I've got an Azure Mobile Service with a custom API. I have tested this API in the past from iOS and it seems to work fine. I am now testing this API on Android. This is the API method in question:
exports.post = function(request, response) {
var body = request.body;
var email = body.email;
var tables = request.service.tables;
var users = tables.getTable('User');
users.where({ email: email }).read({
success: function (userList) {
if (userList.length === 0) {
response.send(200, { Status: 'Error', Error: 'Email not found.' });
} else {
var user = userList[0];
var providerId = user.ObjectId;
var accounts = tables.getTable('Account');
accounts.where({ User: providerId }).read({
success: function (accountList) {
if (accountList.length === 0) {
response.send(200, { Status: 'Error', Error: 'Internal server error.' });
} else {
var account = accountList[0];
var mssql = request.service.mssql;
var sql = "EXEC [db].[usp_RequestPasswordReset] ?;";
mssql.query(sql, [account.id], {
success: function (results) {
console.log(results);
var codeRow = results[0];
if (codeRow == undefined) {
console.log("codeRow is undefined");
} else {
console.log(codeRow);
}
var code = codeRow.Code;
response.send(200, { Status: 'Success', Message: 'Please check your email for further instructions.', Code: code });
sendEmail(email, user.Name, code);
}
});
}
}
});
}
}
});
};
Now, sendEmail is a separate function that sends an email using Azure's SendGrid feature.
What is really perplexing me is that all of the code appears to be working fine.
The stored procedure executes just fine.
The database is updated exactly as I would expect.
The email comes through the SendGrid service exactly as expected.
The console.log messages that I have in the code display the expected values.
The only thing that is funky is that the call is returning a "500: Internal Server Error" error.
This is true both in my Android client and also in the API log on the Azure Management Portal.
The error message I am getting is telling me that var code = codeRow.Code; is trying to access 'Code' of 'undefined'. But it's not undefined.
Going back and checking my iOS client against this produces the same results.
Everything works fine except for the message returned to the user.
To be clear, the error code is 500, not 200, since it's possible for my code to return an "Internal Server Error" message.
Also, I am very sure that my mssql.query success block is firing, based on the console log messages and the outcome.
So, what gives?
mssql.query can call your callback more than once depending on what's in your stored procedure. You can define a variable outside your callback, e.g.
var callbackReceived = false;
and then in your callback, only send a response for the call that actually receives the updated record:
if (callbackReceived === false && results && results.length > 0) {
callbackReceived = true;
// continue as before
}
See also this question answered by one of the Azure developers:
Azure mobile service custom API calling SQL SP multiple times
Related
This is my first Google Action project. I have a simple slot after the invocation. User enters the value on prompt and slot invokes the webhook and make a call to API using the user input. All works fine. However the webhook returns to users even before the API call finish processing and returns the value (line 1 conv.add). I do see in the logs that everything from API is logged fine after the webhook returns to user. Below is the code I am using. I am using inline editor. What am I missing? Thanks for help in advance.
const { conversation } = require('#assistant/conversation');
const functions = require('firebase-functions');
var https = require('https');
const fetch = require('node-fetch');
const app = conversation({debug: true});
app.handle('SearchData', conv => {
const body = JSON.stringify({
val: "this is my body"
});
// prepare the header
var postheaders = {
'Content-Type' : 'application/json',
'Auth' : 'MyAuthCreds'
};
fetch('https://host.domain.com/data', {
method: 'post',
body: body,
headers: postheaders,
})
.then(res => res.json())
.then(d => {
console.log(d);
var profile = d;//JSON.parse(d);
console.log(d.entries);
console.log("Length: "+ d.entries.length);
if(d.entries.length > 0)
{
console.log("Data found");
conv.add("Data found"); //line 1
}
else
{
console.log("no data found");
conv.add("no data found"); //line 1
}
})
.catch(function (err) {
// POST failed...
console.log(err);
});
});
exports.ActionsOnGoogleFulfillment = functions.https.onRequest(app);
Your issue is that your handler is making API calls which are asynchronous, but the Assistant Conversation library doesn't know that you're doing so. So as soon as the handler finishes, it tries to send back a response, but your asynchronous responses (the stuff in the then() blocks) haven't executed yet.
To address this, you need to return a Promise object so the library knows to wait till the Promise is fulfilled before it returns.
Fortunately, in your case, this should be pretty straightforward. fetch and all the .then() blocks return a Promise. So all you need to do is add a return statement in front of the call to fetch. So something like this:
return fetch('https://host.domain.com/data', {
I have an issue saving changes to an object from a Cloud Code function.
I have a collection called Character and one record inside it.
This Character record has an ACL with Public Read, and Private Write Access by a specific ParseUser (6MwfSLdAxd).
In Unity, I authenticated the user and I then call the Cloud Code function as follows:
ParseCloud.CallFunctionAsync<Character>("startBattle", null).ContinueWith(t =>
{
Debug.Log("I got here...");
Debug.Log(t.Result.ClassName);
});
In my Cloud Code function, I grab the first character in the collection (ignoring checking if it belongs to this user, because at the moment there is only one and it DOES belong to this user - there's only one user too).
var Character = Parse.Object.extend("Character");
Parse.Cloud.define("startBattle", function (request, response) {
var user = request.user;
if (user == null)
{
return response.error("You must login before you can battle!");
}
var characterQuery = new Parse.Query(Character);
characterQuery.first()
.then(
function (character) {
character.set("name", "Cloud Code sucka");
character.save().then(function(character) {
return response.success(character);
});
},
function (error) {
return response.error("You must create a character before you can battle! " + error);
}
)
});
However, I simply cannot save any changes to this character. All the documentation and forum posts I've found suggest that if you call a Cloud Code function when authenticated then that function should have the same level permissions as the user calling it.
The only time this code works is if I set the ACL of the character to Public Write.
Does anyone have any ideas why this wouldn't be working?
Note: Worth noting that I can see in the server logs that the Cloud Code function IS being called by the authenticated user 6MwfSLdAxd as I get this error (if I add a response.error call):
error: Failed running cloud function startBattle for user 6MwfSLdAxd with:
Input: {}
Error: {"code":141,"message":"Messed up: [object Object]"} functionName=startBattle, code=141, message=Messed up: [object Object], , user=6MwfSLdAxd
error: Error generating response. ParseError { code: 141, message: 'Messed up: [object Object]' } code=141, message=Messed up: [object Object]
[object Object]
[object Object]
After some extensive searching I've now found the solution to this.
For anyone else encountering the same issues, you should be aware that whilst Parse.com used to run Cloud Code functions in the context of the user that called them (afaik), self-hosted Parse Servers do not.
In order to call queries or saves in the context of a user you must pass their session token as shown below. I hope this saves someone the hours of confusion I went through!
var MyObject = Parse.Object.extend("MyObject");
Parse.Cloud.define("myCloudFunction", function (request, response) {
var user = request.user;
var sessionToken = user.getSessionToken();
var query = new Parse.Query(MyObject)
.find({ sessionToken: sessionToken })
.then(
function (object) {
object.set("someKey", "someValue");
return object.save(null, { sessionToken: sessionToken });
}
)
.then(
function (object) {
return response.success(object);
},
function (error) {
return response.error(error.message);
}
);
});
For further context see:
https://github.com/ParsePlatform/parse-server/wiki/Compatibility-with-Hosted-Parse#cloud-code
I am having a bit of difficulty figuring out why I am getting 401 Unauthorized status from service framework. At the moment I have it setup to allow everyone to do as they please but that because when I try to enable authorisation I get 401 error code.
//[SupportedModules("Boards")]
//[DnnModuleAuthorize(AccessLevel = SecurityAccessLevel.View)]
[AllowAnonymous]
public class BoardsServiceController : DnnApiController
{ ... }
The strange thing is I have another module which is more than happy to work away with DnnModuleAuthorize
[SupportedModules("Assignments")]
[DnnModuleAuthorize(AccessLevel = SecurityAccessLevel.View)]
public class AsgnsServiceController : DnnApiController
{ ... }
In both cases I have checked to make sure the user has permissions to view the page on which the module lives.
I have cross referenced both projects and everything seems to be spot on. Yet one is working away just fine and the other one returns 401.
Any suggestions?
Update
For Assignments module I am mostly using jQuery style of ajax request just because I haven't got around to revising the module. So a typical GET request would look something like this:
$.ajax({
type: "GET",
url: sf.getServiceRoot( "Assignments" ) + "AsgnsService/GetAssignments",
data: data,
beforeSend: sf.setModuleHeaders
}).done( function ( items ) {
//removed for brevity
}).fail( function ( xhr, result, status ) {
//removed for brevity
});
As for Boards module the code structure is slightly different due knockout implementation. There is a dedicated ServiceCaller but it all boils down to the same ajax call to the server except that instead of having full blown ajax call defined as above it looks much neater.
var that = this;
that.serviceCaller = new dnn.boards.ServiceCaller($, this.moduleId, 'BoardsService');
var success = function (model) {
if (typeof model !== "undefined" && model != null) {
viewModel = new boardViewModel(model.colLists);
ko.bindingHandlers.sortable.beforeMove = viewModel.verifyAssignments;
ko.bindingHandlers.sortable.afterMove = viewModel.updateLastAction;
// normally, we apply moduleScope as a second parameter
ko.applyBindings(viewModel, settings.moduleScope);
}
//console.log('success', model);
};
var failure = function (response, status) {
console.log('request failure: ' + status);
};
var params = {
BoardId: this.boardId
};
that.serviceCaller.get('GetBoardLists', params, success, failure);
And the ServiceCaller ajax function itself looks like this:
function (httpMethod, method, params, success, failure, synchronous) {
var options = {
url: that.getRoot() + method,
beforeSend: that.services.setModuleHeaders,
type: httpMethod,
async: synchronous == false,
success: function (d) {
if (typeof (success) != 'undefined') {
success(d || {});
}
},
error: function (xhr, textStatus, errorThrown) {
if (typeof (failure) != 'undefined') {
var message = undefined;
if (xhr.getResponseHeader('Content-Type').indexOf('application/json') == 0) {
try {
message = $.parseJSON(xhr.responseText).Message;
} catch (e) {
}
}
failure(xhr, message || errorThrown);
}
}
};
if (httpMethod == 'GET') {
options.data = params;
} else {
options.contentType = 'application/json; charset=utf-8';
options.data = ko.toJSON(params);
options.dataType = 'json';
}
$.ajax(options);
};
This would be the two GET requests from two different modules where one is happy and the other throws a status 401 when I enable the same annotations.
Does this provide any clues?
Update
Now in saying all of the above if one takes a look at the original Boards module code base one will notice [DnnAuthorize] annotation attached to every function.
During module revision I removed all instances of [DnnAuthorize] annotation and replaced it with two of my own on the service class itself.
When I add [DnnAuthorize] as annotation on service class itself things work as expected. So why [SupportedModules("Boards")] and [DnnModuleAuthorize(AccessLevel = SecurityAccessLevel.View)] combination doesn't !?
I am not sure but working with the WebAPI you have to register the Service Framework anti forgery stuff
ServicesFramework.Instance.RequestAjaxAntiForgerySupport();
This is part of asking the API to work with a specific module.
I have a WorkFlow Service hosted in a server: http://myServer.net/MyWorkflowService.xamlx
and it's working normally, I called it from a Windows Phone app before and working.
Now, I wanted to call it from a PCL Project (profile 78) for Xamarin.
I got this error:
A correlation query yielded an empty result set. Please ensure
correlation queries for the endpoint are correctly configured.
I added it as a service reference, and I call an Async Method, and subscribes for completed event:
example
TaskCompletionSource<MyResponse> tsk = new TaskCompletionSource<MyResponse>();
WorkFlowService.SubmitModel serviceModel = new WorkFlowService.SubmitModel()
{
List = MyList.ToArray<string>(),
Guid = Guid,
Description = Description,
userid = UserId
};
WorkFlowClient.SubmitCompleted += (sender, eventArgs) => {
if (eventArgs.Error != null)
{
Debug.WriteLine("Exception : DataService : Adding New" + eventArgs.Error.Message);
tsk.TrySetResult(new MyResponse() {
HasError = true
});
}
else
{
tsk.TrySetResult(new MyResponse()
{
HasError = false
});
}
};
WorkFlowClient.SubmitAsync(new WorkFlowService.SubmitRequest((serviceModel)));
return tsk.Task;
I should send an array of strings with my request, Should I provide ServiceReferences.ClientConfig file and what is the build action for it inside the PCL?!
I use REST API in JavaScript. When I request REST API multiple times, it returns(response) invalid session id, but I am providing a valid session id, because I have pulled data with this session id.
Anyone came across this issue?
function sugarLogin(url, user, password) {
var request = new XMLHttpRequest();
var params = {
user_auth: {
user_name: user,
password: password
},
name_value_list: [{
name: 'notifyonsave',
value: 'true'
}]
};
var json = $.toJSON(params);
var crm_api = url;
request.open("POST", crm_api, true);
request.setRequestHeader("Content-type", "application/x-www-form-urlencoded");
request.onreadystatechange = function () {
if (request.readyState == 4 && request.status == 200) {
var response = request.responseText;
var response_obj = jQuery.parseJSON(response);
if (response_obj) {
if (response_obj.name && response_obj.name == "Invalid Login") {
//invalid login
ProcessingFlag = 3;
} else {
session_id = response_obj.id;
ProcessingFlag = 1;
}
}
} else if (request.readyState == 4 && request.status == 404) {
ProcessingFlag = 2;
}
}
request.send("method=login&input_type=JSON&response_type=JSON&rest_data=" + json);}
I have used above code to login and set session_id (global scope)
and then using this session id I am calling search_by_module function of REST API.
It is working fine but if made multiple requests frequently then it says invalid session id.
Although I have tried to call login function again before making search_by_module call.
Main issue is when I tried calling other REST function after response returned from search_by_module and rendered HTML, it says me invalid session. I can't figure out why session expires immediately while we know that on server session expires after 24 minutes (server where our sugar instance hosted)
I bet you're getting this because of item number 3 :
1/ Defined an error callback that checks for that particular response -invalid login- and calls the login function. Reading your code, I guess this is ProcessingFlag = 3; job.
2/ make sure the login function updates the session_id correctly and globally so that future function calls will get the correct value.
3/ make sure you're passing that new session_id to all your subsequent calls as FIRST parameter in all you rest_data. I got caught on this and lost many hours only to find out that SugarCRM DOESN'T support named parameters in its rest_data (is it poorely implemented function-arguments-wise ?) This is because I was adding session_id as last parameter and all of my REST calls were returning invalid ID.