I found doc that indicates I need to setup a webserver in my collective environment, however, I cannot determine the correct set of steps. Thoughts?
It would help to see what you've already tried, but consider the following:
Create two or more servers on one or more of the hosts and join them to the collective. Make sure your servers are clusterMembers and collectiveMembers. The following post should help with creating servers and joining them to the collective:
How can I setup a cell and collective in Bluemix
Update the controller's /etc/hosts file with the hostnames of all the hosts in the collective.
Download and follow this guide to generate the plugin-cfg.xml file on the controller:
https://developer.ibm.com/wasdev/downloads/#asset/scripts-jython-Generate_Cluster_Plugin
Copy the generated plugin-cfg.xml file to /opt/IBM/WebSphere/HTTPServer/conf
Edit /opt/IBM/WebSphere/HTTPServer/conf/httpd.conf and uncomment these two lines at the bottom of the file:
LoadModule was_ap22_module /opt/IBM/WebSphere/Plugins/bin/64bits/mod_was_ap22_http.so
WebSpherePluginConfig /opt/IBM/WebSphere/Profiles/Liberty/servers/controller/pluginConfig/myLibertyCluster-plugin-cfg.xml
Change the WebSpherePluginConfig value to be /opt/IBM/WebSphere/HTTPServer/conf/plugin-cfg.xml
Stop and start the HTTP server
sudo ./apachectl stop
sudo ./apachectl start
Verify the application can be reached using the webserver <webserverIP>:80/appname
Generate the plugin again if the application is added or removed.
Related
Currently I have a VM running and installed the binaries needed for fabric-ca. I have a docker-compose file looking like this:
I have some questions regarding this:
the docker-compose file will create one container, if I want it for
more organizations, do I need to copy/paste this and change the port
number? (I don't want to use intermediate CAs).
When registering/enrolling an identity, it will override the default
materials because It will always put the materials from the new identity in /etc/hyperledger/fabric-ca-client. So when creating multiple
identities (orderer, peers, users etc..) how do I need to organize
them? What's the best practise?
In the image you can see that the server and clients are specified,
is this a good approach? Or should the client and the server be a
different container?
More than one CA in a Docker Compose file - you can look at the Build your first network tutorial in the Fabric Docs which has a 2 Org network and various configuration files including Docker Compose.
Combined client/server Container - This might be convenient for testing, but in a production scenario definitely not for Security and Operational Integrity reasons.
Overwriting Identities - the enroll command writes a tree of data to the location specified by the environment variable FABRIC_CA_CLIENT_HOME but you can use --home to redirect the tree to a different location:
fabric-ca-client enroll -u http://Jane:janepw#myca.example.com:7054 --home /home/test/Jane/
I want edit raspberrypi-net-mods.service to copy a file, rather than move it.
How would I go about locating this please?
YOu can get the location of a systemd-unit via
systemctl status raspberrypi-net-mods.service
You shouldn't edit system-installed service-files directly.
Instead you can customize a service by adding configuration to /etc/systemd/system/
You probably want to read the documentation, e.g. man 5 systemd.unit
I'm trying to setup my own instance of nextcloud on my server but I'm running into a problem as I want nextcloud to be available under https://example.com/cloud/.
Next cloud is running in a CoreOS virtual machine called let's say myvm.
So this is the way I setup my CaddyFile:
example.com {
gzip
proxy /cloud myvm:8080 {
transparent
without /cloud
}
}
I have other proxies that work fine for other services or VMs that are written similarily.
With this, and publishing port 8080 in my docker-compose file, I manage to connect to the nextcloud instance. But every time I go to example.com/cloud/ it will redirect me to example.com/apps/files/ instead of example.com/cloud/apps/files/.
If I enter this last url manually, I can access to nextcloud, but also the page doesn't load properly because all the contents cannot be loaded because they are not prompted with the prefix cloud/.
Is there a way to explain nextcloud about this prefix through the configuration of docker-compose file? (It's the only configuration I created, it works with just that and no extra work, I use one similar to the one available here (the apache one).)
Or maybe I can improve the CaddyFile config? (By the way, if I don't use the without option, it will just not work at all and return 404 when I go to the url).
I have installed SAP WebIDE local on my machine and trying to connect with the below services:
https://sapes4.sapdevcenter.com/sap/opu/odata/IWBEP/GWSAMPLE_BASIC/?sap-ds-debug=true
http://services.odata.org/v3/northwind/northwind.svc/
I am getting two errors attached for reference.
Below is my destination file1:
Description=es4
Type=HTTP
TrustAll=true
Authentication=NoAuthentication
WebIDEUsage=odata_abap
Name=es4
WebIDEEnabled=true
URL=https\://sapes4.sapdevcenter.com\:443
ProxyType=Internet
WebIDESystem=es4
File 2:
Description=es4
Type=HTTP
TrustAll=true
Authentication=NoAuthentication
WebIDEUsage=odata_gen
Name=es4
WebIDEEnabled=true
URL=https\://sapes4.sapdevcenter.com
ProxyType=Internet
WebIDESystem=es4
Is there any configuration needed in my local Cloud connector?
First, you shouldn't have separate files for the same destination. Please have it in one file and separate the WebIDEUsage values with commas (make sure there are no spaces). More information can be found in the documentation Hofit has added.
Second, there's no need in a Cloud Connector, as there's no cloud here. If you install Web IDE locally then it's installed in your local station, there's no connectivity to the cloud.
I'm sure you can find all the needed information in both the documentation and SAP community.
I just tried to connect to es4- as you did in the first screenshot and it is working fine. (the name in the service catalog dropdown should be es4 as the name in the destination file 1- and not es4123).
Here is a link to the documentation.
I have an HAProxy install which was configured by someone who left the company. It runs on Ubuntu 10.04 and it seems to use 3 configuration files in the directory /etc/haproxy
haproxy.cfg
haproxy.http.cfg
haproxy.https.cfg
I don't see the point in using the haproxy.https.cfg file as I believe (in our configuration) it can all be configured from a single haproxy.http.cfg file but when I remove that httpS file it complains bitterly and refuses to run. My question
Is this the standard configuration haproxy uses or if not, I can't find a reference to the "S" file anywhere. Can anyone suggest how HAProxy concludes it should use it?
Thanks
The very answer to your question: your haproxy is simply launched with those three config files ( -f haproxy.cfg -f haproxy.http.cfg -f haproxy.https.cfg, maybe from /etc/init.d/haproxy but mileage varies depending on your distribution ).
If you remove the file, of course it will complain.
This is not particularly standard, but ain't bad either, it helps structuring the conf rather than having a very long file.
The task of the .https version will certainly be to redirect the https traffic towards a service that can handle HTTPS (stunnel or nginx usually), since haproxy cannot terminate ssl connections. (stunnel has to be patched, see on the haproxy page)
If you want you can merge those files into one or two, just find out how haproxy is launched (check for init.d or let us know which distribution) and fix it appropriately.
I believe that it is only /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg that is used by default.
This may be of use to you (1.4 configuration reference):
http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.4/doc/configuration.txt