I would like to test sentence level parsing for discourse relation. I already downloaded SPADE from isi.edu. I set up the package according to the instructions. But it does not work. I used Padre, the Perl IDE to run the package. According to the instructions, I changed the $CHP variable to the path of parser like that.
$CHP = "D:/SIITcourse/Special Study/RhetoricalToolKit/parser/";
I downloaded Charniak's syntactic parser from the link at isi.edu. May I know if I need something else for parser. Thanks in advance.
Related
I've already Google'd for an answer, since this is a common problem, but all the replies point in using alternatives instead of explaining why this doesn't work, so I'm asking here.
I put this code in my Atom's init.coffee script:
beautify = require('js-beautify').html
But Atom fails with Failed to load init.coffee and Cannot find module 'js-beautify'. Curiously enough, this works on a package and this works if I type the exact same code on Atom's console.
Of course, I could write a package for this, in fact there are a couple available, this is just an example because I want to learn how to require modules from init.coffee for future tweaks.
Thanks a lot!
When you require() from init.coffee, Atom looks for those modules in its own path. An example of where you might want to do that is if you had oni = require('oniguruma') to get access to regular expression functions.
In order to get to js-beautify, you have to specify its complete path. So far, only explicitly declaring the entire absolute path has worked for me:
beaut = require 'C:\\Users\\<username>\\.atom\\packages\\atom-beautify\\node_modules\\js-beautify'
console.log beaut
In practice, the most reliable way to use a module like this is to globally install it so that you can link to your global NPM folder. Linking to a module inside a package will break if the package is ever uninstalled.
I'm developing a Modelica library and need to produce a document with source code listings. I'd like to be able to include the source of the Modelica models without annotations.
I could manually edit them out, but I'm looking for a more automated strategy. I'm guessing the most convenient and straightforward approach is to use some tool to save .mo files with no annotations and include those in my document (I'm using \lstinputlisting in LaTeX).
Is it possible to do this? I have access to Dymola, OpenModelica and JModelica. Dymola is obviously capable of producing such a listing, as it's able to include it in the automatically generated documentation (File > Export > HTML...). I've been looking into scripting with Dymola and OpenModelica, but haven't found a way to do this either.
JModelica seems like it could be a good option, but I don't have experience working with Python. If this is possible and someone gives me some pointers, I'm willing to look into it myself. I found a mention to a prettyprint function that might do the job, but I'm not sure where to start. I can't even find reference to that function in the latest documentation.
It would also be more convenient for me to find a way of doing it with Dymola/OpenModelica (whether through the UI or by using a script). Have I missed something?
I think you could use saveTotalModel("total.mo", MyModelName) in OpenModelica. This will strip most annotations (not ones used for code generation if I remember correctly) and pretty-print the source code including all dependencies. Then you just copy-paste the models/packages that you want to include in the listing. Or if you prefer, you can do something like the following to only include code for a particular model:
loadModel(Modelica);
loadFile("MyModel.mo");
saveTotalModel("total.mo", MyModel.A.B);
clear();
loadFile(MyModel);
str := list(MyModel.A.B);
writeFile("MyModel.A.B.listing", str);
I have an OO project in MATLAB and would like to automatically produce some documentation.
After some research I have found a convenient tool called mtoc++ which apparently produces a documentation using Doxygen (I have no experience with).
My only question is whether in order to use the tool I need to write comments in MATLAB using a specific format (language?) so that mtoc++/Doxygen could understand and document my comments?
If so, then what this format/ language is and where I can find its description?
After correctly installing and configuring mtoc++/Doxygen, the documentation is created automatically.
If you want to define personalized comments for specific custom parameters, you can follow the instructions on this page:
http://www.ians.uni-stuttgart.de/MoRePaS/software/mtocpp/docs/tools.html
Look under the heading Configuration options for the mtoc++ filter.
What you have to do is to edit the mtocpp.conf file, located in tools/config folder, and the format you'll be using is this:
add(params) = <parameter1_name> => """Your parameter1 description text in triple quotes""";
An example would be:
add(params) = myVariable => """This variable is defined by me""";
So you can define personalized comments for your Parameters, Fields, Extra Documentation and Global Settings.
I am sure there must be other workarounds to add comments and documentation.
I hope this helps. Happy coding.
The plugin description for a libpeas plugin contains a line determining the Loader and with this the programming language the plugin is written in. It seems the documentation includes not list of available languages. Inspecting the git repository of the project, a top-level directory "Loaders" can be found listing entries for
c,
gjs,
seed and
python.
It is unclear also if the python version expected is 2 or 3.
These are by far fewer languages that the related gobject introspection provides support for.
Are the listed 4 all available loaders? Or do external projects exist that provides more loaders?
AFAIK yes, those are all the loaders which are available, though it would make much more sense to ask on an official libpeas forum (like the mailing list or IRC channel) than on SO.
Vala uses the C loader, and can be used with libpeas.
Also, a lot of the projects listed on that site aren't in particularly good shape. For example, JGIR is probably in better shape than most (IIRC there is a GSoC student working on it right now), but it can't handle out or inout parameters. A libpeas loader isn't really necessary until the language is actually usable with GI.
For people that would needs a list of supported loaders, i think this may be useful.
As stated on the valadoc page for libpeas-1.0/Peas.Engine.enable_loader ยน :
C : The C plugin loader is always enabled ;
lua5.1 : Lua 5.1 loader - Example ;
python : Python2 loader ;
python3 : Python3 loader - Example.
gjs : GJS loader - EDIT: Seems to have been disconstinued.
I suppose that using the C loader may works for Genie plugins too.
Summary :
I have a project using GNU Autotools. I have a pot file. I need to update it. Is there a magical "make" task that run xgettext for me (I'm lazy ?)
Verbose version :
Hi
I am trying to setup a project using GNU autotools and gettext.
I'm trying to follow the 'lazy' path (that is, only writing configure.ac, Makefile.am, and such, and let tools generate the rest for me as much as possible).
I used gettextize once on my package, so I got a package.pot file created, and I derived a fr.po file (I'm trying to translate in french).
I never managed to get my code translated, but I figured out it might be because the code was not in the proper place. The translated string is in a lib instead of a main, and the documentation is quite unclear about what I must do in this case. If my main call a function in a lib, and the function from the lib is using _(). Should I use gettext of dgettext in this case ? My lib is just here for organisation purpose, so I'm okay with using the same domain (only one package.pot file for the whole app).
So, to try something simpler, I moved my string to the main (it's really just a hello world, for the moment). So I need to update the package.pot file, at least, to realize that the string position changed, need I ? In this case, would I use xgettext manually (painfully passing it the list of all interesting cpp files, which will be a pain in the ass when I have more than one file), or is there a 'make whatever' task somewhere that I can run ?
This may look stupid, but I've not been able to find it.
Also, any help on finding why my code is not translated, (anything not in http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/FAQ.html#integrating_noop) is welcome !
Thanks
PH
Ok, it turns out that :
there is a update-po task in the generated Makefile of the po/ folder, that does just what I want ;
this tasks looks to file referenced in the POTFILES.in file, which I had forgotten to update.
So it was something stupid.