React Serverside rendering Unexpected token, JSX and Babel - babeljs

I'm having trouble finding the correct way to use babel to allow me to use jsx in serverside.
Node-jsx was deprecated for babel. It seems like babel-core/register is whats supposed to be used but I still get unexpected token issues.
I created a repo with the problem im having.
https://github.com/pk1m/Stackoverflow-helpme
When I run node app or npm run watch-js I keep getting unexpected token referring to the JSX code '<'.
How do I get babel to transpile JSX, or am I completely off, thanks.

You need to use babel-register (npm i babel-register --save). And run on your server:
require('babel-register')({
stage: 0
});
You can omit stage 0 if you aren't using experimental babel features. Also you might prefer to put those options in .babelrc instead.
Note that it will only work for files required AFTER calling that (so it would not have an effect on the file you include it in).
You could also have the presets and other options in a .babelrc file.
For babel 6x:
npm i babel-register babel-preset-es2015 babel-preset-react --save
require('babel-register')({
presets: ['es2015', 'react']
});
Note: there are also stage 0-2 presets.
For watching as you've written in your package.json you could try a CLI command like the one facebook are suggesting in the note here (or use webpack):
babel --presets react es2015 --watch app/ --out-dir build/

Related

Is there a way to set up Babel to continuously transpile and/or minify a src folder to a compiled folder?

Starting with an empty directory, is it possible to do that? Should I use stage-0 like it is on the Babel REPL?
I hope to transpile it just like how ReactJS does it. For some reason, I always got an error for just a file containing:
let obj = { a: 1 };
let newObj = {
...obj,
ha: 3
};
Other times, I can transpile a file, but if I transpile a folder, it'd say:
foo.js: Cannot read property 'contexts' of null
The commands I tried included:
npx babel src --out-dir compiled --presets=es2015,react,minify --watch
but the errors I mentioned above appeared. Also, when I do
npm install babel-minify
it reported
found 2489 vulnerabilities (849 low, 306 moderate, 1329 high, 5 critical)
There is also a notice
As of v7.0.0-beta.55, we've removed Babel's Stage presets.
Please consider reading our blog post on this decision at
https://babeljs.io/blog/2018/07/27/removing-babels-stage-presets
for more details. TL;DR is that it's more beneficial in the
long run to explicitly add which proposals to use.
and I wonder what should be done.
Is it possible to
just continuously minify a folder
transpile some ES6 or ES7, 8 syntax that are not yet commonly supported
transpile JSX as well
?
I have found some reliable ways to make it work, although I am not sure when I should use babel.config.json and when to use .babelrc.json or .babelrc. It seems I have to run babel as ./node_modules/.bin/babel and is it true if I don't npm install babel using the -g option.
Here is what works:
create a folder, such as TryBabel
cd TryBabel
Go to https://babeljs.io/setup.html and click "CLI"
You need a package.json, so use npm init and just press Enter a few times
It should lead you to install
a. npm install --save-dev #babel/core #babel/cli
b. now look at your package.json. Remove the script about test but use this: "build": "babel src -d lib"
Now npm run build or ./node_modules/.bin/babel src -d lib should work, but make sure you have some .js files in the src folder. The transpiled result will be in the lib folder.
Now to transpile things into "pre ES6", just follow the #babel/preset-env instructions:
a. npm install #babel/preset-env --save-dev
b. make your babel.config.json to contain { "presets": ["#babel/preset-env"] }
Now you can use npm run build to transpile once, or use ./node_modules/.bin/babel src -d lib --watch to keep on running it and "watch" the src folder and transpile files in it when the files change.
To do minification or make it work with JSX/React, see
https://babeljs.io/docs/en/babel-preset-minify
and
https://babeljs.io/docs/en/babel-preset-react
and make sure your babel.config.json file looks like:
{
"presets": [
[
"#babel/preset-env",
{
"useBuiltIns": "entry"
}
],
["#babel/preset-react"],
["minify"]
]
}
and remove minify if you don't want the code to be minified.

Unit testing ionic services with jest

I'm building an ionic app and would like to add unit tests for a couple of services. I'm trying to get jest working with typescript but it doesn't seem to play well.
I'm getting this error:
/myuser/project/node_modules/#ionic/storage/dist/index.js:1
({"Object.<anonymous>":function(module,exports,require,__dirname,__filename,global,jest){import { NgModule } from '#angular/core';
^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Unexpected token import
Now I have read that you have to add the babel-plugin-transform-es2015-modules-commonjs and use that in the test env of babel. However I am using babel 7 and this plugin is not available for babel 7. Is there a different solution?
I will also provide my package.json and .babelrc below.
gist
You just need to add #ionic/storage to your transformIgnorePatterns in jest config. For example, here's mine, take note of the #ionic/storage part:
"transformIgnorePatterns": [
"node_modules/(?!#ngrx|moment|#ionic/storage|#ionic-native)"
]
Additionally, make sure in your tsconfig compiler options you have module: 'commonjs'
Also, if you need localstorage mocks, you can just use the following npm module:
npm install --save-dev jest-localstorage-mock
and then (in your setupJest.ts file)
import 'jest-localstorage-mock
Lastly, I recommend taking a look at:
https://github.com/thymikee/jest-preset-angular
for more help with jest + ionic configurations.

Can I use CoffeeScript to write my Electron (Atom Shell) application?

Does anything special have to be done to get Electron to run my main.coffee file? I have a main.js file (that works) that I converted to CoffeeScript (hence main.coffee), but when I run Electron main.coffee I get an error like the following:
App threw an error when running [SyntaxError: /Users/foo/develop/electron/main.coffee:13
app.on('window-all-closed', ->
^
Unexpected token >]
I can only assume this is a CoffeeScript issue, since when I commented the offending code with CoffeeScript's block comment (###), I got the following:
App threw an error when running [SyntaxError: /Users/foo/develop/electron/main.coffee:13
###
^
Unexpected token ILLEGAL]
I added coffee-script to my packages.json as a dependency, and made sure it was installed to my local node_modules directory like my other application dependencies, but that didn't seem to help.
I think, the main file main.js has to be javascript. But you can require a coffee file, for example application.coffee, from there using coffee-script.
main.js
// main.js
require('coffee-script').register();
require('./application')
application.coffee
# application.coffee
app = require('app')
BrowserWindow = require('browser-window')
# ...
Installing coffee-script
Include it in your package.json:
{
...
"devDependencies": {
"electron-prebuilt": "^0.33.1",
"coffee-script": "~1.10.0"
}
}
And run:
npm install
I've recently discovered that instead of transpiling to Javascript, you can do something like:
<script>
require('coffee-script').register();
require('../src/app/boot');
and then in src/app/boot.coffee you can use regular CoffeeScript :)
I found it in the app https://github.com/postcasio/hearthdash so there are more examples there.
There is no way to do it (atom doesn't ship with a coffeescript compiler), but you can use the watch option of coffeescript,
-w, --watch watch scripts for changes and rerun commands
For example:
coffee -w main.coffee in your case.

my coffeescript file compiles but mocha gives an error

I have a project that uses "coffee-script": "^1.7.1" in its package.json.
The code has this line in it:
[{id: id, name: name}, ...] = result.rows
This compiles fine using coffeescript version 1.7.1
The problem is that I am trying to use mocha for unit tests and it gives me an error on this line:
Parse error on line xyz: Unexpected '...'
Apparently mocha uses an older coffeescript. Is there a way to make it work without adjusting the source for mocha?
EDIT:
my Gruntfile.coffee:
'use strict'
module.exports = ->
#initConfig
cafemocha:
src: ['test/*.coffee']
options:
reporter: 'spec'
ui: 'bdd'
coffee:
compile:
files:
'lib/mylib.js': ['src/*.coffee']
#loadNpmTasks 'grunt-cafe-mocha'
#loadNpmTasks 'grunt-contrib-coffee'
#registerTask 'default', ['coffee', 'cafemocha']
I added mocha.opts to the test directory:
--require coffee-script/register
--compilers coffee:coffee-script/register
--reporter spec
--ui bdd
but, still, when I run grunt, it gives me the same error. I am new to this environment, and I find it too complicated, please help.
Starting from version 1.7.x CoffeeScript compiler should be explicitly registered (see change log for version 1.7.0).
So, the problem is that CoffeeScript compiler is not registered when you're running your mocha tests, so node.js treats all your .coffee files as .js files.
The best possible solution is to specify --compilers option for your mocha tests:
--compilers coffee:coffee-script/register
If you don't want to include it to every mocha call, you could set it up using mocha.opts file.
Here are some useful links:
issue about it on github
reference in mocha docs
the reason behind this breaking change in CoffeeScript engine
Update
Looks like your issue is much deeper then I thought.
First, grunt-cafe-mocha doesn't respect mocha.opts because it's running tests by requireing mocha as a dependency, instead of calling mocha test runner.
So, it would've been enough to add require('coffee-script/register') to the top of your gruntfile, if not for this old grunt issue.
In short, grunt uses coffee-script 1.3.x, forcing all its tasks to use the same version of coffee. I had the same problem with grunt-contrib-connect, being unable to use latest coffee-script in my express app.
So, the only help I can offer you is a small grunt task I wrote to solve similar problem in one of my projects. It runs mocha in a separate child process, thus completely isolating it from grunt.
N.B. I had a thought about releasing this task to npm, but considered it too minor.

how to pass compiler options to mocha

I run a mocha command to run my tests
$ ./node_modules/.bin/mocha --compilers coffee:coffee-script -R spec
I wish to pass additional options to the coffee-script compiler (--bare to avoid the outer closure that is introduced when compiling .coffee to .js). Is there a way to do this? I tried
$ ./node_modules/.bin/mocha --compilers coffee:coffee-script --bare -R spec
but that doesn't look right. It also failed saying that --bare is not a valid option for mocha.
error: unknown option `--bare'
The --compiler option doesn't support this, but you can write a script which activates the compiler with your options, then use mocha's --require option to activate your registration script. For example, create a file at the root of the project called babelhook.js:
// This file is required in mocha.opts
// The only purpose of this file is to ensure
// the babel transpiler is activated prior to any
// test code, and using the same babel options
require("babel-register")({
experimental: true
});
Then add this to mocha.opts:
--require babelhook
And that's it. Mocha will require babelhook.js before any tests.
Simply add a .babelrc file to your root.
Then any instances of babel (build, runtime, testing, etc) will reference that.
https://babeljs.io/docs/usage/babelrc/
You can even add specific config options per-environment.
In case anyone stumbles upon this. The 'experimental' option in babel has been deprecated. Your 'babelhook.js' should now read:
// This file is required in mocha.opts
// The only purpose of this file is to ensure
// the babel transpiler is activated prior to any
// test code, and using the same babel options
require("babel/register")({
stage: 1
});