I am trying to invoke rest end point from Protractor E2E tests. I have referred to following site, however this post seems to be based on old API
eg: protractor.promise.defer(); seems no longer valid on latest API.
http://squirrel.pl/blog/2014/01/15/direct-server-http-calls-in-protractor/
Could you please advise/give sample code to invoke rest end point based on latest protractor API (>= 1.3).
I'm trying to write generic function, something like following.
var executeRequest = function(method, url) {
var defer = protractor.promise.defer();
// method can be ‘GET’, ‘POST’ or ‘PUT’
request({uri: url, method: method, json: true}, function(error, response, body) {
if (error || response.statusCode >= 400) {
defer.reject({
error : error,
message : response
});
} else {
defer.fulfill(body);
}
});
// Return a promise so the caller can wait on it for the request to complete
return defer.promise;
};
You could use request-promise instead. Example from their website...
var rp = require('request-promise');
var options = {
uri : 'http://posttestserver.com/post.php',
method : 'POST'
};
rp(options)
.then(console.dir)
.catch(console.error);
I have used npm module - "needle" to invoke restAPI . That has option for redirects, which helped to validate test site even after redirect.
Please find below sample test to validate rest endpoint is up and running.
it("check restendpoint service is running", function(done){
var restendpointUrl = browser.baseUrl + 'service';
needle.get(healthcheckUrl,{follow_max : 5}, function(err,resp) {
expect(resp.statusCode).toBe(200);
if (!err && resp.statusCode == 200) {
expect(true).toBe(true);
} else {
expect(false).toBe(true);
}
done();
});
});
Brine, many thanks for your earlier reply.
Related
This is my first Google Action project. I have a simple slot after the invocation. User enters the value on prompt and slot invokes the webhook and make a call to API using the user input. All works fine. However the webhook returns to users even before the API call finish processing and returns the value (line 1 conv.add). I do see in the logs that everything from API is logged fine after the webhook returns to user. Below is the code I am using. I am using inline editor. What am I missing? Thanks for help in advance.
const { conversation } = require('#assistant/conversation');
const functions = require('firebase-functions');
var https = require('https');
const fetch = require('node-fetch');
const app = conversation({debug: true});
app.handle('SearchData', conv => {
const body = JSON.stringify({
val: "this is my body"
});
// prepare the header
var postheaders = {
'Content-Type' : 'application/json',
'Auth' : 'MyAuthCreds'
};
fetch('https://host.domain.com/data', {
method: 'post',
body: body,
headers: postheaders,
})
.then(res => res.json())
.then(d => {
console.log(d);
var profile = d;//JSON.parse(d);
console.log(d.entries);
console.log("Length: "+ d.entries.length);
if(d.entries.length > 0)
{
console.log("Data found");
conv.add("Data found"); //line 1
}
else
{
console.log("no data found");
conv.add("no data found"); //line 1
}
})
.catch(function (err) {
// POST failed...
console.log(err);
});
});
exports.ActionsOnGoogleFulfillment = functions.https.onRequest(app);
Your issue is that your handler is making API calls which are asynchronous, but the Assistant Conversation library doesn't know that you're doing so. So as soon as the handler finishes, it tries to send back a response, but your asynchronous responses (the stuff in the then() blocks) haven't executed yet.
To address this, you need to return a Promise object so the library knows to wait till the Promise is fulfilled before it returns.
Fortunately, in your case, this should be pretty straightforward. fetch and all the .then() blocks return a Promise. So all you need to do is add a return statement in front of the call to fetch. So something like this:
return fetch('https://host.domain.com/data', {
I am running an automation script. We have a scenario where Java makes a callback REST call to UI. Below is the code where am doing httpGet to that URL. I want to know when the response comes. If it comes how to know that. I searched a lot I din't find a clear answer anywhere. Please give some hints!
http.get(siteUrl, function(response) {
var bodyString = '';
response.setEncoding('utf8');
response.on("data", function(chunk) {
bodyString += chunk;
});
response.on('end', function() {
defer.fulfill({
statusCode: response.statusCode,
bodyString: bodyString
});
});
}).on('error', function(e) {
defer.reject("Got http.get error: " + e.message);
});
//If we are sure that response has come, then extract it
httpGet("http://testurl").then(function(result) {
//alert('inside test automation');
console.log(result);
});
You can use the response detail whether success or fail with "response code", there are lots of way using interface as callback, using methods by checking response code, lots of network library available - volley, okhttp rest client etc...
help : response code detail
if(response.statusCode == 200) {
// do success work read response etc...
// you can call methods what you want if success happen
} else {
// you can check other status code too..
// call methods if api get fail.
}
Hope this would help
good luck.
I've got an Azure Mobile Service with a custom API. I have tested this API in the past from iOS and it seems to work fine. I am now testing this API on Android. This is the API method in question:
exports.post = function(request, response) {
var body = request.body;
var email = body.email;
var tables = request.service.tables;
var users = tables.getTable('User');
users.where({ email: email }).read({
success: function (userList) {
if (userList.length === 0) {
response.send(200, { Status: 'Error', Error: 'Email not found.' });
} else {
var user = userList[0];
var providerId = user.ObjectId;
var accounts = tables.getTable('Account');
accounts.where({ User: providerId }).read({
success: function (accountList) {
if (accountList.length === 0) {
response.send(200, { Status: 'Error', Error: 'Internal server error.' });
} else {
var account = accountList[0];
var mssql = request.service.mssql;
var sql = "EXEC [db].[usp_RequestPasswordReset] ?;";
mssql.query(sql, [account.id], {
success: function (results) {
console.log(results);
var codeRow = results[0];
if (codeRow == undefined) {
console.log("codeRow is undefined");
} else {
console.log(codeRow);
}
var code = codeRow.Code;
response.send(200, { Status: 'Success', Message: 'Please check your email for further instructions.', Code: code });
sendEmail(email, user.Name, code);
}
});
}
}
});
}
}
});
};
Now, sendEmail is a separate function that sends an email using Azure's SendGrid feature.
What is really perplexing me is that all of the code appears to be working fine.
The stored procedure executes just fine.
The database is updated exactly as I would expect.
The email comes through the SendGrid service exactly as expected.
The console.log messages that I have in the code display the expected values.
The only thing that is funky is that the call is returning a "500: Internal Server Error" error.
This is true both in my Android client and also in the API log on the Azure Management Portal.
The error message I am getting is telling me that var code = codeRow.Code; is trying to access 'Code' of 'undefined'. But it's not undefined.
Going back and checking my iOS client against this produces the same results.
Everything works fine except for the message returned to the user.
To be clear, the error code is 500, not 200, since it's possible for my code to return an "Internal Server Error" message.
Also, I am very sure that my mssql.query success block is firing, based on the console log messages and the outcome.
So, what gives?
mssql.query can call your callback more than once depending on what's in your stored procedure. You can define a variable outside your callback, e.g.
var callbackReceived = false;
and then in your callback, only send a response for the call that actually receives the updated record:
if (callbackReceived === false && results && results.length > 0) {
callbackReceived = true;
// continue as before
}
See also this question answered by one of the Azure developers:
Azure mobile service custom API calling SQL SP multiple times
I am having a bit of difficulty figuring out why I am getting 401 Unauthorized status from service framework. At the moment I have it setup to allow everyone to do as they please but that because when I try to enable authorisation I get 401 error code.
//[SupportedModules("Boards")]
//[DnnModuleAuthorize(AccessLevel = SecurityAccessLevel.View)]
[AllowAnonymous]
public class BoardsServiceController : DnnApiController
{ ... }
The strange thing is I have another module which is more than happy to work away with DnnModuleAuthorize
[SupportedModules("Assignments")]
[DnnModuleAuthorize(AccessLevel = SecurityAccessLevel.View)]
public class AsgnsServiceController : DnnApiController
{ ... }
In both cases I have checked to make sure the user has permissions to view the page on which the module lives.
I have cross referenced both projects and everything seems to be spot on. Yet one is working away just fine and the other one returns 401.
Any suggestions?
Update
For Assignments module I am mostly using jQuery style of ajax request just because I haven't got around to revising the module. So a typical GET request would look something like this:
$.ajax({
type: "GET",
url: sf.getServiceRoot( "Assignments" ) + "AsgnsService/GetAssignments",
data: data,
beforeSend: sf.setModuleHeaders
}).done( function ( items ) {
//removed for brevity
}).fail( function ( xhr, result, status ) {
//removed for brevity
});
As for Boards module the code structure is slightly different due knockout implementation. There is a dedicated ServiceCaller but it all boils down to the same ajax call to the server except that instead of having full blown ajax call defined as above it looks much neater.
var that = this;
that.serviceCaller = new dnn.boards.ServiceCaller($, this.moduleId, 'BoardsService');
var success = function (model) {
if (typeof model !== "undefined" && model != null) {
viewModel = new boardViewModel(model.colLists);
ko.bindingHandlers.sortable.beforeMove = viewModel.verifyAssignments;
ko.bindingHandlers.sortable.afterMove = viewModel.updateLastAction;
// normally, we apply moduleScope as a second parameter
ko.applyBindings(viewModel, settings.moduleScope);
}
//console.log('success', model);
};
var failure = function (response, status) {
console.log('request failure: ' + status);
};
var params = {
BoardId: this.boardId
};
that.serviceCaller.get('GetBoardLists', params, success, failure);
And the ServiceCaller ajax function itself looks like this:
function (httpMethod, method, params, success, failure, synchronous) {
var options = {
url: that.getRoot() + method,
beforeSend: that.services.setModuleHeaders,
type: httpMethod,
async: synchronous == false,
success: function (d) {
if (typeof (success) != 'undefined') {
success(d || {});
}
},
error: function (xhr, textStatus, errorThrown) {
if (typeof (failure) != 'undefined') {
var message = undefined;
if (xhr.getResponseHeader('Content-Type').indexOf('application/json') == 0) {
try {
message = $.parseJSON(xhr.responseText).Message;
} catch (e) {
}
}
failure(xhr, message || errorThrown);
}
}
};
if (httpMethod == 'GET') {
options.data = params;
} else {
options.contentType = 'application/json; charset=utf-8';
options.data = ko.toJSON(params);
options.dataType = 'json';
}
$.ajax(options);
};
This would be the two GET requests from two different modules where one is happy and the other throws a status 401 when I enable the same annotations.
Does this provide any clues?
Update
Now in saying all of the above if one takes a look at the original Boards module code base one will notice [DnnAuthorize] annotation attached to every function.
During module revision I removed all instances of [DnnAuthorize] annotation and replaced it with two of my own on the service class itself.
When I add [DnnAuthorize] as annotation on service class itself things work as expected. So why [SupportedModules("Boards")] and [DnnModuleAuthorize(AccessLevel = SecurityAccessLevel.View)] combination doesn't !?
I am not sure but working with the WebAPI you have to register the Service Framework anti forgery stuff
ServicesFramework.Instance.RequestAjaxAntiForgerySupport();
This is part of asking the API to work with a specific module.
I'm new to AngularJS and to JS testing in general and I'm having trouble wrapping my mind around how to go about testing this rather simple service. I've tried using $httpBackend with 'when' and 'expect' GET in variations configurations, to no avail. The test should verify that 1) data is returned via the deferred.resolve and 2) no data is returned via the deferred.reject. If someone could point me in the right direction i'd be quite grateful. Thanks!
btw: I'm using Jasmine + Testacular
.service('myService', function($http, $q) {
return {
getMyData: function() {
var deferred = $q.defer();
$http.get('/foo/bar.do').success(function(data) {
deferred.resolve(data);
}).error(function(){
deferred.reject();
});
return deferred.promise;
}
}
})
I had kind of the same problem testing a service with $http and $q.
Here is one of my test which passes:
it('should issue a GET request to /foo/bar.do', inject(function ($httpBackend) {
$httpBackend.when('GET', '/foo/bar.do').respond('success');
var finalResult = '';
var result = myService.getMyData();
result.then(function(data) {
finalResult = data;
}, function() {
console.log('error');
});
$httpBackend.flush();
expect(finalResult).toBe('success');
}));