Is there a more elegant way to maintain a view in Model-First Entity Framework? There's plenty of discussion regarding how to do this using Migrations in Code-First, but of course Migrations are not available when using Model-First.
My current approach:
Run "Generate Database from Model..."
Run the created script
Delete the table EF generates for the view
Create the view manually
The last two steps are done in a post-script, of course.
I'm not expecting an integrated view-designer (although I think that's what MS was originally intending for future releases, before they fell in love with Code-First). For example, if it's possible simply to tell EF not to create that table, it would be a small improvement.
Related
Need help! I am new to Core 2.0 and VS 2017 and haven't had much experience with MVC. I have an existing database that I need to use with a core 2.0 project at work. I was able to use the Scaffold-DbContect to initially create the domain models from the existing database.
However, the database developers are making changes to the database and adding new tables. I need to keep my domain models in sync with the database changes that are being made.
The only thing I can find on the internet is how to make changes to the model and update the database schema. However, I need to update the model from changes made to the database.
EF Core works on Code First approach. And You guys are following DB First approach together. So you should make changes in your code and then generate migrations accordingly, Otherwise, it will lead you in trouble.
You can use EF Core Power tool for generating the db changes at code side. But in this case you have to take care while generating migrations from code side.
I'm using Entity Framework 5 model first. Say I've deployed the application and I'd like to upgrade an EF entity with new columns, basically adding columns to the table.
What is the best way to upgrade the existing database without losing data? For example I have a User table that I add two new columns to. If I try to script a schema change the tables will need to be dropped in order to add the new columns. Is there a way to update the tables without needing to recreate them? Thanks!
This may be a late answer but I have had the same problem and could just find one solution, there is an application that can update the model-first generated databases without losing the data.
It can directly open the model file and update the database tables.
It also installs some extensions on Visual Studio that I have not personally used but may be usable.
The name is Entity Developer and there are some editions of the application listed here:
Entity Developer Editions
The free edition is usable only for 10 entities or less that may not suit your needs but the Professional edition is usable for 30 day as a trial that may help you do the job. The only solution I could find on the net was this one.
Hope it helps you with the problem.
I got an existing database with many tables which are accessed using stored procedures only (no O/RM). I'd like to create new tables in this database using Entity Framework and the Code First approach.
Do all the tables in my existing database need to be modelized in my Entity Framework classes? Will I be able to hand-code only the new classes I need in my DbContext? Other tables really need to stay untouched and away from O/RM for the moment.
Note: I'm going to be using the latest EF5.
As for now the Power Tools only allow you to reverse engineer all tables and views in the DB, which can be a problem if you have a big DB, with hundreds of objects, you do not want to reverse engineer.
However, I found an easy workaround for that:
Create a new technical user for the reverse engineering. To this user you only grant permission to the tables and views, that you want to be reverse engineered.
Have fun!
You are under no obligation to map any given table with EF. If you already have a database, you may want to consider reverse-engineering your database with the EF Power Tools available from Microsoft. I did this recently with a MySQL database that I had for testing purposes and it worked quite well!
If you are new to EF an advantage is that the PowerTools write a ton of code for you, which will help you get a grasp on the syntax of Code First. You will need to modify the output but it is a great start. I really believe that this approach will give you the least headache.
The EF PowerTools can be found here: http://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/72a60b14-1581-4b9b-89f2-846072eff19d/
How can I do incremental developments with entity framework code first database. Because if I change something i model classes it will regenerate the database which cased to loss my data already in the database. I'm using DropCreateDatabaseIfModelChanges . Is there any thing other than that to execute alter quires rather than recreating.
EF Code First Migrations would help you here, it's in alpha/CTP currently: Entity Framework Code First Migrations: Alpha, also check out the ADO.NET team blog:
The most consistent request we have heard from you since releasing EF
4.1 has been for a migrations solution for Code First that will
incrementally evolve the database schema as you model changes over
time. Today we are announcing the release of our first Community
Technical Preview (CTP) of our Code First Migrations work.
As I recall, the Microsoft docs tell you to be sure not to use DropCreateDatabaseIfModelChanges in production environments. The point of that option is to help you come up with code-based data population for your test runs. I haven't seen any tools to help with incremental changes when using code-first. Where I work, we use a database-first setup, and we create a change script for each new release that includes alter and insert statements.
incremental database development is not currently available in the current version of the codefirst framework however it is included in the roadmap for the next release which will ship with MVC 4
as of right now you would need to remove metadata tracking from the database conventions and update the database manually via scripting or using the sql tooling until this new convention is added to the framework
I've been working Entity Framework trying to get better with it. I'm liking what I'm seeing thus far but now have a question. With this new 'Code First' approach (from the CTP 4 download) we can now use EF from a code first approach, but I'm trying to find out if one can use an existing EDMX file with this approach.
I have a project I'm working on which has an EDMX file and I notice the ModelBuilder has a RegisterEdmx method but am not finding a lot out there on whether this will allow to use an existing EDMX file with my code first approach.
Also, I know with this new CTP things like RecreateDatabaseIfModelChanges are avilable but these options drop the database and recreate it, wont this cause all your data to be lost if you ever change your models? Is there something I'm missing here?
I can't speak to using previously generated EDMX files but there is support to use Code First with existing databases. As for the automatic Recreate, yes, this will kill all your data. This is meant only in rapid development where the persistence of data doesn't matter (and, in fact, is likely unwanted as you discover issues with business logic and want a clean start with your updates.)
This is meant only as a quick way to develop. As of (when Scott Guthrie blogged about the CTP - jump to section 5) there are no data migration features available. Your options are to manually update the database to match your model, delete the database and let it be recreated or set the automatic recreate option. Only the first option is non-destructive to your data.