I'm doing some stuff to create correctly a release like 'X.X.build_number.build_id'. But I can't have correctly my build number like I want :
MMdd instead of YY-MM-DD_hh:mm:ss . With the ZenTimestamp plugin, it only change it on display, but when I try to pass to an other job, PROMOTED_ID have the same value than the timestamp.
So I tried to use a variable to format it, but it's not working ...
I made a variable called ID
I made a Windows Powershell build :
$format = '{0:MMdd}' -f $env:BUILD_ID
echo "`$env:ID='$format'" > releaseId
I made an "Inject environment variables" to pass my new value.
I tried a lot of different solution, but nothing is working like I want... What do I miss ??
#Slav : My parameter wasn't set so I didn't have any value in it.
To solve it I used a groovy script, to recreate my parameters and add what I needed :
import hudson.model.*
import java.text.SimpleDateFormat
def build = Thread.currentThread().executable
def npl = new ArrayList<StringParameterValue>()
def newParam = null
def oldParam = build.getAction(ParametersAction.class)
def dateFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("MMdd").format(new Date())
npl.add(new StringParameterValue("RELEASE_ID",dateFormat))
if (oldParam != null) {
build.actions.remove(oldParam)
newParam = oldParam.createUpdated(npl)
}
else {
newParam = new ParametersAction(npl)
}
build.actions.add(newParam)
return null
Related
Apologies for a length post. I have been trying to beat my head around reading about mock, MagicMock, and all the time getting confused. Hence, decided to write this post.
I know several questions, and pages have been written on this. But, still not able to wrap my head around this.
My Setup:
All the test code, and the 2 module files come under one "folder" mymodule
my_module_1.py file contains
class MyOuterClass(object):
MyInnerClass(object):
attribute1: str
attribute2: str
attribute3: str
def get(self) -> MyInnerClass:
'''
pseudocode
1. a call to AWS's service is made
2. the output from call in step 1 is used to set attributes of this InnerClass
3. return innerclass instance
'''
I use the OuterClass in another file(my_module_2.py), to set some values and return a string as follows:
class MyModule2():
def get_foo(self, some_boolean_predicate):
if some_boolean_predicate:
temp = my_module_1.OuterClass().get()
statement = f'''
WITH (
BAR (
FIELD_1 = '{temp.attribute1}',
FIELD_2 = '{temp.attribute2}',
FIELD_3 = '{temp.attribute3}'
)
)
'''
else:
statement = ''
return statement
I want to write the unit tests for the file my_module_2.py file, and test the function get_foo
How I am writing the tests(or planning on)
a test file by name test_my_module2.py
I started with creating a pytest.fixture for the MyOuterClass's get function as follows since I will be reusing this piece of info again in my other tests
#pytest.fixture
def mock_get(mocker: MockerFixture) -> MagicMock:
return mocker.patch.object(MyOuterClass, 'get')
Finally,
Then I proceeded to use this fixture in my test as follows:
from unittest import mock
from unittest.mock import MagicMock, Mock, patch, PropertyMock
import pytest
from pytest_mock import MockerFixture
from my_module.my_module_1 import myOuterClass
def test_should_get_from_inner_class(self, mock_get):
# mock call to get are made
output = mock_get.get
#update the values for the InnerClass's attributes here
output.attribute1.side_effect = 'attr1'
output.attribute2.side_effect = 'attr2'
output.attribute3.side_effect = 'attr3'
mock_output_str = '''
WITH (
BAR (
FIELD_1 = 'attr1',
FIELD_2 = 'attr2',
FIELD_3 = 'attr3'
)
)
'''
module2Obj = MyModule2()
response = module2Obj.get_foo(some_boolean_predicate=True)
# the following assertion passes
assert mock_get.get.called_once()
# I would like match `response to that with mock_output_str instance above
assert response == mock_output_str
But, the assertion as you might have guessed failed, and I know I am comparing completely different types, since I see
errors such as
FAILED [100%]
WITH (
BAR (
FIELD1 = '<MagicMock name='get().attr1' id='4937943120'>',
FIELD3 = '<MagicMock name='get().attr2' id='4937962976'>',
FIELD3 = '<MagicMock name='get().attr3' id='4937982928'>'
)
)
Thank you for being patient with me till here, i know its a really lengthy post, but stuck on this for a few days, ended up creating a post here.
How do i get to validate the mock's value with the mock_output_str?
yess! the hint was in the #gold_cy's answer. I was only calling my mock and never setting its values
this is what my test case ended up looking
mock_obj = OuterClass.InnerClass()
mock_obj.attribute1='some-1'
mock_obj.attribute2='some-2'
mock_obj.attribute3='some-3'
mock_get.return_value = mock_obj
once my mock was setup properly, then the validation became easy! Thank you!
Below is the code written by my collegue who doesnt work in the firm anymore. I am inserting records in object with data loader and I can see success message but I do not see any records in my object. I am not able to understand what below trigger is doing.Please someone help me understand as I am new to salesforce.
trigger DataLoggingTrigger on QMBDataLogging__c (after insert) {
Map<string,Schema.RecordTypeInfo> recordTypeInfo = Schema.SObjectType.QMB_Initial_Letter__c.getRecordTypeInfosByName();
List<QMBDataLogging__c> logList = (List<QMBDataLogging__c>)Trigger.new;
List<Sobject> sobjList = (List<Sobject>)Type.forName('List<'+'QMB_Initial_Letter__c'+'>').newInstance();
Map<string, QMBLetteTypeToVfPage__c> QMBLetteTypeToVfPage = QMBLetteTypeToVfPage__c.getAll();
Map<String,QMBLetteTypeToVfPage__c> mapofLetterTypeRec = new Map<String,QMBLetteTypeToVfPage__c>();
set<Id>processdIds = new set<Id>();
for(string key : QMBLetteTypeToVfPage.keyset())
{
if(!mapofLetterTypeRec.containsKey(key)) mapofLetterTypeRec.put(QMBLetteTypeToVfPage.get(Key).Letter_Type__c, QMBLetteTypeToVfPage.get(Key));
}
for(QMBDataLogging__c log : logList)
{
Sobject logRecord = (sobject)log;
Sobject QMBLetterRecord = new QMB_Initial_Letter__c();
if(mapofLetterTypeRec.containskey(log.Field1__c))
{
string recordTypeId = recordTypeInfo.get(mapofLetterTypeRec.get(log.Field1__c).RecordType__c).isAvailable() ? recordTypeInfo.get(mapofLetterTypeRec.get(log.Field1__c).RecordType__c).getRecordTypeId() : recordTypeInfo.get('Master').getRecordTypeId();
string fieldApiNames = mapofLetterTypeRec.containskey(log.Field1__c) ? mapofLetterTypeRec.get(log.Field1__c).FieldAPINames__c : '';
//QMBLetterRecord.put('Letter_Type__c',log.Name);
QMBLetterRecord.put('RecordTypeId',tgh);
processdIds.add(log.Id);
if(string.isNotBlank(fieldApiNames) && fieldApiNames.contains(','))
{
Integer i = 1;
for(string fieldApiName : fieldApiNames.split(','))
{
string logFieldApiName = 'Field'+i+'__c';
fieldApiName = fieldApiName.trim();
system.debug('fieldApiName=='+fieldApiName);
Schema.DisplayType fielddataType = getFieldType('QMB_Initial_Letter__c',fieldApiName);
if(fielddataType == Schema.DisplayType.Date)
{
Date dateValue = Date.parse(string.valueof(logRecord.get(logFieldApiName)));
QMBLetterRecord.put(fieldApiName,dateValue);
}
else if(fielddataType == Schema.DisplayType.DOUBLE)
{
string value = (string)logRecord.get(logFieldApiName);
Double dec = Double.valueOf(value.replace(',',''));
QMBLetterRecord.put(fieldApiName,dec);
}
else if(fielddataType == Schema.DisplayType.CURRENCY)
{
Decimal decimalValue = Decimal.valueOf((string)logRecord.get(logFieldApiName));
QMBLetterRecord.put(fieldApiName,decimalValue);
}
else if(fielddataType == Schema.DisplayType.INTEGER)
{
string value = (string)logRecord.get(logFieldApiName);
Integer integerValue = Integer.valueOf(value.replace(',',''));
QMBLetterRecord.put(fieldApiName,integerValue);
}
else if(fielddataType == Schema.DisplayType.DATETIME)
{
DateTime dateTimeValue = DateTime.valueOf(logRecord.get(logFieldApiName));
QMBLetterRecord.put(fieldApiName,dateTimeValue);
}
else
{
QMBLetterRecord.put(fieldApiName,logRecord.get(logFieldApiName));
}
i++;
}
}
}
sobjList.add(QMBLetterRecord);
}
if(!sobjList.isEmpty())
{
insert sobjList;
if(!processdIds.isEmpty()) DeleteDoAsLoggingRecords.deleteTheProcessRecords(processdIds);
}
Public static Schema.DisplayType getFieldType(string objectName,string fieldName)
{
SObjectType r = ((SObject)(Type.forName('Schema.'+objectName).newInstance())).getSObjectType();
DescribeSObjectResult d = r.getDescribe();
return(d.fields.getMap().get(fieldName).getDescribe().getType());
}
}
You might be looking in the wrong place. Check if there's an unit test written for this thing (there should be one, especially if it's deployed to production), it should help you understand how it's supposed to be used.
You're inserting records of QMBDataLogging__c but then it seems they're immediately deleted in DeleteDoAsLoggingRecords.deleteTheProcessRecords(processdIds). Whether whatever this thing was supposed to do succeeds or not.
This seems to be some poor man's CSV parser or generic "upload anything"... that takes data stored in QMBDataLogging__c and creates QMB_Initial_Letter__c out of it.
QMBLetteTypeToVfPage__c.getAll() suggests you could go to Setup -> Custom Settings, try to find this thing and examine. Maybe it has some values in production but in your sandbox it's empty and that's why essentially nothing works? Or maybe some values that are there are outdated?
There's some comparison if what you upload into Field1__c can be matched to what's in that custom setting. I guess you load some kind of subtype of your QMB_Initial_Letter__c in there. Record Type name and list of fields to read from your log record is also fetched from custom setting based on that match.
Then this thing takes what you pasted, looks at the list of fields in from the custom setting and parses it.
Let's say the custom setting contains something like
Name = XYZ, FieldAPINames__c = 'Name,SomePicklist__c,SomeDate__c,IsActive__c'
This thing will look at first record you inserted, let's say you have the CSV like that
Field1__c,Field2__c,Field3__c,Field4__c
XYZ,Closed,2022-09-15,true
This thing will try to parse and map it so eventually you create record that a "normal" apex code would express as
new QMB_Initial_Letter__c(
Name = 'XYZ',
SomePicklist__c = 'Closed',
SomeDate__c = Date.parse('2022-09-15'),
IsActive__c = true
);
It's pretty fragile, as you probably already know. And because parsing CSV is an art - I expect it to absolutely crash and burn when text with commas in it shows up (some text,"text, with commas in it, should be quoted",more text).
In theory admin can change mapping in setup - but then they'd need to add new field anyway to the loaded file. Overcomplicated. I guess somebody did it to solve issue with Record Type Ids - but there are better ways to achieve that and still have normal CSV file with normal columns and strong type matching, not just chucking everything in as strings.
In theory this lets you have "jagged" csv files (row 1 having 5 fields, row 2 having different record type and 17 fields? no problem)
Your call whether it's salvageable or you'd rather ditch it and try normal loading of QMB_Initial_Letter__c records. (get back to your business people and ask for requirements?) If you do have variable number of columns at source - you'd need to standardise it or group the data so only 1 "type" of records (well, whatever's in that "Field1__c") goes into each file.
I have the below test_dss.py file which is used for pytest:
import dataikuapi
import pytest
def setup_list():
client = dataikuapi.DSSClient("{DSS_URL}", "{APY_KEY}")
client._session.verify = False
project = client.get_project("{DSS_PROJECT}")
# Check that there is at least one scenario TEST_XXXXX & that all test scenarios pass
scenarios = project.list_scenarios()
scenarios_filter = [obj for obj in scenarios if obj["name"].startswith("TEST")]
return scenarios_filter
def test_check_scenario_exist():
assert len(setup_list()) > 0, "You need at least one test scenario (name starts with 'TEST_')"
#pytest.mark.parametrize("scenario", setup_list())
def test_scenario_run(scenario, params):
client = dataikuapi.DSSClient(params['host'], params['api'])
client._session.verify = False
project = client.get_project(params['project'])
scenario_id = scenario["id"]
print("Executing scenario ", scenario["name"])
scenario_result = project.get_scenario(scenario_id).run_and_wait()
assert scenario_result.get_details()["scenarioRun"]["result"]["outcome"] == "SUCCESS", "test " + scenario[
"name"] + " failed"
My issue is with setup_list function, which able to get only hard coded values for {DSS_URL}, {APY_KEY}, {PROJECT}. I'm not able to use PARAMS or other method like in test_scenario_run
any idea how I can pass the PARAMS also to this function?
The parameters in the mark.parametrize marker are read at load time, where the information about the config parameters is not yet available. Therefore you have to parametrize the test at runtime, where you have access to the configuration.
This can be done in pytest_generate_tests (which can live in your test module):
#pytest.hookimpl
def pytest_generate_tests(metafunc):
if "scenario" in metafunc.fixturenames:
host = metafunc.config.getoption('--host')
api = metafuc.config.getoption('--api')
project = metafuc.config.getoption('--project')
metafunc.parametrize("scenario", setup_list(host, api, project))
This implies that your setup_list function takes these parameters:
def setup_list(host, api, project):
client = dataikuapi.DSSClient(host, api)
client._session.verify = False
project = client.get_project(project)
...
And your test just looks like this (without the parametrize marker, as the parametrization is now done in pytest_generate_tests):
def test_scenario_run(scenario, params):
scenario_id = scenario["id"]
...
The parametrization is now done at run-time, so it behaves the same as if you had placed a parametrize marker in the test.
And the other test that tests setup_list now has also to use the params fixture to get the needed arguments:
def test_check_scenario_exist(params):
assert len(setup_list(params["host"], params["api"], params["project"])) > 0,
"You need at least ..."
I have written this function which is called when a user clicks a link. The function basically creates a copy of the user data with one field altered (thus keeping the original value unchanged i.e. not-mutable) and then updates the database with the new value
def confirmSignupforUser(user:User):Future[Option[User]] = {
println("confirming user: "+user)
val newInternalProfile = user.profile.internalProfileDetails.get.copy(confirmed=true)//new data which should be added in the database
println("old internal profile: "+user.profile.internalProfileDetails.get)
println("new internal profile: "+newInternalProfile)
val newProfile = UserProfile(Some(newInternalProfile),user.profile.externalProfileDetails)
println("old profile: "+user.profile)
println("new profile: "+newProfile)
val confirmedUser = user.copy(profile=newProfile)
for(userOption <- userRepo.update(confirmedUser)) yield { //database operation
println("returning modified user:"+userOption)
userOption
}
}
To test the code, I have written the following spec
"confirmSignupforUser" should {
"change confirmed status to True" in {
val testEnv = new TestEnv(components.configuration)
val externalProfile = testEnv.externalUserProfile
val internalUnconfirmedProfile = InternalUserProfile(testEnv.loginInfo,1,false,None)
val internalConfirmedProfile = internalUnconfirmedProfile.copy(confirmed=true)
val unconfirmedProfile = UserProfile(Some(internalUnconfirmedProfile),externalProfile)
val confirmedProfile = UserProfile(Some(internalConfirmedProfile),externalProfile)
val origUser = User(testEnv.mockHelperMethods.getUniqueID(),unconfirmedProfile)
val confirmedUser = origUser.copy(profile = confirmedProfile)
//the argument passed to update is part of test. The function confirmSignupforUser should pass a confirmed profile
when(testEnv.mockUserRepository.update(confirmedUser)).thenReturn(Future{Some(confirmedUser)})
//// await is from play.api.test.FutureAwaits
val updatedUserOption:Option[User] = await[Option[User]](testEnv.controller.confirmSignupforUser(origUser))
println(s"received updated user option ${updatedUserOption}")
updatedUserOption mustBe Some(confirmedUser)
}
}
I am not confident if I am testing the method correctly. The only way I can check that the confirmed field got changed is by looking at the return value of confirmSignupforUser. But I am actually mocking the value and I have already set the field confirmed to true in the mocked value (when(testEnv.mockUserRepository.update(confirmedUser)).thenReturn(Future{Some(confirmedUser)}).
I know the code works because in the above mock, the update method expects confirmedUser or in other words, a user with confirmed field set to true. So if my code wasn't working, update would have been called with user whose confirmed field was false and mockito would have failed.
Is this the right way to test the method or is there a better way?
You don't need to intialize internalConfirmedProfile in your test. The whole point is to start with confirmed=false, run the confirmSignupforUser method, and make sure that the output is confirmed=true.
You should check 2 things:
check that the return value has confirmed=true (which you do)
check that the repository has that user saved with confirmed=true (which you don't check). To check that you would need to load the user back from the repository at the end.
I want to test Restful web service in SoapUI. For that, I need to read values from Excel and pass that to request.
I searched in net, I found that it is possible through DataGen TestStep. I have SoapUI, but I couldn't find that option.
Can someone please tell if DataGen TestStep is available in SoapUI-4.5.1 or SoapUI Pro.
I am 99% sure that the data sources and such are only in SoapUI pro. You can accomplish the same thing in groovy scripts, though, but you would probably be better off reading from a text file as opposed to a spreadsheet.
The step is available only in Soap UI Pro only(Ready API)
In free version that is Soap UI, you can use POI way of reading an excel file via groovy scripting and pass those values in your input request.
import org.apache.poi.xssf.usermodel.*
import org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.DataFormatter;
def fs = new FileInputStream("F:\\Gaurav\\soapui\\readFile.xlsx")
def wb = new XSSFWorkbook(fs)
def ws = wb.getSheet("Sheet1")
def r = ws.getPhysicalNumberOfRows()
for(def i =0 ; i < r ; i++)
{
def row = ws.getRow(i);
def c=row.getPhysicalNumberOfCells()
for(def j=0; j <c ; j++)
{
def cell= row.getCell(j)
// to convert everything to a String format
DataFormatter formatter = new DataFormatter()
def cellValue=formatter.formatCellValue(cell)
log.info cellValue
}
}
// Above is the code to read from excel. Once you have read the values, you can // store the values in property
testRunner.testCase.setPropertyValue(tcprop,"cellValue")
then in your request you can expand it like below
${#TestCase#tcprop}
This way you can achieve the same DataGen thing in Soap UI free version 4.5
So, there is an option in SoapUI Setup Script that could be run in advance
You can convert your Excel to csv or text file and handle the date from there.
I've done some testing with REST services, used only reading from the text file feature.
the code like this:
//Load the text file
def inputFile = new File("C://Temp//whatever");
//Create an empty list...
def mega_List = [];
//...and then populate it with the contents
// of the text file.
addSomeThingToList = {mega_List.add(it)};
inputFile.eachLine(addSomeThingToList);
//...and assign its value to the Test Case Property
def tc = testRunner.testCase;
//Randomly pick an item from the list...
def index = context.expand( '${#TestCase#index}' ).toInteger()
if ( index < mega_List.size() ) {
def id = mega_List.get(index);
index++
tc.setPropertyValue("id", id);
tc.setPropertyValue("index", index.toString());
}
else {
tc.setPropertyValue("index", "0");
tc.setPropertyValue("id", "0");
testrunner.cancel( "time to go home" )
}