I want to ask about JBoss Middleware for ISO8583.
So, I kinda new on ISO8583, from what I know is we could use JPOS framework for this one. Then my supervisor ask me to research about JBoss Middleware that could be used to develop middleware application for send, receive, and parse ISO8583 message.
I have read on JBoss Middleware website, unfortunately I'm still not sure which JBoss technology should I use to develop such application.
Here is my questions:
1. In order develop enterprise application that capable to send, receive, and parse ISO8583, should I combine JPOS with JBoss Middleware? or JBoss Middleware has a complete capability to handle it?
2. Does anyone has/know good material/tutorial for me to learn about building ISO8583 middleware with JBoss technology?
Thank you.
JBoss Middleware is a family of products and its components alone do not provide ISO8583 capabilities out of the box.
jPOS is one of the most popular Java frameworks that provide complete capabilities to handle sending and receiving ISO8583 messages. There are other alternatives such as j8583 and IsoTypes.
You can combine any of these ISO8583 libraries together with JBoss Fuse (part of the JBoss Middleware family) to build a solution capable of sending, receiving and parsing ISO8583 messages.
I'm not aware of a definitive guide about building such solutions. If you need to use JBoss Middleware, you can follow this route:
Look into IsoTypes, which provides an ISO8583 marshalling library for Apache Camel (used by JBoss Fuse).
Start by building a Camel route that implements the IsoType library functions. Look into this sample project.
Please, be aware that building a production ready ISO8583 server and/or client from open source solutions require significant work in terms of scalability, information security and compatibility with multiple financial hosts and switches.
My answer only refers to the first basic steps to understand your problem/solution fit a bit better.
As a side note, you may be interested in looking at jreactive-8583, an ISO8583 connector that handles message parsing and the network layer out of the box. You may build your application using this and deploy it into JBoss Application Server (part of the JBoss Middleware family too). I use it in production.
You can take advantage of JPos Q2 and create a servlet deployable to JBoss container.
In the service init method you can do this:
Q2 q2 = new Q2();
q2.start();
Related
I want to use an embedded http server in my enterprise apps (and move away from standalone containers) and was expecting Tomcat to provide an implementation. I was assuming Sun, Jetty and Jersey's implementations cannot support enterprise load.
But looking at Tomcat, I see no way to run REST apps that use JAX-RS, only servlets. So my questions are:
Will use of com.sun.net.httpserver.HttpServer work in a production environment, or do I need another library?
Am I understanding correctly the boundary between JAX-RS embedded servers and servlet containers (maybe that will explain why Tomcat doesn't provide such a server)
Other notes:
I do not want to use Spring unless that's the only choice
I know that Apache Camel is java open source framework and Jboss Fuse is ESB which act like container to bind camel into its container . However i need to know its differences in some more depth .
Any help will be appreciated .
In simplified terms, camel framework is the set of api's (java code) which are used in system integration projects whereas fuse is the server like tomcat where code is deployed.
"JBoss Fuse combines several technologies like core Enterprise Service Bus capabilities (based on Apache Camel, Apache CXF, Apache ActiveMQ), Apache Karaf and Fabric8 in a single integrated distribution."
Deploy applications utilizing some different configurations and technologies is one of many qualities in Jboss Fuse.
"Camel" as being a rule based routing & mediation engine which can be used inside a full blown ESB, a message broker or a web services smart client. Though if you want to, you could consider that Camel is a small, lightweight embeddable ESB since it can provide many of the common ESB services like smart routing, transformation, mediation, monitoring, orchestration etc.
We should also mention what Camel isn’t. Camel isn’t an enterprise service bus complete(ESB ), although some call Camel a lightweight ESB because of its support for routing, transformation, monitoring, orchestration, and so forth. Camel doesn’t have a container or a reliable message bus, but it can be deployed in one, such as Open-ESB or ServiceMix. For that reason, we prefer to call
Camel an integration framework rather than an ESB.
I have a very typical problem. I am using in-house developed platform which uses Jetty server and rest easy to provide a wrapper over REST framework. When they did that they made lot of tweaks for some specific scenes.
Now problem is that when I developed a REST based service with raw interfaces of rest easy and embed my jetty server in same JVM. My service can receive the request but response is always 500 server error.
I feel the in-house framework is intercepting the response doing some security validations so my response doesn't reach.
I was wondering if there is a way to use the different rest easy version and run in same JVM. I have tried to embed a jetty server and added a normal Servlet and I can access it but I can't achieve the same with my rest based servlet.
Any Idea how could I load two versions of rest easy on same JVM ?
What you can't have is two applications in the same web application context, since you are supposed to define only one class implementing javax.ws.rs.Application.
But that shouldn't be a problem, as long as classes live in different ClassLoaders. Each web application context must be in isolation of other contexts, each defining its own ClassLoader.
You can perform all kinds of class loading manipulation in Jetty: https://wiki.eclipse.org/Jetty/Reference/Jetty_Classloading
In conclusion, as long as you use different jar files of RESTEasy in each web context, you should be able to run two REST applications using different RESTEasy versions in the same JVM process.
Has anyone had any experience integrating JBoss Drools with Mule ESB?
While Apache ServiceMix appears to have good Drools support (http://servicemix.apache.org/servicemix-drools.html), the web based monitoring and tooling in Mule make it particularly useful for us as we often have non-technical service workers needing access to information around messaging.
One of the Mule committers has recently been working to update the Drools support in Mule. You can ask this question on the Mule user mailing list and probably get an up to date answer and a pointer to the work in progress code.
Hosting an application on a web application server e.g. JBoss automatically brings in lots of app server specific functionalities with it e.g. security, clustering & load balancing etc. I have a situation where I have to develop a server app with which, legacy apps can talk to over TCP/IP socket as well as be highly available. Initially, I had though of using JBoss app server to leverage its clustering support for HA. However, I am not sure whether it would be possible to connect to a JBoss web app using pure TCP/IP sockets from both java and non-java apps.
What is the best way to achieve this without using web service or Http approach?
UPDATE: I am specially interested to know how legacy apps will connect to the hosted web app through TCP/IP socket.
A really simple solution to bridge the two worlds would be to add a simple Java server which maps the old TCP/IP requests to HTTP requests. This is probably a pretty braindead task, so this "server" will be simple to write and maintain. Also, this server won't need as much power since it just accepts and forwards connections (no business logic or DB code).
On the JBoss server, you develop like you normally would. The legacy apps connect to the little bridge server which passes the requests on to JBoss and translate the result back.
This ensures that you're building for the future: When new apps are developed, they can connect directly to JBoss and use all the great HTTP features.
There's no reason why you can't open up a normal socket in (say) a servlet application hosted in JBoss.
You can then get a byte stream from this. The headache is then to decide on a platform-independent representation of your messages, such that your client end can format and send such that the JBoss-hosted end can read. But it's all perfectly feasible.
I would implement a very simple http (1.0) client.