Is it possible to include LaTeX-style math in any way with github repo wikis? Googling implies github no longer allows things like MathJax, but most references are years old. What (if any) alternatives are there to including LaTeX-formatted math in github wikis?
You can use chart.apis.google.com to render LaTeX formulas as PNG.
It work nicely with Githhub's markdown:
Example (Markdown):
The ratio of the momentum to the velocity is
the relativistic mass, m.
![f1]
And the relativistic mass and the relativistic
kinetic energy are related by the formula:
![f2]
Einstein wanted to omit the unnatural second term
on the right-hand side, whose only purpose is
to make the energy at rest zero, and to declare
that the particle has a total energy, which obeys:
![f3] which is a sum of the rest energy ![f4]
and the kinetic energy.
[f1]: http://chart.apis.google.com/chart?cht=tx&chl=m=\frac{m_0}{\sqrt{1-{\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}}
[f2]: http://chart.apis.google.com/chart?cht=tx&chl=E_k=mc^2-m_0c^2
[f3]: http://chart.apis.google.com/chart?cht=tx&chl=E=mc^2
[f4]: http://chart.apis.google.com/chart?cht=tx&chl=m_0c^2
https
Some installations of Github Enterprise reject http and work only if you use https
Rendered:
For simple formulas (such as exponents etc) you may one just to use the available render languages. For example, using Textile, you can do:
_E = mc ^2^_
Thiw will be rendered as:
_ is used for italic style and ^ for superscript.
You can do the same thing in Markdown adding some HTML:
*E = mc<sup>2</sup>*
You can see it in action in this very place:
E = mc2
If you're looking for support for complex math formulas, then you have no better option than using a third-party service generating images for you. mathUrl looks interesting.
As input we give it E = mc ^ 2 and it generates the following link:
http://mathurl.com/render.cgi?E%20%3D%20mc%20%5E%202%5Cnocache
There is good solution for your problem - use TeXify github plugin - more details about this plugin and explanation why this is good approach you can find in that answer.
GitLab Wiki and markdown supports formulas. I moved multiple repos for this reason.
Now GitHub officially supports showing Mathjax in the wiki!
In Markdown, just use $ as the deliminator of inline formulas, and $$ as the deliminator of display formulas.
To add math equations to a GitHub wiki, I used mathURL as suggested by Ionică. It will render your LaTeX equations. Append .png to the generated url and use that url as an image (either block or inline) in your markdown.
Related
I use Python for plotting geospatial data on maps.
For certain map-styles, such as ["basic", "streets", "outdoors", "light", "dark", "satellite", "satellite-streets"], I need a mapbox-access token and for some geospatial plotting packages like folium I even need to create my own link for retrieving the map-tiles.
So far, it worked great with the style "satellite":
mapbox_style = "satellite"
mapbox_access_token = "....blabla"
request_link = f"https://api.mapbox.com/v4/mapbox.{mapbox_style}/{{z}}/{{x}}/{{y}}#2x.jpg90?access_token={mapbox_access_token}"
However, when choosing "satellite-streets" as mapbox-tile-ID, the output doesn't show a background map anymore. It fails with inserting "satellite-streets", "satellitestreets" and "satellite_streets" into the aforementioned link-string.
Why is that and how can I come to know what's the correct tile-ID-name for "satellite-streets"?
I found an answer when reaching out to the customer support.
Apparently, one has to access the static APIs which have specific names listed on their website:
"In general, the styles that you mentioned including
"satellite_streets" that you are referencing are our classic styles
that are going to be deprecated starting June 1st. I would recommend
using our modern static API the equivalent modern styles. This
will allow you to see the most updated street data as well.
Like the example request below:
https://api.mapbox.com/styles/v1/mapbox/satellite-streets-v11/tiles/1/1/0?access_token={your_token}
Here is more info on the deprecation of the classic styles and
the migration guide for them."
My personal adaptation after having tried everything out myself, is:
Via combining the above-mentioned with the details on how to construct a Mapbox-request link on this documention from mapbox' website,
I finally managed to make it work.
An example request looks like so (in python using f-strings):
mapbox_tile_URL = f"https://api.mapbox.com/styles/v1/mapbox/{tileset_ID_str}/tiles/{tilesize_pixels}/{{z}}/{{x}}/{{y}}#2x?access_token={mapbox_access_token}"
The tileset_ID_str could be e.g. "satellite-streets-v11" which can be seen at the following link containing valid static maps.
I want to make a network graph which shows the distribution of our documents in our folder structure.
I have the nodefile, edgefile and gephi graph file in this location:
https://1drv.ms/f/s!AuVfRBdVHkO7hgs5K9r9f7jBBAUH
What I do is:
Run the algorithm ForceAtlas2 with scaling 10-20, dissuade hub marked and prevent overlap marked, all other standard setting.
What I get is a graph with groups radial/spherical distributed. However, what I want is a tree directed network graph.
Anyone know how I can adjust Gephi to make this?
Thanks!
I just found a solution.
I tested the file format as shown on the Yed site "import excel file" page
http://yed.yworks.com/support/manual/import_excel.html
This gave me the Yed import dialog (took a life time to figure out that it's a pop up menu and not selectable through the standard menu)
Anyway, it worked and I've adjusted the test files with the data prepared for the Gehpi. This was pretty easy, I could used the source target ID's etc. Just copy paste.
I load it into Yed and used some directed and radial clustering algorithms on it. Works fine!
Below you can find the excel node/edge file used to import in Yed and the graph file you can open with Yed to see the final radial result.
https://1drv.ms/f/s!AuVfRBdVHkO7hg6DExK_eVkm5_mR
Only thing to figure out is how to combine the weight (which represents the number of documents) with the node size.
Unfortunately, as of version 0.9.0, Gephi no longer supports hierarchical graphs. Maybe try using a previous version?
Other alternatives involve more complex software, such as Graphviz, but you need a .dot file instead of your .csv. I looked all over, but could not find an easy-to-use csv to dot converter.
You could try looking at d3-hierarchy, a node.js program, but then again you need to use the not-so-user-friendly npm. If you look at the link, it looks like it can produce the kind of diagram you're looking for.
Currently I'm using this markdown text inside the README.md file of a project on GitHub:
See the docs of [testthat][3] on how to write unit tests.
Links
-----
- http://www.rstudio.com/products/rpackages/devtools/
- https://github.com/hadley/testthat
- http://r-pkgs.had.co.nz/tests.html
---
[1]: http://www.rstudio.com/products/rpackages/devtools/
[2]: https://github.com/hadley/testthat
[3]: http://r-pkgs.had.co.nz/tests.html
I don't like this duplication, but I don't see what choice I have. If I remove the explicit bullet point lists, then GitHub won't display the reference links. If I remove the reference links, then GitHub shows the bullet point list (of course), but the embedded links like "testthat" above don't work.
Is there a better way than duplicating? What am I missing?
Inspired by #mb21, I suppose this would be the right way to do it:
See the docs of [testthat][2] on how to write unit tests.
Links
-----
- [RStudio Devtools][1]
- [testthat][2]
- [More unit test examples][3]
[1]: https://stackoverflow.com/users/214446/mb21
[2]: https://github.com/hadley/testthat
[3]: http://r-pkgs.had.co.nz/tests.html
That is, it's not a good practice to include links verbatim and without a meaningful title. I should keep the link URLs only in the reference links section at the bottom, and in the bullet point list use meaningful titles.
When you view this on GitHub, the URLs shouldn't really matter, and if you really want to know you can move the mouse over. When you view this in plain text, now the links have meaningful titles, which is useful additional information about the URLs.
I'd write that as follows:
See the docs of [testthat][1] on how to write unit tests.
Links
-----
- [RStudio Devtools](http://www.rstudio.com/products/rpackages/devtools/)
- [Testthat](https://github.com/hadley/testthat)
- [Tests][1]
[1]: http://r-pkgs.had.co.nz/tests.html
Did that answer your question? If not, you'll have to clarify it.
An answer from 8 years in the future!
The answer to your question will depend on what your Markdown parser supports. Nowadays, most parsers support CommonMark (plus some flavouring). However, don't take this for granted and double check it. If CommonMark is not supported, try using the "vanilla" Markdown syntax as described below. Just be aware that the "vanilla" Markdown specification is flawed and may result in broken links (by design, almost).
Using CommonMark
If you can guarantee that your Markdown parser supports CommonMark, then you can do it in a simple way:
Writing unit tests is explained in the [Unit Testing] website
[Unit Testing]: https://unittesting.somedomain.com
In the Links section of the CommonMark specification (currently at version 0.30) you see that a "link" is composed of a link text, link destination and a title and each one has its own syntax and quirks. For example, if the link destination contains spaces, you need to wrap it in <angled brackets>, or if your link text is some kind of code, you're allowed to write
[`AwesomeClass`](<../docs/awesome class.md>]
Note:
In this section I am using the CommonMark syntax, so you can click the
"Edit" button to see the syntax that I used for a "real" example.
Using vanilla Markdown
The vanilla Markdown specification simply requires an extra set of angled brackets with nothing in between, as described in the links section.
Writing unit tests is explained in the [Unit Testing][] website
[Unit Testing]: https://unittesting.somedomain.com
Note
And in this section I've only used vanilla Markdown syntax. Stack Overflow's Markdown parser supports both CommonMark and vanilla Markdown. This is not by accident, since CommonMark intends to be compatible with the original specification (wherever possible!). Stack Overflow do state that they use the CommonMark spec in their Markdown help page.
Tl;dr
See the docs of [`testthat`] on how to write unit tests.
Links
-----
- [RT Studio dev tools]
- [`testthat`]
- [R Packages]
---
[RT Studio dev tools]: http://www.rstudio.com/products/rpackages/devtools/
[`testthat`]: https://github.com/hadley/testthat
[R Packages]: http://r-pkgs.had.co.nz/tests.html
Someone was recently raving about how great jQuery was and how it made javascript into a pleasure and also how the whole source code was so small(and one file).
I looked it up on www.ohloh.net/ and it said it was about 30,000 lines of javascript, when I tired curl piped to wc it said about 5000 lines(strange discrepancy that, maybe test suites, etc?).
I thought well it isn't that strange since javascript from what I've heard has a lot of fun dynamic tricks, so you can probably get away with a small library.
But then I thought what about other high level languages, the ones with large standard libraries and wondered how big the standard are for python/ruby/haskell/pharo(smalltalk)/*ml/etc. (libraries not vm stuff to the degree its possible to separate it)
Anybody know? Any details (comment/blank/code lines , test code lines, lines in language vs lines in ffi/byte-code) are appreciated!
edit: ps. since it started this me asking about jQuery as a bonus if you could please list the size of mega frameworks, a megaframewok provides so much that people using an x megaframework in language y might sometimes refer to programming in xy or even x rather then in y (ie. : qt, jQuery, etc.).
In Pharo, printing:
|i|
i := 0.
SystemNavigation default allBehaviorsDo: [:each|
each selectors do: [:selector |
i := i+((each sourceCodeAt: selector) lineCount)]].
i.
results in:
PharoCore-1.1-11326 updated to 11334: 367231
Seaside-2.8.4: 473368
Pharo-1.0 with Suixo base framework: 558656
Seaside 3.0a5: 408019
That includes method comments, and I'm not sure what happens to traits.
Probably it should be fairer to compare jQuery with other javascript libraries alike ONLY. I'd like to think that this was taking into account that someone you talk about.
jQuery, PRODUCTION (24KB, Minified and Gzipped) or (155KB, Uncompressed Code)
jQuery UI, full Minified 200kb
Prototype, Size: 128kB
Script.aculo.us, Size: 63kB
mootools, Size: 63kB
extJS, Size: 6.6mB FULL, core 130Kb
Yahoo! UI Library (YUI), Size: core minified 17kb, 7kb minified and gzipped, full 379kb minified, 135 minified and gzipped
Mochikit, Size: 380kB
dojo, Size: compressed (27k)
I am looking for a way of generating PNG images of equations from LATEX source code embedded in templates. For example, given:
[% FILTER latex_display ]
\begin{eqnarray*}
\max && U(x,y) \\
\mathrm{s.t.} && p_x x + p_y y \leq I \\
&& x \geq 0, y \geq 0
\end{eqnarray*}
[% END %]
I would like to get the output:
<div class="latex display"><img src="equation.png" width="x" height="y"></div>
which should ultimately display as:
I am using ttree to generate documents offline. I know about Template::Plugin::Latex but that is geared towards producing actual documents out of LATEX templates.
Any suggestions?
Update:
I appreciate the suggestions (and I have voted them up). However, they are no quite what I need. I would really appreciate a few pointers towards getting started with a Plugin or Filter for Template Toolkit.
Wikipedia does something similar to what you want. They use a program called texcv. Then you also have MathJAX which is more aimed at dynamic math rendering in web-pages.
texcv is according to the linked page written in OCaml however since the rest of Mediawiki is written in PHP I don't think you should have any problem with repurposing the program to use with Perl.
you should take a look at jsMath, MathML, or mathjax
I would really appreciate a few pointers towards getting started with a Plugin or Filter for Template Toolkit
These docs on Template Toolkit site should provide all necessary info to setup a plugin or filter:
Plugin provider module
Base class for plugin filters
Once you have your LATEX to PNG conversion sorted then you probably need to save it as a file using redirect. Example from POD:
[% PROCESS my/png/generator
FILTER redirect("images/logo.png", binmode=1) %]
Hope that helps.
/I3az/