I have found code on github in Go and want to use it as library in my program. Unfortunately, whole code is in "main" package. Is there any way how I can import the code as library without changing that code?
No. Fork the repo, and fix it to work as a library, or if it's simple enough, copy the files directly into your main package.
No, you can't.
Agree with #JimB - fork repo and change it like 'package main' > 'package lib' and import in your code like that:
package main
import L "somelib"
func main() {
L.SomeFunc()
}
etc..
you can import it as a separate package, something like:
import sth "path/to/your/package"
Related
I have a set of Swift Packages that I'm writing (ex: CUIExpandableButton), that I'd like to roll up into another Swift Package called CrystalUI. The overall goal is to write a set of packages that get bundled into a single package. However, I want to make it so people can just have one import
import CrystalUI
instead of a series of import statements
import CrystalUI
import CUIExpandableButton
import PreviewKit
...
Is it possible to re-expose an existing library as part of the parent library?
Looks like #_exported Is what I was looking for. Found this article that explains it. It's an unsupported method but it's also used in Alamofire so I think it's safe.
Probably a basic mistake, but the cause is eluding me. I am trying to import a package, but I get an error saying it cannot be found or imported.
First I set the current directory to the parent directory of the package, and this does not work.
Second, the docs say that the parent folder of the package must be added to the matlab path. I tried this, and still no luck.
It is not due to using plot as the package name as I get the same error when trying to import analysis.
What I can do is to import using: import plot.* or import analyse.* and then go on to use the functions in the packages, but I want to use the namespaces (i.e. not use .*).
Edit
I'm having this problem on both versions I have installed: 2015b and 2016a.
The answer is that, somewhat counterintuitively, you don't need to call import at all. The docs state that
The parent of the top-level package folder must be on the MATLAB path.
Which is what your addpath(pwd) does and then state that (emphasis is mine):
All references to packages, functions, and classes in the package must
use the package name prefix, unless you import the package.
Meaning at this stage you should be able to call
analyse.testFunc
If you were to import analyse.testFunc you would then be able to call testFunc without prefacing it with the namespace but since you want to retain the namespace the answer is to not call import at all.
I want to clean my code structure and put class/object files in another directories in my gatling project.
If i put all simulation class and utils class in the same directory and same package i do not need an import statement and everything works fine.
Let's say my structure is as follow :
/user-files
----/simulations
--------MySimulation.scala
----/utils
--------Router.scala
I have tried several import or naming configuration to be able to use Router in my Simulation.
Follow package naming as directories structure
Put simulations and utils class in the same package
I have also tried different style of import
//using package
import packagename.Router
//another try
import packagename.Router._
//without package name
import Router._
My attempt to search a solution on scala docs or stack overflow didn't helped me.
This is the error given after executing gatling.bat
not found: value Router
You can't do that this way: there's one single source folder, which is by default /user-files/simulations.
If you want to use folders/packages (which is a good thing), you can have a structure such as:
/user-files
----/simulations
--------MySimulation.scala
--------/utils
------------Router.scala
Then, in Scala, packages and folder hierarchy are not related, BUT it's a good practice to use the same convention as in Java.
So, you would have:
package utils
object Router
then in MySimulation:
import utils.Router
I'd like to import package com.example.abc from com.example.iop in similar manner to bash expression ../abc.
Is this possible in Scala? I've read couple of articles but they say nothing about my case.
Update: I've discovered code suitable for simple uses (I've seen it in some project while ago):
package com.example
package com.example.abc
import iop
Your updated package structure has a hint of the solution, but isn't quite right. You can live in multiple packages, including a broad parent package defined by the first package statement – subsequent statements refine the tree.
package com.foo // we're in: com.foo
package bar // we're also in: com.foo.bar
package wibble // we're also in: com.foo.bar.wibble
import frobble._ // this could be com.foo.frobble or com.foo.bar.frobble or com.foo.bar.wibble.frobble
Obviously, things can get confusing if you have multiple packages with the same name, but the compiler asks you politely to sort that out.
That is simply not possible -- same as in Java.
I have a class uses the following lines, it works fine in a Google App Engine project:
import javax.jdo.annotations.IdGeneratorStrategy;
import javax.jdo.annotations.IdentityType;
import javax.jdo.annotations.PersistenceCapable;
import javax.jdo.annotations.Persistent;
import javax.jdo.annotations.PrimaryKey;
But when I included this class in another project, it cause error :
package javax.jdo.annotations does not exist
What should I do to find javax.jdo.* ?
Add the JDO jar file to the class path.
The star notation for imports isn't working the way you think it does.
It's not recursive - it only applies the child classes in javax.jdo, not the child packages.
If you want all the classes in javax.jdo.annotations, you'll need to import javax.jdo.annotations.*, too.
I'd recommend not using the star notation. Better to type out the imports for every class individually. Use an IDE to help you. It's clearer for you and other programmers who come after you where those classes came from.