pass environment variables to resource gaurd in powershell_script in LWRP - powershell

I have a LWRP with a provider action that looks like this. I want to pass environment variables to a resource guard:
action :create do
powershell_script 'create file' do
environment({'fileName' => new_resource.fileName})
code <<-EOH
New-Item $env:fileName
EOH
guard_interpreter :powershell_script
not_if '(Test-Path $env:fileName)'
end
In the example above, what I am trying to do is create a new file if one doesn't exist already. When I execute this, the new file is created every time. I expect that the second time around that the guard would execute and the resource would not be recreated. I think what is happening is that I am not able to use the environment variables in the guard like I am in the code block.
Please note that my real-life problem is substantially more complex than this, and I'm not just looking for a way to create a file if it doesn't exist. I need to know how I can use a property specified in the lightweight resource inside the 'not-if' block.

It's buried, but it is in the documentation here. Just do this:
action :create do
my_environment = 'fileName' => new_resource.fileName
powershell_script 'create file' do
environment my_environment
code <<-EOH
New-Item $env:fileName
EOH
guard_interpreter :powershell_script
not_if '(Test-Path $env:fileName)', :environment => my_environment
end
end

Related

SCP command not working in karate project - it throws command error:cannot run program scp.exe: CreateProcess error=2 [duplicate]

I'm trying to execute bash script using karate. I'm able to execute the script from karate-config.js and also from .feature file. I'm also able to pass the arguments to the script.
The problem is, that if the script fails (exits with something else than 0) the test execution continues and finishes as succesfull.
I found out that when the script echo-es something then i can access it as a result of the script so I could possibly echo the exit value and do assertion on it (in some re-usable feature), but this seems like a workaround rather than a valid clean solution. Is there some clean way of accessing the exit code without echo-ing it? Am I missing on something?
script
#!/bin/bash
#possible solution
#echo 3
exit 3;
karate-config.js
var result = karate.exec('script.sh arg1')
feture file
def result = karate.exec('script.sh arg1')
Great timing. We very recently did some work for CLI testing which I am sure you can use effectively. Here is a thread on Twitter: https://twitter.com/maxandersen/status/1276431309276151814
And we have just released version 0.9.6.RC4 and new we have a new karate.fork() option that returns an instance of Command on which you can call exitCode
Here's an example:
* def proc = karate.fork('script.sh arg1')
* proc.waitSync()
* match proc.exitCode == 0
You can get more ideas here: https://github.com/intuit/karate/issues/1191#issuecomment-650087023
Note that the argument to karate.fork() can take multiple forms. If you are using karate.exec() (which will block until the process completes) the same arguments work.
string - full command line as seen above
string array - e.g. ['script.sh', 'arg1']
json where the keys can be
line - string (OR)
args - string array
env - optional environment properties (as JSON)
redirectErrorStream - boolean, true by default which means Sys.err appears in Sys.out
workingDir - working directory
useShell - default false, auto-prepend cmd /c or sh -c depending on OS
And since karate.fork() is async, you need to call waitSync() if needed as in the example above.
Do provide feedback and we can tweak further if needed.
EDIT: here's a very advanced example that shows how to listen to the process output / log, collect the log, and conditionally exit: fork-listener.feature
Another answer which can be a useful reference: Conditional match based on OS
And here's how to use cURL for advanced HTTP tests ! https://stackoverflow.com/a/73230200/143475
In case you need to do a lot of local file manipulation, you can use the karate.toJavaFile() utility so you can convert a relative path or a "prefixed" path to an absolute path.
* def file = karate.toJavaFile('classpath:some/file.txt')
* def path = file.getPath()

Passing parameters to puppet manifest via command line

I have been searching for an answer to this question with no luck, but is there a way to pass parameters into puppet manifests when running the 'apply' command, in a similar way to the way you pass parameters when running a UNIX script on the command line?
The suggestions I see mention either keeping variables at the top of the manifest for use later, or to store them in a hiera file. But neither really answer the question I am posing?
Any guidance on how to do this would be greatly appreciated?
Edit:
An example of what I have been doing is:
$doc_root = "/var/www/example"
exec { 'apt-get update':
command => '/usr/bin/apt-get update'
}
package { 'apache2':
ensure => "installed",
require => Exec['apt-get update']
}
file { $doc_root:
ensure => "directory",
owner => "www-data",
group => "www-data",
mode => 644
}
file { "$doc_root/index.html":
ensure => "present",
source => "puppet:///modules/main/index.html",
require => File[$doc_root]
}
As you can see the variable is hardcoded at the top, whereas whilst I am trying to use the variable in the same way, I need to be able to pass the value in when running the apply command.
Using lookup functions in conjunction with hiera.yaml files doesn't fulfil my requirements for the same reason.
The only thing I can think may be a work around is to create a UNIX script that accepts parameters, saves those values in a yaml file, and then have the script execute the .pp file.
But I'm hoping that puppet has a way to do this directly.
The common procedure for passing variables into a classless manifest for use with the puppet apply subcommand would be to assign the value to a Facter fact from the CLI, and then resolve its value inside the manifest. You would begin with removing the hardcoded variable doc_root from the head of the manifest. Then, you would modify the variable into a fact like:
file { $facts['doc_root']:
...
file { "${facts['doc_root']}/index.html":
...
require => File["${facts['doc_root']}"] <-- interpolation required due to Puppet DSL inability to resolve hash value as first class expression
You would then pass the Facter value from the puppet apply subcommand like:
FACTER_doc_root=/var/www/example puppet apply manifest.pp
Note this also causes FACTER_doc_root to be temporarily set as an environment variable as a side effect.

Calling a Capistrano task with argument from other task

I have a Capistrano 2 task that updates a file
task :update_file, roles: :app do
...
end
Now I need to write a task that performs the some operation on all the files within a folder so from within update_folder I'd like to call update_file passing to it the name of the file to update but I have an hard time doing so.
How can I set a Capistrano task to accept an argument and call it from inside an other task?
Thanks
you can do like this:
$gkey=""
$gvalue=""
desc "generate config files"
task :gen_conf_files do
$servers.each do |key,value|
$MYSQL["mysql"]["passwd"]="#{key.to_s}++"
$gkey=key.to_s
$gvalue=value.to_s
$NODE_NAME="#{key.to_s}"
$NODE_NUM=key.to_s[9,10]
gen_mfs_conf
gen_cfs_conf
gen_client_conf
gen_config_shell
gen_cdn_reacheyes_net
gen_click_reacheyes_net
gen_log_reacheyes_net
gen_fluent_conf
gen_nagios_conf
end
end
desc "genrate fluent config file"
task :gen_fluent_conf do
file = "#{generate_conf_dir}/#{$gvalue}/fluent.conf"
filename ="#{config_file_path}/fluent.conf.sample"
erb = ERB.new(File.read(filename))
erb.filename = filename
File = File.new("#{file}", "w")
File.puts erb.result
end
first define a global variable
$gvalue=""
then you can use this variable between different task

Capistrano how to access a serverDefinition option in the code

I am defining my server setup like this:
task :test do
role(:frontend) {[server1,server2,server3, {:user=> "frontend-user", :options => {:log_location=>"HOW DO I READ THIS??"}}]}
role(:backend) {...}
role(:db) {...}
role(:mq) {...}
end
task :staging do
role(:frontend) {[server1,server2,server3, {:user=> "frontend-user", :options => {:log_location=>"HOW DO I READ THIS??"}}]}
role(:backend) {...}
role(:db) {...}
role(:mq) {...}
end
task :prod do
role(:frontend) {[server1,server2,server3, {:user=> "frontend-user", :options => {:log_location=>"HOW DO I READ THIS??"}}]}
role(:backend) {...}
role(:db) {...}
role(:mq) {...}
end
This is to embrace all the complexity of a legacy enterpricey system.
Now, from a task, I want to read the log_location.
Task example:
namespace :log do
desc "list all log files"
task :list do
run %(ls -1 #{log_location}/*/*.log)
end
end
The problem is that the variable log_location is undefined.
/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.0.0-p0/gems/capistrano-2.14.2/lib/capistrano/configuration/namespaces.rb:193:in
method_missing': undefined local variable or methodlog_location'
for
# (NameError)
How do I access that variable?
Is there a smarter/simpler way of setting this custom variable?
I'm sorry to say you can't read that. The blocks passed to task() aren't executed in a server context, thus the block in effect doesn't know what server it's operating on.
The classical workaround for this over the years has been to upload a config file which looks something like this:
---
hostname1:
log_file_location: "/var/log/hostname1/foo/bar"
hostname2:
log_file_location: "/var/log/hostname2/foo/bar"
(or similar) and use the machines hostname when loading the configuration.
I know this isn't a great workaround, thus in the forthcoming (see the v3 branch at Github) version of Capistrano there's a feature which looks like this:
host1 = SSHKit::Host.new 'user#example.com'
host2 = SSHKit::Host.new 'user#example.org'
host1.properties = {log_file_location: "/foo/bar"}
host2.properties.log_file_location = "/bar/baz"
on hosts do |host|
target = "/var/www/sites/"
if host.hostname =~ /org/
target += "dotorg"
else
target += "dotcom"
end
execute! :head, '-n 20', host.properties.log_file_location
execute! :git, :clone, "git#git.#{host.hostname}", target
end
(SSHKit Examples) - SSHKit is the new backend driver for Capistrano.
The v3 branch probably isn't ready for prime time yet, we're having a lot of success internally but the documentation is pretty ahem non existent. However the code is quite literally an oder of magnitude less imposing, and I think you'll find quite readable.
You need this: https://github.com/capistrano/capistrano/wiki/2.x-Multistage-Extension
It means that you can isolate stage specific code in separate files named after the stage. If you want to test for the stage name in the shared deploy.rb you can do that too, like this:
Put this in your deploy.rb
task :show_stage do
puts(stage)
end
Test from command line
$ cap staging show_stage
staging
Actually, I was able to pull out the log_location variable, but ended up with a solution that had one restriction:
I am using log location for one environment only. This is no problem in my current project, since I run the capistrano task against one role at a time.
For testing this setup, I made this task:
namespace :support do
desc "Test if the log location variable is correctly fetched from configuration"
task :test_log_location do
find_servers_for_task(current_task).each do |server|
# puts server.host
# puts server.port
# puts server.user
# puts server.options
result = "LOG LOCATION: #{server.options[:log_location]}"
#puts result
logger.info result
end
end
end
Then, for my tasks in the :log namespace, I defined the variable with set :log_location and also define the :current_role variable:
namespace :log do
def set_log_location
#set_log_location
#puts fetch(:log_location)
log_location = nil
options = nil
find_servers_for_task(current_task).each do |server|
# puts server.host
# puts server.port
# puts server.user
# puts server.options
options = server.options
log_location = server.options[:log_location]
#log_location = server.options[:current_role]
end
msg1="FATAL: you need to specify 'ROLES=frontend,backend,mq' (or one of them) from command line"
msg2="FATAL: Could not get log_location from environment/server options. I can only see these options: #{options}"
raise msg1 if ENV['ROLES'].nil?
raise msg2 if log_location.nil?
set :log_location, log_location
set :current_role, ENV['ROLES'].split(',').first
logger.info %(CURRENT_ROLE #{fetch(:current_role)})
logger.info %(THE LOG LOCATION IS: #{fetch(:log_location)})
end
end
Finally, I used a separate method to fully qualify the log path (needed for my setup -- also in the :log namespace):
def log_location
log_names = {
:frontend => "*/play.log",
:backend => "*Weblogic*/*.{log,out}"
}
loc = "#{fetch(:log_location)}/#{log_names[fetch(:current_role).to_sym]}"
logger.info "using the log location of '#{loc}'"
loc
end
Now, each task can use the specific log location like this:
desc "list all log files"
task :list do
set_log_location
run %(ls -l #{log_location})
end
I am sure this can be done more elegant, but it works for me

Use AppCmd to LIST CONFIG in APPHOST only

I have a requirement to use powershell to configure IIS7.5 on WebApplications that have not yet had code deployed (possibly at all, possibly old/broken web.configs exist) to the file system. I would like to be able to do this all at the APPHOST level. (Note at the bottom about use of Powershell > AppCmd).
I can SET all the values properly, however, being somewhat diligent, I like to also validate the values were set properly by retrieving them after setting.
Here's the scenario:
I can set this value using AppCmd so the setting is applied at the APPHOST level using the /Commit:APPHOST flag. However, I havent found a way to READ the values exclusively at the APPHOST level.
Setting the Code is successful:
C:\Windows\System32\inetsrv\appcmd.exe set config "webSiteName/webAppName" -section:system.webServer/security/authentication/anonymousAuthentication /enabled:"True" /commit:apphost
However, I cant find a way to read the values using AppCmd (or Powershell):
Running the following AppCmd returns an error due to the broken pre-existing web.config in the folder (the specific error is unimportant, as it is reading the WebApp's web.config instead of the ApplicationHost.config/APPHOST):
C:\Windows\System32\inetsrv\appcmd.exe list config "MACHINE/WEBROOT/APPHOST/webSiteName/webAppName" -section:system.webServer/security/authentication/anonymousAuthentication
ERROR ( message:Configuration error
Filename: \\?\c:\inetpub\wwwroot\webSiteName\webAppName\web.config
Line Number: 254
Description: The configuration section 'system.runtime.caching' cannot be read because it is missing a section declaration
. )
Note: I would prefer to do this all in Powershell instead of using AppCmd, so if anyone has the syntax for modifying the APPHOST settings for anonymousAuthentication section of a WebApplication, that lives under a Website, from inside Powershell (Get-WebConfiguration seems to only use the WebApp web.config), that would be totally awesome and much appreciated!
Here's how to do this in PowerShell:
[Reflection.Assembly]::Load(
"Microsoft.Web.Administration, Version=7.0.0.0,
Culture=Neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35") > $null
$serverManager = New-Object Microsoft.Web.Administration.ServerManager
$config = $serverManager.GetApplicationHostConfiguration()
$anonymousAuthenticationSection = $config.GetSection("system.webServer/security/authentication/anonymousAuthentication", "simpleasp.net")
Write-Host "Current value: " $anonymousAuthenticationSection["enabled"]
# Now set new value
$anonymousAuthenticationSection["enabled"] = $true
$serverManager.CommitChanges()