During debugging my DW script, When I debug xmlStreamReader I have tried to look for .hasNext() which will give me TRUE
but getting .next() will terminate the script, thus
I am not able to continue from .next() point after that.
I also faced the same problem, I have made the hasNext as Number variable.
The issue is with this -> orderXMLReader.next() == XMLStreamConstants.START_ELEMENT
Here orderXMLReader.next() return String value and it is compared with Number constant
Related
During testing my iOS app, (it's a workout app), the app crashed (EXC_BREAKPOINT) as it was trying to save the workout data.
The crash was an index out of range issue whereby the array count is 1 lesser than the workout seconds. (I should have started the seconds counter from 1 instead of 0)
for i in 0...seconds {
let data = "\(i),\(dataArray.powerGenY[i-1]),\(dataArray.powerGenYAlt[i-1])\n"
do {
try data.appendToURL(fileURL: fileURL)
}
catch {
print("Could not write data to file")
}
}
anyways, the error dropped me to LLDB. Is there any way I an Use LLDB to bypass this error and continue execution?
Having worked out for a hour, I wasn't prepared to have this crash take my data along with it. Since the crashed dropped me into LLDB, I wanted to see if there's any way to salvage the data by stepping over / bypassing / changing the value of i so that the program execution can continue.
Initially I tried
(lldb) po i = 3327
error: <EXPR>:3:1: error: cannot assign to value: 'i' is immutable
i = 3327
^
but it won't let me change the value (I is immutable)
Then I tried thread jump -l 1 but it spewed some error about not the code execution outside of current function.
(lldb) th j -l 29
error: CSVExport.swift:29 is outside the current function.
Finally, going thru this site https://www.inovex.de/blog/lldb-patch-your-code-with-breakpoints/ and trying a few things. The one that helped was thread jump
thread return
The mentioned disadvantage of thread jump can be avoided by using a
different technique to change control flow behaviour. Instead of
manipulating the affected lines of code directly the idea is to
manipulate other parts of the program which in turn results in the
desired behaviour. For the given example this means changing the
return value of can_pass() from 0 to 1. Which, of course, can be done
through LLDB. The command to use is thread just like before, but this
time with the subcommand return to prematurely return from a stack
frame, thereby short-circuiting its execution.
Executing thread return 1 did the trick. This returned true (1) to the index out of range issue and then continued the execution to the next line of code.
I am trying to execute the code after repeat exhaustion using onErrorResume but onErrorResume is not being trigger.
Here is the code sample
Mono.just(request)
.filter(this::isConditionSatified)
.map(aBoolean -> performSomeOperationIfConditionIsSatified(request))
.repeatWhenEmpty(Repeat.onlyIf(i -> true)
.exponentialBackoff(Duration.ofSeconds(5)), Duration.ofSeconds(10))
.timeout(Duration.ofSeconds(30)))
.delaySubscription(Duration.ofSeconds(10)))
.onErrorResume(throwable -> {
log.warn("Max timeout reached", throwable);
return Mono.just(false);
});
onErrorResume is never trigged. I am trying to use it as a fallback. My goal is if the repeat exhaustion is hit, return the false value.
My unit test complains of
expectation "expectNext(false)" failed (expected: onNext(false); actual: onComplete())
Any help or suggestion would be helpful.
since an empty source is valid by itself, repeatWhenEmpty doesn't necessarily propagate an exception after exhausting its attempts. The Repeat util from addons doesn't, even when the "timeout" triggers (as hinted in the timeout parameter's javadoc: "timeout after which no new repeats are initiated", ok that could be clearer).
since you're using repeatWhenEMPTY, I'm guessing that the empty case is always "irrelevant" to you and thus defaultIfEmpty(false) should be the acceptable solution.
I am using a gen_server behaviour and trying to understand how can handle_info/2 be triggered from a timeout occurring in a handle_call for example:
-module(server).
-export([init/1,handle_call/3,handle_info/2,terminate/2).
-export([start/0,stop/0]).
init(Data)->
{ok,33}.
start()->
gen_server:start_link(?MODULE,?MODULE,[]).
stop(Pid)->
gen_server:stop(Pid).
handle_call(Request,From,State)->
Return={reply,State,State,5000},
Return.
handle_info(Request,State)->
{stop,Reason,State}.
terminate(Reason,State)->
{ok,S}=file:file_open("D:/Erlang/Supervisor/err.txt",[read,write]),
io:format(S,"~s~n",[Reason]),
ok.
What i want to do:
I was expecting that if I launch the server and would not use gen_server:call/2 for 5 seconds (in my case) then handle_info would be called, which would in turn issue the stop thus calling terminate.
I see it does not happen this way, in fact handle_info is not called at all.
In examples such as this i see the timeout is set in the return of init/1.What I can deduce is that it handle_info gets triggered only if I initialize the server and issue nothing (nor cast nor call for N seconds).If so why I can provide Timeout in the return of both handle_cast/2 and handle_call/3 ?
Update:
I was trying to get the following functionality:
If no call is issued in X seconds trigger handle_info/2
If no cast is issued in Y seconds trigger handle_info/2
I thought this timeouts can be set in the return of handle_call and handle_cast:
{reply,Reply,State,X} //for call
{noreply,State,Y} //for cast
If not, when are those timeouts triggered since they are returns?
To initiate timeout handling from gen_server:handle_call/3 callback, this callback has to be called in the first place. Your Return={reply,State,State,5000}, is not executed at all.
Instead, if you want to “launch the server and would not use gen_server:call/2 for 5 seconds then handle_info/2 would be called”, you might return {ok,State,Timeout} tuple from gen_server:init/1 callback.
init(Data)->
{ok,33,5000}.
You cannot set the different timeouts for different calls and casts. As stated by Alexey Romanov in comments,
Having different timeouts for different types of messages just isn’t something any gen_* behavior does and would have to be simulated by maintaining them inside state.
If one returns {reply,State,Timeout} tuple from any handle_call/3/handle_cast/2, the timeout will be triggered if the mailbox of this process is empty after Timeout.
i suggest you read source code:gen_server.erl
% gen_server.erl
% line 400
loop(Parent, Name, State, Mod, Time, HibernateAfterTimeout, Debug) ->
Msg = receive
Input ->
Input
after Time ->
timeout
end,
decode_msg(Msg, Parent, Name, State, Mod, Time, HibernateAfterTimeout, Debug, false).
it helps you to understand the parameter Timeout
I have a pyclips / clips program for which I wrote some unit tests using pytest.
Each test case involes an initial clips.Clear() followed by the execution of real clips COOL code via clips.Load(rule_file.clp). Running each test individually works fine.
Yet, when telling pytest to run all tests, some fail with ClipsError: S03: environment could not be cleared. In fact, it depends on the order of the tests in the .py file. There seem to be test cases, that cause the subsequent test case to throw the exception.
Maybe some clips code is still "in use" so that the clearing fails?
I read here that (clear)
Clears CLIPS. Removes all constructs and all associated data structures (such as facts and instances) from the CLIPS environment. A clear may be performed safely at any time, however, certain constructs will not allow themselves to be deleted while they are in use.
Could this be the case here? What is causing the (clear) command to fail?
EDIT:
I was able to narrow down the problem. It occurs under the following circumstances:
test_case_A comes right before test_case_B.
In test_case_A there is a test such as
(test (eq (type ?f_bio_puts) clips_FUNCTION))
but f_bio_puts has been set to
(slot f_bio_puts (default [nil]))
So testing the type of a slot variable, which has been set to [nil] initially, seems to cause the (clear) command to fail. Any ideas?
EDIT 2
I think I know what is causing the problem. It is the test line. I adapted my code to make it run in the clips Dialog Windows. And I got this error when loading via (batch ...)
[INSFUN2] No such instance nil in function type.
[DRIVE1] This error occurred in the join network
Problem resided in associated join
Of pattern #1 in rule part_1
I guess it is a bug of pyclips that this is masked.
Change the EnvClear function in the CLIPS source code construct.c file adding the following lines of code to reset the error flags:
globle void EnvClear(
void *theEnv)
{
struct callFunctionItem *theFunction;
/*==============================*/
/* Clear error flags if issued */
/* from an embedded controller. */
/*==============================*/
if ((EvaluationData(theEnv)->CurrentEvaluationDepth == 0) &&
(! CommandLineData(theEnv)->EvaluatingTopLevelCommand) &&
(EvaluationData(theEnv)->CurrentExpression == NULL))
{
SetEvaluationError(theEnv,FALSE);
SetHaltExecution(theEnv,FALSE);
}
I have an All Exceptions breakpoint configured in Xcode:
Sometimes Xcode will stop on a line like:
[managedObjectContext save:&error];
with the following backtrace:
but the program continues on as if nothing happened if you click Continue.
How can I ignore these "normal" exceptions, but still have the debugger stop on exceptions in my own code?
(I understand that this happens because Core Data internally throws and catches exceptions, and that Xcode is simply honoring my request to pause the program whenever an exception is thrown. However, I want to ignore these so I can get back to debugging my own code!)
Moderators: this is similar to "Xcode 4 exception breakpoint filtering", but I think that question takes too long to get around to the point and doesn't have any useful answers. Can they be linked?
For Core Data exceptions, what I typically do is remove the "All Exceptions" breakpoint from Xcode and instead:
Add a Symbolic Breakpoint on objc_exception_throw
Set a Condition on the Breakpoint to (BOOL)(! (BOOL)[[(NSException *)$x0 className] hasPrefix:#"_NSCoreData"])
The configured breakpoint should look something like this:
This will ignore any private Core Data exceptions (as determined by the class name being prefixed by _NSCoreData) that are used for control flow. Note that the appropriate register is going to be dependent on the target device / simulator that you are running in. Take a look at this table for reference.
Note that this technique can be adapted easily to other conditionals. The tricky part was in crafting the BOOL and NSException casts to get lldb happy with the condition.
I wrote an lldb script that lets you selectively ignore Objective-C exceptions with a much simpler syntax, and it handles both OS X, iOS Simulator, and both 32bit and 64bit ARM.
Installation
Put this script in ~/Library/lldb/ignore_specified_objc_exceptions.py or somewhere useful.
import lldb
import re
import shlex
# This script allows Xcode to selectively ignore Obj-C exceptions
# based on any selector on the NSException instance
def getRegister(target):
if target.triple.startswith('x86_64'):
return "rdi"
elif target.triple.startswith('i386'):
return "eax"
elif target.triple.startswith('arm64'):
return "x0"
else:
return "r0"
def callMethodOnException(frame, register, method):
return frame.EvaluateExpression("(NSString *)[(NSException *)${0} {1}]".format(register, method)).GetObjectDescription()
def filterException(debugger, user_input, result, unused):
target = debugger.GetSelectedTarget()
frame = target.GetProcess().GetSelectedThread().GetFrameAtIndex(0)
if frame.symbol.name != 'objc_exception_throw':
# We can't handle anything except objc_exception_throw
return None
filters = shlex.split(user_input)
register = getRegister(target)
for filter in filters:
method, regexp_str = filter.split(":", 1)
value = callMethodOnException(frame, register, method)
if value is None:
output = "Unable to grab exception from register {0} with method {1}; skipping...".format(register, method)
result.PutCString(output)
result.flush()
continue
regexp = re.compile(regexp_str)
if regexp.match(value):
output = "Skipping exception because exception's {0} ({1}) matches {2}".format(method, value, regexp_str)
result.PutCString(output)
result.flush()
# If we tell the debugger to continue before this script finishes,
# Xcode gets into a weird state where it won't refuse to quit LLDB,
# so we set async so the script terminates and hands control back to Xcode
debugger.SetAsync(True)
debugger.HandleCommand("continue")
return None
return None
def __lldb_init_module(debugger, unused):
debugger.HandleCommand('command script add --function ignore_specified_objc_exceptions.filterException ignore_specified_objc_exceptions')
Add the following to ~/.lldbinit:
command script import ~/Library/lldb/ignore_specified_objc_exceptions.py
replacing ~/Library/lldb/ignore_specified_objc_exceptions.py with the correct path if you saved it somewhere else.
Usage
In Xcode, add a breakpoint to catch all Objective-C exceptions
Edit the breakpoint and add a Debugger Command with the following command:
ignore_specified_objc_exceptions name:NSAccessibilityException className:NSSomeException
This will ignore exceptions where NSException -name matches NSAccessibilityException OR -className matches NSSomeException
It should look something like this:
In your case, you would use ignore_specified_objc_exceptions className:_NSCoreData
See http://chen.do/blog/2013/09/30/selectively-ignoring-objective-c-exceptions-in-xcode/ for the script and more details.
Here is an alternative quick answer for when you have a block of code e.g. a 3rd part library that throws multiple exceptions that you want to ignore:
Set two breakpoints, one before and one after the exception throwing block of code you want to ignore.
Run the program, until it stops at an exception, and type 'breakpoint list' into the debugger console, and find the number of the 'all exceptions' break point, it should look like this:
2: names = {'objc_exception_throw', '__cxa_throw'}, locations = 2
Options: disabled
2.1: where = libobjc.A.dylibobjc_exception_throw, address = 0x00007fff8f8da6b3, unresolved, hit count = 0
2.2: where = libc++abi.dylib__cxa_throw, address = 0x00007fff8d19fab7, unresolved, hit count = 0
This means it is breakpoint 2. Now in xcode, edit the first breakpoint (before the exception throwing code) and change the action to 'debugger command' and type in 'breakpoint disable 2' (and set 'automatically continue...' checkbox ).
Do the same for the break point after the offending line and have the command 'breakpoint enable 2'.
The all breakpoints exception will now turn on and off so it's only active when you need it.