I'm very new to WebIOPi and I'm trying my first tests. First of all I apologize for my english.
I'm trying to get to work a RPi with a MCP3008 on CE0 and a MCP23S17 on CE1 with SPI bus.
My problem is that devices only work when connected on CE1 (so, when 23017 is on CE0 I am not able to set pins to be inputs or outputs and to set it on 1 or 0, but 3008 is on CE1 and I see its levels changing. When - vice versa - 23017 is on CE1 it is fully functional, but 3008 outputs stay still).
Due to this, I think it is not an hardware issue (I don't have much expertise in electronics, but luckily I don't build my circuits by myself :) ), I think it is a problem in WebIOPi config. Here is my WebIOPi config:
[DEVICES]
mcp1 = MCP23S17 chip:1 slave:0x27
adc0 = MCP3008 chip:0
I only added these two lines to my config file.
I did not touch anything else of my original WebIOPi installation.
In this case (adc0 fully functional, mcp1 not working), when loading the WebIOPi devices monitor I see adc0 levels working good and mcp1 pins randomly changing between being a input and an output and from 0 and 1.
May it be a config error?
Use python and spidev module instead! Look my answer on another thread for function for the mcp3008 chip.
Related
I've been exploring the ADAM 6717 from Advantech.
This is the ModBus address table for said device:
At first I wanted to modify the value of the Digital output channel 0(DO0), so, as can be seen from the picture above, such address is the 0x0017.
I succeed at this by using a ModBus tool and the following settings:
Sending either "On" or "Off", turns On and off a LED connected to that output. Everything runs smoothly according to my expectation up to this point.
The problem arises when I want to read the Analog Input channel 6 or equivalently, address 400431~40044.
Since that address lies on the Analog Output Holding Registers part of the address table, I though that the following settings would accomplish the job:
However, as can be seen above, the reading shows 0.0 when there is actually 6V connected to that input (a potentiometer)
It is worth mentioning that I've made sure to enable the AI6 channel as well as setting it to Voltage mode instead of current. Also, the web utility for the device shows the AI6 reading correctly as I change the potentiometer's resistance value.
So the problem doesn't lie in the connection from the potentiometer to the AI6 but somewhere else.
Out of nothing and leaving aside what I think I know on this topic, I though of changing the function from 0x03 to 0x04
However, the response is exactly the same.
It bugs me that I can read and write values to the output coils but not the Analog output holding registers.
Is there any configuration that I might be missing over here?
Thanks in advance.
Device settings:
IP address: 10.0.0.1
Port in which the ModBus service is running: 5020
I am having troubles using an I2C sensor with the Beagle Bone Black (BBB). The BBB is running a newly flashed 18.04 Ubuntu image specifically for the BBB.
I wired the sensor (VIN, GND, SCL, SDA) to the corresponding I2C2 pins (4, 2, 19, 20) on the BBB using the below pinout.
The sensor is supposed to be using address 0x40, but scanning I2C2 (using i2cdetect -r 2) does not show the sensor.
I have tested this with two separate sensors as I thought at first I may have fried the original sensor somehow, but the results are the same. In fact, running the I2C2 scan command yields the exact same results when nothing is connected at all.
I have read in many places that I2C2 may not be enabled by default, but I assume it is enabled in my case as I can scan I2C2 without getting an error. Is this assumption incorrect? Again, this is a freshly flashed BBB, and I have not enabled/disabled anything - it should be in the default state.
I have also verified the connectivity of my wires between the sensor and BBB. The voltage between VIN and GND on the chip is 3.3V, so it is definitely being powered.
Why can't I connect to my I2C sensors using the BBB?
it could be that the source you are using is outdated or not a viable entry for i2c.
Also, you could use this command to make sure i2c2 pins are available:
config-pin p9.21 i2c
config-pin p9.22 i2c
This may work, also. If this does not work, please reply with your entire source.
Seth
P.S. Also, if you have time, you may want to get an i2c library to use if your software falls short of setting up your own i2c library. They have smbus2 you can install with pip and other i2c libraries out there still.
Here are a few things you should check (in random order).
List all I2C buses wich i2cdetect -l and try them all. Depending on the platform, the i2c bus number in Linux may be different from the peripheral number used in the datasheet and pinout. E.g. "I2C2" might be bus i2c-1 or i2c-3 in Linux).
Use an oscilloscope or logical analyzer to see if the SCL and SDA lines are being driven. If they aren't check the bus number as above. If they are, then check whether the device gives an ACK; if it doesn't, anything else will never work: double-check the chip slave address. There are cheap logical analyzers that you can buy and user with pulseview.
Simply load the Linux driver for your chip (see the kernel docs on how to do it from userspace for a quick test). Then see check if the device appears or use dmesg to see any kernel error messages while probing.
I am working with STM32H743, and I want to use Pin no. 89 as DAC output. Is there any register setting where I can change PA4 to PG4(89).
I tried replacing PA4 to PG4 in a working example code, but the output still comes on PA4.
I don't know which STM32F7 you are using exactly so I could not lock at the Reference Manual, but I guess it is the same as on STM32F4 devices:
The answer is quite simple:
NO, you could not reroute the DAC pins.
(A look ad a randomly chosen F7 datasheet also shows only one pin for the DACs)
I simply guess it is not possible to route the output signal through a multiplexer without generating to much interference.
According to the H753 datasheet (can't find a specific one for H743), there are two DAC channels, PA4 is DAC1_OUT1 and PA5 is DAC1_OUT2. It does not appear to be changeable.
when using the GPIO library on the Raspberry PI and having an example code like this:
while True:
GPIO.setup(21, GPIO.OUT)
pwm = GPIO.PWM(21, 50)
pwm.start(0)
for i in range(0, 101, 2):
pwm.ChangeDutyCycle(i)
time.sleep(0.03)
for i in range(100, -1, -2):
pwm.ChangeDutyCycle(i)
time.sleep(0.03)
pwm.stop()
GPIO.cleanup(21)
time.sleep(1)
The code might stop suddenly after a while. No error, just no changes via pwm are recognized any longer. Anyone got an idea why this is?
This issue has been mentioned here in the old sourceforge repo:
https://sourceforge.net/p/raspberry-gpio-python/tickets/111/
https://sourceforge.net/p/raspberry-gpio-python/tickets/94/
Its because the GPIO library by default creates a new pthread for every call without cleaning up afterwards, but the number of threads might be limited to a number of 250 or so.
I created a fork of this repo (https://github.com/wuestkamp/raspberry-gpio-python) which solves this and contains instructions on how to use this on your PI.
What is the Difference between BGAPI and BGScript ?
And if we write any code for BG profile than how can we burn it in BLE 112?
The BGAPI interface defines the protocol used to talk to the module over USB or serial link.
BGScript is something which runs on the module processor itself, when the USB or serial link is not used.
I have the dongle, BLED112, which is the same thing as BLE112 with a USB connector on it, and the code is "burned" to it using standard USB DFU interface.
The downloading of the code to BLE112 can be done using several methods:
(1) Bring out the DD, DC debug interface pins from your module and use the CC-Debugger (digikey part 296-30207-ND, $55). This works every time. If you have the DKBLE112 kit, the CC-Debugger fits on the 10-pin .050 connector in lower right corner. You can "burn" any firmware and any stack this way. Works awesome.
(2) Hope that the current firmware on the CC2540 has serial bootloader, and load the new firmware (hopefully also containing serial bootloader) using UART. TI has the tools, but it sure seems quite convoluted to me, and I did not try it.