Should I use Google Webmaster Tools’ "change of address" if merging two sites? - redirect

Two sites, with very similar content. Both existing and well established. I've set up 301 redirects to site A from site B.
Should I use the Webmaster 'change of address' feature to support the merge?
From what I've read, it seems more suited to an old domain transferring to a new domain. Thoughts?

The use the change of address tool in Google Webmaster will help you to manage the transition needed by Google to index your new URLs at the new address, while minimizing impact to your current ranking in the SERP.
You can use it together with a "Standard" 301 Moved Permanently redirect, which will pass Page Rank from site A to site B.

Related

How do you verify user-owned subdomains in Facebook?

As part of the upcoming changes to Facebook Ads, you now must verify ownership of your domain name.
We operate a SaaS platform where user content is hosted on subdomains (myaccount.example.com etc). We need these users to be able to verify ownership of their domain so they can track their own events. We have enabled them to add the meta tag on their domain, and this verifies okay.
<meta name="facebook-domain-verification" content="codefromfbhere" />
However, the problem is, when you go into 'Events manager' -> 'Aggregated event measurement' -> 'Configure web events', it shows me the root domain instead of the subdomain I just verified (e.g. example.com instead of myaccount.example.com).
This is possible, as Leadpages has achieved the same goal. When you add in a Leadpages subdomain, you're able to verify it via meta tag, and it shows the subdomain in the 'Web event configurations' area.
I don't see any extra headers that they have provided or anything else that would enable this.
How do you mark subdomains as independent from the eTLD+1?
I wanted to chime in with the perspective of someone who works for Facebook. For most businesses, even ones that host pages for other businesses, Aggregated Event Measurement without anything extra is the correct solution.
Advertisers who do not own their own domains will not be able to verify the domain for the purpose of event configuration in Ads Manager. Advertisers may consider purchasing their own domain to continue running their campaigns uninterrupted, or moving toward link clicks/landing page views for campaign optimization and reporting. We are currently investigating other solutions for this use case but do not have any additional information to share at this time.
For a very small number of businesses already on the Public Suffix List (PSL) subdomains will be able to get data as if they were a root domain. This is because being on the PSL basically makes the root domain name act as if it was a TLD (such as “co.uk“ or ”gov.au“). In almost every case it does not make sense for sites to request to be added to the PSL as this dramatically changes how the Public Suffix listed domain name will function.
The PSL process is intended only for platform providers that provide subdomains for large numbers of small businesses which really ought to be treated as though they were in fact separate domains.
The Public Suffix List is not useful, nor intended to be used as a means to gain additional subdomain events reporting. Adding a domain name to the PSL means that there will be total cookie separation between subdomains and that cookies will become disabled on the root domain. If you a domain gets added to the PSL you'll not have much control for that site itself. For example, if you have a /login page on that domain. This may not work as it does today if you proceeded with a PSL addition, as cookies may get disabled on the root domain.
It’s also important to note that browsers will enforce the behavior described based on their own update cadence of the PSL. Some browsers don't update their lists more regularly than bi-annually. This means that if you're on the list and a browser updates their copy of the list, and you later decide to not be on the list, there may not be an easy way to back out the effects; it's not as simple as submitting another request to get taken off of the list.
More information can be found at Facebook’s help center article here.
[Update Mar 19 2021]
Facebook just announced they will be supporting the Public Suffix List for domain verification and event configuration. This means that merchants using a registered domain on the Public Suffix List will be able to use that domain for verifying and configuring their top 8 events on the domain. For example, if myplatform.com is a registered domain on the Public Suffix List, then Jasper, a merchant with the subdomain jasper.myplatform.com, would now qualify as an effective eTLD+1 and would be able to verify "jasper.myplatform.com" and use it to configure their top 8 events in the web events configuration tool.
Read more here:
https://developers.facebook.com/docs/sharing/domain-verification
[Original Answer]
For the upcoming changes for Apple iOS 14.5, you can only verify root domain, which is example.com in your example in order to setup the web event configurations.
The only way you can do this is provide your client's a way to buy/setup their own domain on your service.
You may watch the webinar recording here
https://www.facebook.com/business/m/sessionsforsuccess

How can i re-create bing's webmaster verifiction DNS TXT record for an already verified domain?

Our website's Bing verification TXT record was accidentally deleted yet i see no way to create a new one for an already verified domain.
I'm afraid that as in 'google search console', at some point the domain will be removed from bing's webmaster tools.
Thanks.
There was no option to re-verify and our domain Was removed after some time.
Only then we could verify it again but the statistics were lost.

How to check the 302 redirect domain history?

I was buying a domain and I need to verify the history of the domain in-terms of 302 redirects on the domains. is there any way by which I can check a domains history
There are tools and sites available through which you can check their NS records which can be used before for redirection rules as per their name servers also some paid tools are available to get the entire domain history
Check whoisrequest.com and go to domain history.
Check archive.org if you would like to check what type of site it was
Check research.domaintools.com/research/hosting-history/ to get entire data
hope it helps!

301 Redirect with limited access to site

I've recently developed a new website for a local charity that organises an annual sporting event. With the event coming up in a few weeks we approached the previous/existing 'dev' company to either redirect the domain to the new site/server or transfer the domain to us.
This other 'company' is refusing to do anything, simply because they want to force the charity to stay with them, so that they get good local publicity.
So, we've purchased a new domain for the site but need to redirect the old site to the new one. Unfortunately the system the old web company uses is very poor and cumbersome. It also only give us access to files which form the content of a given page. It doesn't however give us any access to the site template / style elements of the site, nor does it give us access to things like .htacess file(s).
So, at the moment the best I've come up with is using the existing systems single input for the site description, to force in a meta refresh that will bump users over to the new domain/site. However, this isn't going to result in a permanent 301 redirect for users or search engines.
As such, I'm desperately hoping to come up with a way to force a 301 for all pages without directly accessing every page content file and manually adding in some sort of redirect.
Due to some crappy sitewide one size fits all unescaped metatag implementation, I was able to inject an additional metatag with a redirect to the new domain.

Submit Review Request to Google for Reported Attack Page of a subdomain that i have no ownership

My website is JerryDelRio.com – it's wordpress install looks clean, but it appears that malware exists on all sub-domains in their idxbroker.com search. For example:
http://www.jerrydelrio.idxco.com/idx/14511/mapSearch.php
How can we make google realize that these sub-domains are good to go? Idxbroker.com is a service we use to display property real estate search – I do NOT control that domain and I am sure it is very clean.
Here is a screenshot on how to submit review request to google:
But it ask to upload verification file to jerrydelrio.idxco.com. But i don't control the domain. It is just a service from Idxbroker.com
Please help me on how i can request google to review the Reported Attack page.
Thanks for your time.
You should move this account to a custom subdomain via a CNAME record. Then you can claim in google webmasters tools.