Related
I've notice this behavior in Scala
val list = List[(Int, Int)]()
val set = HashSet[(Int, Int)]()
scala> list :+ (1, 2)
res30: List[(Int, Int)] = List((1,2))
scala> list :+ (1 -> 2)
res31: List[(Int, Int)] = List((1,2))
scala> list :+ 1 -> 2
res32: List[(Int, Int)] = List((1,2))
//Work
// But the same for set not work
set += (1, 2)
<console>:14: error: type mismatch;
found : Int(2)
required: (Int, Int)
set += (1, 2)
//Ok may be += in set mean add all that mean this should work
set += ((1, 2))
set += ((1, 2), (3,4))
// Worked
// But why this one work
set += 1 -> 2
set += (1 -> 2)
set += ((1 -> 2))
Now I'm confuse, could you explain why tuple is not tuple?
scala> (4->5).getClass
res28: Class[_ <: (Int, Int)] = class scala.Tuple2
scala> (4,7).getClass
res29: Class[_ <: (Int, Int)] = class scala.Tuple2$mcII$sp
The parser stage -Xprint:parser gives
set.$plus$eq(1, 2)
which seems to resolve to
def += (elem1: A, elem2: A, elems: A*)
that is a method that accepts multiple arguments so compiler probably thinks elem1 = 1 or elem2 = 2 instead of considering (1,2) as a tuple.
missingfaktor points to SLS 6.12.3 Infix Operations as the explanation
The right-hand operand of a left-associative operator may consist of
several arguments enclosed in parentheses, e.g. π;op;(π1,β¦,ππ).
This expression is then interpreted as π.op(π1,β¦,ππ).
Now the operator += is left-associative because it does not end in :, and the right-hand operand of += consists of several arguments enclosed in parentheses (1,2). Therefore, by design, the compiler does not treat (1,2) as Tuple2.
I think the difference is that HashSet[T] defines two overloads for +=, one of which takes a single T, and the other takes multiple (as a T* params list). This is inherited from Growable[T], and shown here.
List[T].:+ can only take one T on the right hand side, which is why the compiler works out that it's looking at a tuple, not something that should be turned into a params list.
If you do set += ((1, 2)) then it compiles. Also, val tuple = (1,2); set += x works too.
See Mario Galicβs answer for why in the case of HashSet[T].+= the compiler chooses the overload that can't type over the one that can.
Here's a quite simple request to combine two lists as following:
scala> list1
res17: List[(Int, Double)] = List((1,0.1), (2,0.2), (3,0.3), (4,0.4))
scala> list2
res18: List[(Int, String)] = List((1,aaa), (2,bbb), (3,ccc), (4,ddd))
The desired output is as:
((aaa,0.1),(bbb,0.2),(ccc,0.3),(ddd,0.4))
I tried:
scala> (list1 ++ list2)
res23: List[(Int, Any)] = List((1,0.1), (2,0.2), (3,0.3), (4,0.4),
(1,aaa), (2,bbb), (3,ccc), (4,ddd))
But:
scala> (list1 ++ list2).groupByKey
<console>:10: error: value groupByKey is not a member of List[(Int,
Any)](list1 ++ list2).groupByKey
Any hints? Thanks!
The method you're looking for is groupBy:
(list1 ++ list2).groupBy(_._1)
If you know that for each key you have exactly two values, you can join them:
scala> val pairs = List((1, "a1"), (2, "b1"), (1, "a2"), (2, "b2"))
pairs: List[(Int, String)] = List((1,a1), (2,b1), (1,a2), (2,b2))
scala> pairs.groupBy(_._1).values.map {
| case List((_, v1), (_, v2)) => (v1, v2)
| }
res0: Iterable[(String, String)] = List((b1,b2), (a1,a2))
Another approach using zip is possible if the two lists contain the same keys in the same order:
scala> val l1 = List((1, "a1"), (2, "b1"))
l1: List[(Int, String)] = List((1,a1), (2,b1))
scala> val l2 = List((1, "a2"), (2, "b2"))
l2: List[(Int, String)] = List((1,a2), (2,b2))
scala> l1.zip(l2).map { case ((_, v1), (_, v2)) => (v1, v2) }
res1: List[(String, String)] = List((a1,a2), (b1,b2))
Here's a quick one-liner:
scala> list2.map(_._2) zip list1.map(_._2)
res0: List[(String, Double)] = List((aaa,0.1), (bbb,0.2), (ccc,0.3), (ddd,0.4))
If you are unsure why this works then read on! I'll expand it step by step:
list2.map(<function>)
The map method iterates over each value in list2 and applies your function to it. In this case each of the values in list2 is a Tuple2 (a tuple with two values). What you are wanting to do is access the second tuple value. To access the first tuple value use the ._1 method and to access the second tuple value use the ._2 method. Here is an example:
val myTuple = (1.0, "hello") // A Tuple2
println(myTuple._1) // prints "1.0"
println(myTuple._2) // prints "hello"
So what we want is a function literal that takes one parameter (the current value in the list) and returns the second tuple value (._2). We could have written the function literal like this:
list2.map(item => item._2)
We don't need to specify a type for item because the compiler is smart enough to infer it thanks to target typing. A really helpful shortcut is that we can just leave out item altogether and replace it with a single underscore _. So it gets simplified (or cryptified, depending on how you view it) to:
list2.map(_._2)
The other interesting part about this one liner is the zip method. All zip does is take two lists and combines them into one list just like the zipper on your favorite hoodie does!
val a = List("a", "b", "c")
val b = List(1, 2, 3)
a zip b // returns ((a,1), (b,2), (c,3))
Cheers!
Is there a quick scala idiom to have retrieve multiple elements of a a traversable using indices.
I am looking for something like
val L=1 to 4 toList
L(List(1,2)) //doesn't work
I have been using map so far, but wondering if there was a more "scala" way
List(1,2) map {L(_)}
Thanks in advance
Since a List is a Function you can write just
List(1,2) map L
Although, if you're going to be looking things up by index, you should probably use an IndexedSeq like Vector instead of a List.
You could add an implicit class that adds the functionality:
implicit class RichIndexedSeq[T](seq: IndexedSeq[T]) {
def apply(i0: Int, i1: Int, is: Int*): Seq[T] = (i0+:i1+:is) map seq
}
You can then use the sequence's apply method with one index or multiple indices:
scala> val data = Vector(1,2,3,4,5)
data: scala.collection.immutable.Vector[Int] = Vector(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
scala> data(0)
res0: Int = 1
scala> data(0,2,4)
res1: Seq[Int] = ArrayBuffer(1, 3, 5)
You can do it with a for comprehension but it's no clearer than the code you have using map.
scala> val indices = List(1,2)
indices: List[Int] = List(1, 2)
scala> for (index <- indices) yield L(index)
res0: List[Int] = List(2, 3)
I think the most readable would be to implement your own function takeIndices(indices: List[Int]) that takes a list of indices and returns the values of a given List at those indices. e.g.
L.takeIndices(List(1,2))
List[Int] = List(2,3)
Scala REPL gives the same type for both expressions - (tuple? -- strange!). Yet ("a" ->1) which is a Map I can add to map and ("a", 1)can not. Why Scala REPL shows tuple type type for Map expression?
scala> :t ("a" -> 1)
(String, Int)
scala> :t ("a",1)
(String, Int)
scala> val m = Map.empty[String, Int]
m: scala.collection.immutable.Map[String,Int] = Map()
scala> m + ("a",1)
<console>:9: error: type mismatch;
found : String("a")
required: (String, ?)
m + ("a",1)
^
scala> m + ("a" ->1)
res19: scala.collection.immutable.Map[String,Int] = Map(a -> 1)
Scala thinks a + (b,c) means you are trying to call the + method with two arguments, which is a real possibility since maps do have a multi-argument addition method so you can do things like
m + (("a" -> 1), ("b" -> 2))
the solution is simple: just add an extra set of parentheses so it's clear that (b,c) is in fact a tuple being passed as a single argument.
m + (("a", 1))
Actually, the reason for this is that Predef: http://www.scala-lang.org/api/current/index.html#scala.Predef$ (which is always in scope in Scala) contains an implicit conversion from Any to ArrowAssoc (the method implicit def any2ArrowAssoc[A](x: A): ArrowAssoc[A])
ArrowAssoc contains the method -> which converts it to a tuple.
So basically you are doing any2ArrowAssoc("a").->(1) which returns ("a",1).
From repl:
any2ArrowAssoc("a").->(1)
res1: (java.lang.String, Int) = (a,1)
Furthermore, you can work on immutable hashmaps like this:
val x = HashMap[Int,String](1 -> "One")
x: scala.collection.immutable.HashMap[Int,String] = Map((1,One))
val y = x ++ HashMap[Int,String](2 -> "Two")
y: scala.collection.immutable.Map[Int,String] = Map((1,One), (2,Two))
val z = x + (3 -> "Three")
z: scala.collection.immutable.HashMap[Int,String] = Map((1,One), (3,Three))
I'm new to scala, and what I'm learning is tuple.
I can define a tuple as following, and get the items:
val tuple = ("Mike", 40, "New York")
println("Name: " + tuple._1)
println("Age: " + tuple._2)
println("City: " + tuple._3)
My question is:
How to get the length of a tuple?
Is tuple mutable? Can I modify its items?
Is there any other useful operation we can do on a tuple?
Thanks in advance!
1] tuple.productArity
2] No.
3] Some interesting operations you can perform on tuples: (a short REPL session)
scala> val x = (3, "hello")
x: (Int, java.lang.String) = (3,hello)
scala> x.swap
res0: (java.lang.String, Int) = (hello,3)
scala> x.toString
res1: java.lang.String = (3,hello)
scala> val y = (3, "hello")
y: (Int, java.lang.String) = (3,hello)
scala> x == y
res2: Boolean = true
scala> x.productPrefix
res3: java.lang.String = Tuple2
scala> val xi = x.productIterator
xi: Iterator[Any] = non-empty iterator
scala> while(xi.hasNext) println(xi.next)
3
hello
See scaladocs of Tuple2, Tuple3 etc for more.
One thing that you can also do with a tuple is to extract the content using the match expression:
def tupleview( tup: Any ){
tup match {
case (a: String, b: String) =>
println("A pair of strings: "+a + " "+ b)
case (a: Int, b: Int, c: Int) =>
println("A triplet of ints: "+a + " "+ b + " " +c)
case _ => println("Unknown")
}
}
tupleview( ("Hello", "Freewind"))
tupleview( (1,2,3))
Gives:
A pair of strings: Hello Freewind
A triplet of ints: 1 2 3
Tuples are immutable, but, like all cases classes, they have a copy method that can be used to create a new Tuple with a few changed elements:
scala> (1, false, "two")
res0: (Int, Boolean, java.lang.String) = (1,false,two)
scala> res0.copy(_2 = true)
res1: (Int, Boolean, java.lang.String) = (1,true,two)
scala> res1.copy(_1 = 1f)
res2: (Float, Boolean, java.lang.String) = (1.0,true,two)
Concerning question 3:
A useful thing you can do with Tuples is to store parameter lists for functions:
def f(i:Int, s:String, c:Char) = s * i + c
List((3, "cha", '!'), (2, "bora", '.')).foreach(t => println((f _).tupled(t)))
//--> chachacha!
//--> borabora.
[Edit] As Randall remarks, you'd better use something like this in "real life":
def f(i:Int, s:String, c:Char) = s * i + c
val g = (f _).tupled
List((3, "cha", '!'), (2, "bora", '.')).foreach(t => println(g(t)))
In order to extract the values from tuples in the middle of a "collection transformation chain" you can write:
val words = List((3, "cha"),(2, "bora")).map{ case(i,s) => s * i }
Note the curly braces around the case, parentheses won't work.
Another nice trick ad question 3) (as 1 and 2 are already answered by others)
val tuple = ("Mike", 40, "New York")
tuple match {
case (name, age, city) =>{
println("Name: " + name)
println("Age: " + age)
println("City: " + city)
}
}
Edit: in fact it's rather a feature of pattern matching and case classes, a tuple is just a simple example of a case class...
You know the size of a tuple, it's part of it's type. For example if you define a function def f(tup: (Int, Int)), you know the length of tup is 2 because values of type (Int, Int) (aka Tuple2[Int, Int]) always have a length of 2.
No.
Not really. Tuples are useful for storing a fixed amount of items of possibly different types and passing them around, putting them into data structures etc. There's really not much you can do with them, other than creating tuples, and getting stuff out of tuples.
1 and 2 have already been answered.
A very useful thing that you can use tuples for is to return more than one value from a method or function. Simple example:
// Get the min and max of two integers
def minmax(a: Int, b: Int): (Int, Int) = if (a < b) (a, b) else (b, a)
// Call it and assign the result to two variables like this:
val (x, y) = minmax(10, 3) // x = 3, y = 10
Using shapeless, you easily get a lot of useful methods, that are usually available only on collections:
import shapeless.syntax.std.tuple._
val t = ("a", 2, true, 0.0)
val first = t(0)
val second = t(1)
// etc
val head = t.head
val tail = t.tail
val init = t.init
val last = t.last
val v = (2.0, 3L)
val concat = t ++ v
val append = t :+ 2L
val prepend = 1.0 +: t
val take2 = t take 2
val drop3 = t drop 3
val reverse = t.reverse
val zip = t zip (2.0, 2, "a", false)
val (unzip, other) = zip.unzip
val list = t.toList
val array = t.toArray
val set = t.to[Set]
Everything is typed as one would expect (that is first has type String, concat has type (String, Int, Boolean, Double, Double, Long), etc.)
The last method above (.to[Collection]) should be available in the next release (as of 2014/07/19).
You can also "update" a tuple
val a = t.updatedAt(1, 3) // gives ("a", 3, true, 0.0)
but that will return a new tuple instead of mutating the original one.