I've followed the example for creating Web Sockets with Scala Play and Akka actors:
https://www.playframework.com/documentation/2.5.x/ScalaWebSockets#Handling-WebSockets-with-Akka-Streams-and-actors
On resume, the controller:
import play.api.mvc._
import play.api.libs.streams._
class Controller1 #Inject() (implicit system: ActorSystem, materializer: Materializer) {
def socket = WebSocket.accept[String, String] { request =>
ActorFlow.actorRef(out => MyWebSocketActor.props(out))
}
And the Actor:
import akka.actor._
object MyWebSocketActor {
def props(out: ActorRef) = Props(new MyWebSocketActor(out))
}
class MyWebSocketActor(out: ActorRef) extends Actor {
def receive = {
case msg: String =>
out ! ("I received your message: " + msg)
}
}
The actors created (one per websocket connection) are child of /user actor. I've created 3 connections and the actor created were:
/user/$b
/user/$c
/user/$d
I want to change the actors' name based in a field of the web socket message. How could i do this?.
You can set the name of the actor as follows:
Create a file BetterActorFlow.scala
package your.package
import akka.actor._
import akka.stream.scaladsl.{Keep, Sink, Source, Flow}
import akka.stream.{Materializer, OverflowStrategy}
object BetterActorFlow {
def actorRef[In, Out](props: ActorRef => Props, bufferSize: Int = 16, overflowStrategy: OverflowStrategy = OverflowStrategy.dropNew, maybeName: Option[String] = None)(implicit factory: ActorRefFactory, mat: Materializer): Flow[In, Out, _] = {
val (outActor, publisher) = Source.actorRef[Out](bufferSize, overflowStrategy)
.toMat(Sink.asPublisher(false))(Keep.both).run()
def flowActorProps: Props = {
Props(new Actor {
val flowActor = context.watch(context.actorOf(props(outActor), "flowActor"))
def receive = {
case Status.Success(_) | Status.Failure(_) => flowActor ! PoisonPill
case Terminated(_) => context.stop(self)
case other => flowActor ! other
}
override def supervisorStrategy = OneForOneStrategy() { case _ => SupervisorStrategy.Stop }
})
}
def actorRefForSink =
maybeName.fold(factory.actorOf(flowActorProps)) { name => factory.actorOf(flowActorProps, name) }
Flow.fromSinkAndSource(Sink.actorRef(actorRefForSink, Status.Success(())), Source.fromPublisher(publisher))
}
}
Use BetterActorFlow instead of ActorFlow:
BetterActorFlow.actorRef(out =>
ChatActor.props(out), 16, OverflowStrategy.dropNew, Some("alicebob"))
This worked for me. The created actor is at user/alicebob (use this with context.system.actorSelection("user/alicebob"))
According to the source code of ActorFlow, it is currently not possible to thange the name of the actual actor spawned for a connection (line 38):
Sink.actorRef(factory.actorOf(Props(new Actor { ... }) /*, name parameter is omitted */)
However, ActorFlow.actorRef accepts an implicit ActorRefFactory, which is implicit system: ActorSystem in all cases in your code. As we know, there are 2 most common ActorRefFactories: ActorSystem and ActorContext. You can modify your code in such a way that each time a connection is accepted another dummy actor would spawn with your preferred name (e.g. myActor1), and pass this new actor's context to ActorFlow.actorRef instead. In return, actors for connections would be named as follows:
/user/myActor1/$a
/user/myActor2/$a
etc
Related
I have an actor like this
class TcpClientActor(target: Target) extends Actor with Logger {
override def preStart(): Unit = {
self ! TestConnection
}
override def receive: Receive = {
case TestConnection =>
IO(Tcp) ! Connect(remoteAddress = new InetSocketAddress(target.endpoint, target.port), localAddress = None, options = Nil, timeout = Some(timeout), pullMode = false)
case failed#CommandFailed(_: Connect) =>
info(s"Failure: $target.endpoint:$target.port")
shutdown()
case Connected(_, _) =>
info(s"Success: $target.endpoint:$target.port")
sender() ! Close
shutdown()
}
def shutdown(): Unit = {
context stop self
}
}
I'm iterating over a file with endpoints to test against and creating one of these actors with each line as a constructor argument of type Target. I want to be able to throttle the number of parallel TCP connections to initiate to some set number, are there built-in mechanisms I can use in Akka to ensure I don't overload the system by just immediately creating a TcpClientActor for every line of input and kicking off a socket connection?
I would use an Akka Stream to throttle the messages
import scala.concurrent.duration._
import akka.NotUsed
import akka.actor.ActorRef
import akka.stream.{ ActorMaterializer, OverflowStrategy, ThrottleMode }
import akka.stream.scaladsl.{ Sink, Source }
object TcpThrottle {
def throttler(ratePerSecond: Int, burstRate: Option[Int], bufferSize: Int = 1000)(implicit materializer: ActorMaterializer): ActorRef =
Source.actorRef(bufferSize = bufferSize, OverflowStrategy.dropNew)
.throttle(ratePerSecond, 1.second, burstRate.getOrElse(ratePerSecond), ThrottleMode.Shaping)
.to(Sink.actorRef(IO(Tcp), NotUsed)
.run()
}
class TcpClientActor(target: Target) extends Actor with Logger {
val throttler = TcpThrottle.throttler(1, Some(5))
// otherwise identical
def receive: Receive = {
case TestConnection => throttler ! Connect(remoteAddress = new InetSocketAddress(target.endpoint, target.port), localAddress = None, options = Nil, timeout = Some(timeout), pullMode = false)
// other cases identical
}
}
Adapted from The Akka 2.5 migration guide. It may be necessary
I'm trying to wrap my head around akka streams and the way to handle web sockets, but some things are quite clear to me.
For starters, I'm trying to accomplish one-way communication from some client to the server and communication between the same server and some other client.
client1 -----> Server <------> client2
I was looking at the example provided here.
The resulting code looks something like this:
1) starting with the controller
class Test #Inject()(#Named("connManager") myConnectionsManager: ActorRef, cc: ControllerComponents)
(implicit val actorSystem: ActorSystem,
val mat: Materializer,
implicit val executionContext: ExecutionContext)
extends AbstractController(cc) {
private def wsFutureFlow(id: String): Future[Flow[String, String, NotUsed]] = {
implicit val timeout: Timeout = Timeout(5.seconds)
val future = myConnectionsManager ? CreateRemote(id)
val futureFlow = future.mapTo[Flow[String, String, NotUsed]]
futureFlow
}
private def wsFutureLocalFlow: Future[Flow[String, String, NotUsed]] = {
implicit val timeout: Timeout = Timeout(5.seconds)
val future = myConnectionsManager ? CreateLocal
val futureFlow = future.mapTo[Flow[String, String, NotUsed]]
futureFlow
}
def ws: WebSocket = WebSocket.acceptOrResult[String, String] {
rh =>
wsFutureFlow(rh.id.toString).map { flow =>
Right(flow)
}
}
def wsLocal: WebSocket = WebSocket.acceptOrResult[String, String] {
_ =>
wsFutureLocalFlow.map { flow =>
Right(flow)
}
}
}
As for the connection manager actor. That would be the equivalent of the UserParentActor from the example.
class MyConnectionsManager #Inject()(childFactory: MyTestActor.Factory)
(implicit ec: ExecutionContext, mat: Materializer) extends Actor with InjectedActorSupport {
import akka.pattern.{ask, pipe}
implicit val timeout: Timeout = Timeout(2.seconds)
override def receive: Receive = {
case CreateRemote(x) =>
val child = injectedChild(childFactory(), s"remote-$x")
context.watch(child)
privatePipe(child)
case CreateLocal =>
val child = injectedChild(childFactory(), "localConnection")
context.become(onLocalConnected(child))
privatePipe(child)
case Terminated(child) =>
println(s"${child.path.name} terminated...")
}
def onLocalConnected(local: ActorRef): Receive = {
case CreateRemote(x) =>
val child = injectedChild(childFactory(), s"remote-$x")
context.watch(child)
privatePipe(child)
case x: SendToLocal => local ! x
}
private def privatePipe(child: ActorRef) = {
val future = (child ? Init).mapTo[Flow[String, String, _]]
pipe(future) to sender()
() // compiler throws exception without this: non-unit value discarded
}
}
And the MyTestActor looks like this:
class MyTestActor #Inject()(implicit mat: Materializer, ec: ExecutionContext) extends Actor {
val source: Source[String, Sink[String, NotUsed]] = MergeHub.source[String]
.recoverWithRetries(-1, { case _: Exception => Source.empty })
private val jsonSink: Sink[String, Future[Done]] = Sink.foreach { json =>
println(s"${self.path.name} got message: $json")
context.parent ! SendToLocal(json)
}
private lazy val websocketFlow: Flow[String, String, NotUsed] = {
Flow.fromSinkAndSourceCoupled(jsonSink, source).watchTermination() { (_, termination) =>
val name = self.path.name
termination.foreach(_ => context.stop(self))
NotUsed
}
}
def receive: Receive = {
case Init =>
println(s"${self.path.name}: INIT")
sender ! websocketFlow
case SendToLocal(x) =>
println(s"Local got from remote: $x")
case msg: String => sender ! s"Actor got message: $msg"
}
}
What I don't understand, apart from how sinks and sources actually connect to the actors, is the following. When I start up my system, I send a few messages to the actor. However, after I close the connection to an actor named remote, and continue sending messages to the one called "localConnection", the messages get sent to DeadLetters:
[info] Done compiling.
[info] 15:49:20.606 - play.api.Play - Application started (Dev)
localConnection: INIT
localConnection got message: test data
Local got from remote: test data
localConnection got message: hello world
Local got from remote: hello world
remote-133: INIT
remote-133 got message: hello world
Local got from remote: hello world
remote-133 got message: hello from remote
Local got from remote: hello from remote
[error] 15:50:24.449 - a.a.OneForOneStrategy - Monitored actor [Actor[akka://application/user/connManager/remote-133#-998945083]] terminated
akka.actor.DeathPactException: Monitored actor [Actor[akka://application/user/connManager/remote-133#-998945083]] terminated
deadLetters got message: hello local
I assume this is because of the exception thrown... Can anyone explain to me as to why the message gets sent to DeadLetters?
Apart from that, I would like to know why I keep getting a compiler exception without the "()" returned at the end of privatePipe?
Also, should I be doing anything differently?
I realised that the exception was being thrown because I forgot to handle the Terminated message in the new behaviour of the MyConnectionsManager actor.
def onLocalConnected(local: ActorRef): Receive = {
case CreateRemote(x) =>
val child = injectedChild(childFactory(), s"remote-$x")
context.watch(child)
privatePipe(child)
case Terminated(child) => println(s"${child.path.name} terminated...")
case x: SendToLocal => local ! x
}
It seems to be working now.
I'm just messing around with some basics to learn akka remoting, and I'm running into an issue where my proxy class sends Identify messages to my backend, but never receives a response back.
I've verified that the backend receives messages sent to the ActorSelection, and I've seen a logging message where the backend actor says it will use xxx for serialization of the ActorIdentity messages. Not sure where I'm getting it wrong.
Here is my proxy class:
package remoting
import akka.actor.{Actor, ActorIdentity, ActorRef, Identify, ReceiveTimeout, Terminated}
import com.typesafe.config.ConfigFactory
import scala.concurrent.duration._
class BackendProxyActor extends Actor {
context.setReceiveTimeout(3.seconds)
val path = createPath
val backendSelection = context.actorSelection(path)
println(f"BackendSelection is $backendSelection")
override def preStart(): Unit = backendSelection ! Identify(1)
override def receive: Receive = {
case ActorIdentity(1, Some(actor)) =>
context.setReceiveTimeout(Duration.Undefined)
context.watch(actor)
context.become(active(actor))
case ActorIdentity(1, None) =>
println("Backend actor not available")
case ReceiveTimeout =>
backendSelection ! Identify(1)
case msg: Any => println(f"Received $msg while identifying backend")
}
def active(backend: ActorRef): Receive = {
case msg: Any => backend ! msg
case Terminated(backend) =>
println("backend terminated, going to identifying state")
context.setReceiveTimeout(3.seconds)
context.become(receive)
}
def createPath: String = {
val config = ConfigFactory.load("frontend").getConfig("backend")
val name = config.getString("name")
val host = config.getString("host")
val port = config.getString("port")
val system = config.getString("system")
val protocol = config.getString("protocol")
f"$protocol://$system#$host:$port/$name"
}
}
Here is my backend class:
package remoting
import akka.actor.{Actor, Identify, PoisonPill}
import com.typesafe.config.ConfigFactory
class BackendActor extends Actor {
val config = ConfigFactory.load("backend")
override def receive: Receive = {
case "stop" => self ! PoisonPill
case msg: Any => println(f"Received $msg")
}
}
My frontend class:
package remoting
import akka.actor.{Actor, Props}
class FrontendActor extends Actor {
val proxy = context.actorOf(Props[BackendProxyActor], "backendProxy")
override def receive: Receive = {
case msg: Any => proxy ! msg
}
}
and finally my App class:
package remoting
import akka.actor.{ActorSystem, Props}
import com.typesafe.config.ConfigFactory
object Main extends App {
val frontendConfig = ConfigFactory.load("frontend")
val frontend = ActorSystem("frontend", frontendConfig)
val frontendActor = frontend.actorOf(Props[FrontendActor], "FrontendActor")
(1 to 20).foreach(i => frontendActor ! f"Msg #$i")
frontendActor ! "stop"
}
My backend is being started in another process, and is run on port 2551, while my frontend is on port 2552.
In Play 2.6 I'm using the following code in my controller to spin up a WebSocket actor:
def ws: WebSocket = WebSocket.accept[JsValue, JsValue] { request =>
ActorFlow.actorRef { out =>
WebSocketActor.props(request.id.toString, out)
}
}
Internally Play will create some sink actor and my actor (WebSocketActor) will be created as a child of that actor. The sink actor provides some default supervision strategy (Stop on an error), but I'd like to set my own strategy to restart WebSocketActor in the event of a failure. How can I do it?
Play's ActorFlow doesn't provide a way to override its supervisor strategy of stopping your actor when an exception is thrown. You could, however, simply define your own copy of ActorFlow with the strategy of your choice:
import akka.actor._
import akka.stream.{ Materializer, OverflowStrategy }
import akka.stream.scaladsl.{ Sink, Keep, Source, Flow }
object ActorFlowAlt {
def actorRef[In, Out](props: ActorRef => Props, bufferSize: Int = 16, overflowStrategy: OverflowStrategy = OverflowStrategy.dropNew)(implicit factory: ActorRefFactory, mat: Materializer): Flow[In, Out, _] = {
val (outActor, publisher) = Source.actorRef[Out](bufferSize, overflowStrategy)
.toMat(Sink.asPublisher(false))(Keep.both).run()
Flow.fromSinkAndSource(
Sink.actorRef(factory.actorOf(Props(new Actor {
val flowActor = context.watch(context.actorOf(props(outActor), "flowActor"))
def receive = {
case Status.Success(_) | Status.Failure(_) => flowActor ! PoisonPill
case Terminated(_) => context.stop(self)
case other => flowActor ! other
}
override def supervisorStrategy = OneForOneStrategy() {
case _ => SupervisorStrategy.Restart // <--- restart instead of stop
}
})), Status.Success(())),
Source.fromPublisher(publisher)
)
}
}
Then use this alternative in your controller:
def ws: WebSocket = WebSocket.accept[JsValue, JsValue] { request =>
ActorFlowAlt.actorRef { out =>
WebSocketActor.props(request.id.toString, out)
}
}
I am new to Scala Akka actor. Based on the akka tutorial example on their website,i coded a similar example with just printing messages with the time they started. But the code does not get executed in my eclipse IDE.
import akka.actor.Actor
import akka.actor.ActorRef
import scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer
import akka.actor.Props
import akka.routing.RoundRobinRouter
import akka.actor.ActorSystem
object AkaObj extends App{
process()
sealed trait PiMessage
case class Work(value:String) extends PiMessage
case class printComp(valu:String)extends PiMessage
case object Start extends PiMessage
case class ListObj(cont:Seq[String]) extends PiMessage
class Worker extends Actor{
def receive()={
case Work(value:String)=>
println(value)
sender ! printComp(value)
}
}
class Master(listener: ActorRef) extends Actor{
val nrOfWorkers = 10
var counter = 0
var lis = ListBuffer[String]()
val workerRouter = context.actorOf(
Props[Worker].withRouter(RoundRobinRouter(nrOfWorkers)), name = "workerRouter")
def receive()={
//handle message
case Start=>workerRouter ! Work("Start now " + System.currentTimeMillis())
case printComp(value:String)=> {
counter+=1
lis.append(counter+"-"+value)
if(counter >=10)
listener ! ListObj(lis.toSeq)
// Stops this actor and all its supervised children
context.stop(self)
}
}
}
class Listener extends Actor{
def receive()={
case ListObj(cont:Seq[String])=>
println("Completed " +cont)
context.system.shutdown()
}
}
def process(){
// Create an Akka system
val system = ActorSystem("PiSystem")
// create the result listener, which will print the result and shutdown the system
val listener = system.actorOf(Props[Listener], name = "listener")
// create the master
val master = system.actorOf(Props(new Master(listener)),
name = "master")
// start the calculation
master ! Start
}
}
Issue: The error message i get is: "Error: Could not find or load main class AkaObj"
It does not even compiling i think. When i run the project,that's the message i get.
Actually, I managed to run your code just after dependencies were resolved. So the problem is in your environment configuration. I use Intellij Idea IDE.
Try this Eclipse Error: Could not find or load main class
The actual problem is the use of object AkaObj extends App. When programming scala I have noticed that using scala.App is restricted to simple programs (at least in IDEs). As soon as you start defining objects and classes inside scala.App Eclipse starts complaining about not finding the entry point of the program.
Try to fix this as follows:
import akka.actor.Actor
import akka.actor.ActorRef
import scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer
import akka.actor.Props
import akka.routing.RoundRobinRouter
import akka.actor.ActorSystem
object AkaObj {
def main(args:Array[String]) {
process()
}
def process() {
// Create an Akka system
val system = ActorSystem("PiSystem")
// create the result listener, which will print the result and shutdown the system
val listener = system.actorOf(Props[Listener], name = "listener")
// create the master
val master = system.actorOf(Props(new Master(listener)),
name = "master")
// start the calculation
master ! Start
}
sealed trait PiMessage
case class Work(value:String) extends PiMessage
case class printComp(valu:String)extends PiMessage
case object Start extends PiMessage
case class ListObj(cont:Seq[String]) extends PiMessage
class Worker extends Actor{
def receive()={
case Work(value:String)=>
println(value)
sender ! printComp(value)
}
}
class Master(listener: ActorRef) extends Actor{
val nrOfWorkers = 10
var counter = 0
var lis = ListBuffer[String]()
val workerRouter = context.actorOf(
Props[Worker].withRouter(RoundRobinRouter(nrOfWorkers)), name = "workerRouter")
def receive()={
//handle message
case Start=>workerRouter ! Work("Start now " + System.currentTimeMillis())
case printComp(value:String)=> {
counter+=1
lis.append(counter+"-"+value)
if(counter >=10)
listener ! ListObj(lis.toSeq)
// Stops this actor and all its supervised children
context.stop(self)
}
}
}
class Listener extends Actor{
def receive()={
case ListObj(cont:Seq[String])=>
println("Completed " +cont)
context.system.shutdown()
}
}
}
Using def main(args:Array[String]) fixes the problem in most cases.