I am upgrading essax to grizzly.
I noted this note https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg16188.html which said after 1.60 swift would use a new format for the ring, but this note didn't specified how to upgrade the ring file.It just said
" Once your entire cluster is upgraded, only then upgrade the version
of swift on the box that builds your ring files (ie where you run
swift-ring-builder). Upgrading this piece will change the on-disk
format of your generated ring files. Deploy the new ring files to the
swift cluster."
But I didn't see anything happen to the ring file after the upgrade,the last modified date of the ring files were still the same.
So how to upgrade the ring file in a safe way?
Is there a way to verify if the ring file is upgraded?
You may find the text in Administrator's Guide - Managing the rings more clearly.
Swift 1.6.0 is the last version to use a Python pickle format. Subsequent versions use a different serialization format. Rings generated by Swift versions 1.6.0 and earlier may be read by any version, but rings generated after 1.6.0 may only be read by Swift versions greater than 1.6.0. So when upgrading from version 1.6.0 or earlier to a version greater than 1.6.0, either upgrade Swift on your ring building server last after all Swift nodes have been successfully upgraded, or refrain from generating rings until all Swift nodes have been successfully upgraded.
The newer version can read the old format, so first upgrade all nodes to newer swift version. And then regenerate (rebalance) ring files with new swift-ring-builder command. And you will get the upgraded ring files.
Related
I have a similar issue to others with version numbers in the App Store being unable to upload but don't see a solution for mine.
I created version 1.21, which is a published app. I now realize that the format is supposed to be 1.2.1
Then I tried to create version 1.3 but it says the 1.21 is higher.
How can I get back on the 1.x version numbering format?
Thanks in advance,
~eric
~eric
1.21 is obvisously higher than 1.3.
I think your only option would be version number 1.22 or higher.
I have searched the interwebs for PostgreSQL 10.4 (32 & 64) for Linux platforms and Windows platforms but have been unable to locate any binaries to download. All I can find is the 10.5 version (or 9.x). Any ideas on where to look?
Thanks!
As mentioned in Versioning policy,
the rightmost number denotes the minor release, so 10.5 is the most recent release of PostgreSQL 10:
Minor releases are numbered by increasing the last part of the
version number. Beginning with PostgreSQL 10, this is the second part
of the version number, e.g. 10.0 to 10.1; for older versions this is
the third part of the version number, e.g. 9.5.3 to 9.5.4
10.(x-1) is generally made unavailable as soon as 10.x is released, because 10.(x-1) is the same set of programs, but with known bugs not yet fixed: it should not be prefered over a more recent version.
In most cases, the will to install a specific outdated minor release is due to not knowing the version numbering policy.
The Scala website says:
For historical and testing purposes, we also keep an archive of
previous releases (currently since version 2.5). Prior versions of
Scala, from 0.9.x to 2.4.x, have been archived offline.
Is there any way to get these versions? The source code is available in the git repo, but binaries would be nice.
EDIT:
I found some old versions at archive.org, but the oldest that I could get was 1.1.1.3 from http://web.archive.org/web/20040603140225/http://scala.epfl.ch/downloads/index.html
It turns out, if one looks hard enough, everything from 1.0.0-b4 can be found on archive.org. Unfortunately, some version in between are nowhere to be found, for example 2.3.x and 2.0.x. The question remains why they aren't published on http://scala-lang.org.
JProfiler agent seems to require glibc 2.7, but Centos has glibc 2.5. Has anyone successfully compiled the jprofiler agent for glibc 2.5 or did previous version of JProfiler create agents with 2.5?
Actul error is
Error occurred during initialization of VM
Could not find agent library /opt/jprofiler/bin/linux-x64/libjprofilerti.so in absolute path, with error: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by /opt/jprofiler/bin/linux-x64/libjprofilerti.so)
The problem is that JProfiler you are using has been built on a system with glibc-2.7 (or later).
In general, UNIX systems support backwards compatibility (code compiled on an older system continues to work on a newer one), but not forward compatibility (you can't expect code built on a newer system to work on an older one).
Your choices are: upgrade your version of glibc, or obtain a different build of JProfiler (that was built on glibc-2.5 based system or older).
That's actually a regression in 7.0.1, an easy workaround is to use 7.0:
http://download.ej-technologies.com/jprofiler/jprofiler_linux_7_0.tar.gz
We'll fix this dependency problem shortly (my company develops JProfiler). Thanks for letting us know.
I want to create an MSI installer containing three apps. I will be releasing frequent updates to each app as I work through the list of feature requests and do bug fixes. The three apps are currently at versions 1.6.3, 1.6.12 and 1.8.1 respectively.
I was wondering what you guys can recommend for the version of the package. Should I:
Make the package version independent of the versions of the individual apps ?
Change the apps so they always have the same version as each other ?
Some other suggestion ?
Modify the package version each time the version of one of the apps changes. Then, you can look at the package version and know exactly which version of each app was being used.
Example:
Main version 1.4.1 has (1.6.3, 1.6.12, 1.8.1)
Main version 1.4.2 has (1.6.3, 1.6.13, 1.8.1)
Main version 1.5.0 has (1.7.0, 1.6.13, 1.8.2)
Main version 2.0.0 has (1.7.0, 1.6.14, 2.0.0)
So, if you're doing a minor version upgrade to one of your apps, the main application also goes up by a minor version number. Major changes to a sub-app result in the main app also getting a major version number change.