I got vcs compile error when adding function in declaration of struct. The IEEE doc does not mention if function in struct is allowed.
I also got vcs compile error when trying to assign a default value to a field. But it is allowed in IEEE-1800-2012 7.2.2.
typedef struct {
int a = 1; //compile error here
int b;
function void func();
b = a;
endfunction
} a_struct;
So I add the command line and error info as suggested:
vcs -sverilog a.sv
Error-[V2KIIAD] Invalid initialization at declaration
....
Struct or union member field 'a' cannot be initialized at declaration.
Error-[SE] Syntax error
Following verilog source has syntax error :
"a.sv", 4: token is 'function'
function void func();
^
And my vcs version is 2013.06-SP1-10
Functions declared inside structs are not supported as of IEEE Std 1800-2012. Looking over the syntax for structure declaration, a struct_union_member is a data_type_or_void and a function is not data_type.
§ 7.2 Structures
data_type ::= // from A.2.2.1
...
| struct_union [ packed [ signing ] ] { struct_union_member { struct_union_member } }
{ packed_dimension }
struct_union_member ::=
{ attribute_instance } [random_qualifier] data_type_or_void list_of_variable_decl_assignments ;
data_type_or_void ::= data_type | void
struct_union ::= struct | union [ tagged ]
Expanding data_type from § A.2.2.1 Net and variable types
data_type ::=
integer_vector_type [ signing ] { packed_dimension }
| integer_atom_type [ signing ]
| non_integer_type
| struct_union [ packed [ signing ] ] { struct_union_member { struct_union_member } }
{ packed_dimension }
| enum [ enum_base_type ] { enum_name_declaration { , enum_name_declaration } }
{ packed_dimension }
| string
| chandle
| virtual [ interface ] interface_identifier [ parameter_value_assignment ] [ . modport_identifier ]
| [ class_scope | package_scope ] type_identifier { packed_dimension }
| class_type
| event
| ps_covergroup_identifier
| type_reference
As we know that structures are static and classes are dynamic data types. So in SV, while we are using class,we can assign values intially or in other conditions. But for structure we can't initialise any variable inside the declaration.
Related
I have converted an ARM template into a bicep template and during the conversion, I got the following errors for the following lines.
module virtualMachineName_VmAlertsRule_0 './nested_virtualMachineName_VmAlertsRule_0.bicep' = {
name: '${virtualMachineName}-VmAlertsRule-0'
params: {
name: 'Percentage CPU - vm-name'
severity: 3
allOf: [
{
name: 'Metric1'
metricName: 'Percentage CPU'
metricNamespace: 'Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines'
operator: 'GreaterThan'
timeAggregation: 'Average'
criterionType: 'StaticThresholdCriterion'
threshold: 80
}
]
actionGroups: [
{
actionGroupId: '/subscriptions/xxxxxx/resourceGroups/my_resource_group/providers/microsoft.insights/actionGroups/RecommendedAlertRules-AG-1'
webhookProperties: {
}
}
]
location: 'Global'
vmResourceId: '/subscriptions/${subscription().subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/${resourceGroup().name}/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines/${virtualMachineName}'
}
dependsOn: [
resourceId(virtualMachineRG, 'Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines', virtualMachineName)
resourceId(virtualMachineRG, 'Microsoft.Resources/deployments', '${virtualMachineName}-AlertsActionGroup')
]
}
Error is as follows.
Error BCP034: The enclosing array expected an item of type "module[] | (resource | module) | resource[]", but the provided item was of type "string".
From my research, it appears I should be using a dynamic function, however I am unsure about this. The errors are littered for all the alerts, however I am confident that once one is fixed, the others can easily be resolved also.
Having multiple DB's in a redshift cluster,is there a way a set of users can only view particular DB in cluster and all other DB's are hidden to him.
Currently all users can view DB's in a cluster.
I suspect this is not possible.
The privileges that can be granted in PostgreSQL 8 (on which Redshift is based) are:
GRANT { { SELECT | INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE | RULE | REFERENCES | TRIGGER }
[,...] | ALL [ PRIVILEGES ] }
ON [ TABLE ] tablename [, ...]
TO { username | GROUP groupname | PUBLIC } [, ...] [ WITH GRANT OPTION ]
GRANT { { CREATE | TEMPORARY | TEMP } [,...] | ALL [ PRIVILEGES ] }
ON DATABASE dbname [, ...]
TO { username | GROUP groupname | PUBLIC } [, ...] [ WITH GRANT OPTION ]
GRANT { EXECUTE | ALL [ PRIVILEGES ] }
ON FUNCTION funcname ([type, ...]) [, ...]
TO { username | GROUP groupname | PUBLIC } [, ...] [ WITH GRANT OPTION ]
GRANT { USAGE | ALL [ PRIVILEGES ] }
ON LANGUAGE langname [, ...]
TO { username | GROUP groupname | PUBLIC } [, ...] [ WITH GRANT OPTION ]
GRANT { { CREATE | USAGE } [,...] | ALL [ PRIVILEGES ] }
ON SCHEMA schemaname [, ...]
TO { username | GROUP groupname | PUBLIC } [, ...] [ WITH GRANT OPTION ]
GRANT { CREATE | ALL [ PRIVILEGES ] }
ON TABLESPACE tablespacename [, ...]
TO { username | GROUP groupname | PUBLIC } [, ...] [ WITH GRANT OPTION ]
At table level, there is no ability to control visibility.
The closest is at the schema level, where privileges can be granted on whether they can use a schema.
That's not possible. The max that you can do is to revoke (or do not grant) usage on schema / access to table that you want to conceal.
The user would still be able to view the schema / table in the listing, all its attributes (primary keys, columns etc) but will not be able to view any data and that should suffice the data protection intended.
I am getting the above error in Mongo DB when entering the following in the shell but I can't for the life of me see where there is a syntax error...
db.createUser (
... "user":"dbTest",
... "pwd":"testPass",
... "roles": [
... { "role":"readWrite", "db":"test" }
... ]
... )
That has been copied and pasted directly from the console.
You're missing curly braces around the object literal:
db.createUser ({
"user":"dbTest",
"pwd":"testPass",
"roles": [
{ "role":"readWrite", "db":"test" }
]
})
See db.createUser() - Examples
While working on rational numbers with leon, I have to add as requirement isRational pretty much everywhere.
For example:
import leon.lang._
case class Rational (n: BigInt, d: BigInt) {
def +(that: Rational): Rational = {
require(isRational && that.isRational)
Rational(n * that.d + that.n * d, d * that.d)
} ensuring { _.isRational }
def *(that: Rational): Rational = {
require(isRational && that.isRational)
Rational(n * that.n, d * that.d)
} ensuring { _.isRational }
// ...
def isRational = !(d == 0)
def nonZero = n != 0
}
Is it possible to add a require statement in a class constructor to DRY this code so that it applies to all instances of the data structure? I tried adding it on the first line of the class body but it seems to have no effect...
case class Rational (n: BigInt, d: BigInt) {
require(isRational) // NEW
// ... as before ...
def lemma(other: Rational): Rational = {
Rational(n * other.d + other.n * d, d * other.d)
}.ensuring{_.isRational}
def lemmb(other: Rational): Boolean = {
require(other.d * other.n >= 0)
this <= (other + this)
}.holds
}
This does not prevent leon from creating a Rational(0, 0) for example as the report suggest:
[ Info ] - Now considering 'postcondition' VC for Rational$$plus #9:16...
[ Info ] => VALID
[ Info ] - Now considering 'postcondition' VC for Rational$$times #14:16...
[ Info ] => VALID
[ Info ] - Now considering 'postcondition' VC for Rational$lemma #58:14...
[ Error ] => INVALID
[ Error ] Found counter-example:
[ Error ] $this -> Rational(1, 0)
[ Error ] other -> Rational(1888, -1)
[ Info ] - Now considering 'postcondition' VC for Rational$lemmb #60:41...
[ Error ] => INVALID
[ Error ] Found counter-example:
[ Error ] $this -> Rational(-974, 0)
[ Error ] other -> Rational(-5904, -1)
[ Info ] - Now considering 'precond. (call $this.<=((other + $this)))' VC for Rational$lemmb #62:5...
[ Error ] => INVALID
[ Error ] Found counter-example:
[ Error ] $this -> Rational(-1, 0)
[ Error ] other -> Rational(0, -1)
[ Info ] - Now considering 'precond. (call other + $this)' VC for Rational$lemmb #62:14...
[ Error ] => INVALID
[ Error ] Found counter-example:
[ Error ] $this -> Rational(1, 2)
[ Error ] other -> Rational(7719, 0)
[ Info ] ┌──────────────────────┐
[ Info ] ╔═╡ Verification Summary ╞═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
[ Info ] ║ └──────────────────────┘ ║
[ Info ] ║ Rational$$plus postcondition 9:16 valid U:smt-z3 0.010 ║
[ Info ] ║ Rational$$times postcondition 14:16 valid U:smt-z3 0.012 ║
[ Info ] ║ Rational$lemma postcondition 58:14 invalid U:smt-z3 0.011 ║
[ Info ] ║ Rational$lemmb postcondition 60:41 invalid U:smt-z3 0.018 ║
[ Info ] ║ Rational$lemmb precond. (call $this.<=((ot... 62:5 invalid U:smt-z3 0.015 ║
[ Info ] ║ Rational$lemmb precond. (call other + $this) 62:14 invalid U:smt-z3 0.011 ║
[ Info ] ╟┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄╢
[ Info ] ║ total: 6 valid: 2 invalid: 4 unknown 0 0.077 ║
[ Info ] ╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
(this and other don't always meet the constructor requirement.)
Am I missing something?
The main difficulty with invariants can be decomposed in two problems:
Problem 1
Given
case class A(v: BigInt) {
require(v > 0)
}
Leon would have to inject this requirement in preconditions of all functions taking A as argument, so
def foo(a: A) = {
a.v
} ensuring { _ > 0 }
will need to become:
def foo(a: A) = {
require(a.v > 0)
a.v
} ensuring { _ > 0 }
While trivial for this case, consider the following functions:
def foo2(as: List[A]) = {
require(as.nonEmpty)
a.head.v
} ensuring { _ > 0 }
or
def foo3(as: Set[A], a: A) = {
as contains a
} ensuring { _ > 0 }
Here it is not so easy to constraint foo2 so that the list contains only valid As. Leon would have to synthesize traversal functions on ADTs so that these preconditions can be injected.
Moreover, it is impossible to specify that the Set[A] contains only valid As as Leon lacks capabilities to traverse&constraint the set.
Problem 2
While it would be practical to write the following function:
case class A(a: BigInt) {
require(invariant)
def invariant: Boolean = // ...
}
You have a chicken-and-egg issue, where invariant would be injected with a precondition checking invariant on this.
I believe both problems can be solved (or we can restrict the usage of these invariants), but they constitute the reasons why class invariants have you been trivially implemented yet.
I'm trying to generate a REST-Service on a XPage with the viewJsonService service type.
Within a column I need to have a JSON object and tried to solve that with this code:
<xe:restViewColumn name="surveyResponse">
<xe:this.value>
<![CDATA[#{javascript:
var arrParticipants = new Array();
arrParticipants.push({"participant": "A", "selection": ["a1"]});
arrParticipants.push({"participant": "B", "selection": ["b1", "b2"]});
return (arrParticipants);
}
]]>
</xe:this.value>
</xe:restViewColumn>
I was expecting to get this for that specific column:
...
"surveyResponse": [
{ "participant": "A",
"selection": [ "a1" ]
},
{ "participant": "B",
"selection": [ "b1", "b2" ]
}
]
...
What I am getting is this:
...
"surveyResponse": [
"???",
"???"
]
...
When trying to use toJson for the array arrParticipants the result is not valid JSON format:
...
"surveyResponse": "[{\"selection\": [\"a1\"],\"participant\":\"A\"},{\"selection\": [\"b1\",\"b2\"],\"participant\":\"B\"}]"
...
When tyring to use fromJson for the array arrParticipants the result is:
{
"code": 500,
"text": "Internal Error",
"message": "Error while executing JavaScript computed expression",
"type": "text",
"data": "com.ibm.xsp.exception.EvaluationExceptionEx: Error while executing JavaScript computed expression at com.ibm.xsp.binding.javascript.JavaScriptValueBinding.getValue(JavaScriptValueBinding.java:132) at com.ibm.xsp.extlib.component.rest.DominoViewColumn.getValue(DominoViewColumn.java:93) at com.ibm.xsp.extlib.component.rest.DominoViewColumn.evaluate(DominoViewColumn.java:133) at com.ibm.domino.services.content.JsonViewEntryCollectionContent.writeColumns(JsonViewEntryCollectionContent.java:213) at com.ibm.domino.services.content.JsonViewEntryCollectionContent.writeEntryAsJson(JsonViewEntryCollectionContent.java:191) at com.ibm.domino.services.content.JsonViewEntryCollectionContent.writeViewEntryCollection(JsonViewEntryCollectionContent.java:170) at com.ibm.domino.services.rest.das.view.RestViewJsonService.renderServiceJSONGet(RestViewJsonService.java:394) at com.ibm.domino.services.rest.das.view.RestViewJsonService.renderService(RestViewJsonService.java:112) at com.ibm.domino.services.HttpServiceEngine.processRequest(HttpServiceEngine.java:167) at com.ibm.xsp.extlib.component.rest.UIBaseRestService._processAjaxRequest(UIBaseRestService.java:242) at com.ibm.xsp.extlib.component.rest.UIBaseRestService.processAjaxRequest(UIBaseRestService.java:219) at com.ibm.xsp.util.AjaxUtilEx.renderAjaxPartialLifecycle(AjaxUtilEx.java:206) at com.ibm.xsp.webapp.FacesServletEx.renderAjaxPartial(FacesServletEx.java:225) at com.ibm.xsp.webapp.FacesServletEx.serviceView(FacesServletEx.java:170) at com.ibm.xsp.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:160) at com.ibm.xsp.webapp.FacesServletEx.service(FacesServletEx.java:138) at com.ibm.xsp.webapp.DesignerFacesServlet.service(DesignerFacesServlet.java:103) at com.ibm.designer.runtime.domino.adapter.ComponentModule.invokeServlet(ComponentModule.java:576) at com.ibm.domino.xsp.module.nsf.NSFComponentModule.invokeServlet(NSFComponentModule.java:1281) at com.ibm.designer.runtime.domino.adapter.ComponentModule$AdapterInvoker.invokeServlet(ComponentModule.java:847) at com.ibm.designer.runtime.domino.adapter.ComponentModule$ServletInvoker.doService(ComponentModule.java:796) at com.ibm.designer.runtime.domino.adapter.ComponentModule.doService(ComponentModule.java:565) at com.ibm.domino.xsp.module.nsf.NSFComponentModule.doService(NSFComponentModule.java:1265) at com.ibm.domino.xsp.module.nsf.NSFService.doServiceInternal(NSFService.java:653) at com.ibm.domino.xsp.module.nsf.NSFService.doService(NSFService.java:476) at com.ibm.designer.runtime.domino.adapter.LCDEnvironment.doService(LCDEnvironment.java:341) at com.ibm.designer.runtime.domino.adapter.LCDEnvironment.service(LCDEnvironment.java:297) at com.ibm.domino.xsp.bridge.http.engine.XspCmdManager.service(XspCmdManager.java:272) Caused by: com.ibm.jscript.InterpretException: Script interpreter error, line=7, col=8: Error while converting from a JSON string at com.ibm.jscript.types.FBSGlobalObject$GlobalMethod.call(FBSGlobalObject.java:785) at com.ibm.jscript.types.FBSObject.call(FBSObject.java:161) at com.ibm.jscript.types.FBSGlobalObject$GlobalMethod.call(FBSGlobalObject.java:219) at com.ibm.jscript.ASTTree.ASTCall.interpret(ASTCall.java:175) at com.ibm.jscript.ASTTree.ASTReturn.interpret(ASTReturn.java:49) at com.ibm.jscript.ASTTree.ASTProgram.interpret(ASTProgram.java:119) at com.ibm.jscript.ASTTree.ASTProgram.interpretEx(ASTProgram.java:139) at com.ibm.jscript.JSExpression._interpretExpression(JSExpression.java:435) at com.ibm.jscript.JSExpression.access$1(JSExpression.java:424) at com.ibm.jscript.JSExpression$2.run(JSExpression.java:414) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:284) at com.ibm.jscript.JSExpression.interpretExpression(JSExpression.java:410) at com.ibm.jscript.JSExpression.evaluateValue(JSExpression.java:251) at com.ibm.jscript.JSExpression.evaluateValue(JSExpression.java:234) at com.ibm.xsp.javascript.JavaScriptInterpreter.interpret(JavaScriptInterpreter.java:221) at com.ibm.xsp.javascript.JavaScriptInterpreter.interpret(JavaScriptInterpreter.java:193) at com.ibm.xsp.binding.javascript.JavaScriptValueBinding.getValue(JavaScriptValueBinding.java:78) ... 27 more Caused by: com.ibm.commons.util.io.json.JsonException: Error when parsing JSON string at com.ibm.commons.util.io.json.JsonParser.fromJson(JsonParser.java:61) at com.ibm.jscript.types.FBSGlobalObject$GlobalMethod.call(FBSGlobalObject.java:781) ... 43 more Caused by: com.ibm.commons.util.io.json.parser.ParseException: Encountered " "object "" at line 1, column 2. Was expecting one of: "false" ... "null" ... "true" ... ... ... ... "{" ... "[" ... "]" ... "," ... at com.ibm.commons.util.io.json.parser.Json.generateParseException(Json.java:568) at com.ibm.commons.util.io.json.parser.Json.jj_consume_token(Json.java:503) at com.ibm.commons.util.io.json.parser.Json.arrayLiteral(Json.java:316) at com.ibm.commons.util.io.json.parser.Json.parseJson(Json.java:387) at com.ibm.commons.util.io.json.JsonParser.fromJson(JsonParser.java:59) ... 44 more "
}
Is there any way to get the desired answer?
Well, the best way to achieve the desired result is to use the xe:customRestService if you need to return a cascaded JSON object.
All other xe:***RestService elements assume that you will return a flat JSON construct of parameter and value pairs, where the value is a simple data type (like boolean, number or string and - funny though - arrays) but not a complex data type (like objects).
This is, that this result here
...
"surveyResponse": [
{ "participant": "A",
"selection": [ "a1" ]
},
{ "participant": "B",
"selection": [ "b1", "b2" ]
}
]
...
will be only available on using xe:customRestService where you can define your JSON result by yourself.
Using the other services the results are limited to this constructions:
...
"surveyResponse": true;
...
or
...
"surveyResponse": [
"A",
"B"
]
...
cant you use built-in server-side javascript function toJson ?
You could try intercepting the AJAX call when reading the JSON and then manually de-sanitise the JSON string data.
There are more details here.
http://www.browniesblog.com/A55CBC/blog.nsf/dx/15112012082949PMMBRD68.htm
Personally I'd recommend against this as unless you are absolutely sure the end user can't inject code into the JSON data.