Build a reactive publication with additional fields in each document - mongodb

I want to make a publication with several additional fields, but I don't want to either use Collection.aggregate and lose my publication updates when the collection change (so I can't just use self.added in it either).
I plan to use Cursor.observeChanges in order to achieve that. I have two major constraints:
I don't want to publish all the documents fields
I want to use some of the unpublished fields to create new ones. For example, I have a field item where I store an array of item _id. I don't want to publish it, but I want to publish a item_count field with the length of my field array
Here comes the approach:
I plan to chain find queries. I never did that so I wonder if it possible. The general (simplified) query structure would be like this: http://jsfiddle.net/Billybobbonnet/1cgrqouj/ (I cant get the code properly displayed here)
Based on the count example in Meteor documentation, I store my query in a variable handle in order to stop the changes notification if a client unsubscribes:
self.onStop(function () {
handle.stop();
});
I add a flag initializing = true; before my query and I set it to true just before calling self.ready();. I use this flag to change my itemCount variable only if it is the publication is initialized. So basically, I change my switch like that:
switch (field) {
case "item"
if (!initializing)
itemCount = raw_document.item.length;
break;
default:
}
I wanted to check that this approach is good and possible before committing into big changes in my code. Can someone confirm me if this is the right way to go?

It's relatively easy to keep fields private even if they are part of the database query. The last argument to self.added is the object being passed to the client, so you can strip/modify/delete fields you are sending to the client.
Here's a modified version of your fiddle. This should do what you are asking for. (To be honest I'm not sure why you had anything chained after the observeChanges function in your fiddle, so maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but looking at the rest of your question this should be it. Sorry if I got it wrong.)
var self = this;
// Modify the document we are sending to the client.
function filter(doc) {
var length = doc.item.length;
// White list the fields you want to publish.
var docToPublish = _.pick(doc, [
'someOtherField'
]);
// Add your custom fields.
docToPublish.itemLength = length;
return docToPublish;
}
var handle = myCollection.find({}, {fields: {item:1, someOtherField:1}})
// Use observe since it gives us the the old and new document when something is changing.
// If this becomes a performance issue then consider using observeChanges,
// but its usually a lot simpler to use observe in cases like this.
.observe({
added: function(doc) {
self.added("myCollection", doc._id, filter(doc));
},
changed: function(newDocument, oldDocument)
// When the item count is changing, send update to client.
if (newDocument.item.length !== oldDocument.item.length)
self.changed("myCollection", newDocument._id, filter(newDocument));
},
removed: function(doc) {
self.removed("myCollection", doc._id);
});
self.ready();
self.onStop(function () {
handle.stop();
});

To solve your first problem, you need to tell MongoDB what fields it should return in the cursor. Leave out the fields you don't want:
MyCollection.find({}, {fields: {'a_field':1}});
Solving your second problem is also pretty easy, I would suggest using the collection helpers packages. You could accomplish this easily, like so:
// Add calculated fields to MyCollection.
MyCollection.helpers({
item_count: function() {
return this.items.length;
}
});
This will be run before an object is added to a cursor, and will create properties on the returned objects that are calculated dynamically, not stored in MongoDB.

Related

MongoDB/Mongoose - "unset" when empty or false-y

Does anyone know of a good way (either natively in MongoDB or through Mongoose) to "unset" a document property when it's empty?
Use case: I have an optional secondary email address field. It's not a required field and it defaults to undefined. But once it's populated, I'm finding it difficult to clear the value again.
I'd normally use a pre-save middleware, but when using transactions, those don't seem to fire.
The behavior I'd like is that whenever the value is false-y (empty string, null, etc.) it should be unset from the document.
I've thought of writing static methods into my various schema to purge some of these fields, but that seems heavy-handed
I hope this is the thing that you looking for
let filters = [ null,false, "undefined",""];
db.collectionName.updateOne({
optionalEmail: {
"$in":filters
}
}, {
"$unset": {
optioanlEmail: ""
}
});

Meteor, mongodb - accessing an object inside an array

Alright, so I have a collection called Polls. Inside the Polls "table" there is an attribute called choiceObjects which is an array of objects. Each object inside this array has its own attributes. What I need to do is update one of the attributes there. Ill give you a screen shot so you can better visualise what Im talking about
As you can see the choice objects have attributes like body, country etc. There is another attribute called pollid which is set to optional and therefore you cant see it right now. I need to update this pollid attribute now that I have acess to the pollid
Polls.update(
{ _id: pollId },
{ "$set": { "choiceObjects": { pollid: pollId } } }
); //this is kind of what Im trying to do but this isnt right
Since then... I have further tried the following :
var selectedpoll = Polls.findOne(pollId);
console.log(selectedpoll);
//Polls.update( selectedpoll, {"$set"{'choiceObjects.$.pollId':pollId}},false, true );
but when i try that i get the error : the positional operator did not find the match needed from the query. unexpanded update: choiceObjects.$.pollId
If I understand your objective correctly, you want to update (or add) pollid to all objects in the choiceObjects array. Unfortunately $, $push, $addToSet only work with single elements AFAIK.
This might not be what you are looking for but one possible and very obvious way to approach this problem would be to update the entire array in the collection i.e.
var choiceObjects = Polls.findOne({_id: pollId}).choiceObjects;
for (var i = 0; i < choiceObjects.length; i++) {
choiceObjects[i].pollid = pollid;
}
Polls.update({_id: pollid}, {choiceObjects: choiceObjects});

How to concatenate strings inside a MongoDB $set

I have a rather complex MongoDB Operator that uses a where to look through multiple users to see if they have a certain value, and if so it changes the value of it. My problem is that the value it checks for can be different for different cases, so my $set would require me to add strings together to get the property that I would change. This is what I mean:
users.update({$where:function() {
return this.profile.chatInfo.subscribedRooms.hasOwnProperty(findChatroom._id);
}},{$set: {"profile.chatInfo.subscribedRooms."+findChatroom._id:false}},{multi:true}
)
The only thing that does not work in that code is the part in the $set where I add "profile.chatInfo.subscribedRooms."+findChatroom._id
Another thing I have tried was making a variable that was equal to those strings added, and use the variable, but it also didn't work.
var addedString = "profile.chatInfo.subscribedRooms."+findChatroom._id;
users.update({$where:function() {
return this.profile.chatInfo.subscribedRooms.hasOwnProperty(findChatroom._id);
}},{$set: {addedString:false}},{multi:true}
)
What I am actually trying to do here, is that whenever a chat message is sent, this operator is ran. It looks for every user that is subscribed to a room, and sets the value to false. The value being true or false just refers to whether or not the user has read the chat. This is to be used for notifications.
Edit: My question is not a duplicate of this because the MongoDB set command works differently from simply changing the value of an object's property. To add onto that, MongoDB can't even use the notation of object[property], because the docs say the only way to access embedded fields is through dot notation.
Actually those links that #BlakesSeven provided will solve your problem. It should be something like this,
var addedString = "profile.chatInfo.subscribedRooms."+findChatroom._id;
var $set = {};
$set[addedString] = false;
users.update({$where:function() {
return this.profile.chatInfo.subscribedRooms.hasOwnProperty(findChatroom._id);
}}, { $set: $set }, { multi:true })

Chats.findOne(id) returns nothing, but db.chats.findOne(ObjectId(id)) does

In my meteor app, I want to publish a chatmate according to the chat object's members: basically there are two members, the one that is not the current user is the one I want to publish. Here's the code. (members is a list which always contains two different user ids)
Meteor.publish('chatmate', function(chat_id) {
var chat = Chats.findOne({_id:chat_id, members: this.userId});
var chatmate = undefined; // just in case... didn't know any better
if (chat) {
for (var i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
if (chat.members[i] !== this.userId)
chatmate = Meteor.users.find(chat.members[i], {fields: {'profile.name': 1}});
}
}
return chatmate;
});
(PS: yes, my publication is in the server folder)
My problem is: my first line of code returns undefined. But if I go on mongo and type db.chats.findOne(ObjectId('<mychatsid>')), I do get my record in the output, along with its members. Problem is, it seems I cannot use this useful ObjectId() method in Meteor!
What am I doing wrong here?
Did you insert these items directly into the mongo shell, or else mongorestore them from another database? By default, Meteor uses strings for _ids (although this can be changed by settings the idGeneration option to "MONGO" when the Collection is declared, as discussed here), whilst stand-alone MongoDB uses ObjectIds, which is what you've got here.
To cut a long story short though, you need to create a new ObjectID object and search based on that if this is the format your _ids are in:
Chats.findOne({ _id: new Meteor.Collection.ObjectID(chat_id), members: this.userId });

mongo: multiple queries or not?

I'm wondering the best way to query mongo db for many objects, where each one has an array of _id's that are attached to it. I want to grab the referenced objects as well. The objects' schemas looks like this:
var headlineSchema = new Schema({
title : String,
source : String,
edits : Array // list of edits, stored as an array of _id's
...
});
...and the one that's referenced, if needed:
var messageSchema = new Schema({
message : String,
user : String,
headlineID : ObjectId // also contains a ref. back to headline it's incl. in
...
});
One part of the problem (well, depending if I want to keep going this route) is that pushing the message id's is not working (edits remains an empty array [] afterwards) :
db.headline.update({_id : headlineid}, {$push: {edits : messageid} }, true);
When I do my query, I need to grab about 30 'headlines' at a time, and each one could contain references to up to 20 or 30 'messages'. My question is, what is the best way to fetch all of these things? I know mongo isn't a relational db, so what I'm intending is to first grab the headlines that I need, and then loop through all 30 of them to grab any attached messages.
db.headline.find({'date': {$gte: start, $lt: end} }, function (err, docs) {
if(err) { console.log(err.message); }
if(docs) {
docs.forEach(function(doc){
doc.edits.forEach(function(ed){
db.messages.find({_id:ed}, function (err, msg) {
// save stuff
});
});
});
}
});
This just seems wrong, but I'm unsure how else to proceed. Should I even bother with keeping an array of attached messages? I'm not married to the way I've set up my schema, either. If there is a better way to track relationships between them, or a better query to achieve this, please let me know.
Thanks
Does each message belong to only one headline? If so, you can store the headline id as part of each message. Then for each headline, do:
db.messages.find({headline_id: current-headline-id-here})
You could try using the $in operator for selecting a list of ObjectIds
http://www.mongodb.org/display/DOCS/Advanced+Queries#AdvancedQueries-%24in