In the spray-can HTTP server example, when I run the server, I don't see any "Bound" message showing up in the log:
https://github.com/spray/spray/tree/master/examples/spray-can/simple-http-server/src/main
However, if I try to create my own server, and ignore the Bound message I get them going to dead-letters:
$ sbt run
[info] Set current project to pingpong (in build file:/D:/Projects/pingpong/)
[info] Updating {file:/D:/Projects/pingpong/}pingpong...
[info] Resolving jline#jline;2.12.1 ...
[info] Done updating.
[info] Running drozdyuk.pingpong.Main
[INFO] [08/03/2015 20:05:47.246] [default-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-2] [akka
://default/user/IO-HTTP/listener-0] Bound to localhost/127.0.0.1:8081
[INFO] [08/03/2015 20:05:47.246] [default-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-2] [akka
://default/deadLetters] Message [akka.io.Tcp$Bound] from Actor[akka://default/us
er/IO-HTTP/listener-0#-892116855] to Actor[akka://default/deadLetters] was not d
elivered. [1] dead letters encountered. This logging can be turned off or adjust
ed with configuration settings 'akka.log-dead-letters' and 'akka.log-dead-letter
s-during-shutdown'.
My question is mainly out of curiosity, how does the Bound message get handled in the example? Is it some kind of logging that swallows them or something else?
Code for my Main.scala:
package drozdyuk.pingpong
import akka.actor.{ActorSystem, Props}
import akka.io.IO
import spray.can.Http
object Main extends App {
implicit val system = ActorSystem()
// the handler actor replies to incoming HttpRequests
val handler = system.actorOf(Props[WebService], name = "handler")
val PORT = 8081
val DOMAIN = "localhost"
IO(Http) ! Http.Bind(handler, interface = DOMAIN, port = PORT)
}
and my WebService.scala:
package drozdyuk.pingpong
import akka.actor._
import spray.http.HttpMethods.{GET}
import spray.can.Http
import spray.http.{HttpRequest, HttpResponse, Uri}
class WebService extends Actor with ActorLogging {
def receive = {
// New connection - register self as handler
case _: Http.Connected => sender ! Http.Register(self)
case HttpRequest(GET, Uri.Path("/ping"), _, _, _) =>
sender ! HttpResponse(entity = "pong")
case HttpRequest(GET, Uri.Path("/pong"), _, _, _) =>
sender ! HttpResponse(entity = "ping")
case _: HttpRequest => sender ! HttpResponse(status = 404, entity = "Unknown resource!")
}
}
You could use another version of tell in your Main:
IO(Http).tell(Http.Bind(handler, interface = DOMAIN, port = PORT), sender = handler)
And then handle Bound message in your WebService:
class WebService extends Actor with ActorLogging {
def receive = {
case Http.Bound(address) =>
//all other cases...
}
}
In your case you are using
def !(message: Any)(implicit sender: ActorRef = Actor.noSender): Unit
and there is no implicit sender in scope of Main so default noSender will be used.
I tried this and it works great for me:
import akka.actor._
import akka.io._
import spray.can.Http
import spray.http.HttpResponse
import spray.http.HttpRequest
import spray.http.Uri
import spray.http.HttpMethods.{GET}
class WebService extends Actor with ActorLogging {
def receive = {
case _: Http.Connected => sender ! Http.Register(self)
case _: HttpRequest => sender ! HttpResponse(status = 404, entity = "Unknown resource!")
case HttpRequest(GET, Uri.Path("/ping"), _, _, _) =>
sender ! HttpResponse(entity = "pong")
//all other cases...
}
}
object TestSpray extends App {
implicit val system = ActorSystem()
val myListener: ActorRef = system.actorOf(Props[WebService], name = "handler")
IO(Http) ! Http.Bind(myListener, interface = "localhost", port = 8080)
}
Related
I'm trying to wrap my head around akka streams and the way to handle web sockets, but some things are quite clear to me.
For starters, I'm trying to accomplish one-way communication from some client to the server and communication between the same server and some other client.
client1 -----> Server <------> client2
I was looking at the example provided here.
The resulting code looks something like this:
1) starting with the controller
class Test #Inject()(#Named("connManager") myConnectionsManager: ActorRef, cc: ControllerComponents)
(implicit val actorSystem: ActorSystem,
val mat: Materializer,
implicit val executionContext: ExecutionContext)
extends AbstractController(cc) {
private def wsFutureFlow(id: String): Future[Flow[String, String, NotUsed]] = {
implicit val timeout: Timeout = Timeout(5.seconds)
val future = myConnectionsManager ? CreateRemote(id)
val futureFlow = future.mapTo[Flow[String, String, NotUsed]]
futureFlow
}
private def wsFutureLocalFlow: Future[Flow[String, String, NotUsed]] = {
implicit val timeout: Timeout = Timeout(5.seconds)
val future = myConnectionsManager ? CreateLocal
val futureFlow = future.mapTo[Flow[String, String, NotUsed]]
futureFlow
}
def ws: WebSocket = WebSocket.acceptOrResult[String, String] {
rh =>
wsFutureFlow(rh.id.toString).map { flow =>
Right(flow)
}
}
def wsLocal: WebSocket = WebSocket.acceptOrResult[String, String] {
_ =>
wsFutureLocalFlow.map { flow =>
Right(flow)
}
}
}
As for the connection manager actor. That would be the equivalent of the UserParentActor from the example.
class MyConnectionsManager #Inject()(childFactory: MyTestActor.Factory)
(implicit ec: ExecutionContext, mat: Materializer) extends Actor with InjectedActorSupport {
import akka.pattern.{ask, pipe}
implicit val timeout: Timeout = Timeout(2.seconds)
override def receive: Receive = {
case CreateRemote(x) =>
val child = injectedChild(childFactory(), s"remote-$x")
context.watch(child)
privatePipe(child)
case CreateLocal =>
val child = injectedChild(childFactory(), "localConnection")
context.become(onLocalConnected(child))
privatePipe(child)
case Terminated(child) =>
println(s"${child.path.name} terminated...")
}
def onLocalConnected(local: ActorRef): Receive = {
case CreateRemote(x) =>
val child = injectedChild(childFactory(), s"remote-$x")
context.watch(child)
privatePipe(child)
case x: SendToLocal => local ! x
}
private def privatePipe(child: ActorRef) = {
val future = (child ? Init).mapTo[Flow[String, String, _]]
pipe(future) to sender()
() // compiler throws exception without this: non-unit value discarded
}
}
And the MyTestActor looks like this:
class MyTestActor #Inject()(implicit mat: Materializer, ec: ExecutionContext) extends Actor {
val source: Source[String, Sink[String, NotUsed]] = MergeHub.source[String]
.recoverWithRetries(-1, { case _: Exception => Source.empty })
private val jsonSink: Sink[String, Future[Done]] = Sink.foreach { json =>
println(s"${self.path.name} got message: $json")
context.parent ! SendToLocal(json)
}
private lazy val websocketFlow: Flow[String, String, NotUsed] = {
Flow.fromSinkAndSourceCoupled(jsonSink, source).watchTermination() { (_, termination) =>
val name = self.path.name
termination.foreach(_ => context.stop(self))
NotUsed
}
}
def receive: Receive = {
case Init =>
println(s"${self.path.name}: INIT")
sender ! websocketFlow
case SendToLocal(x) =>
println(s"Local got from remote: $x")
case msg: String => sender ! s"Actor got message: $msg"
}
}
What I don't understand, apart from how sinks and sources actually connect to the actors, is the following. When I start up my system, I send a few messages to the actor. However, after I close the connection to an actor named remote, and continue sending messages to the one called "localConnection", the messages get sent to DeadLetters:
[info] Done compiling.
[info] 15:49:20.606 - play.api.Play - Application started (Dev)
localConnection: INIT
localConnection got message: test data
Local got from remote: test data
localConnection got message: hello world
Local got from remote: hello world
remote-133: INIT
remote-133 got message: hello world
Local got from remote: hello world
remote-133 got message: hello from remote
Local got from remote: hello from remote
[error] 15:50:24.449 - a.a.OneForOneStrategy - Monitored actor [Actor[akka://application/user/connManager/remote-133#-998945083]] terminated
akka.actor.DeathPactException: Monitored actor [Actor[akka://application/user/connManager/remote-133#-998945083]] terminated
deadLetters got message: hello local
I assume this is because of the exception thrown... Can anyone explain to me as to why the message gets sent to DeadLetters?
Apart from that, I would like to know why I keep getting a compiler exception without the "()" returned at the end of privatePipe?
Also, should I be doing anything differently?
I realised that the exception was being thrown because I forgot to handle the Terminated message in the new behaviour of the MyConnectionsManager actor.
def onLocalConnected(local: ActorRef): Receive = {
case CreateRemote(x) =>
val child = injectedChild(childFactory(), s"remote-$x")
context.watch(child)
privatePipe(child)
case Terminated(child) => println(s"${child.path.name} terminated...")
case x: SendToLocal => local ! x
}
It seems to be working now.
While using Akka HttpRequest and pipe the request to an actor, i couldn't identify the response.
The actor will handle each message that will receive but it doesn't know which request used to get this response. Is there any way to identify each request to match the response with ?
Note: i don't have the server to resend any part of request body again.
Thanks in advance
MySelf.scala
import akka.actor.{ Actor, ActorLogging }
import akka.http.scaladsl.Http
import akka.http.scaladsl.model._
import akka.stream.{ ActorMaterializer, ActorMaterializerSettings }
import akka.util.ByteString
class Myself extends Actor with ActorLogging {
import akka.pattern.pipe
import context.dispatcher
final implicit val materializer: ActorMaterializer =
ActorMaterializer(ActorMaterializerSettings(context.system))
def receive = {
case HttpResponse(StatusCodes.OK, headers, entity, _) =>
entity.dataBytes.runFold(ByteString(""))(_ ++ _).foreach { body =>
log.info("Got response, body: " + body.utf8String)
}
case resp # HttpResponse(code, _, _, _) =>
log.info("Request failed, response code: " + code)
resp.discardEntityBytes()
}
}
Main.scala
import akka.actor.{ActorSystem, Props}
import akka.http.scaladsl.Http
import akka.http.scaladsl.model._
import akka.stream.ActorMaterializer
object HttpServerMain extends App {
import akka.pattern.pipe
// import system.dispatcher
implicit val system = ActorSystem()
implicit val materializer = ActorMaterializer()
// needed for the future flatMap/onComplete in the end
implicit val executionContext = system.dispatcher
val http = Http(system)
val myActor = system.actorOf(Props[MySelf])
http.singleRequest(HttpRequest(uri = "http://akka.io"))
.pipeTo(myActor)
http.singleRequest(HttpRequest(uri = "http://akka.io/another-request"))
.pipeTo(myActor)
Thread.sleep(2000)
system.terminate()
You can simply use map to transform the Future and add some kind of ID (usually called correlation ID for such purposes) to it before you pipe it to myActor:
http.singleRequest(HttpRequest(uri = "http://akka.io"))
.map(x => (1, x)).pipeTo(myActor)
You'll need to change you pattern match blocks to take a tupple:
case (id, HttpResponse(StatusCodes.OK, headers, entity, _)) =>
If you can't/don't want to change your pattern match block for some reason you can use same approach, but instead add a unique HTTP header into your completed request (using copy) with something like this (not checked if compiles):
// make a unique header name that you are sure will not be
// received from http response:
val correlationHeader: HttpHeader = ... // mycustomheader
// Basically hack the response to add your header:
http.singleRequest(HttpRequest(uri = "http://akka.io"))
.map(x => x.copy(headers = correlationHeader +: headers)).pipeTo(myActor)
// Now you can check your header to see which response that was:
case HttpResponse(StatusCodes.OK, headers, entity, _) =>
headers.find(_.is("mycustomheader")).map(_.value).getOrElse("NA")
This is more of a hack though compared to previous option because you are modifying a response.
I think you cannot do that directly using pipeTo because it essentially just adds andThen call to your Future. One option is tomap and then send a (request, response) tuple to actor:
val request = HttpRequest(uri = "http://akka.io")
http.singleRequest(request).map {
response => myActor ! (request, response)
}
class Myself extends Actor with ActorLogging {
...
def receive = {
case (request, HttpResponse(StatusCodes.OK, headers, entity, _)) =>
...
case (request, resp # HttpResponse(code, _, _, _)) =>
log.info(request.toString)
...
}
}
I'm just messing around with some basics to learn akka remoting, and I'm running into an issue where my proxy class sends Identify messages to my backend, but never receives a response back.
I've verified that the backend receives messages sent to the ActorSelection, and I've seen a logging message where the backend actor says it will use xxx for serialization of the ActorIdentity messages. Not sure where I'm getting it wrong.
Here is my proxy class:
package remoting
import akka.actor.{Actor, ActorIdentity, ActorRef, Identify, ReceiveTimeout, Terminated}
import com.typesafe.config.ConfigFactory
import scala.concurrent.duration._
class BackendProxyActor extends Actor {
context.setReceiveTimeout(3.seconds)
val path = createPath
val backendSelection = context.actorSelection(path)
println(f"BackendSelection is $backendSelection")
override def preStart(): Unit = backendSelection ! Identify(1)
override def receive: Receive = {
case ActorIdentity(1, Some(actor)) =>
context.setReceiveTimeout(Duration.Undefined)
context.watch(actor)
context.become(active(actor))
case ActorIdentity(1, None) =>
println("Backend actor not available")
case ReceiveTimeout =>
backendSelection ! Identify(1)
case msg: Any => println(f"Received $msg while identifying backend")
}
def active(backend: ActorRef): Receive = {
case msg: Any => backend ! msg
case Terminated(backend) =>
println("backend terminated, going to identifying state")
context.setReceiveTimeout(3.seconds)
context.become(receive)
}
def createPath: String = {
val config = ConfigFactory.load("frontend").getConfig("backend")
val name = config.getString("name")
val host = config.getString("host")
val port = config.getString("port")
val system = config.getString("system")
val protocol = config.getString("protocol")
f"$protocol://$system#$host:$port/$name"
}
}
Here is my backend class:
package remoting
import akka.actor.{Actor, Identify, PoisonPill}
import com.typesafe.config.ConfigFactory
class BackendActor extends Actor {
val config = ConfigFactory.load("backend")
override def receive: Receive = {
case "stop" => self ! PoisonPill
case msg: Any => println(f"Received $msg")
}
}
My frontend class:
package remoting
import akka.actor.{Actor, Props}
class FrontendActor extends Actor {
val proxy = context.actorOf(Props[BackendProxyActor], "backendProxy")
override def receive: Receive = {
case msg: Any => proxy ! msg
}
}
and finally my App class:
package remoting
import akka.actor.{ActorSystem, Props}
import com.typesafe.config.ConfigFactory
object Main extends App {
val frontendConfig = ConfigFactory.load("frontend")
val frontend = ActorSystem("frontend", frontendConfig)
val frontendActor = frontend.actorOf(Props[FrontendActor], "FrontendActor")
(1 to 20).foreach(i => frontendActor ! f"Msg #$i")
frontendActor ! "stop"
}
My backend is being started in another process, and is run on port 2551, while my frontend is on port 2552.
For router actor with "group mode", we new a series of actors in advance, and then we will use actorOf to associate one router with remote routees.
In fact, it internal will use actorSelection, my question is: how to assure the association already finish?
For actorSelection, we can use resolveOne to make sure the selection is successful, then send message. But how about router actor? See following code, how to assure line2 associate with remote routees before send message to it, just like line line1 does?
package local
import akka.actor._
import akka.routing.RoundRobinGroup
import akka.util.Timeout
import scala.concurrent.duration._
import com.typesafe.config.ConfigFactory
import scala.util.{Failure, Success}
object Local extends App {
val config = ConfigFactory.parseString(s"akka.remote.netty.tcp.port=2251")
val system = ActorSystem("LocalSystem", config.withFallback(ConfigFactory.load()))
system.actorOf(Props[LocalActor], "LocalActor")
val config2 = ConfigFactory.parseString(s"akka.remote.netty.tcp.port=2252")
val system2 = ActorSystem("LocalSystem2", config2.withFallback(ConfigFactory.load()))
system2.actorOf(Props[LocalActor2], "LocalActor2")
}
class LocalActor extends Actor {
def receive = {
case _ => println("hi")
}
}
class LocalActor2 extends Actor {
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext.Implicits.global
implicit val timeout = Timeout(5 seconds)
val a = context.actorSelection("akka.tcp://LocalSystem#127.0.0.1:2251/user/LocalActor")
a.resolveOne().onComplete { // line 1
case Success(actor) => println("ready")
a ! 1
case Failure(ex) => println("not ready")
}
val paths = List("akka.tcp://LocalSystem#127.0.0.1:2251/user/LocalActor")
val b = context.actorOf(RoundRobinGroup(paths).props(), "LocalActorRouter") // line 2
b ! 1
def receive = {
case _ =>
}
}
I've followed the example for creating Web Sockets with Scala Play and Akka actors:
https://www.playframework.com/documentation/2.5.x/ScalaWebSockets#Handling-WebSockets-with-Akka-Streams-and-actors
On resume, the controller:
import play.api.mvc._
import play.api.libs.streams._
class Controller1 #Inject() (implicit system: ActorSystem, materializer: Materializer) {
def socket = WebSocket.accept[String, String] { request =>
ActorFlow.actorRef(out => MyWebSocketActor.props(out))
}
And the Actor:
import akka.actor._
object MyWebSocketActor {
def props(out: ActorRef) = Props(new MyWebSocketActor(out))
}
class MyWebSocketActor(out: ActorRef) extends Actor {
def receive = {
case msg: String =>
out ! ("I received your message: " + msg)
}
}
The actors created (one per websocket connection) are child of /user actor. I've created 3 connections and the actor created were:
/user/$b
/user/$c
/user/$d
I want to change the actors' name based in a field of the web socket message. How could i do this?.
You can set the name of the actor as follows:
Create a file BetterActorFlow.scala
package your.package
import akka.actor._
import akka.stream.scaladsl.{Keep, Sink, Source, Flow}
import akka.stream.{Materializer, OverflowStrategy}
object BetterActorFlow {
def actorRef[In, Out](props: ActorRef => Props, bufferSize: Int = 16, overflowStrategy: OverflowStrategy = OverflowStrategy.dropNew, maybeName: Option[String] = None)(implicit factory: ActorRefFactory, mat: Materializer): Flow[In, Out, _] = {
val (outActor, publisher) = Source.actorRef[Out](bufferSize, overflowStrategy)
.toMat(Sink.asPublisher(false))(Keep.both).run()
def flowActorProps: Props = {
Props(new Actor {
val flowActor = context.watch(context.actorOf(props(outActor), "flowActor"))
def receive = {
case Status.Success(_) | Status.Failure(_) => flowActor ! PoisonPill
case Terminated(_) => context.stop(self)
case other => flowActor ! other
}
override def supervisorStrategy = OneForOneStrategy() { case _ => SupervisorStrategy.Stop }
})
}
def actorRefForSink =
maybeName.fold(factory.actorOf(flowActorProps)) { name => factory.actorOf(flowActorProps, name) }
Flow.fromSinkAndSource(Sink.actorRef(actorRefForSink, Status.Success(())), Source.fromPublisher(publisher))
}
}
Use BetterActorFlow instead of ActorFlow:
BetterActorFlow.actorRef(out =>
ChatActor.props(out), 16, OverflowStrategy.dropNew, Some("alicebob"))
This worked for me. The created actor is at user/alicebob (use this with context.system.actorSelection("user/alicebob"))
According to the source code of ActorFlow, it is currently not possible to thange the name of the actual actor spawned for a connection (line 38):
Sink.actorRef(factory.actorOf(Props(new Actor { ... }) /*, name parameter is omitted */)
However, ActorFlow.actorRef accepts an implicit ActorRefFactory, which is implicit system: ActorSystem in all cases in your code. As we know, there are 2 most common ActorRefFactories: ActorSystem and ActorContext. You can modify your code in such a way that each time a connection is accepted another dummy actor would spawn with your preferred name (e.g. myActor1), and pass this new actor's context to ActorFlow.actorRef instead. In return, actors for connections would be named as follows:
/user/myActor1/$a
/user/myActor2/$a
etc