We have a few VMs in Azure and we rely on the PowerShell DSC extension to deploy our code to the machines. I want to make sure that this extension is not updated automatically so that our code that uses functionality from this extension don't break without we knowing about it first.
The problem is that we have some deployment scripts that read the extension's status codes/messages and do custom logic based on them. When the extension was updated from 1.4.0.0 (which is the version that the plugin was on when we first started using it) to the version 1.5.0.0, some of the status messages changed and our script stopped working. This completely broke our deployment process and we had to do an emergency update on our scripts to be compatible with v1.5. Now that version 1.7.0.0 was released the same exact problem happened again. Some new status codes were added and I had to update our scripts or we would not have a working deployment pipeline.
Is it possible to specify a manual update process for these extensions? Their installation and update seem to be completely automated. Ideally, I'd like to be able to update them on a case by case basis after testing our scripts against the newer versions first, so that our deployment process is not halted because of that. Bonus points for anyone who manages to find up to date documentation or some kind of release notes document for this extension in particular, as I could find none... I was just surprised to see that version 1.7 was installed today when I got an error from our script, and was lucky to know exactly where to look for the status changes.
The default behavior for the DSC extension handler is to update to the latest version. If you want to tie yourself down to a specific version, then you can do so with the following cmdlet (currently there is no provision from the UI)
Set-AzureVMDscExtension -Version
Please note that we are also try to ensure updates do not cause issues. We are not there yet but we would certainly like to get there so everyone is automatically updated.
Related
I have a question regarding the nunit3-console. When running tests through it I am observing a generation of log files like internal-trace and nunit-agent text files.
I was able to disable the generation of the internal-trace with the --trace=off option but for each run having the test .dll specified I am noticing a nunit-agentNumber.txt file generated.
My question is, is this a problem? More specifically for CI/CD and is there an option to disable this? Or clean it at least after each run.
Version 3.15 of the engine introduced a new internal feature, allowing code to change the level of debugging dynamically. (Not yet exposed to users, but intended to be eventually)
As a side effect, it looks as if empty log files are being created. For the moment, the only way to avoid this is to go back to the previous release.
A fix was created in the development code for version 4.0, but has not been ported back to the version 3 code. A bug report might help with that. :-)
I'm currently in the middle of upgrading our API from v0.12 of Sails to v1. Not the easiest task, but will be worth it.
The current problem I'm having, is converting our old "ModelName.query" calls to the new style, which is supposedly "sails.getDatastore". Great, fine.
Except, that when trying to do this in config/bootstrap.js, I constantly get the error "sails.getDatastore is not a function".
Yes, I am using the default sails-hook-orm, the .sailsrc has it turned on explicitly; and yes, I have globals turned on.
Is the problem that the function isn't registered until after bootstrap? Because that is not an option for us; bootstrap is validating our database schema before lift (custom code, using native queries), so our production servers fail to deploy if we missed a database update. It eliminates a ton of human error.
Thanks for taking the 1.0 plunge!
I'm not sure what you mean by the "default" sails-hook-orm -- that hook is installed directly as a dependency on each Sails 1.0 project -- but I can almost guarantee that the version you're using is not correct. I would do:
npm cache clean
npm install sails-hook-orm#beta
in your project to make sure you get the latest (currently v2.0.0-21). It adds getDatastore to the app object when it initializes.
Using a powershell script to deploy a CRM Package works well, but I am running into some unexpected behavior.
The package has 1 unmanaged solution that it uploads. It works perfectly if the solution does not exist on the target CRM organization. However, if the solution does already exist on the organization and I try to deploy it again with some changes, it will not work. The changes are not uploaded and I do not get any errors.
If I change the version number in the solution (from 0.0.1 to 0.0.2, for example) then uploading it works as expected.
I would rather not change the version every time though, and since manually uploading an unmanaged solution with the same version number works perfectly I would expect the script to be able to do it as well.
I tried using the CRM Package Deployer method of importing a package to see if it would work as I expect or if it would show any error messages.
It's messages show:
Skipping solution MySolution. Version 0.0.2 of the solution is already loaded.
So it appears that if a solution with the same name and version number exists in the organization then it will be skipped entirely. This is sort of unfortunate.
It seems I'll have to implement a workaround. I see two options:
The DeployPackage script deletes the solution in the target CRM organization (if it exists) before attempting to upload.
My ExportSolution script changes the version number every time it runs.
I have a msi component which deploys a file MyFile.dll. I have a test machine in which my product already deployed MyFile.dll, which has version 09.99.99.99.
Now I'm writing a major upgrade which will deploy a new version of MyFile.dll with version 05.23.76.123. After execution on the test machine, MyFilee.dll is removed... I need to change or repair to correctly deploy it.
How can I force the deployment of MyFile.dll regardless of its injected version number?
PS: This is happening on our test machines only. The product we delivered to our users has files with version numbers consistent with release history.
There are several ways in Windows Installer to do this but they all have their complications. IMO I would just rebuild the same source code as the old DLL but with a newer higher version and keep it simple.
This is perfectly possible. As said here, you may specify the REINSTALLMODE property and set it to "amus" or "dmus" depending on whether you want to always overwrite files or simply overwrite files with different version:
<Wix ...>
<Product ...>
<Property Id="REINSTALLMODE" Value="amus" />
Note that you'll get this warning when compiling your installer though:
warning LGHT1076: ICE40: REINSTALLMODE is defined in the Property table. This may cause difficulties.
Downgrading a file isn't really straightforward and has issues. As pointed out earlier, you can change the component GUIDs and get this to work. However, it really depends on where your RemoveExistingProducts is sequenced. If its sequenced at a point where the older product is removed and the newer product is installed, then it might work.
There is not really a straight forward and documented way. All the available options are just hacks.
Is this just for your test environment?
If yes, then you could use REINSTALLMODE="amus" in the property table and achieve what you are looking to.
However, this is just for your testing and is not advised to be suggested to your end users.
Regards,
Kiran Hegde
I'm working on an installer that is supposed to install Windows services in wix v3.8. The problem is that we need to make a major upgrade without uninstalling the service only to stop it.
We're using ServiceInstall and ServiceControl inside the component that holds the service exe file. Is there a way to make the execution of ServiceInstall conditional (using a condition like REMOVE="ALL" AND NOT UPGRADINGPRODUCTCODE) so the service is not uninstalled when upgrading (just stopped so we can upgrade the files)?
One solution would be to use custom actions, but maybe there is a better way?
Thanks!
You would have to override the action that process those elements. The following may work as long as you are okay if it applies to all services in your MSI package (if you only have one service then good on ya):
<InstallExecuteSequence>
<DeleteServices>NOT UPGRADINGPRODUCTCODE</DeleteServices>
</InstallExecuteSequence>
You don't need to condition for remove since the DeleteServices would already factor in the state of the Component.
What finally ended up working for me was
<DeleteServices><![CDATA[REMOVE ~= "ALL" AND (NOT UPGRADINGPRODUCTCODE)]]> </DeleteServices>
<InstallServices><![CDATA[NOT Installed]]> </InstallServices>
I arrived at this answer through a series of trial and error attempts and a combination of a few other threads with similar answers.
One of the possible reasons why only the doesn't work is because WIX also removes the service upon re-install.. we only want to install the service once, during the initial install. We also want to make sure that the service is removed upon uninstall. This is the only combination of conditions which worked for me, allowing the service to keep its settings and user account.