
<td>
{{#if iAmEditing}}
{{foo}}
{{else}}
<input type="text" name="foo" value="{{foo}}">
</td>
except that there are several columns with different values of "foo" and I don't want to copy and paste this several times. What's the right way to approach this with templates and helpers?
Another approach might be to use the HTML5 contenteditable attribute. Either way, what is the right way to template these values with handlebars?
You should be able to integrate with Bootstrap Editable
For reference, an answer to the original question...
As of today, handlebars partials can't accept anything other than a context argument, but helpers can. Hence. you can define a helper that sets up the context for the template:
Coffeescript:
Handlebars.registerHelper "eventCell", (context, field, editable) ->
return new Handlebars.SafeString(
Template._eventCell
_id: context._id
field: field
value: context[field]
editable: editable
)
Template:
<template name="_eventCell">
<td><div data-ref="{{field}}" class="{{#if editable}}editable{{/if}}">
{{value}}
</div></td>
</template>
Then, I just use the following to render each field:
{{eventCell this "province" iAmEditing}}
I ended up integrating with bootstrap editable, so the template is a little different than my original question. Also, I'm not sure if this is the best way to do it, but it's a lot cleaner than what I had before.
meteor-editable is a new project implementing something like x-editable, but nicely integrated with Meteor reactivity. Unfortunately inline editing is not supported yet (you have to use a popover the way it's set up now).
I am new to Play Framework and still trying to wrap my head around some things with the new Scala template engine.
Let's say I have the following package structure:
app/
app/controllers/Items.scala
app/models/Item.scala
app/views/layouts/page.scala.html
app/views/item/show.scala.html
app/views/item/details.scala.html //partial
And this is my item/show template:
#(item: Item, form: Form[Item])(implicit flash: Flash)
#layout.page() {
#*want to include details partial, wont work due to item param*#
#item.details(item)
}
Since including another template (e.g. including item/details above) is the exact same syntax as accessing a template parameter (e.g. item above), obviously this existing naming convention won't work without something changing.
I know I can rename my "app.views.item" package to "app.views.items", and rely on singular/plural forms to differentiate the view from the param name, but this does not seem like a very straightforward solution. Also what if I really want the parameter name to be the same as the view package?
One idea I have is to prepend all my views with an extra top level package:
app/views/views/item/details.scala.html
So the include syntax would be #views.item.details(), but again this is obviously a hack.
What is a good way to avoid this issue? How can I better organize my code to avoid such naming collisions?
Most other template engines use operations like "include" or "render" to specify a partial include. I don't mean to offend anyone here, but is the Play Scala template engine syntax so terse that it actually dictates the organization of code?
3 solutions:
First
Typpicaly for partial templates you should use tags as described in the docs, where app/views/tags folder is a base:
file: app/views/tags/product.scala.html
in the templates (no initial import required in the parent view full syntax will allow you to avoid name-clash: #tags.packageName.tagName()):
<div id="container">
#tags.product(item)
</div>
Of course in your case you can also use packages in the base folder
file: app/views/tags/item/product.scala.html
<div id="container">
#tags.item.product(item)
</div>
I'm pretty sure that'll solve your problem.
Second
To avoid clash without changing package's name you can just rename the item in your view, also I recommend do not use a form name for the Form[T] as it can conflict with helpers:
#(existingItem: Item, existingItemForm: Form[Item])(implicit flash: Flash)
#layout.page() {
#item.details(existingItem)
}
Third
If you'll fill your Form[Item] before passing to the view with given Item object, you don't need to pass both, as most probably you can get data from the form:
#(itemForm: Form[Item])(implicit flash: Flash)
#layout.page() {
<div>Name of item is: #itemForm("name").value (this is a replacemnet for ##existingItem.name </div>
#item.details(itemForm)
}
Of course in you product.scala.html you'll need to change the #(item: Item) param to #(itemForm: Form[Item])
I have a form with collection of subforms - student with different studies - relation manyToOne. I have corrent database schema and entities and form builder works well. I don't know how to append new "study" object. I need to get html tags from somewhere in either cases - when there is at least one "study: object (clone him) or there is no such a one.
Let's assume that study object has 2 fields: name and year. If for a student there is such a record (object) it's first input in generated form has name "student[study][0][name]". And is surrounded by . When I click "Add new study" button I want to duplicate this surrounding div and change id's and name's of html form elements respectively. Is there ready library or method to use?
But there may happen there is no study records so far. So I need to get form from server through ajax call. Unfortunately returned form has inputs with names like "study[name]". Is it possible to render this form similar to first case - I mean "student[study][0][name]". But i'd like to avoid manually generate twig template for form - I prefer
{{ form_widget(form) }}
You should be dealing with data-prototype rather than issuing separate AJAX request. The whole concept of adding/removing subform items is described here:
http://symfony.com/doc/current/reference/forms/types/collection.html#adding-and-removing-items
Obviously, you will need to some JS (jQuery is highly recommended) in order to replicate subform fields.
You should note, however, that data-prototype behaves differently when you initially have empty or non-empty collection. At least I have encountered this weird behavior. As far as I remember, in first your when you say {{ form_rest(form) }} additional DIV is appended with data-prototype attribute consisting of form's HTML. In second case actual HTML (not as an attribute) is appended with ID attribute "form_name_$$name$$" where you need to replace $$name$$ with proper index.
Now, you really should take a look - maybe all this has been fixed in some recent versions but I can't be sure...
Hope this helps a bit...