The name can be changed like shown in the tutorial:
TypeScript.Definitions()
.ForLoadedAssemblies()
.WithFormatter((type, f) => "I" + ((TypeLite.TsModels.TsClass)type).Name)
How can the module name be changed using fluent formatter?
As of TypeLite version 1.4.0 the following works fine to change module name:
<# var ts = TypeScript.Definitions()
.WithModuleNameFormatter((module) => "my.module.name");#>
Or you can also play with what's already set as module name to have more control like this:
<# var ts = TypeScript.Definitions()
.WithModuleNameFormatter((module) => "I" + ((TypeLite.TsModels.TsModule)module).Name);#>
There is now an oveload of TypeScriptFluent.WithFormatter that takes TsModuleNameFormatter delegate, so that you can transform module names. For example this code converts module name to the last part of your namespace (MyCompany.Business.Module1 -> Module1):
<#
var ts = TypeScript.Definitions()
.WithFormatter((TsModuleNameFormatter)FormatModuleName)
#>
<#+
string FormatModuleName(string module) {
var parts = module.Split(new []{'.'});
var newModule = parts[parts.Length - 1];
return newModule;
}
#>
Update:
In latest version of TypeLite 1.1.2.0 the API has changed slightly, so the previous example will look like this:
<#
var ts = TypeScript.Definitions().WithModuleNameFormatter((TsModuleNameFormatter)FormatModuleName)
#>
<#+
string FormatModuleName(TsModel module) {
var parts = module.Name.Split(new []{'.'});
var newName = parts[parts.Length - 1];
return newName;
}
#>
Right now it isn't possible to globally change the module name using fluent configuration.
However you can change the module name on per class basis:
TypeScript.Definitions().For<MyClass>().ToModule("ModuleName")
Related
I am creating a vscode extension that does some custom auto-completing of files paths.
I want to take what the user has typed, and if that value resolves to a folder in the workspace, I want to list all the files in that folder for auto-complete.
For example, given:
a workspace located at: /home/me/my-vs-project
with files:
/home/me/my-vs-project/assets/dog.png
/home/me/my-vs-project/assets/cat.jpeg
If I type in 'assets' or './assets' into vscode, the extension should be able to provide me an autocomplete list of:
'./assets/dog.png'
'./assets/cat.png'
Here's a snippet of the code that doesn't work (returns 0 results)..
let inputAsWorkspaceRelativeFolder = getInput(document, position); // for example, would return: '/home/me/my-vs-project/assets' for input of './assets'
let glob = inputAsWorkspaceRelativeFolder + '/*';
vscode.workspace.findFiles(glob, null, 100).then((uris: vscode.Uri[] ) => {
uris.forEach((uri: vscode.Uri) => {
console.log(uri);
});
});
For some reason, the above code is returning 0 uris though. Thoughts on how I have to format the glob to make this happen? and/or if there is a better approach?
I was able to do this using vscode.RelativePattern -- I'm sure I could've done it using generic GlobPatterns but im still not clear what the findFiles(..) consider the 'root' when matching files; RelativePattern is explicitly relative to the workspace root.
let workspaceFolder: vscode.WorkspaceFolder | undefined = vscode.workspace.getWorkspaceFolder(document.uri);
if (!workspaceFolder || document.isUntitled) {
return undefined;
}
// Workspace folder: /home/me/my-project
let workspaceFolderPath: string = workspaceFolder.uri.path;
let relativeSearchFolderPrefix = path.normalize(path.dirname(document.uri.path) + '/' + searchText);
relativeSearchFolderPrefix = path.relative(workspaceFolderPath, relativeSearchFolderPrefix);
let relativePattern: vscode.RelativePattern = new vscode.RelativePattern(
workspaceFolderPath,
relativeSearchFolderPrefix + '/**/*.{png,jpeg,jpg,gif}');
return vscode.workspace.findFiles(globPattern, null, 50).then((uris: vscode.Uri[] ) => {
let relativePaths: string[] = [];
uris.forEach((uri: vscode.Uri) => {
relativePaths.push(path.relative(current, uri.path));
});
// trivial custom function that turns an array of strings into CompletionItems
return getCompletionItems(relativePaths, vscode.CompletionItemKind.File);
});
😊👋🏻
I think you wronged the glob.
I found this intresting wiki about Glob pattern composition.
let inputAsWorkspaceRelativeFolder = 'asset'; // for example, would return: '/home/me/my-vs-project/assets' for input of './assets'
//https://github.com/ev3dev/vscode-ev3dev-browser/wiki/Glob-Patterns
let glob = '**/'+inputAsWorkspaceRelativeFolder+'/*.*';//or +'/{*.png,*.jpeg}';
Or you can use the node built-in fs
import * as fs from 'fs';
fs.readdir(inputAsWorkspaceRelativeFolder, (err, files: string[]) => {
files.forEach((file: path) => {
const uri = vscode.Uri.file(file);
console.log(uri);
});
});
More simple, if you want to get all the files in the asset folder and don't want to filter for extension.
Can not find related document in http://cakebuild.net/dsl/file-operations/
The cmake compares file date automatically, I'm wondering if there is similar facility in cakebuild?
There's no automatic file date comparing in Cake. It's just .NET so you can compare using System.IO just as in regular .NET.
var fileA = new System.IO.FileInfo("./filea.txt");
var fileB = new System.IO.FileInfo("./fileb.txt");
if (fileA.LastWriteTime > fileB.LastWriteTime)
{
}
or
var modifiedA = System.IO.File.GetLastWriteTime("./filea.txt");
var modifiedB = System.IO.File.GetLastWriteTime("./fileb.txt");
if (modifiedA > modifiedB)
{
}
If you want to check if two files are identical or not then there's built-in functionality to get the hash of a given file with the CalculateFileHash alias.
var fileHashA = CalculateFileHash("filea.txt").ToHex();
var fileHashB = CalculateFileHash("fileb.txt").ToHex();
if (fileHashA != fileHashB)
{
//DIFF
}
I followed CasperJS's documentation about including .coffee files from the main Casper test file. My code looks like this:
home/tests/my_test_file.coffee:
parameters = require('../parameters')
casper.test.begin "Test ", (test) ->
home_page = parameters.root_path
page_to_test = home_page + "my_page_to_test"
casper.start page_to_test, ->
test.assertEquals #getCurrentUrl(), page_to_test
casper.run ->
test.done()
home/parameters.coffee:
require = patchRequire global.require
root_path = "http://localhost:1080/"
my_page = "foo"
other_param = "bar"
exports = ->
{
'root_path': root_path,
'my_page': my_page,
'other_param': other_param
}
However, Casper keeps telling me that page_to_test is undefined in my_test_file.coffee.
That's not a proper use of exports. First you don't need a function here, because you directly access the properties of the returned object. And second you cannot assign something directly to exports. That's what module.exports is for.
module.exports = {
'root_path': root_path,
'my_page': my_page,
'other_param': other_param
}
or
exports.root_path = root_path
exports.my_page = my_page
exports.other_param = other_param
By assigning an object to exports (exports = obj), you overwrite the object that does the actual exporting and nothing is exported.
My goal is to modify "JustMyCode" queries using nDepend API. I am using code like:
var justMyCodeGroup = prj.CodeQueries.CodeQueriesSet.ChildGroups.Single(x => x.Name.Contains("JustMyCode"));
var originalQuery = justMyCodeGroup.ChildQueries
.Single(x => x.QueryString.Contains("Discard generated Types from JustMyCode"));
var changedQuery = originalQuery.Controller.CreateQuery(originalQuery.IsActive,
query,
originalQuery.
DisplayStatInReport,
originalQuery.DisplayListInReport,
originalQuery.DisplaySelectionViewInReport,
originalQuery.IsCriticalRule);
var justMyCodeGroupWithModifiedQuery = justMyCodeGroup.ReplaceQuery(originalQuery, changedQuery);
prj.CodeQueries.CodeQueriesSet.ReplaceGroup(justMyCodeGroup, justMyCodeGroupWithModifiedQuery);
However, when I run the code above I get ArgumentException with message:
newGroup.Controller is different than this groupOfGroups.Controller
Any help ?
Update 1:
I also tried code:
var justMyCodeGroup = prj.CodeQueries.CodeQueriesSet.ChildGroups.Single(x => x.Name.Contains("JustMyCode"));
var originalQuery = justMyCodeGroup.ChildQueries
.Single(x => x.QueryString.Contains("Discard generated Types from JustMyCode"));
var changedQuery = originalQuery.Controller.CreateQuery(originalQuery.IsActive,
query,
originalQuery.
DisplayStatInReport,
originalQuery.DisplayListInReport,
originalQuery.DisplaySelectionViewInReport,
originalQuery.IsCriticalRule);
var justMyCodeGroupWithModifiedQuery = justMyCodeGroup.ReplaceQuery(originalQuery, changedQuery);
var newQueries = new List<IQuery>();
foreach (var q in justMyCodeGroup.ChildQueries)
{
if (q.QueryString.Contains("Discard generated Types from JustMyCode"))
{
continue;
}
newQueries.Add(prj.CodeQueries.CodeQueriesSet.Controller.CreateQuery(q.IsActive, q.QueryString,
q.DisplayStatInReport, q.DisplayListInReport, q.DisplaySelectionViewInReport, q.IsCriticalRule));
}
newQueries.Add(prj.CodeQueries.CodeQueriesSet.Controller.CreateQuery(originalQuery.IsActive, query, originalQuery.DisplayStatInReport, originalQuery.DisplayListInReport, originalQuery.DisplaySelectionViewInReport, originalQuery.IsCriticalRule));
var newGroup = prj.CodeQueries.CodeQueriesSet.Controller.CreateGroup(justMyCodeGroup.Name,
justMyCodeGroup.IsActive, justMyCodeGroup.ShownInReport, newQueries, new List<IGroup>());
prj.CodeQueries.CodeQueriesSet.RemoveGroup(justMyCodeGroup);
prj.CodeQueries.CodeQueriesSet.AddGroup(newGroup);
Right now, RemoveGroup throws exception:
this group of groups doesn't contain groupToRemove.
Update 2:
And I also wonder, why does this code return false ?
var justMyCodeGroup = prj.CodeQueries.CodeQueriesSet.ChildGroups.Single(x => x.Name.Contains("JustMyCode"));
prj.CodeQueries.CodeQueriesSet.ContainsGroup(justMyCodeGroup)
Refer to the PowerTools source file:
$NDependInstallDir$\NDepend.PowerTools.SourceCode\CQL2CQLinq\CQL2CQLinqPowerTool.cs
This PowerTools convert code queries written with old CQL syntax into code queries written with new CQLinq syntax, hence it loads the queries set from a project, update CQL queries, and then save the new queries set in the project.
The queriesController is gathered this way...
var queriesSet = project.CodeQueries.CodeQueriesSet;
var queriesController = queriesSet.Controller;
... and then used this way to modify the queries set:
queriesController.DoUpdateQueryObject(query, newQuery);
I'm using entity framework 4.
I have a stored procedure that just updates one value in my table, namely the application state ID. So I created a stored procedure that looks like this:
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[UpdateApplicationState]
(
#ApplicationID INT,
#ApplicationStateID INT
)
AS
BEGIN
UPDATE
[Application]
SET
ApplicationStateID = #ApplicationStateID
WHERE
ApplicationID = #ApplicationID;
END
I created a function import called UpdateApplicationState. I had initially set its return type to null, but then it wasn't created in the context. So I changed its return type to int. Now it was created in the context. Is it wise to return something from my stored procedure?
Here is my method in my ApplicationRepository class:
public void UpdateApplicationState(int applicationID, int applicationStateID)
{
var result = context.UpdateApplicationState(applicationID, applicationStateID);
}
Here is my calling code to this method in my view:
applicationRepository.UpdateApplicationState(id, newApplicationStateID);
When I run it then I get the following error:
The data reader returned by the store
data provider does not have enough
columns for the query requested.
Any idea/advise on what I can do to get this to work?
Thanks
To get POCO to work with function imports that return null, you can customize the .Context.tt file like this.
Find the "Function Imports" named region (the section that starts with region.Begin("Function Imports"); and ends with region.End();) in the .Context.tt file and replace that whole section with the following:
region.Begin("Function Imports");
foreach (EdmFunction edmFunction in container.FunctionImports)
{
var parameters = FunctionImportParameter.Create(edmFunction.Parameters, code, ef);
string paramList = String.Join(", ", parameters.Select(p => p.FunctionParameterType + " " + p.FunctionParameterName).ToArray());
var isReturnTypeVoid = edmFunction.ReturnParameter == null;
string returnTypeElement = String.Empty;
if (!isReturnTypeVoid)
returnTypeElement = code.Escape(ef.GetElementType(edmFunction.ReturnParameter.TypeUsage));
#>
<# if (isReturnTypeVoid) { #>
<#=Accessibility.ForMethod(edmFunction)#> void <#=code.Escape(edmFunction)#>(<#=paramList#>)
<# } else { #>
<#=Accessibility.ForMethod(edmFunction)#> ObjectResult<<#=returnTypeElement#>> <#=code.Escape(edmFunction)#>(<#=paramList#>)
<# } #>
{
<#
foreach (var parameter in parameters)
{
if (!parameter.NeedsLocalVariable)
{
continue;
}
#>
ObjectParameter <#=parameter.LocalVariableName#>;
if (<#=parameter.IsNullableOfT ? parameter.FunctionParameterName + ".HasValue" : parameter.FunctionParameterName + " != null"#>)
{
<#=parameter.LocalVariableName#> = new ObjectParameter("<#=parameter.EsqlParameterName#>", <#=parameter.FunctionParameterName#>);
}
else
{
<#=parameter.LocalVariableName#> = new ObjectParameter("<#=parameter.EsqlParameterName#>", typeof(<#=parameter.RawClrTypeName#>));
}
<#
}
#>
<# if (isReturnTypeVoid) { #>
base.ExecuteFunction("<#=edmFunction.Name#>"<#=code.StringBefore(", ", String.Join(", ", parameters.Select(p => p.ExecuteParameterName).ToArray()))#>);
<# } else { #>
return base.ExecuteFunction<<#=returnTypeElement#>>("<#=edmFunction.Name#>"<#=code.StringBefore(", ", String.Join(", ", parameters.Select(p => p.ExecuteParameterName).ToArray()))#>);
<# } #>
}
<#
}
region.End();
What I'm doing here is instead of ignoring all function imports that return null, I'm creating a method that returns null. I hope this is helpful.
It is because you do not actually returning anything from your stored procedure. Add a line like below to your SP (SELECT ##ROWCOUNT), and it will be executing properly.
BEGIN
...
SELECT ##ROWCOUNT
END
While this solution will address your issue and actually returns the number of effected rows by your SP, I am not clear on why this is an issue for you:
I had initially set its return type to null, but then it wasn't created in the context.
When doing a Function Import, you can select "None" as return type and it will generate a new method on your ObjectContext with a return type of int. This method basically executes a stored procedure that is defined in the data source; discards any results returned from the function; and returns the number of rows affected by the execution.
EDIT: Why a Function without return value is ignored in a POCO Scenario:
Drilling into ObjectContext T4 template file coming with ADO.NET C# POCO Entity Generator reveals why you cannot see your Function in your ObjectContext class: Simply it's ignored! They escape to the next iteration in the foreach loop that generates the functions.
The workaround for this is to change the T4 template to actually generate a method for Functions without return type or just returning something based on the first solution.
region.Begin("Function Imports");
foreach (EdmFunction edmFunction in container.FunctionImports)
{
var parameters = FunctionImportParameter.Create(edmFunction.Parameters, code, ef);
string paramList = String.Join(", ", parameters.Select(p => p.FunctionParameterType + " " + p.FunctionParameterName).ToArray());
// Here is why a Function without return value is ignored:
if (edmFunction.ReturnParameter == null)
{
continue;
}
string returnTypeElement = code.Escape(ef.GetElementType(edmFunction.ReturnParameter.TypeUsage));
...