I am having a model which takes two input & multiplies them & give the output.
output_1 = input_1 * input_2
I have declared my simulink signals as CustomStorageClass= GetSet
input_1 = Simulink.Signal;
input_1.CoderInfo.StorageClass = 'Custom';
input_1.CoderInfo.CustomStorageClass = 'GetSet';
input_1.CoderInfo.CustomAttributes.GetFunction = 'Get_input_1';
input_1.CoderInfo.CustomAttributes.SetFunction = 'Set_input_1';
input_1.CoderInfo.CustomAttributes.HeaderFile = 'signals.h';
input_2 = Simulink.Signal;
input_2.CoderInfo.StorageClass = 'Custom';
input_2.CoderInfo.CustomStorageClass = 'GetSet';
input_2.CoderInfo.CustomAttributes.GetFunction = 'Get_input_2';
input_2.CoderInfo.CustomAttributes.SetFunction = 'Set_input_2';
input_2.CoderInfo.CustomAttributes.HeaderFile = 'signals.h';
output_1 = Simulink.Signal;
output_1.CoderInfo.StorageClass = 'Custom';
output_1.CoderInfo.CustomStorageClass = 'GetSet';
output_1.CoderInfo.CustomAttributes.GetFunction = 'Get_output_1';
output_1.CoderInfo.CustomAttributes.SetFunction = 'Set_output_1';
output_1.CoderInfo.CustomAttributes.HeaderFile = 'signals.h';
Now I am trying to convert my model to code using simulink coder.
In code generation setting of the model i have selected ert.tlc file in the system target file settings.
But the generated code does not have a Get_input_1() or Get_input_2() call like shown in this link.
http://www.mathworks.com/help/ecoder/ug/getset-custom-storage-classes.html
What i have missed in the setting. Please suggest
I know you probably already solved this issue, but I have also seen this behavior before.
Sometimes MATLAB does not update the header files correctly. If you had set a different configuration for your variable and then made a change involving the header files, I would recommend erasing the *_ert_rtw and slprj folders (they will appear again). It is similar to doing a "Make clean" operation, to ensure that everything is brand new.
Related
I have this PowerShell code:
$AsyncTask = $BitmapDecoder.GetSoftwareBitmapAsync()
But discovered that some of the images coming in are rotated, so experimenting I came up with this:
$BmTf = [BitmapTransform]::new()
$BmTf.Rotation = [BitmapRotation]::None
# $BmTf.Rotation = [BitmapRotation]::Clockwise90Degrees
# $BmTf.Rotation = [BitmapRotation]::Clockwise180Degrees
# $BmTf.Rotation = [BitmapRotation]::Clockwise270Degrees
$AsyncTask = $BitmapDecoder.GetSoftwareBitmapAsync(
[BitmapPixelFormat]::Bgra8,
[BitmapAlphaMode]::Ignore,
$BmTf,
[ExifOrientationMode]::IgnoreExifOrientation,
[ColorManagementMode]::DoNotColorManage
)
While it does work, I'm not familiar BitmapPixelFormat, or the other parameters. The documentation for GetSoftwareBitmapAsync() doesn't appear to give any hints on what the default value it is using for BitmapPixelFormat.
Does anyone know the best values to pass to the version of GetSoftwareBitmapAsync() that takes 5 parameters to mimic the version of GetSoftwareBitmapAsync() that takes 0 parameters?
EDIT:
Just found out that trying [BitmapPixelFormat]::Unknown causes this error:
Exception calling "GetSoftwareBitmapAsync" with "5" argument(s): "The
parameter is incorrect. Windows.Graphics.Imaging: The bitmap pixel
format is unsupported."
But no errors with [BitmapPixelFormat]::Bgra8.
I don't know why GetSoftwareBitmapAsync doesn't like [BitmapPixelFormat]::Unknown, but here is the solution I found.
I need to first load the image to see if it needs rotating. That is done with the original command:
$AsyncTask = $BitmapDecoder.GetSoftwareBitmapAsync()
$SoftwareBitmap = GetAsync( $AsyncTask, ([SoftwareBitmap]) )
Then extract its BitmapPixelFormat:
$BitmapPixelFormat = $SoftwareBitmap.BitmapPixelFormat
And then use $BitmapPixelFormat for all calls to the 5 parameter version of GetSoftwareBitmapAsync().
new to Mirth, not new to engines... finding it a bit challenging to do a basic source to destination HL7v2 transformation.
I've set up my Channel to read from a file as the source, and spit out the destination to a file as well. My output template is ${message.encodedData}. The channel seems to be reading the source correctly, and generating an output. But what I'm struggling with is how cumbersome this is.
I'm playing with an HL7 SIU message, my source has a lot more fields than the destination wants to receive, just need a simple way to map the few fields that are required.
I inserted the source system message template into the Destination Transformer Inbound Message Templates, then I'm doing the following which seems to work:
//MSH Segment
if (msg['MSH'][0]){
var MSH1 = msg['MSH']['MSH.1'];
var MSH2 = msg['MSH']['MSH.2'];
var MSH7 = msg['MSH']['MSH.7'];
var MSH9 = msg['MSH']['MSH.9'];
msg['MSH'] = '';
msg['MSH']['MSH.1']=MSH1;
msg['MSH']['MSH.2']=MSH2;
msg['MSH']['MSH.7']=MSH7;
msg['MSH']['MSH.9']=MSH9;
}
Rinse and repeat for the segments that I need, seems very painful to me.
On a second destination, I'm trying to leverage the Inbound and Outbound Message Template. Inserted the source system template as above, inserted the destination system template in Outbound Message Template.
My Javascript for that one looks something like this:
//MSH Segment
if (msg['MSH'][0]){
tmp['MSH'] = "";
tmp['MSH']['MSH.1'] = msg['MSH']['MSH.1'];
tmp['MSH']['MSH.2'] = msg['MSH']['MSH.2'];
tmp['MSH']['MSH.7'] = msg['MSH']['MSH.7'];
tmp['MSH']['MSH.9'] = msg['MSH']['MSH.9'];
}
It's cleaner, but doesn't seem to work properly, in some messages, my source doesn't have a PV1 segment, but the output contains the sample PV1 segment in the Output Message Template. Do I need to have an initial statement that is tmp = "";
There has to be a easier way to accomplish what I'm trying here, any advise is appreciated!
M
Eventually figured out a different route. Removed the outbound template entirely and built the outbound message from scratch. Here's a snapshot of what it looks like.
var output = <HL7Message/>;
//MSH Segment
createSegment('MSH',output);
output.MSH['MSH.1'] = msg['MSH']['MSH.1'];
output.MSH['MSH.2'] = msg['MSH']['MSH.2'];
output.MSH['MSH.7'] = msg['MSH']['MSH.7'];
output.MSH['MSH.9'] = msg['MSH']['MSH.9'];
//SCH Segment
if (msg['SCH'][0]){
createSegment('SCH',output);
output.SCH['SCH.1'] = msg['SCH']['SCH.1'];
output.SCH['SCH.2'] = msg['SCH']['SCH.2'];
output.SCH['SCH.6'] = msg['SCH']['SCH.6'];
output.SCH['SCH.7'] = msg['SCH']['SCH.7'];
output.SCH['SCH.8'] = msg['SCH']['SCH.8'];
output.SCH['SCH.11'] = msg['SCH']['SCH.11'];
output.SCH['SCH.12'] = msg['SCH']['SCH.12'];
output.SCH['SCH.16'] = msg['SCH']['SCH.16'];
output.SCH['SCH.25'] = msg['SCH']['SCH.25'];
}
var message = SerializerFactory.getSerializer('HL7V2').fromXML(output);
channelMap.put('outmsg',message);
And then in my destination, I use ${outmsg} for the Template.
I am using this snippet in order to create a mf4 file with a value to text table, found in the examples from asammdf's github.
vals = 5
conversion = {
'val_{}'.format(i): i
for i in range(vals)
}
conversion.update(
{
'text_{}'.format(i): 'key_{}'.format(i).encode('ascii')
for i in range(vals)
}
)
sig = Signal(
np.arange(cycles, dtype=np.uint32) % 30,
t,
name='Channel_value_to_text',
conversion=conversion,
comment='Value to text channel',
)
sigs.append(sig)
mdf.append(sigs, comment='arrays', common_timebase=True)
Is there a way to create a table with ##TX blocks and also ##CC blocks?(in order to simulate a scale conversion)
Thank you!
If anyone needs it, I found the answer and it was simpler than expected.
Create another conversion (i.e conversion2) in the same manner as the first one, then reassign the value of one of the references to it.
conversionBlock = from_dict(conversion)
conversionBlock.referenced_blocks["text_4"] = from_dict(conversion2)
I know there are similar questions out there, but this one is a little different (I think).
I used the MATLAB Compiler to convert a .m to an Excel add-in. When I run the add-in on my machine, it works just fine. When I send it to a colleague, they get the "ActiveX component can't create object" error. They have added the add-in no problem.
Is there something going on here that's easily fixed?
MATLAB code:
function mess = createAndRouteOrderWithStyle()
c = startbbrg();
[num,text] = exportToM();
s = emsx('//blp/emapisvc_beta');
order.EMSX_ORDER_TYPE = text(1);
order.EMSX_SIDE = text(2);
order.EMSX_TICKER = text(3);
order.EMSX_AMOUNT = int32(num(1));
%order.EMSX_LIMIT_PRICE = num(2);
order.EMSX_BROKER = text(4);
order.EMSX_HAND_INSTRUCTION = text(5);
order.EMSX_TIF = text(6);
events = createOrderAndRoute(s,order);
mess = events.ERROR_MESSAGE;
close(s);
end
Excel VBA code:
Sub GO()
Cells(10,10).Formula = "=createAndRouteOrderWithStyle()"
End Sub
I have looked around and have found a number of questions which approach using-a-string-to-define-the-class-name and dynamic-class-generation-in-coffeescript> but neither of them exactly address my problem, so I am wondering whether I making some fundamental mistake in my approach to the problem.
In the loop below I am looping through some data parsed from JSON. For each set of data I want to extend my class Robot with string = new Robot where string is a string.
Currently my code does not produce any errors, and successfully creates new Robots but since their name is a string, trying to access them with robot1.move() or robot2.doSomeOtherClassyThing() does not work and tells me they are undefined.
This seems like it should not require a verbose helper function to make it work. What am I missing here?
createRobots: -> # process robot commands
createXcoord = missionData.xCoord
createYcoord = missionData.yCoord
createOrient = missionData.orientation
createInstru = missionData.robotInstructions
for command in createOrient
robot = 'robot' + (_i + 1)
name = robot
robot = new Robot \ # create named Robot
name
, createXcoord[_i]
, createYcoord[_i]
, createOrient[_i]
, createInstru[_i]
console.log(robot)
I think what is happening is that the variable "robot = 'string' is written over when the robot = new Robot is declared.
The outcome I am hoping for is string1 = new Robot, "string2 = new Robot". Does that make sense? jsfiddle.net/7EN5y/1
You need to add them to a context. If you want them to be global, create a variable like this:
# Either the browser root, or the CommonJS (e.g. Node) module root
root = window or exports
If you want an object that holds robots, add such an object to the root.
root.robots = []
Then when creating robots, add them to such an object.
robot = 'robot' + (_i + 1)
name = robot
robot = new Robot # ...
root[name] = robot # or robots[name] = robot
You may then use code like robot1.move(), or robots.robot1.move() (depending on if you attached them to the root or not).