I would like to expand a line to a wider polygon. Add 10 meter on both sides of the line for example.
Here is an example of what I would like
Take this line
And expand it to a wider polygon, like this
I did this manually, is there a way to do this automaticly?
Changing the KML or using a program?
Thanks
Vincent
Depending on how accurate you need this – this is not trivial.
One possible algorithm could be:
for each segment do
expand segment to rectangle with width 2r
targetShape.join(rectangle)
next
for each point do
expand point to circle with radius r
targetShape.join(circle)
next
targetShape.outerHull(precision)
Each single line in this routine is tricky and depends on your expectations.
You could leave out the circles and instead make the rectangles longer, but this wil not work on sharp turns.
All of this involves ugly calculations to figure orthogonal lines etc.
You could try it in an graphic tool, gimp or inkskape :-)
Related
I have 4 coordinates assigned to variables, so I would just like to colour in the rectangle that is created from these variables. I tried the fill function, but I cant gather much information from the example.
When I try to use:
fill(bottom left point, top right point,'g')
the figure it makes only shows a line between those points, and doesn't colour in the entire area.
I'm using MATLAB R2019b, if that helps.
Also, if its possible to fill the rectangle with a pattern instead, please let me know aswell.
Thanks in advance
I have an ellipse in the image.After segmentation i got a broken ellipse as shown .which morphological operation is used to get the perfect ellipse
Actual input file is
output obtained is
i tried imopen ,but i will lose lower ellipse like structure .how to close the upper ellipse like structure without losing lower ones
Mask i created is
i want to segment the ellipse like structure.but some of these structures are connected with rectangular like bodies.how to separate it. erode will eliminate small ellipses
If you want to reconnect something with a mathematical morphology operator, do not use an opening (it increases the gap), but a closing (imclose)! The names are explicits.
In you case, you want to reconnect something vertically cut, so use a horizontal structuring element (type segment).
And yes, you have to invert your image, black pixels representing the absence of information.
Usually, for closing gaps, you would need the close operator.
However, since most software assume active pixels are white, you would either need to invert the image, or use the open operator.
On this image, in matlab, the following works well:
imopen(I,ones(32))
This uses a square structuring element. You may want to experiment with other shapes.
Your example also looks like you moved half of the ellipse, as opposed to some process which deleted pixels in the middle. No simple morphological operation can create a perfect ellipse out of the sample image, unless you use the knowledge that multiple components can be moved to re-form the ellipse. If that is the actual case, you can scan connected components and try to match them together.
Given an image consisting of black lines (a few pixels wide) on white background, what is a good way to find the coordinates along the the lines, say for every 10th pixel or so? I am considering using PIL for the task, but other python or java-based libraries would also be OK.
Ideally the coordinates would point to the middle of the line, but as the lines are narrow, it's enough that they point somewhere inside the line.
A very short line or a point should be identified with at least one coordinate.
Usually, Hough transformation is used to find lines. It gives you the parameters describing the line (which can be transformed easily between different representations), and you can sample this function to get your sample points. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hough_transform and https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/hough-transform+python
I only found this http://coding-experiments.blogspot.co.at/2011/05/ellipse-detection-in-image-by-using.html implementation in python, which actually searches for ellipses.
I'm wondering how I should go about drawing a uibezierpath where the stroke width peaks at the center of the arc. Here's an example of what I mean:
Either I have to go through each point when drawing, and set the stroke width accordingly, or there's an easier way. Can anyone point me in the right direction?
Thanks
You can just draw the two outer paths with no stroke, join them, and then fill in the space between them.
Another way to try this if you're interested:
I ended up getting this to work by creating a loop to draw a couple hundred line segments, and changing the line width accordingly during the draw loop.
To adjust the line width I used the following function: MAX_WIDTH * sinf(M_PI * (i/NUMBER_OF_SEGMENTS)
Looks great and no performance issues as far as I can tell. Worked out particularly well because I already had a list of the points to use on the curve. For other cases I'm guessing it would be better to use sosborn's method.
When I make a figure in Matlab, with a legend and a rectangle that touches the y axis (strange, I know) upon exporting the figure to eps (or pdf) I've noticed that the rectangle obtains the line-style of the last line drawn (rather than what the rectangle was drawn with)
This behaviour also occurs for rectangles drawn after the one that touches the axis...
This doesn't happen if the rectangle is drawn before the legend is created....
Needless to say, it took me half a day to create a minimal example:
clf
L=plot(X,sin(X),'--');
legend(L,'sin(x)')
rectangle('position',[0.001,.1,.7,.7])
rectangle('position',[0,.5,.6,.7])
rectangle('position',[0.001,.3,.5,.7])
%legend(L,'sin(x)')
On the screen the 3 rectangle have solid lines, as they should. but once they are exported, the result has the last two with dashed lines (like the sin(x)). If the legend command is done later (as in the commented out line), everything works as it should....
Is this a feature or a bug?
This is not a feature. I am submitting this to development.
You found a workaround that works with minimal code gymnastics. I would document it in your code so someone does not change it unknowingly and move on.
If you are open to other output formats, notice this is not an issue with formats that use an output filter of MATLAB.
http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/techdoc/ref/print.html
(Graphic Format Files section, right column in table)
-Doug, Advanced Support at MathWorks dealing with graphical issues.